
From mehmet.ersue@nsn.com  Wed Dec  4 11:10:29 2013
Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: coman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450641AE2D0 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 11:10:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nToXnXSgMWl0 for <coman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 11:10:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F30C1AE1A8 for <coman@ietf.org>; Wed,  4 Dec 2013 11:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id rB4JAL5r030161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <coman@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:10:22 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.33]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id rB4JALSF000648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <coman@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:10:21 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.40) by DEMUHTC002.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:10:21 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.217]) by DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:10:21 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "coman@ietf.org" <coman@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*
Thread-Index: AQHO8RDEk5J+HNN/C0S8ffBfqYdmcJpEQtYg
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:10:20 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8217A06@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1951
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1386184222-000022AE-4D402700/0-0/0-0
Subject: [coman] FW: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*
X-BeenThere: coman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management of Constrained Networks and Devices <coman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/>
List-Post: <mailto:coman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman>, <mailto:coman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:10:29 -0000

Dear Coman Community,

after the discussion in IETF 88, we are asking the OPSAWG working group to =
publish the Coman drafts (see below).
I would like to please you to review the Coman drafts and send your comment=
s to opsawg@ietf.org.

Thank you for your support in advance.

Cheers,=20
Mehmet=20


-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Warren Kumar=
i
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:49 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-*

Hi all,

Hopefully you all had a good Thanksgiving -- if you are in the US, hopefull=
y you had good turkey, stuffing / whatever.
If you are not US based, hopefully you enjoyed the decrease in email volume=
 while everyone recovered form eating too much. :-)

One of the action items from Vancouver was for us to call for reviewers for=
:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs/
and=20
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-use-cases/

So, can we get some volunteers please? According to our new guidelines we r=
equire sufficient reviewers before adopting new work.

The documents are (IMO) interesting and easy to read. Constrained devices h=
ave some interesting requirements and limitations.
If you would like a quick reminder / refresher from the meeting, slides are=
 here: http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/88/slides/slides-88-opsawg-11.pdf

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> indicated that=
 one of his Ph.D. students had read the draft a couple of weeks ago. So the=
y just have to review the changes to the latest version.


W
--=20
"I think it would be a good idea."=20
- Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization



_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
