Subject: [Dime] Diameter error codes

From: Rajith R <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:28:54 +0530

Why is "DIAMETER_UNKNOWN_PEER              3010" considered as a
protocol error where as "DIAMETER_NO_COMMON_APPLICATION     5010" is
considered a permanent error?

w.r.t the "CER/CEA in open state" thread, if applications may come & go,
should not DIAMETER_NO_COMMON_APPLICATION be treated as a transient
failure?

Regards

Rajith

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime