From nobody Thu Apr 15 07:55:18 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23203A22FF; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0tnB1210xmm; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org (dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org [217.69.81.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A2A3A231E; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rjsparks by dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rjsparks@nostrum.com>) id 1lX3OQ-0006Z7-Gx; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:54:54 +0200
To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1lX3OQ-0006Z7-Gx@dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:54:54 +0200
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com,  wgchairs@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/di2jaGKNlLVQboUhRfsGTqdp0uk>
Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v7.28.0
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:55:09 -0000

Hi,

This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, 
v7.28.0, generated when running the mkrelease script.

Release notes:

ietfdb (7.28.0) ietf; urgency=medium

  ** Show full document by default, email aliases for programs and review teams, bugfixes and enhancements **

  * Remove the check for activate_this from wsgi.py since modern venv
    doesn't provide that script. Change the logging to always log when starting
    a wsgi instance.

  * Merged in [18900] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Tweaks to dockerfile to avoid rust compiler issues.

  * Merged in [18901] from housley@vigilsec.com:
    Make mail aliases for review teams and IAB programs. Fixes #3210

  * Merged in [18904] from fenton@bluepopcorn.net:
    Corrected template to remove spurious No Documents Match warning. Fixes
    #3148.

  * Merged in [18905] from housley@vigilsec.com:
    Point bibxml3 to I-D archive so that all version numbers are handled
    properly, and perform more robust revision suffix cleanup. Fixes #3188.

  * Merged in [18906] from housley@vigilsec.com:
    Provide bibxml test for drafts that end in a hyphen and a digit.

  * Merged in [18909] from housley@vigilsec.com:
    Log Unicode exception instead of printing them to the console when they
    occur building the email alias files.

  * Merged in [18911] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Adjusted ballot email text. Fixes #3208.

  * Merged in [18913] from housley@vigilsec.com:
    Convert generate-draft-aliaes and generate-wg-aliases into management
    commands: generate_draft_aliases and generate_group_aliases.  Also provide
    tests for the new management commands.

  * Merged in [18914] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Update the submission instructions to encourage submission of v3 xml.
    Fixes #3232.

  * Merged in [18927] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Drop parent group filter keyword from special group agenda items. Fixes
    #3115.

  * Merged in [18928] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Simplify javascript on the htmlized document pages.

  * Merged in [18936] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Retain strict acronym validation, specifically disallowing hyphens, for
    new groups of types that create documents, while allowing existing groups
    and new non-document-creating groups to validate when they contain hyphens.
    Fixes #3236.

  * Merged in [18937] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Change the default behavior of a document's main page to show the
    full document content. Users can still control whether the full
    page is shown on a particular document by adding either
    ?include_text=0 or ?include_text=1 to the url. Users can also use
    the settings page at /account/settings to override the default
    behavior for all documents. Fixes #3252.

  * Merged in [18938] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Redirect requests for htmlized bcp or std subseries elements to the
    relevant rfc-editor info page. Fixes #3233.

  * Merged in [18939] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Consolidate repeated searchable field code into SearchableField class.
    Fix single-valued searchable fields. Make javascript test config reusable.
    Use Django Form.media for JS/CSS inclusion. Fixes #3196, #3204.

  * Merged in [18940] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Hide agenda timeslot label rows when all their sessions are hidden.
    Fixes #3249.

  * Merged in [18941] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Add purge_old_personal_api_key_events management command. Fixes #3144.

 -- Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>  15 Apr 2021 14:15:04 +0000

The new version is available for installation through SVN checkout, with
  'svn checkout https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/7.28.0'

For development, copy the new development version instead:
  'svn copy https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/dev/7.28.1.dev0' <YOURBRANCH>

Regards,

	Robert Sparks
	(via the mkrelease script)


From nobody Tue Apr 20 12:48:09 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF373A14E1 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dluePeiyIW6t for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 107E13A14DF for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 13KJm0Nu006160 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:48:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1618948081; bh=Lg42OQAU5xQQAy99uxbDp5az0cPvcq6O6Dq1sszDcQg=; h=From:To:References:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BWXa2yq1qN2IOGDK2rxzHymjzDw7TQh6c5ugmhfWGjSKZKgM5yivYFIimT14f1dHy bSUNFULGO+5NDVo8sU/nqXtfBSh98JrUBWSsmiN+vGlNmgSF10RYgYy2I7kNuHqO7F nLRXHz+PV3q0Zu2zdwNk3oSWA0xCz0sr982AQyG8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: codesprints@ietf.org
References: <4e1453b8-fdea-0bda-a7f8-38918dfebbbd@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <2ec52ddc-19b9-126c-e37d-6e51ba8c3e9b@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:47:55 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4e1453b8-fdea-0bda-a7f8-38918dfebbbd@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/8o5DkpDdQnPVjYed9nM1rIyleeg>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Codesprints before IETF111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:48:08 -0000

I didn't see a lot of response to this message, and I haven't followed=20
up on the notion of a sprint in the first week proposed below (which is=20
next week).

I think, now, it's a bit to close to try to set up something then. How=20
about the week of 10 May, and again the week of June 7?

Here's a doodle to help stir a few more concrete responses than we got=20
with the below email: https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r

(Hopefully by now you've seen the announcement that 111 will be online,=20
so I do not plan to hold a sprint the Saturday before).

RjS

On 3/29/21 5:06 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> With the larger number of weeks between IETF 110 and 111, I propose we =

> hold two codesprint days.
>
> I'm currently thinking one the week of April 26-30, and another the=20
> week of June 7-11.
>
> Let me know if there's a major conflict with either of those weeks.
>
> RjS
>
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints