From nobody Fri Jul 16 01:51:22 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC753A2DD5 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:51:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sm7g_DiFy_0e for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB8613A2DDA for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id oz7so10224763ejc.2 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:51:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p4HQ3gV/mm7dgVA+7LrqaLBGCAtdZ6az5D8ZT43YVVs=; b=dztp9jS5kTl9FLuA+RwCcOzfogLQxSks9P/OsoWHuqI72DkBA5w/p58MNKNnXOkibm 8rRH02w7u2QDbfVKIrjttEwfg0a6OcG84MUsusvqjRY0DrMKSdLz+sR2n+esT9tnGoNr CrLF3kYa16vAKCLc0Dh/X7l3alqHbo6I986d188LOCWxs67mzsycCzzafS3/rSp4T9sV b/6uEJln0nVFhDc96WqumH7YsSWQpF6MRt0qaXCMPDpSnkk8OHhLqaLTX6QEtssT7nJr R/buxnDl8DQUi3R5SMXmYIQdA33CZQFIYr1rEeb8Qbs6hshpJU/Xiv+kOhrF7kYTl2cM 1ZBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p4HQ3gV/mm7dgVA+7LrqaLBGCAtdZ6az5D8ZT43YVVs=; b=KvE6T5p92zUgmTj7vn0LxvJ7VVtK3KNWIu14aBJ+usN4AQ/MTW17A2BN388ttvpJ1e W9gD65TevNZPBOZOa9ARi4jkjgiBDP5orWnlM/id+C6a5s+SqttUwW2FpNPq9Mu2sQgB +YV9APy9E+ICG2mqSg/I1KULXV9nGDoyXGV0VxBhXW3oaBPrcyy/AN/dRxxNMqqw3+Wz s5gzScpdrrFz/dnyg7xBs96JT7qowQICj7XRolanvz+k8or8U38ZUCt8X99rcHYgdpaE s9ljLao/OLoA3SmFmgqMqzeaPn84a7E+0DEOEN3WdeW2Uceh8VhuVbriELYCNdBUSLg0 425A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532K6Pt07iyzDcBRFYYUWyYwFsoFD3YpNbyg1dIJ9e+g6gmfG1mt FggZa6hF+OQ+92nZTomO8JW46BoGx+G6F3YzM/bjf1hKgDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0PJZ4i4gb/5veY7cC1Hz+z1lM0soYZCLQnqaBf5h80TctSsabEefTZIgDtiLhnim1Me6F2k0amy7e2cI8Xjo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c49:: with SMTP id t9mr10448846ejf.405.1626425474568; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:51:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:50:40 +0300 Message-ID: To: crypto-panel@irtf.org Cc: cfrg-chairs@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aa552805c739b090" Archived-At: Subject: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:51:21 -0000 --000000000000aa552805c739b090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear Crypto Panel Experts, We've obtained a request for review of the version -21 of the "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" draft, draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-21, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations/ The Crypto Panel (that was my review back then) provided a review of the -00 version three years ago: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/1itH0lM9w0bZiADJXQkizr8JTiA/ The document has changed significantly since then, so the authors ask for a new review. The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide a review (another pair of eyes + reviewing all the changes in the document). Any volunteers? Regards, Stanislav (for CFRG Chairs) --000000000000aa552805c739b090 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Crypto Panel Experts,=C2=A0

We'= ;ve obtained a request for review of the version -21 of the "Alternati= ve Elliptic Curve Representations" draft, draft-ietf-lwig-curve-repres= entations-21,=C2=A0https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwi= g-curve-representations/

The Crypto Panel (that was = my review back then) provided a review of the -00 version three years ago:<= /div>

The = document has changed significantly since then, so the authors ask for a new= review.=C2=A0

The chairs would like to ask the Cr= ypto Panel to provide a review (another pair of eyes + reviewing all the ch= anges in the document).

Any volunteers?
=
Regards,
Stanislav (for CFRG Chairs)
--000000000000aa552805c739b090-- From nobody Fri Jul 16 07:26:57 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D446E3A38FF for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.895 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZ0KXPUkzoEu for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 841D73A3904 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9C8300BF8 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id a7znXOOwKDnc for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10722300231; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Russ Housley Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F744C68-07B5-40CE-9242-CF5C4EC445E0" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:26:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:26:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_1F744C68-07B5-40CE-9242-CF5C4EC445E0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have already done a review of this document in another context, so I = suggest someone else take a look. Russ > On Jul 16, 2021, at 4:50 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev = wrote: >=20 > Dear Crypto Panel Experts,=20 >=20 > We've obtained a request for review of the version -21 of the = "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" draft, = draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-21, = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations/ = >=20 > The Crypto Panel (that was my review back then) provided a review of = the -00 version three years ago: > = https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/1itH0lM9w0bZiADJXQkizr8= JTiA/ = >=20 > The document has changed significantly since then, so the authors ask = for a new review.=20 >=20 > The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide a review = (another pair of eyes + reviewing all the changes in the document). >=20 > Any volunteers? >=20 > Regards, > Stanislav (for CFRG Chairs) > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel --Apple-Mail=_1F744C68-07B5-40CE-9242-CF5C4EC445E0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii I = have already done a review of this document in another context, so I = suggest someone else take a look.

Russ


On Jul = 16, 2021, at 4:50 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> = wrote:

Dear Crypto Panel Experts, 
We've obtained a request for review of = the version -21 of the "Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations" = draft, draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-21, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-curve-represen= tations/

The = Crypto Panel (that was my review back then) provided a review of the -00 = version three years ago:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/1itH0lM9w0bZ= iADJXQkizr8JTiA/

The document has changed significantly = since then, so the authors ask for a new review. 

The chairs would like to = ask the Crypto Panel to provide a review (another pair of eyes + = reviewing all the changes in the document).

Any volunteers?

Regards,
Stanislav = (for CFRG Chairs)
_______________________________________________
Crypto-panel= mailing list
Crypto-panel@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel

= --Apple-Mail=_1F744C68-07B5-40CE-9242-CF5C4EC445E0--