Subject: [Dime] Re-Confirming HUM: draft-jones-dime-extended-naptr

From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:51:32 +0200

Hi all, 

During the IETF meeting we had a presentation for 
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jones-dime-extended-naptr

I asked for feedback and 7 persons were in favor of the document
becoming a WG item and nobody against. 

Please provide additional feedback (for or against) by the 22nd of
December. 

Ciao
Hannes

---

From: Tom Taylor <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:06:20 -0500

YES

Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
>

---

From: jouni korhonen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:15:10 +0200

I'll re-confirm my YES for adoption.

Jouni

---

From: Itsuma TANAKA <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:23:14 +0900

Dear All,

I'd like to support this proposal to be a part of DiME charter.

Thank you.

Itsuma Tanaka
NTT DOCOMO

---

From: Qin Wu <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:24:13 +0800

YES.

---

From: "Glen Zorn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:27:56 -0800

It's OK with me (though I have reservations about both the necessity of the
work & the security of dynamic discovery).

Hope this helps.

~gwz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:52 PM
> To: [email-masked]

---

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:43:03 +0100

Hello Hanes,

I'm in favour that the document become a WG item.

Best regards

 Wolfgang

>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] Im 
>Auftrag von Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 21:52
>An: [email-masked]
>Betreff: [Dime] Re-Confirming HUM: draft-jones-dime-extended-naptr
>
>Hi all, 
>
>I asked for feedback and 7 persons were in favor of the 
>document becoming a WG item and nobody against. 
>
>Please provide additional feedback (for or against) by the 
>22nd of December. 
>
>Ciao
>Hannes