Subject: [Ietf-calsify] RFC 2445: URL versus ATTACH property

From: cyrus at daboo.name (Cyrus Daboo)
Date: Thu May 24 14:10:34 2007

Hi Bernard,

--On May 24, 2007 3:04:59 PM -0400 Bernard Desruisseaux 
<[email-masked]> wrote:

> I can only imagine that end users will actually specify an
> external attachment in this field, and as such, this value
> should be stored in the ATTACH property.
>
> What do you think?

I disagree that people would use it for attachments if the client also 
provides a separate "attach" mechanism.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo