From nobody Tue May 11 09:29:07 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFCC3A1D6D; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9iki3EBc3jdV; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org (dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org [217.69.81.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67BC3A1D6F; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rjsparks by dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <rjsparks@nostrum.com>) id 1lgVFb-00058C-RN; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:28:51 +0200
To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1lgVFb-00058C-RN@dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:28:51 +0200
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com,  wgchairs@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/pXf9_COoDg5crDjLLApwv-CgvYY>
Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v7.29.0
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:29:05 -0000

Hi,

This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, 
v7.29.0, generated when running the mkrelease script.

Release notes:

ietfdb (7.29.0) ietf; urgency=medium

  ** RFC8989 eligibility rules, improved timezone support for upcoming meetings

  * Merged in [18958] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Fix occasional failure in test_agenda_view_team_group_filter_toggle.  

  * Merged in [18960] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Allow external resources to be set/suggested during submission process. 
    Fixes #3068.  

  * Merged in [18969] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Correct javascript that toggles visibility of byme/forme discusses. 
    Fixes #3263.  

  * Merged in [18970] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Add timezone selector to upcoming meetings page. Separate general 
    timezone handling from parts only relevant to main agenda page. Speed up 
    agenda timezone javascript tests. Fixes #3184.  

  * Merged in [18975] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Add RFC 8989 nomcom eligibility calculations.  

 -- Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>  11 May 2021 14:13:17 +0000

The new version is available for installation through SVN checkout, with
  'svn checkout https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/7.29.0'

For development, copy the new development version instead:
  'svn copy https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/dev/7.29.1.dev0' <YOURBRANCH>

Regards,

	Robert Sparks
	(via the mkrelease script)


From nobody Tue May 11 12:34:01 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A453A23AD for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vC8Lg3FAh6b for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AACA03A23A9 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14BJXoXT018801 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:33:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1620761630; bh=LCBXoUfxpRlsJNKw2oMO3bWdIihzcnBQXmylqtyyyVA=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=lHbeSIMwrXR3jLKPvcyNSeep1EH4+IDJ3VltzW4fsrFiQh7i2Bz5o2YY1uGYECA6W 1BqnoUWf+Rh50rXysKoxVfnVODoOhrYc7cq4DtUnPwBj27+7aTI1Uk9dRa30IN0Wmc RoH3xejPFVA8nkoyX8w+X7rc6gXdbc7K0TIWSyBE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: codesprints@ietf.org
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:33:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/vU4C0ZAKIIUtV_iA780mwi0p6fo>
Subject: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:34:00 -0000

The response to the doodle at=20
https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dl=
ink

was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could probably =

make progress even without a dedicated call.

Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest in=20
virtual codesprints just isn't that high.

So I have two questions:

1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of people, =

or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up tickets=20
when they can give us a block of time?

2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on some=20
axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?

RjS



From nobody Tue May 11 12:44:04 2021
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF2F3A2407 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wiYnXxx3XKv1 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E153A2405 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5FE300BD6 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 15:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bu_oteGX9VPH for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 15:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0B3A3004AC; Tue, 11 May 2021 15:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.20\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:43:52 -0400
Cc: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/dLEsatgmkOT_Jmhedwsi7Kw-AaQ>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:44:04 -0000

If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not start a =
new project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but =
without that incentive I would spend my time on other things.

Russ


> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> The response to the doodle at =
https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dli=
nk
>=20
> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could =
probably make progress even without a dedicated call.
>=20
> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest in =
virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>=20
> So I have two questions:
>=20
> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of =
people, or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up =
tickets when they can give us a block of time?
>=20
> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on =
some axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>=20
> RjS
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Tue May 11 12:53:41 2021
Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28AC3A243E for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mW3uIjoscREf for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa12-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEA93A243D for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spectre ([173.8.184.78]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id gYRjl97rssHktgYRjl1o07; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:53:35 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Ba0dbph2 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=609ae0bf a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:117 a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Z80JlwQ0AAAA:8 a=_JY9ZxHVAAAA:8 a=lUfnaJ8P8mg7AW2llzQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=Zz-tw7mMPhxMdvFcggwQ:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: peter@akayla.com
From: "Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com>
To: "'Russ Housley'" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "'Robert Sparks'" <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: "'IETF Codesprints'" <codesprints@ietf.org>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:53:38 -0700
Message-ID: <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHmrUk1ABi2/V8D675M14gf6VtN2wGW7IKNqrMsVQA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMYgPAlFiLJ7dRfL9WbDzEkPP/7Onb5ToAqqXWLPWKFxmDQRQ3whkkpk7jQTLLdWUvnULPQbd3jiKtg296yngwxACKZaLzfssETLm1k0RckEXcu4+fXd 4OnCr0Bph98CmXVbi8SizaaiyaWicqao1WnnZUVr2BZuF1/1BNnPtPBQ9BR4Adf6vn+IeQyvC+eZqn/dU9MxrHrjOir3DoA8FEIwqFxsi9XWWuU8aqxCR9to
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/BIqx9ONdgu1LVGO_75FJcTGNrwU>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 19:53:40 -0000

I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a fixed block
of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and hint on
getting started are often all I need to run with it.

		-Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ
Housley
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
To: Robert Sparks
Cc: IETF Codesprints
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before
IETF 111

If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not start a new
project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but without
that incentive I would spend my time on other things.

Russ


> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> The response to the doodle at
https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
> 
> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could probably
make progress even without a dedicated call.
> 
> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest in
virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
> 
> So I have two questions:
> 
> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of people,
or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up tickets when
they can give us a block of time?
> 
> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on some
axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
> 
> RjS
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints

_______________________________________________
codesprints mailing list
codesprints@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Tue May 11 14:19:54 2021
Return-Path: <rcross@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EF43A26FA for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_NoKfurWrCX for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569A53A26F9 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F768389FB2; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hn1Z2FeyYAVz; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2601:602:9c00:ae0:45e7:14ae:df8b:3ac8]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07B90389EB6; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
From: Ryan Cross <rcross@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:19:47 -0700
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>,  IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com> <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/_LC9ifUVE81iY5noIxJnRxZja74>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:19:53 -0000

+1

- Ryan

> On May 11, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>=20
> I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a fixed =
block
> of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and hint =
on
> getting started are often all I need to run with it.
>=20
> 		-Peter
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of =
Russ
> Housley
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
> To: Robert Sparks
> Cc: IETF Codesprints
> Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful =
before
> IETF 111
>=20
> If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not start =
a new
> project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but =
without
> that incentive I would spend my time on other things.
>=20
> Russ
>=20
>=20
>> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>> The response to the doodle at
> =
https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dli=
nk
>>=20
>> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could =
probably
> make progress even without a dedicated call.
>>=20
>> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest =
in
> virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>>=20
>> So I have two questions:
>>=20
>> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of =
people,
> or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up tickets =
when
> they can give us a block of time?
>>=20
>> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on =
some
> axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>>=20
>> RjS
>>=20
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> codesprints mailing list
>> codesprints@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>=20


From nobody Tue May 11 14:37:40 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9674E3A276D for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2g8SN3aCqszf for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3810A3A2764 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14BLbPjn060178 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 May 2021 16:37:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1620769046; bh=Al/3EsnMIrbvBMjx41wEcvucg07VfY/P9EkjI/9SvI8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RPYnMJSgost7/zwBarNg+Jq0oyWw2Ow4nn43dIbAWNlvlOAC0fi+T+/FL25fnvZyK oFz3fCRw1FTkPgQhAOskmw5mCW08qQC2mBSmeR2jTHxMbDBDCiPtB1di1wQ0KxbU7J 7O9GV+FFbawzyCn1yCGFwuXCbgzBq15L+k+scX/o=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Ryan Cross <rcross@amsl.com>, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com> <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com> <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:37:20 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/kfEXhXA-EZsPApN_xherKPF8qpw>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:37:39 -0000

So, our best day for this month was tomorrow, which really isn't the 
best notice. The second best was Friday - would you like me to proceed 
with setting something up then?

The dates we tried in June were not good for most - I can try doodling 
some other June weeks if you prefer.

RjS

On 5/11/21 4:19 PM, Ryan Cross wrote:
> +1
>
> - Ryan
>
>> On May 11, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a fixed block
>> of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and hint on
>> getting started are often all I need to run with it.
>>
>> 		-Peter
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ
>> Housley
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
>> To: Robert Sparks
>> Cc: IETF Codesprints
>> Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before
>> IETF 111
>>
>> If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not start a new
>> project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but without
>> that incentive I would spend my time on other things.
>>
>> Russ
>>
>>
>>> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The response to the doodle at
>> https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>>> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could probably
>> make progress even without a dedicated call.
>>> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest in
>> virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>>> So I have two questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of people,
>> or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up tickets when
>> they can give us a block of time?
>>> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on some
>> axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>>> RjS
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>> _______________________________________________
>> codesprints mailing list
>> codesprints@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> codesprints mailing list
>> codesprints@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>


From nobody Tue May 11 14:50:34 2021
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60723A27BE for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s09hAZFOYJJn for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8583A27C4 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A37B300BE2 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:50:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rMoCV8nzZxN8 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0ED033004AC; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.20\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:50:19 -0400
Cc: Ryan Cross <rcross@amsl.com>, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0B141C52-9843-42AD-BC74-20F9A5B6F374@vigilsec.com>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com> <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com> <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com> <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/cm8-UbhXRZ4z7y-93pcfoCQc1KQ>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:50:33 -0000

I think a new doodle would be better.

Russ

> On May 11, 2021, at 5:37 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> So, our best day for this month was tomorrow, which really isn't the =
best notice. The second best was Friday - would you like me to proceed =
with setting something up then?
>=20
> The dates we tried in June were not good for most - I can try doodling =
some other June weeks if you prefer.
>=20
> RjS
>=20
> On 5/11/21 4:19 PM, Ryan Cross wrote:
>> +1
>>=20
>> - Ryan
>>=20
>>> On May 11, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a =
fixed block
>>> of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and =
hint on
>>> getting started are often all I need to run with it.
>>>=20
>>> 		-Peter
>>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of =
Russ
>>> Housley
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
>>> To: Robert Sparks
>>> Cc: IETF Codesprints
>>> Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be =
useful before
>>> IETF 111
>>>=20
>>> If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not =
start a new
>>> project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but =
without
>>> that incentive I would spend my time on other things.
>>>=20
>>> Russ
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> =
wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> The response to the doodle at
>>> =
https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=3Dpoll&utm_medium=3Dli=
nk
>>>> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could =
probably
>>> make progress even without a dedicated call.
>>>> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest =
in
>>> virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>>>> So I have two questions:
>>>>=20
>>>> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of =
people,
>>> or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up =
tickets when
>>> they can give us a block of time?
>>>> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on =
some
>>> axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>>>> RjS
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> codesprints mailing list
>>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>>=20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>>=20


From nobody Tue May 11 14:58:30 2021
Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B13A2803 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCSUoxlp9p96 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C8F3A2800 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spectre ([173.8.184.78]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id gaOUlvX6Gx9R8gaOUl82x5; Tue, 11 May 2021 14:58:22 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=S9EcfKgP c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=609afdfe a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:117 a=PF7/PIuz6ZQ4FM3W1XNKAQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=tGX7uwomAAAA:8 a=Z80JlwQ0AAAA:8 a=soKBErP5AAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=_JY9ZxHVAAAA:8 a=2v-TteomD5odb4G3J7wA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=OJAZQCPpPQ8A:10 a=ZFOOzkjxzLGrPE5HuMia:22 a=Zz-tw7mMPhxMdvFcggwQ:22 a=HCcp_izDSj6DkKgPSDQm:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: peter@akayla.com
From: "Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com>
To: "'Russ Housley'" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "'Robert Sparks'" <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: "'IETF Codesprints'" <codesprints@ietf.org>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com> <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com> <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com> <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com> <0B141C52-9843-42AD-BC74-20F9A5B6F374@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <0B141C52-9843-42AD-BC74-20F9A5B6F374@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:58:25 -0700
Message-ID: <00a301d746b0$c4e74c00$4eb5e400$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHmrUk1ABi2/V8D675M14gf6VtN2wGW7IKNAYuXuGECSl5qKgFMLk/WAwFE1BGqcjQKAA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMdtONDGLY+1ALgGw6L9ei1/FZ1pcPFNBKh7CfHu10QyHRDZKJ4WNvPnhgRAswmozhVnN9rrEUuXUhZ0CI+SK+mFKvyZl1Z+97JziEUzAgVxK6TxHbnP EpYreKgQzuaLlANAzwbNaIC3vdrPGHmz5qziqkGHU88qANaeKJb/aK9mws6JEtIiMps6k2v/W7z4ji7UK4JPjHUzvlX8SEEZ5ioAz9YQTwI4B5VY8XOAoaFJ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/2qwgo-PBOgMFIX06wgnOI0glP1w>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:58:28 -0000

I'm going to have to agree with Russ again. This week is out for me (as
reflected in the original Doodle). 

		-Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:50 PM
To: Robert Sparks
Cc: Ryan Cross; Peter Yee; IETF Codesprints
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before
IETF 111

I think a new doodle would be better.

Russ

> On May 11, 2021, at 5:37 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> So, our best day for this month was tomorrow, which really isn't the best
notice. The second best was Friday - would you like me to proceed with
setting something up then?
> 
> The dates we tried in June were not good for most - I can try doodling
some other June weeks if you prefer.
> 
> RjS
> 
> On 5/11/21 4:19 PM, Ryan Cross wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> - Ryan
>> 
>>> On May 11, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a fixed
block
>>> of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and hint
on
>>> getting started are often all I need to run with it.
>>> 
>>> 		-Peter
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Russ
>>> Housley
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
>>> To: Robert Sparks
>>> Cc: IETF Codesprints
>>> Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful
before
>>> IETF 111
>>> 
>>> If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not start a
new
>>> project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but
without
>>> that incentive I would spend my time on other things.
>>> 
>>> Russ
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The response to the doodle at
>>> https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>>>> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could
probably
>>> make progress even without a dedicated call.
>>>> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest in
>>> virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>>>> So I have two questions:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of
people,
>>> or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up tickets
when
>>> they can give us a block of time?
>>>> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on some
>>> axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>>>> RjS
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> codesprints mailing list
>>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>> 



From nobody Tue May 11 22:28:29 2021
Return-Path: <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4155F3A34E0 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 22:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bluepopcorn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTOtMGnermSK for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 May 2021 22:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from v2.bluepopcorn.net (v2.bluepopcorn.net [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a994::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1B73A34DF for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 May 2021 22:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluepopcorn.net; s=supersize; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e1h9jz2H9oDPtyWrDcajAcT6EW3NOnAS2ncXSg3RKJY=; b=MFovD+rhEhSb6qUOS9zd9JURSj BoQedNt0ChCQ1GG5xvzD+0d5uSTCNAc+kx0SRm+RqoI6QRy+V4/F/yFreUEtviWGX81O+Ia4kwIZ2 QIWJHDcZq/1pPmmAwuAFw20E4C6RNo6UNDzRvW1Ah33c6BvHYSuMWIG0ZiZZn2z+jrDE=;
Received: from [2601:647:4400:1261:8847:16e8:56d1:6a58] (helo=[10.10.20.144]) by v2.bluepopcorn.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>) id 1lghPn-000717-JS; Tue, 11 May 2021 22:28:13 -0700
From: "Jim Fenton" <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
To: "Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: "Ryan Cross" <rcross@amsl.com>, "Peter Yee" <peter@akayla.com>, "IETF Codesprints" <codesprints@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 22:28:08 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5757)
Message-ID: <A0C61620-42D8-4029-A5A8-9D653D4559FA@bluepopcorn.net>
In-Reply-To: <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com>
References: <ba096d14-7372-6d00-9559-2836a739ddf8@nostrum.com> <8E0C8BBC-E1B7-4719-AAFF-93A2480DA8C6@vigilsec.com> <008501d7469f$5617be60$02473b20$@akayla.com> <D60780F6-5D35-48D6-8C35-1AB5F25FCC10@amsl.com> <a6de7464-0f5e-32d5-bb0e-939a69d9d6fc@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/aLCtUOngIDTnQ_YEEM3XZ6bc_DI>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be useful before IETF 111
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 05:28:28 -0000

Other weeks in June would be better for me. We’re going to Yosemite 
that week.

I think the virtual code sprints are somewhat effective, but not as much 
as in person. I only manage to accomplish a small fix or something 
before work or distractions intervene. I sometimes wonder if that little 
bit outweighs the amount of support I need (getting questions answered, 
etc.). No need to answer that.

-Jim

On 11 May 2021, at 14:37, Robert Sparks wrote:

> So, our best day for this month was tomorrow, which really isn't the 
> best notice. The second best was Friday - would you like me to proceed 
> with setting something up then?
>
> The dates we tried in June were not good for most - I can try doodling 
> some other June weeks if you prefer.
>
> RjS
>
> On 5/11/21 4:19 PM, Ryan Cross wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> - Ryan
>>
>>> On May 11, 2021, at 12:53 PM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have to agree with Russ on this. It's really helpful to have a 
>>> fixed block
>>> of time to kick off something. That and the ticket suggestion and 
>>> hint on
>>> getting started are often all I need to run with it.
>>>
>>> 		-Peter
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: codesprints [mailto:codesprints-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
>>> Russ
>>> Housley
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:44 PM
>>> To: Robert Sparks
>>> Cc: IETF Codesprints
>>> Subject: Re: [codesprints] Would a specific codesprint time be 
>>> useful before
>>> IETF 111
>>>
>>> If I do not set aside a block of time, then I probably will not 
>>> start a new
>>> project.  Often, for me, the project takes more than the block, but 
>>> without
>>> that incentive I would spend my time on other things.
>>>
>>> Russ
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 11, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The response to the doodle at
>>> https://doodle.com/poll/4mitmqfqa5w5f88r?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
>>>> was small, and was from the set of usual participants who could 
>>>> probably
>>> make progress even without a dedicated call.
>>>> Offline I had a regular participant suggest that maybe the interest 
>>>> in
>>> virtual codesprints just isn't that high.
>>>> So I have two questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is it worth setting time aside for the regular small group of 
>>>> people,
>>> or should we shift to a model for those folks to just pick up 
>>> tickets when
>>> they can give us a block of time?
>>>> 2) Would interest be different if we changed the virtual format on 
>>>> some
>>> axis. Is there something completely different we should be trying?
>>>> RjS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> codesprints mailing list
>>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> codesprints mailing list
>>> codesprints@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Wed May 12 06:40:08 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4175B3A1164 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2021 06:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1YXHziGk2pl for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 May 2021 06:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0263A1163 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2021 06:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14CDdvm9065413 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 May 2021 08:39:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1620826799; bh=xL7AoGM5jE47Ve6puBtP5qAowgs3I9HxV2S9vl2roFY=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=E0fe5AuWLG1wqWiFzlj8RVBD3vmsupT5jki9xAqtIL2ELhN93Bpe7X8a53z8qdch8 jG3fHYkVLZwESHDerHutmythPqmiHVT5xuvk4apO65Mo0Su6XQEOm2Wef8nCVuzkDU 4wTxR0Ar6eFQwA9wWRlOnwR7pfeDDVwCPIFVe6Dw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <1d4115e5-837a-5b39-02fa-2bc137f2a0a5@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 08:39:52 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/94zJfkJjIl1iJSUMGCdzRVVOTlQ>
Subject: [codesprints] Re-doodle for a time in the next few weeks
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 13:40:06 -0000

Here's a doodle to see if there's a good day in the next few weeks. If 
we don't find something here, I'll put together a different doodle later 
for something in late Jun/Jul.

https://doodle.com/poll/5e8yyt8ch4v9cbmh

RjS


From nobody Thu May 13 11:28:01 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51753A10C1 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Hre304iiKhn for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8683A10E3 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14DIRoct043202 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 13:27:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1620930471; bh=/M5vQWSphYwghV463VGHDYQCIliw+/zORZFxufzyCNo=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=wG9lXX4CkEmwyH/5PwS6x1NoUOEyu/SJ4PL2bE2KxgdUw7Lo6nZ27SLKObobmZS4w jVzolxYhqIXppe44QpjfXNY3SMDNRULN7lmnsyyWcIBIyZlaa0GWhPPBNp/ahqa8uw J/4ZlZCkx3mBOrEDOcjricck70+5kis1SRJCpl7k=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <f28227cc-240c-421f-ec0a-ceffd8fc1d9b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 13:27:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/30ik-540hX_4m7FQg6Ox7ZftR8k>
Subject: [codesprints] SVN/TRAC for the datatracker and xml2rfc has been moved from tools.ietf.org to ietf.org
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 18:28:01 -0000

All -

If you have working copies that you want to keep using, you should 
change the svn server they point to using the svn command as follows:


$ svn relocate https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb 
https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb

$ svn up

You would do similar things if you have working copies of xml2rfc.

Fresh checkouts should be made using 
https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb going forward.

Trac has also been moved. Redirects are in place to help you land in the 
right places, but please update any bookmarks you find.

Please help me spot and correct places in the documentation (the sprint 
pages at the ietfdb wiki will need a global update - I'm happy to let 
someone else do that if they have the energy.

RjS


From nobody Thu May 13 11:43:00 2021
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4883A114D for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpGwPyyadYUf for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AB73A114B for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AD0300B91 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EidfIl4auylR for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9304F300AEF; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.20\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <f28227cc-240c-421f-ec0a-ceffd8fc1d9b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 14:42:46 -0400
Cc: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D50FE8C8-A607-413A-A688-EFC68BB2A42E@vigilsec.com>
References: <f28227cc-240c-421f-ec0a-ceffd8fc1d9b@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/3jqlwin3LFNCLk-dOODCPJ_VTwc>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] SVN/TRAC for the datatracker and xml2rfc has been moved from tools.ietf.org to ietf.org
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 18:42:59 -0000

Robert:

What URL do we use to review tickets?  It was =
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb

Russ


> On May 13, 2021, at 2:27 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> All -
>=20
> If you have working copies that you want to keep using, you should =
change the svn server they point to using the svn command as follows:
>=20
>=20
> $ svn relocate https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb =
https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb
>=20
> $ svn up
>=20
> You would do similar things if you have working copies of xml2rfc.
>=20
> Fresh checkouts should be made using =
https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb going forward.
>=20
> Trac has also been moved. Redirects are in place to help you land in =
the right places, but please update any bookmarks you find.
>=20
> Please help me spot and correct places in the documentation (the =
sprint pages at the ietfdb wiki will need a global update - I'm happy to =
let someone else do that if they have the energy.
>=20
> RjS
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Thu May 13 11:48:20 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F233A1187 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaLZjdmm7i3o for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324BC3A1184 for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2021 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14DImCFW049979 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 May 2021 13:48:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1620931693; bh=mS70Ma5FRYB2DcSGHPgRV4MUA89FEof+f2wYEgw3YCU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ILlKdRULMNqZJJHjd53cWQ2mWjNQI6UZ3ENx3+A5771iNLayfr01/RRLQq3uUBlcx vVsYQ3jDOCFOkk0d6I0fHM79XqBrWhrAzMnD60t1/eg0r246V/4tzXTLPyx6+9SEOm F2md2aCa22tL1FAZUuPH6TCbmNzKsFC80Tx+QSLY=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
References: <f28227cc-240c-421f-ec0a-ceffd8fc1d9b@nostrum.com> <D50FE8C8-A607-413A-A688-EFC68BB2A42E@vigilsec.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <4c0c02bc-5d07-fcc8-ff63-4c4dc967cf8b@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 13:48:07 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D50FE8C8-A607-413A-A688-EFC68BB2A42E@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/S9e2ALZ8iBM8LOcPI1T3HTIUaTc>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] SVN/TRAC for the datatracker and xml2rfc has been moved from tools.ietf.org to ietf.org
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 18:48:19 -0000

Note that that URL redirects to https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb

You'll need to login (with your datatracker credentials) to view tickets.

fwiw, I'm considering changing the permissions to allow viewing tickets 
anonymously again - we started requiring that at tools.ietf.org to help 
avoid the extra load from badly-behaved robots. I think we could better 
handle that with cloudflare, but there is some setup investigation that 
needs to happen first.

RjS

On 5/13/21 1:42 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Robert:
>
> What URL do we use to review tickets?  It was http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
>
> Russ
>
>
>> On May 13, 2021, at 2:27 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>> All -
>>
>> If you have working copies that you want to keep using, you should change the svn server they point to using the svn command as follows:
>>
>>
>> $ svn relocate https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb
>>
>> $ svn up
>>
>> You would do similar things if you have working copies of xml2rfc.
>>
>> Fresh checkouts should be made using https://svn.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb going forward.
>>
>> Trac has also been moved. Redirects are in place to help you land in the right places, but please update any bookmarks you find.
>>
>> Please help me spot and correct places in the documentation (the sprint pages at the ietfdb wiki will need a global update - I'm happy to let someone else do that if they have the energy.
>>
>> RjS
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> codesprints mailing list
>> codesprints@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Fri May 14 09:17:53 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573B73A37F6 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgfGL8AUoq0E for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A8E3A37EA for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14EGHYes020962 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:17:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1621009054; bh=XrIA1oIBqmP5Gg5wKVBCesGQ/b46qS00K3dnKTVNF7o=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BN3OS7H19G5l05WQe56oNQuWq2/tE6mcVSpYMXVFWHuwaDWWB6VhzjUIGy1SMeqHl cjcLjT7O4Zdffzf/ZFW0rnOkkJ376Q6qoGHOSJ9lVE83LU0VnMPZGUpcmK4fwtT517 pUukBlEUrrs3Ni7Ldt54AG4kYbTcnuA1UsxAR+go=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: codesprints@ietf.org
References: <1d4115e5-837a-5b39-02fa-2bc137f2a0a5@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <3926cb7d-9c77-880f-e61f-e711b2f1707a@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:17:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1d4115e5-837a-5b39-02fa-2bc137f2a0a5@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/vydKnuRR9NKuQ8vKN_SuYStNnHo>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Re-doodle for a time in the next few weeks
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:17:51 -0000

June 1 is looking the best at the moment.

If you plan to participate in the sprint, but haven't added yourself to 
the doodle, please do so today - we will set a date on Monday.

RjS

On 5/12/21 8:39 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Here's a doodle to see if there's a good day in the next few weeks. If 
> we don't find something here, I'll put together a different doodle 
> later for something in late Jun/Jul.
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/5e8yyt8ch4v9cbmh
>
> RjS
>
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Mon May 17 15:38:52 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036BB3A10D7 for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HiqIyF2Sr0_q for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01C23A10CA for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14HMcieh005142 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:38:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1621291124; bh=alcVqkQm+4UDJMsfmOxjanckWvsmwgnZ4qnfgOo/VFI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Xq9kjaFiEjgDaIeP5x6YPuWPIV3KUdsQGs5X39CHeWVsw8VokSCCYf73sF49pcu3x Uzl2XAUF8pO0ii22gI/bq3EEnIW6g+NCiTRKMRcl6DC742m7VJu7WuT91w/dUIzS/c 2hS8pP/LFX345kVZ2Ds8DPVlDwccuY8ZNkW0NUXI=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: codesprints@ietf.org
References: <1d4115e5-837a-5b39-02fa-2bc137f2a0a5@nostrum.com> <3926cb7d-9c77-880f-e61f-e711b2f1707a@nostrum.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9daa7451-b060-3cc4-1f54-ff5ff65f1875@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:38:38 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3926cb7d-9c77-880f-e61f-e711b2f1707a@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/X99CMWSOXa3dv_mjF84JBZGMx2o>
Subject: Re: [codesprints] Re-doodle for a time in the next few weeks
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 22:38:51 -0000

The June 1 date is the best on the doodle - we'll hold a sprint on that 
date.

I'll send online coordinates soon.

RjS

On 5/14/21 11:17 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> June 1 is looking the best at the moment.
>
> If you plan to participate in the sprint, but haven't added yourself 
> to the doodle, please do so today - we will set a date on Monday.
>
> RjS
>
> On 5/12/21 8:39 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> Here's a doodle to see if there's a good day in the next few weeks. 
>> If we don't find something here, I'll put together a different doodle 
>> later for something in late Jun/Jul.
>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/5e8yyt8ch4v9cbmh
>>
>> RjS
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> codesprints mailing list
>> codesprints@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints
>
> _______________________________________________
> codesprints mailing list
> codesprints@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints


From nobody Thu May 20 10:48:55 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C103A202B; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJ-T4VdSLytP; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5623A2026; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 28c88792cbac ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14KHmfr3009209 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 May 2021 12:48:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1621532922; bh=YFAzIywSTIzo3ezYO6CRspx9fdVxhXuOZJARs690jkA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=kVyZftVmWHboYz0PdlyssiKgmXK0/JW8v7E+m1awM8mNeo+74WJfi1EY/BFyoLvC2 xiA/FKpKITLXsxb4fjXSJts30vFrXHhkEfTODaX49LNshITTqo/wpWmAMEcgmsVp13 DAPnZ3pZMU1phMyeoeSMvdHyORPu9u8J+qZWqjTw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be 28c88792cbac
Received: from rjsparks by 28c88792cbac with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <rjsparks@nostrum.com>) id 1ljmmi-000GuE-E8; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:48:36 +0000
From: rjsparks@nostrum.com
To: codesprints@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1ljmmi-000GuE-E8@28c88792cbac>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:48:36 +0000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/7L1cnU1OA_AsCzXahleVYRTIp9o>
Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v7.30.0
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:48:50 -0000

Hi,

This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, 
v7.30.0, generated when running the mkrelease script.

Release notes:

ietfdb (7.30.0) ietf; urgency=medium

  ** Bugfixes, adjustments to moving datatracker repository

  * Merged in [18999] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Correct invalid date assumption in rfc8989 eligibility tests.

  * Merged in [18991] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Missing migration needed by [18960] / [18977]

  * Merged in [18989] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Allow secretariat to edit document author list. Fixes #3185.

  * Merged in [18995] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Link only to datatracker htmlization. Adjust mail-to-authors and
    mail-to-list. Fixes #3261.

  * Merged in [18997] from rjsparks@nostrum.com:
    Changes to reflect repository moves.

  * Merged in [18998] from jennifer@painless-security.com:
    Prevent unscheduled session drop target from collapsing to zero size in
    agenda editor. Fixes #3174.

 -- Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>  19 May 2021 18:07:42 +0000

The new version is available for installation through SVN checkout, with
  'svn checkout https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/7.30.0'

For development, copy the new development version instead:
  'svn copy https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/dev/7.30.1.dev0' <YOURBRANCH>

Regards,

	Robert Sparks
	(via the mkrelease script)


From nobody Fri May 28 13:35:16 2021
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3953A34DE for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.078
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiHABmWlHd1h for <codesprints@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBE83A34DD for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.9.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14SKZ7Ge030975 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <codesprints@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:35:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1622234107; bh=2D51KVB/nKvWhOmxMf3/kDOa7wu3NPfTBAagYTRMlkU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=hNDNIUfsug1Y786MiuAzRuTEPUNSOvFNtsLVlR2Qu2IdynJD6GEcXbsEhlN9VR19S 0xbKhr19cjJ/pkkWvYi5I2Q6WcULxrlmQX2i902GiEIZqZB/tuJlx/jMX2wrSOURJH aHOp8iPZBR4fGXrdwpOnp3UR7fyB0u0oVFmNaWIE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.9.176] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
To: IETF Codesprints <codesprints@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <ae2a9a4a-c03a-5688-c0b4-4fbc7e1004a9@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:35:01 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/codesprints/_loJOT0szXnzVRQRqbB-2NkZ7W0>
Subject: [codesprints] Coordinates for next week's codesprint
X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" <codesprints.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/codesprints/>
List-Post: <mailto:codesprints@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints>, <mailto:codesprints-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 20:35:15 -0000

Codesprint
Hosted by Robert Sparks

https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m4b4c5fc79a2832f1769271b18c7d98b3
Tuesday, Jun 1, 2021 10:00 am | 4 hours | (UTC-05:00) Central Time (US & 
Canada)
Meeting number: 161 829 7663
Password: BPbdS4gJY25

Join by video system
Dial 1618297663@ietf.webex.com
You can also dial 173.243.2.68 and enter your meeting number.

Join by phone
1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
Access code: 161 829 7663