From ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Wed Nov 30 07:24:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF6421F8B48 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.546 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dy8UmdDJZB8R for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAD421F8B43 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19677D6FE; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6+25QL-jnWNp; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FDF3E017E; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:37 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Delivered-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FEF3E017E for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKG3TLm+JIlI for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFC73E017D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D890E421BB; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:31:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:24:26 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cyrus@daboo.name References: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org, bhamidipati_praveen@rediffmail.com Subject: Re: [ietf-calsify] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5546 (3037) X-BeenThere: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: "RFC2445, 2446 and 2447 Discusions" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Errors-To: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Cyrus, please let us know if you agree with this report. On 11/30/11 5:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5546, > "iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5546&eid=3037 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Praveen Bhamidipati > > Section: 3.1.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | > | | | present. | > | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | > | | | present. | > > Corrected Text > -------------- > | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | > | | | present. | > | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | > | | | present. | > > Notes > ----- > Currently, the Component/Property doesn't match the term used in Comment. That needs to be corrected. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5546 (draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis-10) > -------------------------------------- > Title : iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP) > Publication Date : December 2009 > Author(s) : C. Daboo, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Calendaring and Scheduling Standards Simplification > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ ietf-calsify mailing list ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify From ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Wed Nov 30 07:35:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126E121F8B4D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:35:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRhK06BOvwOo for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81CA21F8B4C for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADABD3E017E; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:35:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j94V-4e0sOHj; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E14F77D70F; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:34:08 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Delivered-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0DF3E017E for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:34:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trXXebV0DeI7 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.kainhofer.com (server.kainhofer.com [88.198.35.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B0A77D70F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.130.51.71] (dhcpb.fam.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.51.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.kainhofer.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E3892B010; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:33:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4ED64CD6.4030807@kainhofer.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:33:42 +0100 From: Reinhold Kainhofer Organization: FAM, TU Wien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Saint-Andre References: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org, bhamidipati_praveen@rediffmail.com Subject: Re: [ietf-calsify] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5546 (3037) X-BeenThere: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: "RFC2445, 2446 and 2447 Discusions" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Errors-To: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org On 30/11/2011 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Cyrus, please let us know if you agree with this report. > > On 11/30/11 5:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5546, >> "iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)". >> [...] >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Praveen Bhamidipati >> >> Section: 3.1.3 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >> | | | present. | >> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >> | | | present. | >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >> | | | present. | >> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >> | | | present. | >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Currently, the Component/Property doesn't match the term used in Comment. That needs to be corrected. No! The RFC is entirely correct on this. If DURATION is present within a VALARM, then the restriction is that REPEAT MUST also be present (and vice versa). I.e. either DURATION and REPEAT is present, or none of them. This is exactly what the original text says. Compare also rfc 5545 (section 3.6.6. Alarm Componen): ; 'duration' and 'repeat' are both OPTIONAL, ; and MUST NOT occur more than once each; ; but if one occurs, so MUST the other. ; duration / repeat / The "Corrected Text" doesn't make sense logically, either (if it is present, it is present, so no need for MUST ;-) ) Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinhold@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ ietf-calsify mailing list ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify From ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Wed Nov 30 07:43:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2C621F8B51 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.22 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.621, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fS1LVtvoOX7M for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419D921F8B50 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FC17841F1; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id woQRI4E3YTUx; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FA43E1F93; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:42:30 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Delivered-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE903E1F93 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:40:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRMoERspoX81 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E403E017D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:40:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; l=2155; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1322667633; x=1323877233; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YRGSxyASKXZ4PkAsZjzcuxNkrrrwtRi5Fs0iJsoEkAM=; b=QoFVjIK1La0gzOCHEJqzC4O6CuE/YJWSrUsjSK6DGePZxuRK1wMLOYQf 1sxjwuG3fEa5NRFm3vj59U9KmCJnU6Lv2T5sL16r8RK20+8k4UoxxjBfb yBuTxdNh++EGrywwdsx/a1ecRqTFZ5A/cjC9FNMIqMl6oYEHgCG4kSrcp Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAPRN1k6Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABEhQOmDoEFgXIBAQEEEgEQVQEQCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQUCAQEeoUMBjFuRZoEwiFqBFgSUV5IR X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,597,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="122814384" Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2011 15:40:31 +0000 Received: from dhcp-10-61-105-129.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-105-129.cisco.com [10.61.105.129]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAUFeUQ6001860; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:40:30 GMT Message-ID: <4ED64E69.1070807@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:40:25 +0100 From: Eliot Lear User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reinhold Kainhofer References: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> <4ED64CD6.4030807@kainhofer.com> In-Reply-To: <4ED64CD6.4030807@kainhofer.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org, bhamidipati_praveen@rediffmail.com Subject: Re: [ietf-calsify] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5546 (3037) X-BeenThere: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: "RFC2445, 2446 and 2447 Discusions" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Errors-To: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org I agree with Reinhold on this one. On 11/30/11 4:33 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On 30/11/2011 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Cyrus, please let us know if you agree with this report. >> >> On 11/30/11 5:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5546, >>> "iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)". >>> [...] >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Editorial >>> Reported by: Praveen Bhamidipati >>> >>> Section: 3.1.3 >>> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >>> | | | present. | >>> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >>> | | | present. | >>> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >>> | | | present. | >>> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >>> | | | present. | >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> Currently, the Component/Property doesn't match the term used in Comment. That needs to be corrected. > No! The RFC is entirely correct on this. If DURATION is present within a > VALARM, then the restriction is that REPEAT MUST also be present (and > vice versa). I.e. either DURATION and REPEAT is present, or none of > them. This is exactly what the original text says. Compare also rfc 5545 > (section 3.6.6. Alarm Componen): > ; 'duration' and 'repeat' are both OPTIONAL, > ; and MUST NOT occur more than once each; > ; but if one occurs, so MUST the other. > ; > duration / repeat / > > > The "Corrected Text" doesn't make sense logically, either (if it is > present, it is present, so no need for MUST ;-) ) > > Cheers, > Reinhold > _______________________________________________ ietf-calsify mailing list ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify From ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Wed Nov 30 07:45:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963BC21F8B50 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.553 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e1ILZhkdohky for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2159921F8B4F for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2533E1FB9; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWDh33NkNNSj; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B642F77D702; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:44:02 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Delivered-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EC27841F4 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c600yc3H2InD for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6113E017D for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44CB2421BB; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:50:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4ED64F1F.7090304@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:43:27 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eliot Lear References: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> <4ED64CD6.4030807@kainhofer.com> <4ED64E69.1070807@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <4ED64E69.1070807@cisco.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org, bhamidipati_praveen@rediffmail.com Subject: Re: [ietf-calsify] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5546 (3037) X-BeenThere: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: "RFC2445, 2446 and 2447 Discusions" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Errors-To: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org With my individual hat on, I agree. I was going to immediately reject it but wanted to check with the author / WG first. On 11/30/11 8:40 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: > I agree with Reinhold on this one. > > On 11/30/11 4:33 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: >> On 30/11/2011 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Cyrus, please let us know if you agree with this report. >>> >>> On 11/30/11 5:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5546, >>>> "iCalendar Transport-Independent Interoperability Protocol (iTIP)". >>>> [...] >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Type: Editorial >>>> Reported by: Praveen Bhamidipati >>>> >>>> Section: 3.1.3 >>>> >>>> Original Text >>>> ------------- >>>> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >>>> | | | present. | >>>> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >>>> | | | present. | >>>> >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> | DURATION | 0 or 1 | If present, DURATION MUST be | >>>> | | | present. | >>>> | REPEAT | 0 or 1 | If present, REPEAT MUST be | >>>> | | | present. | >>>> >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> Currently, the Component/Property doesn't match the term used in Comment. That needs to be corrected. >> No! The RFC is entirely correct on this. If DURATION is present within a >> VALARM, then the restriction is that REPEAT MUST also be present (and >> vice versa). I.e. either DURATION and REPEAT is present, or none of >> them. This is exactly what the original text says. Compare also rfc 5545 >> (section 3.6.6. Alarm Componen): >> ; 'duration' and 'repeat' are both OPTIONAL, >> ; and MUST NOT occur more than once each; >> ; but if one occurs, so MUST the other. >> ; >> duration / repeat / >> >> >> The "Corrected Text" doesn't make sense logically, either (if it is >> present, it is present, so no need for MUST ;-) ) >> >> Cheers, >> Reinhold >> _______________________________________________ ietf-calsify mailing list ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify From ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Wed Nov 30 07:50:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-calsify-archive-Feit0ahl@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2647621F8B5C for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:50:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oy38vw5VIIxn for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (leka.osafoundation.org [149.20.54.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1ED21F8B64 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AC177D709; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bGLuHZIpmHyO; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from leka.osafoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629B677D702; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:49:02 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Delivered-To: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142BF77D6F9 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:49:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org Received: from leka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (leka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RBumMj3e-h0 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [173.13.55.49]) by leka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9881577D702 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1396B1D90B36; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:48:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daboo.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A--bQrc6lN58; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:48:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [17.45.162.181] (unknown [17.45.162.181]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E23681D90800; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:48:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:48:52 -0500 From: Cyrus Daboo To: Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: <1743D603918DF063EF35E5F2@cyrus.local> In-Reply-To: <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> References: <20111130122935.6FAD1B1E002@rfc-editor.org> <4ED64AAA.3010308@stpeter.im> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline; size=395 Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org, bhamidipati_praveen@rediffmail.com Subject: Re: [ietf-calsify] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5546 (3037) X-BeenThere: ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: "RFC2445, 2446 and 2447 Discusions" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Errors-To: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org Hi Peter, --On November 30, 2011 8:24:26 AM -0700 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Cyrus, please let us know if you agree with this report. As Reinhold just pointed out the errata is wrong. RFC5546's current text is absolutely correct. The correct text is simply stating that if any one of DURATION or REPEAT is present, then the other must be present too. -- Cyrus Daboo _______________________________________________ ietf-calsify mailing list ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify