From bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch Fri Apr 1 06:11:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3743A6857 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.263 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VH-UC+56dK7n for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC6B3A6862 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 06:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5eAI-0008IU-Uv; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:13:27 +0200 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:13:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:11:48 -0000 Hi E2MD folks After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is to close the E2MD mailing list, unless there are good grounds to keep it open. If you feel this list should remain open, please send your view (incl. reasons) to this list by April 15th. Unless we see valid reasons to keep this list open by April 15th, I'll report back to the AD that he can close it. cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization From jim@rfc1035.com Fri Apr 1 07:13:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8000D3A681A for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:13:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a77-RwU2uF5m for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hutch.rfc1035.com (hutch.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F153A67FA for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 07:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jim) by hutch.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D564D15420A1; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:15:02 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: From: Jim Reid To: Bernie Hoeneisen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:15:02 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:13:53 -0000 On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:13, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, > what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is > to close the E2MD mailing list The list has been quiet for about a year. The shutdown of the ENUM WG means this list probably has no justification to continue. So Bernie, I think this is the right time for the e2md list's funeral. Let's declare victory and go for a beer. From richard@shockey.us Fri Apr 1 08:12:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C6A3A68A2 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:12:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.137 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHN8jExeAWOE for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E2D053A688C for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28059 invoked by uid 0); 1 Apr 2011 15:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 15:14:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=shockey.us; h=Received:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Identified-User; b=D6RJfwhMDfTXeQi6ULMCrdTD49hQGBGbS2WSOCBYEhU2+EOer2XTrdke34iZOihlqEb0AYEcp8nnpPZM42Z4LXFYHNl6PLpk9QopWFWbDEw3FVr51A7CnyKb774i475y; Received: from pool-71-178-24-118.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([71.178.24.118] helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5g3L-0000iv-Oz; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:14:24 -0600 From: "Richard Shockey" To: "'Jim Reid'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: <000001cbf07f$79e84890$6db8d9b0$@us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acvwd0Rt3p7Ts1i8Qtm65HNuanczngAB4HhA Content-Language: en-us X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.178.24.118 authed with richard@shockey.us} Cc: "'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list'" Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:12:44 -0000 Close it .. the underlying issues are not going away since there is a very active discussion going on in North America about the end of TDM/POTS. When it needs to be resurrected it will have to restart with a clean slate. -----Original Message----- From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Reid Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:15 AM To: Bernie Hoeneisen Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:13, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, > what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is > to close the E2MD mailing list The list has been quiet for about a year. The shutdown of the ENUM WG means this list probably has no justification to continue. So Bernie, I think this is the right time for the e2md list's funeral. Let's declare victory and go for a beer. _______________________________________________ e2md mailing list e2md@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md From pp3129@att.com Fri Apr 1 08:34:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFAE3A68AF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:34:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id An+DhnyByUCH for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203F3A6889 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: pp3129@att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1301672166!12172138!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146] Received: (qmail 17240 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 15:36:07 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-3.tower-119.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 15:36:07 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p31FZ4NZ018370; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:35:04 -0400 Received: from gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com (gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com [135.53.26.15]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p31FZ1rQ018302; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:35:01 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:35:59 -0400 Message-ID: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B0623C2E6@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> In-Reply-To: <000001cbf07f$79e84890$6db8d9b0$@us> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list Thread-Index: Acvwd0Rt3p7Ts1i8Qtm65HNuanczngAB4HhAAADpyZA= References: <000001cbf07f$79e84890$6db8d9b0$@us> From: "PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)" To: "Richard Shockey" , "Jim Reid" Cc: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:34:28 -0000 Amen. And whatever happens there are always TXT records :-) Penn Pfautz AT&T Access Management +1-732-420-4962 -----Original Message----- From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:14 AM To: 'Jim Reid' Cc: 'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list' Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list Close it .. the underlying issues are not going away since there is a very active discussion going on in North America about the end of TDM/POTS. When it needs to be resurrected it will have to restart with a clean slate. -----Original Message----- From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Reid Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:15 AM To: Bernie Hoeneisen Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:13, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, =20 > what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is =20 > to close the E2MD mailing list The list has been quiet for about a year. The shutdown of the ENUM WG =20 means this list probably has no justification to continue. So Bernie, =20 I think this is the right time for the e2md list's funeral. Let's =20 declare victory and go for a beer. _______________________________________________ e2md mailing list e2md@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md _______________________________________________ e2md mailing list e2md@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md From lconroy@insensate.co.uk Sat Apr 2 11:24:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BD428C13D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCT6L6U8hQVN for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from insensate.co.uk (ghost.insensate.co.uk [213.152.49.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF728C13A for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2317E36A998; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:06 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at insensate.co.uk Received: from insensate.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psyche.insensate.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrhCMUOAbhya; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8FD36A98D; Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:26:03 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Lawrence Conroy In-Reply-To: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B0623C2E6@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 20:26:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <000001cbf07f$79e84890$6db8d9b0$@us> <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B0623C2E6@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> To: "PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:24:28 -0000 Kill it. BTW, not just TXT records it's a domain so anything will fit. -- there are always P- Enumservices, with data: URLs. Both are already = kinda "legal". This doesn't need further effort/pain in the IETF. atb, Lawrence On 1 Apr 2011, at 17:35, PFAUTZ, PENN L (ATTCORP) wrote: > Amen. > And whatever happens there are always TXT records :-) >=20 > Penn Pfautz > AT&T Access Management > +1-732-420-4962 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of > Richard Shockey > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:14 AM > To: 'Jim Reid' > Cc: 'E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list' > Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list >=20 > Close it .. the underlying issues are not going away since there is a > very > active discussion going on in North America about the end of TDM/POTS. > When > it needs to be resurrected it will have to restart with a clean slate. >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: e2md-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:e2md-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of > Jim > Reid > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:15 AM > To: Bernie Hoeneisen > Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list > Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list >=20 > On 1 Apr 2011, at 14:13, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: >=20 >> After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, =20 >> what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is =20= >> to close the E2MD mailing list >=20 > The list has been quiet for about a year. The shutdown of the ENUM WG =20= > means this list probably has no justification to continue. So Bernie, =20= > I think this is the right time for the e2md list's funeral. Let's =20 > declare victory and go for a beer. > _______________________________________________ > e2md mailing list > e2md@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md >=20 > _______________________________________________ > e2md mailing list > e2md@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md > _______________________________________________ > e2md mailing list > e2md@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md From bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch Thu Apr 14 05:54:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CDDE068E for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:54:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B79DYaFp-BRu for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130DEE065F for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAM3p-0000yb-UX for e2md@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:54:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:54:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:54:11 -0000 Hi again We appear to have a strong consensus to close the E2MD mailing list at the IETF. I will shortly inform the AD in charge about this consensus. >From the recent statements on this list I understood that the opposition faced in the IETF does not stop folks from implementing E2MD anyways. Should there be another mailing list outside the IETF (and thus not under the Note Well), where interested implementors can coordinate / exchange ideas and alike? If yes, please state your opinion by the end of this week. cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Hi E2MD folks > > After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, what we > shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is to close the > E2MD mailing list, unless there are good grounds to keep it open. > > If you feel this list should remain open, please send your view (incl. > reasons) to this list by April 15th. > > Unless we see valid reasons to keep this list open by April 15th, I'll report > back to the AD that he can close it. > > cheers, > Bernie > > -- > > http://ucom.ch/ > Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization > > _______________________________________________ > e2md mailing list > e2md@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md > From bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch Thu Apr 21 12:19:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: e2md@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: e2md@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1467CE067F for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:19:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id obcucS4NWqkN for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26706E00BE for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCzPe-0003jE-Mo; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:19:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:19:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: "E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list" Subject: [e2md] The end of the IETF E2MD list X-BeenThere: e2md@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "E.164 To MetaData \(E2MD\) BOF discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:19:42 -0000 Hi Gonzalo There is a strong consensus among the E2MD folks that it is best to close the IETF E2MD mailing list. (Discussions and implementations are likely to go on outside the IETF.) cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:13:26 From: Bernie Hoeneisen To: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list Subject: [e2md] Future of the e2md mailing list Hi E2MD folks After the ENUM WG has been concluded there is also the question, what we shall do with the E2MD mailing list. The current proposal is to close the E2MD mailing list, unless there are good grounds to keep it open. If you feel this list should remain open, please send your view (incl. reasons) to this list by April 15th. Unless we see valid reasons to keep this list open by April 15th, I'll report back to the AD that he can close it. cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Standardization _______________________________________________ e2md mailing list e2md@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md