<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-03" number="9650" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" updates="5029" obsoletes="" version="3" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true"> 

  <front>
    <title abbrev="Link-Attribute Bit Values Registration">Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values</title>
    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9650"/>
    <author initials="T." surname="Li" fullname="Tony Li">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
      <address>
        <email>tony.li@tony.li</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024" month="August"/>

    <area>RTG</area>
    <workgroup>lsr</workgroup>
    <abstract>
      <t>RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", defines an IANA
      registry called "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". This
document changes the registration procedure for that registry from
"Standards Action" to "Expert Review". This document updates RFC 5029.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t><xref target="RFC5029"/> defines the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values"
registry and specifies a registration procedure of "Standards
Action". In practice, this registration procedure is unnecessarily
restrictive, as it prevents allocation of bits to experimental
protocols, which in turn increases the risk of conflicts introduced by
use of unregistered code points (so-called "code point squatting").</t>
      <t>Accordingly, this document changes the registration procedure for the
registry, as described in <xref target="IANA"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="IANA">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>IANA has changed the registration procedure for the "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values" registry to "Expert Review" <xref target="RFC8126"/> and has listed this document as a reference for the registry.  General guidance
for the designated experts is defined in <xref target="RFC7370"/>, and more specific
guidance can be found in <xref target="RFC5029"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>This document does not affect the security issues discussed in <xref target="RFC5029"/>.</t>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5029.xml"/>
      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7370.xml"/>
	<xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
     <section anchor="acknowledgements" numbered="false">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>The author would like to thank <contact fullname="John Scudder"/> for his contributions.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
</rfc>
