Subject: [core] draft-he-core-energy-aware-pd

From: Salvatore Loreto <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:59:16 +0100

Hi there,

the idea is interesting,
and it is quite similar to what I have proposed (with the necessary 
modifications) in my previous comment on draft core-pd-00:
i.e.the usage of a direct multicast request etc.etc.

however the section 3.2. Example is not correct or consistent with what 
you have stated before in the
draft indeed you there is no lifetime in the POST request
but the response is 2.01 Created and not 4.00 "Bad Request"

btw I would suggest that the absence of lifetime would not generate a 
4.00 "Bad Request" but instead
assume a default lifetime (e.g. 3600 seconds)

cheers
Salvatore

-- 
Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com