From nobody Mon Feb 1 08:24:46 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66AD3A12B0; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:24:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.233 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMvHZsVtdzVx; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org (dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org [217.69.81.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F323A12B2; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rjsparks by dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6c0E-0000Te-W0; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:24:38 +0100 To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org Message-Id: From: Robert Sparks Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:24:38 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: codesprints@ietf.org, henrik@levkowetz.com, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rjsparks@nostrum.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v7.25.0 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:24:45 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, v7.25.0, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: ietfdb (7.25.0) ietf; urgency=medium **Timezone tools on agenda page, other enhancements ** * Merged in [18712] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Add timezone support to agenda weekview; display UTC on UTC agenda page. Fixes #3111. * Merged in [18689] from kivinen@iki.fi: New version of the timezone support for agenda. Now the ongoing bars work. This also moves the javascript from the agenda.html to separate timezone.js file. This commit does not include the moment and moment-timezone javascript libraries that are needed to get this working, they need to be added to ietf/externals/static separately. * Add a more granular setting for enabling extra debugging on the agenda page. Commit ready for merge. * Merged in [18803] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Integrate week-view timezone handling with changes to main agenda page. * recursively create place to stage mail from mkrelease. Remove toolsfeed/toolspush from mkrelease. * Allow setuptools to progress past py27 * Merged in [18782] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Remove HistoricalGroupFeatures. Fixes #3152. * Merged in [18791] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Allow ballot text to be edited after the ballot is approved. Fixes #3157. Related to #3119. * Merged in [18798] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Improve handling of submissions for closed working groups. Fixes #3058. * Merged in [18808] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Tweaked schedule editor colors to match preferences chosen by Liz. Added coloration for sessions having the IAB as a parent. -- Robert Sparks 29 Jan 2021 20:13:13 +0000 The new version is available for installation through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/7.25.0' For development, copy the new development version instead: 'svn copy https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/dev/7.25.1.dev0' Regards, Robert Sparks (via the mkrelease script) From nobody Thu Feb 4 08:39:53 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6439F3A1653; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:39:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.281 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P20KbWwxpOfF; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42923A0977; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 114Gdgje048687 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:39:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1612456784; bh=hWHrC4T2/9WldJRUYHZZnynG+EeETDB7rDokQcXV410=; h=Subject:From:To:Reply-To:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DuPA9rFqRjJGLZCODuRflGf3jbDsBh0Z0kTVSohX7Y6awMMCDqwu6JwVrgTqQ65ge VLsgKaYB+e6E137cT1awpVFmyqXvMPqRyVK5dvJVA2XKtIXBF66RjKxqNbg17vAXFA bcS/Li3MLFDYWgXWzQ9LLlAaeYvQXRs/QoRBv1F0= X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain From: Robert Sparks To: codesprints@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, tools-discuss Reply-To: codesprints@ietf.org References: <9270c846-a25b-00ab-a2d8-f705757ceae4@nostrum.com> Message-ID: <2894965b-8c0b-cc86-7805-0b4af147164d@nostrum.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:39:37 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9270c846-a25b-00ab-a2d8-f705757ceae4@nostrum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: Re: [codesprints] Codesprint before IETF 110 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:39:52 -0000 Last call for input - I will move forward with scheduling tomorrow. Again, please consider joining. I would particularly like to talk to anyone that has strong skills in building docker containers and wrangling github's APIs at one of these upcoming sprints. RjS On 1/29/21 10:38 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: > (If you want to reply to this, please be careful to honor the > Reply-To: codesprints@ietf.org header). > > We are considering holding one or more CodeSprints well before IETF > 110 instead of (or perhaps in addition to) the Saturday before the > meeting. > > If you've never been to an IETF CodeSprint, please consider joining > for a couple of hours, even if only to learn about how you can > contribute. > > The doodle is at > https://doodle.com/poll/vz2uh2wez79e8xf8?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link. > > Please note that it offers many more options than it initially > displays. The doodle includes the Saturday before the meeting if that > remains your preference. > > Please let me know what date/times would work for you as soon as you can. > > RjS > > > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints From nobody Thu Feb 4 08:45:15 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E772A3A1661 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:45:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=painless-security-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GbZ46whSluZT for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:45:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979BE3A165F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 08:45:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id j5so3850831iog.11 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:45:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=painless-security-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ulv3helBU52EqhckvDAnIsUujS6x/c+VrkQLFU1CMD8=; b=0niorjKQ7wEVB6bKQHAqQiJZviFbMTYLxpwN4V14SpKCg8p87h4FyJZ1D2cE67Ilv5 cf1JDXknPGGMdg83VHpBtHt3snwKpuNPuA83zIk52IqnwDfV2h9A95alRUGtK22/u6Ic nnawOqL0DQ5HhK2tcEvaCtXaN93HcIR8mW0Tx1Gfbt0O3JkqJOPAnrgszriDHKp1rU+W pehi9VvPnYKx8NQRQIyZV/+f4g1ItqdwYlpJlGJEHYlt0/CmQsWdGdzvgGF6YUSciC4G Rexxd5HY2G+UTYZK4HCjrFsSp1PqCVm/hybpO0Y1iOmjb/VaE3uMpaKR4AWb27+bcxOJ e/9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Ulv3helBU52EqhckvDAnIsUujS6x/c+VrkQLFU1CMD8=; b=LWmJZd8Euua4HXW/YwTJrwWppfPSMOPlead5fMtPYLi3UcdbnU9jG7/9Y0H9liFpt8 H1R1YrVs/fj3uvkW9sOMwLpAveVGtqEhSUugb6ZEnt9inkB3omnpc5TgYNcelNgjJVEA ehl2KzKrBeE3a2YX8O+KOsSUBa7kG5YyBoy3SWSf+729Jnjhh07+9H0WdSl/45wB4WFB +YbrDMJM6wOAfcRoHmMpkafWOz+uYsF4yKif9IBNl9IAte/GUx+ULDcNHhypct5xodtU +YDtdYToqf794rO1sw3wa+d+eTJ7AUQaAPC0yz9pynvFOnW5c1icd8Ve7hBMnPmdOzMk OJHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LExu8w8mwk866ddDJArPjUnUCbDguqV/84gCqTc9BIGlUA4iS NnngIYjXxWvc0a6K0rzOZwFi9B72KkenEvJUFN2foPfFT2SHHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+yKi+PtxoX98J2c0zfqU63oRJ8TsWoZh+vq7NWvL7XkZMUj5xb/Ai3zKJNJixC3AHUPtPcLIXYX2Duk+qxKQ= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:a0a:: with SMTP id z10mr157126ioi.67.1612457110225; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 08:45:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9270c846-a25b-00ab-a2d8-f705757ceae4@nostrum.com> <2894965b-8c0b-cc86-7805-0b4af147164d@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <2894965b-8c0b-cc86-7805-0b4af147164d@nostrum.com> From: Mark Donnelly Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:44:59 -0500 Message-ID: To: codesprints@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045543105ba856d17" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [codesprints] Codesprint before IETF 110 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 16:45:14 -0000 --00000000000045543105ba856d17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Robert: I don't already have experience in building docker containers, but I'm interested in developing some. If you don't get anyone better, I'll be happy to talk to you. Cheers, --Mark On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:39 AM Robert Sparks wrote: > Last call for input - I will move forward with scheduling tomorrow. > > Again, please consider joining. > > I would particularly like to talk to anyone that has strong skills in > building docker containers and wrangling github's APIs at one of these > upcoming sprints. > > RjS > > On 1/29/21 10:38 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: > > (If you want to reply to this, please be careful to honor the > > Reply-To: codesprints@ietf.org header). > > > > We are considering holding one or more CodeSprints well before IETF > > 110 instead of (or perhaps in addition to) the Saturday before the > > meeting. > > > > If you've never been to an IETF CodeSprint, please consider joining > > for a couple of hours, even if only to learn about how you can > > contribute. > > > > The doodle is at > > https://doodle.com/poll/vz2uh2wez79e8xf8?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link > . > > > > Please note that it offers many more options than it initially > > displays. The doodle includes the Saturday before the meeting if that > > remains your preference. > > > > Please let me know what date/times would work for you as soon as you can. > > > > RjS > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > codesprints mailing list > > codesprints@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints > > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints > --00000000000045543105ba856d17 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Robert:

I don't already have experi= ence in building docker containers, but I'm interested in developing so= me.=C2=A0 If you don't get anyone better, I'll be happy to talk to = you.

Cheers,

--Mar= k

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:39 AM Robert S= parks <rjsparks@nostrum.com&= gt; wrote:

Last = call for input - I will move forward with scheduling tomorrow.

Again, please consider joining.

I would particularly like to talk to anyone that has strong skills in
building docker containers and wrangling github's APIs at one of these =
upcoming sprints.

RjS

On 1/29/21 10:38 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> (If you want to reply to this, please be careful to honor the
> Reply-To: co= desprints@ietf.org header).
>
> We are considering holding one or more CodeSprints well before IETF > 110 instead of (or perhaps in addition to) the Saturday before the > meeting.
>
> If you've never been to an IETF CodeSprint, please consider joinin= g
> for a couple of hours, even if only to learn about how you can
> contribute.
>
> The doodle is at
> https://doodle.= com/poll/vz2uh2wez79e8xf8?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dlink.
>
> Please note that it offers many more options than it initially
> displays. The doodle includes the Saturday before the meeting if that =
> remains your preference.
>
> Please let me know what date/times would work for you as soon as you c= an.
>
> RjS
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@= ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codespri= nts

_______________________________________________
codesprints mailing list
codesprints@ietf.= org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints

If you are planning to join for this codesprint, please add yourself to https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF110SprintSignUp as soon as you can. That will allow me to more easily put sprint branches in place for everyone.

RjS

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	Re: [codesprints] Codesprint before IETF 110
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:18:11 -0600
From:	Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To:	codesprints@ietf.org

Based on the responses, I'm going to set up 4 hours on Tue Feb 23, 1600-2000 UTC, and _not_ set up a Codesprint on the Saturday before 110.

The expectation is that any given attendee would only be around for a couple of hours. Dropping in and out is not a problem.

RjS

On 2/4/21 10:39 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:

Last call for input - I will move forward with scheduling tomorrow.

Again, please consider joining.

I would particularly like to talk to anyone that has strong skills in building docker containers and wrangling github's APIs at one of these upcoming sprints.

RjS

On 1/29/21 10:38 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:

(If you want to reply to this, please be careful to honor the Reply-To: codesprints@ietf.org header).

We are considering holding one or more CodeSprints well before IETF 110 instead of (or perhaps in addition to) the Saturday before the meeting.

If you've never been to an IETF CodeSprint, please consider joining for a couple of hours, even if only to learn about how you can contribute.

The doodle is at https://doodle.com/poll/vz2uh2wez79e8xf8?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link.

Please note that it offers many more options than it initially displays. The doodle includes the Saturday before the meeting if that remains your preference.

Please let me know what date/times would work for you as soon as you can.

RjS

_______________________________________________
codesprints mailing list
codesprints@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints

_______________________________________________
codesprints mailing list
codesprints@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints

--------------0AC14BBB327CB77847693E77-- From nobody Thu Feb 18 08:58:46 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B30B3A1451; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:58:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.233 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNFlRqIJL2VR; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org (dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org [217.69.81.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B33C3A144B; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rjsparks by dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCmdN-0008S4-AO; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:58:33 +0100 To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org Message-Id: From: Robert Sparks Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:58:33 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: codesprints@ietf.org, henrik@levkowetz.com, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rjsparks@nostrum.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v7.26.0 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:58:40 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, v7.26.0, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: ietfdb (7.26.0) ietf; urgency=medium **IESG 'Who has the action', bugfixes** * Bump the required setuptools to at least the 51 releases to avoid issues with some python3.6 -mvenv installed setuptools. * Enable two tests that were not running because of typos in the test name. Thanks to Jennifer for spotting the typos. * Merged in [18821] from rjsparks@nostrum.com: Add proper folding for static content in the DESCRIPTION in the important-dates ics feed. Remove important-dates from the upcoming meetings ics. * Hold Unidecode before 1.2.0 for awhile before adjusting patch to match changed __init__.py * Merged in [18828] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Use Roles instead of dedicated model for liaison statement group contacts. Fixes #3100. * Merged in [18829] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Allow assignment of Person as 'action holder' for a Doc, plus rudimentary automation of assignment. Fixes #3146. * Merged in [18833] from jennifer@painless-security.com: Refactor reviewer queue policy handling of 'skip' setting. Fixes #3038. -- Robert Sparks 17 Feb 2021 15:28:41 +0000 The new version is available for installation through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/7.26.0' For development, copy the new development version instead: 'svn copy https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/dev/7.26.1.dev0' Regards, Robert Sparks (via the mkrelease script)