Subject: Re: FW: [AAA-WG]: Fwd: Failover processing

From: "naveen sarma" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:40:10 +0530

Hi Rajith,
    Can you please send your answer to my question.  I haven't received any
reply.  I think there is some problem.

Thanks & Regards,
Naveen

On 7/26/06, Rajith R <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>  Pls ignore the previous post.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] *On Behalf
> Of *naveen sarma
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:46 PM
> *To:* [email-masked]
> *Subject:* [AAA-WG]: Fwd: Failover processing
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *naveen sarma* <[email-masked]>
> Date: Jul 26, 2006 12:35 PM
> Subject: Failover processing
> To: [email-masked]
>
> Hi,
>
> In the case of failover processing, do we need to change the destination
> host before forwarding to the new alternate peer?
>
> Suppose consider the following scenario:
>
> P0 is the originating host, to which P1 and P2 are peers (direct
> connection).
>
> P0 is supporting applications 1, 2, 3
> P1 is supporting applications 1, 2
> P2 is supporting applications 2, 3
>
> After some time if P1 is down.  Cosider that in the pending message queue
> of P1, there is a message M1 with application id 2 and the destination host
> as P1.  As part of the failover, we will send the request message M1 to P2.
>
> In this case do we need to change the destination host inside the request
> message to P2, which was actually having the destination host as P1?
>
> Can anyone explain the responsibility when the diameter node is acting as
> an intermidate also?
>
> --
> Yours
>
> Naveen.
>
>
>
> --
> Yours
> Naveen.
>

-- 
Yours
Naveen.