Subject: [AAA-WG]: Issue 366: Vendor-Specific Result AVP

From: Bernard Aboba <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:44:27 -0700 (PDT)

Issue 366: Vendor-specific Result AVP
Submitter: Bernard Aboba
Submitter email address: [email-masked]
Date first submitted: September 9, 2002
Reference:
Document: BASE-12
Comment type: T
Priority: S
Section: 7.6
Rationale/Explanation of issue:

It would appear that this AVP was created for use with
Vendor-specific Commands which are no longer supported
in the protocol. Should this be renamed to
"Experimental Result AVP" with the appropriate changes in text?