Subject: RE: [Dime] WGLC: Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for Network Access Server to Diameter Server Interaction

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:00:53 +0200

Hi

Few minor comments:

 o Should we reserve a small range from MIP6-Feature-Vector
   for experimental use? For example upper 8 bits.

 o I would like to relax the 'MUST' in 4.7.1 where is says
   "When the MIP6-Agent-Info AVP is present in a message,
    it MUST contain either a MIP-Home-Agent-Address AVP or
    a MIP-Home-Agent-Host AVP, but not both."

   Imho SHOULD is enough. The use of must makes these nasty
   in message dependencies between AVPs

Cheers,
	Jouni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:22 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Dime] WGLC: Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for 
> Network Access Server to Diameter Server Interaction
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> this message marks the issuance of a working group last call 
> (WGLC) on DIME's Internet Draft entitled "Diameter Mobile 
> IPv6: Support for Network Access Server to Diameter Server 
> Interaction" 
> (draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integrated-05.txt). You may view this 
> document at 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integ
> rated-05.txt
> 
> Please post comments and questions to the DIME mailing list 
> no later than 9 September 2007.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes & Dave
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime