From nobody Fri Jan 29 08:38:26 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D523A1145; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:38:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id beqjKn2TMWBB; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB5C3A1146; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 10TGc9L4090910 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:38:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1611938290; bh=JlxAuLVQa8I7uxeyt7RNvmokSCUtPAIfZKG2b9+Lnhw=; h=From:To:Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=N6SmNdFKKqFsID2EeIKGtcu1UcsLa3c+HI8sJtdWp99+pqZczgQekc0UQLK1iyzLO Gz5a+elasTQT9b/bbO97/M2r0pizUOwUQOMWRk8xrIXZz5eAr7xkU9/MjKlfW336ur 8Pbm5PUkZJh+lM3APGHZDEYRFPKXqvHSYBLKbRQg= X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain From: Robert Sparks To: codesprints@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, tools-discuss Reply-To: codesprints@ietf.org Message-ID: <9270c846-a25b-00ab-a2d8-f705757ceae4@nostrum.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:38:04 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: [codesprints] Codesprint before IETF 110 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:38:13 -0000 (If you want to reply to this, please be careful to honor the Reply-To:=20 codesprints@ietf.org header). We are considering holding one or more CodeSprints well before IETF 110=20 instead of (or perhaps in addition to) the Saturday before the meeting. If you've never been to an IETF CodeSprint, please consider joining for=20 a couple of hours, even if only to learn about how you can contribute. The doodle is at=20 https://doodle.com/poll/vz2uh2wez79e8xf8?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dl= ink. Please note that it offers many more options than it initially displays. = The doodle includes the Saturday before the meeting if that remains your = preference. Please let me know what date/times would work for you as soon as you can.= RjS