Subject: [Ecrit] IETF#90: ECRIT raw notes

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 01:34:47 +0000

Hi,

Below are my raw notes from the ECRIT session in Toronto.

Regards,

Christer

------------------

Topic:     Additional data:

Draft:     draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-22

Presenter: Randall Gellens

ISSUE: As IMSI has been added to device identifier types, associated privacy issues need to be described in the security considerations.

OUTCOME: Text regarding privacy issues associated with IMSI delivery will be added.

ISSUE: Does device classification registry in section 3.3.1 need an entry for soft client on unknown device type?

OUTCOME: Yes (Soft client running on a computer does not know on what type of computer it is running)

ISSUE: Service providers without NENA/EENA IDs. Do providers need to be identified and globally unique?

OUTCOME: Service providers do need to be unique.

ISSUE: Type Of Data Provider is unclear

OUTCOME: Will be renamed TypeOfProvider

ISSUE: Does a Data Provider Contact, given as a telephone number, have to be in E.164 format?

OUTCOME: Data Provider Contact URI can be generic SIP URI and when telephone number, MUST be E.164.

ISSUE: Suggestion to add a new element in Owner/Subscriber block to indicate source of data.

OUTCOME: The suggested was not accepted.

It was indicated that the document is not restricted to emergency calls.

It was indicated that a UE may not be aware that it is making an emergency call (but the network will detect the call as an emergency call), in which case a UE will not provide additional data.

It was determined that additional text is needed to cover the privacy issues associated with the additional data, and that the data should only be provided for emergency calls. The chairs indicated that a new WGLC is not needed, but that the community needs to review such text.

Topic:     Data-Only Emergency Calls

Draft:     draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-08

Presenter: Brian Rosen

The author requested WGLC for the draft. It was indicated that the terminology needs to be double checked, as "call" often implies the presence of conversational media.

Topic:     A LoST extension to support return of complete and similar location info

Draft:     draft-marshall-ecrit-similar-location-03

Presenter: Roger Marshall

ISSUE: There was a request to adopt the draft as a WG document.

OUTCOME: There was WG consensus to adopt the draft.

Topic:     A Routing Extension for HELD

Draft:     draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc-04

Presenter: Laura Liess

ISSUE: It was suggested to extend HELD, by adopting draft-winterbottom-ecrit-priv-loc, in order to solve the problem presented.

OUTCOME: Some people did not agree to the statements made, and the suggested was to solve the problem. Additional discussions need to take place on the mailing list.

Topic:     Feedback for ACE Use Cases

Draft:     draft-seitz-ace-usecases-01

Presenter: Ludwig Seitz

The ECRIT community was requested to provide feedback, and real-lire use-cases.