From zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn Wed Jan 8 22:45:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0469C1ADF5E for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:45:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ewx3osmf3tfU for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:45:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 37B801ADF63 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:45:13 -0800 (PST) X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: zhoulinlin@cnnic.cn Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO lenovo95e6383c) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:45:02 +0800 From: "Linlin Zhou" To: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:45:00 +0800 Message-ID: <004401cf0d06$5215a9b0$f640fd10$@cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac8NBlFLGn8ETyt4QW2BgwHC6BqZvQ== Content-Language: zh-cn Subject: Re: [eppext] Document Adoption and Starting Work X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:45:16 -0000 I'd like to review the draft draft-obispo-epp-idn and give some comments. Regards, Linlin > From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" > To: "eppext at ietf.org" > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:55:38 +0000 > List-id: EPPEXT > I'd like to propose that we formally adopt all of the documents described in our charter. They are: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ > Scott From galvin@elistx.com Mon Jan 13 11:56:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693C31ADF97 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ylmda--mlQmP for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5461ADF89 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so2689932igq.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dw883bbBT9CW2RmhR2AJGjZd1Jkub2BjQBtyHrph8E4=; b=QAOtoZudWR9QqzyrpVYzJClnvSqPZT00Cz/lfYqSyYKPBGOdFFQ7ft9p6TNmoIYUzu 8JxPVQVrDqp9OMy5HTI6ax7nZ0D/I3Ht6Kb6FZUdJ0BuJWlpDiI3Ofl6+n5Bg79kVjgG 1if7F21nYAlHCKAIloVQZ95VF7Y3Gwvjs4gW3BETdgqwgKe0b5M8TSpTGCUxrvDAgqZa yBUTrnwaO7LjUOqugz3yNHkxR/V4aJIP8KYH0qMa4yiKgj6Huz/5Zs4J3DHl48Rws13c MGETvw1HUve5pziDf0r946MPh/BynQ4kxDutInqZtbf36Cs1LYthgJXRhWdz1Xc+DSiO vV5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHRDXHOKMl0G2xTcyFf3U7IFYr/dwGGTMgPvv1uRcVdZ2x4kfJ0SUvSKXq5nl+4PVw5a+y MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.134 with SMTP id w6mr20901728igl.20.1389642987213; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:56:27 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:27 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184b0c9e350e04efdf7878 Subject: [eppext] time to get started X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:56:40 -0000 --089e01184b0c9e350e04efdf7878 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Your quiet chairs starting off the new year by finally speaking up. Our charter was approved last year. It might seem so long ago but it was just a month ago. We have two administrative actions to get past and then we should begin our review process. The first thing is we do have to formally accept what documents we want to be working group documents. Scott Hollenbeck posted the list from the charter before the end of the year holidays, which we'll repeat here. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ Since they were listed in our charter which we have all reviewed we don't imagine there will be any objection but for completeness we'll follow this message with a separate message asking for objections. In addition, we do need to decide if we want to have a working group meeting in London. The request has to be put in by this Friday so time is short. We're inclined to ask for meeting slot. We are just getting started and it is unlikely we will be done by March so the opportunity to review or close on outstanding actions in a face to face environment should be helpful. We'll follow this message with a separate message asking about the meeting situation. Finally, one person has already promised to give review comments for one of the documents above: Linlin for draft-obispo-epp-idn. We are going to have to take note of how many people have reviewed a document in order to move it forward so it would be helpful if folks would indicate if they plan to review a document in detail. Even better would be to send a note saying you have read it with your comments or saying it's good to go if that's the case. Thanks to everyone for your patience thus far. Watch for the follow up messages coming next. Jim and Antoin --089e01184b0c9e350e04efdf7878 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Your quiet chairs start= ing off the new year by finally speaking up.

Our charter was approve= d last year.=C2=A0 It might seem so long ago but it was just a month ago.
We have two administrative actions to get past and then we should beg= in our review process.

The first thing is we do have to formally acc= ept what documents we want to be working group documents.=C2=A0 Scott Holle= nbeck posted the list from the charter before the end of the year holidays,= which we'll repeat here.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp= -ext-reg/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/

Since they were listed in our charter which we have all reviewed we d= on't imagine there will be any objection but for completeness we'll= follow this message with a separate message asking for objections.

In addition, we do need to decide if we want to have a working gr= oup meeting in London.=C2=A0 The request has to be put in by this Friday so= time is short.

We're inclined to ask for meeting slot.=C2= =A0 We are just getting started and it is unlikely we will be done by March= so the opportunity to review or close on outstanding actions in a face to = face environment should be helpful.=C2=A0 We'll follow this message wit= h a separate message asking about the meeting situation.

Finally, one person has already promised to give review comments = for one of the documents above:=C2=A0 Linlin for draft-obispo-epp-idn.=C2= =A0 We are going to have to take note of how many people have reviewed a do= cument in order to move it forward so it would be helpful if folks would in= dicate if they plan to review a document in detail.=C2=A0 Even better would= be to send a note saying you have read it with your comments or saying it&= #39;s good to go if that's the case.

Thanks to everyone for your patience thus far.=C2=A0 Watch for th= e follow up messages coming next.

Jim and Antoin

<= div>

--089e01184b0c9e350e04efdf7878-- From galvin@elistx.com Mon Jan 13 12:01:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463EA1ADFCA for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ooG3z_oXqSD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC811ADFFB for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m12so6415881iga.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DWXpKuu3/kWltGK0rD2+csILIEZ7r1JmwCOSURtJ9bE=; b=LzXSKoDiS7V6z2G82cgAvSB6PzxwY0wR1EmVxiTEZoK9yGmKMwcL6cL3Jj2haWHj3r HjzxWNjnuZg9KoQEcp63rPpZQ60jObXH01ap67ODNZw3kBRkkOWUPfrLdugd7Ybz/Wb9 xsGaSe5z2v3mF3yfOt0CrxNkmLTggU7vPB3fSwoiB+lx/oGgs+gwMi7bkZsYiRQOobfN CGaVXCtdA6uEo7OOs/+bKohgDK1sbK4QY8qDLey3HYEgLNhAwZ/h8EeKYAWbBwaEGfzz fnHS2ohsSieJEq2EwR8gBNYyhFeLSdAeaEHbPNfEY5o2fKwTBEvntWXsRtwcdnuBsjDj CerA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7+Zswu08nKdkaYNLF2pLxWSh0HOz0chHCeduB/NfIn0Si62Fsx7VcAVn60hN+O8AKm6No MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.25.129 with SMTP id c1mr20797181igg.23.1389643302514; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:01:42 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:01:42 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc10ec6958ce04efdf8bb5 Subject: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:01:55 -0000 --047d7bdc10ec6958ce04efdf8bb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by adopting them as a group. In the future we should expect to make a decision on each document separately. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working group document? If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why. We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this case. We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us. If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting your objection that would be great! Thanks! Jim and Antoin --047d7bdc10ec6958ce04efdf8bb5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since these documents were included in the charter we'= re going to start by adopting them as a group.=C2=A0 In the future we shoul= d expect to make a decision on each document separately.
Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as= a working group document?=C2=A0 If you, now is the time to speak up and te= ll us all why.

We'd like to suggest a relatively shor= t time period for objections in this case.=C2=A0 We have all known about th= ese documents for some time so it seems reasonable to just get started and = see where the detailed reviews takes us.

If folks would please respond to the list by close of busine= ss everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all document= s or a message noting your objection that would be great!

Thanks!

Jim and Antoin

--047d7bdc10ec6958ce04efdf8bb5-- From galvin@elistx.com Mon Jan 13 12:08:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C93F1AE098 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:08:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5RBjGMCHH0v for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:08:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F9F1AE107 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:08:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id uy17so3628093igb.4 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Kejzs/bClSzNwQk4Kq5+ExcglAsRFWtij4PaqR6T5bA=; b=dqvolIJNoKQxqYsoaL+Zxz0ydVL9oQLAeslv4BZfvEOu+VELPStawuH66GEJDp7vcY YLP0SKEe+MvX/fr/0ZziFipBygyupW8i6/sM+sAyCL2KSc2AiaQ43C8shi4g58RCGt2S W1gnPCA0Uhw6n1+cwuiUnqTUfmo36a/ykDf8/5j977A8YaombtdyXKcVNk0/a1MCV20y WjdF4EFFKfZYJ18SZNrHe9sp5AY/ulNcotX1JeGSg/uIZWhBJg5RzNMKUwZ5GaObl956 8p+nmxShTkElDzuKfINvU/MwRZzEX8w6G/z9uuvsosIjB2HT3qz86ApvVjmIf3mi9vAR bPww== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsDobGD7+vcoOiQpkRm8vYY7V3Uhy7MjgR/X1kK2wUZaI8X3t67N+2V6CGjcijpAY9oYJL MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.25.129 with SMTP id c1mr20827265igg.23.1389643669014; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:07:48 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:07:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc10ec41955304efdfa169 Subject: [eppext] meeting during London X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:08:10 -0000 --047d7bdc10ec41955304efdfa169 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 As previously noted, we have until this Friday to decide if we want a meeting slot during the London IETF. We're inclined to ask for a meeting slot but folks should feel free to disagree. It's not hard to imagine that with 5 documents we could use an opportunity to discuss any review issues. Of course, we could also choose to do all our work on the mailing list rather than using a meeting slot. If we do ask for a slot the next question is do we want a short slot of 1 hour or do we want to ask for a more typical "2 hour" slot? Finally, the most critical thing to care about if we do ask for a slot is what other meetings do we want to avoid? We have to list the conflicts we care about. So, if folks would please respond to this message on the list with one of the following options that would be great! +1 - let's have a meeting - please indicate if you think it should be 1 hour or 2 hours, and please indicate what other meetings you want to avoid. -1 - let's not have a physical meeting - any other comment you can make in support of this would be helpful. Thanks! Jim and Antoin --047d7bdc10ec41955304efdfa169 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As previously noted, we= have until this Friday to decide if we want a meeting slot during the Lond= on IETF.

We're inclined to ask for a meeting slot but folk= s should feel free to disagree.

It's not hard to imagine that with 5 documents we could = use an opportunity to discuss any review issues.=C2=A0 Of course, we could = also choose to do all our work on the mailing list rather than using a meet= ing slot.

If we do ask for a slot the next question is do we wan= t a short slot of 1 hour or do we want to ask for a more typical "2 ho= ur" slot?

Finally, the most critical thing to care about = if we do ask for a slot is what other meetings do we want to avoid?=C2=A0 W= e have to list the conflicts we care about.

So, if folks would please respond to this message on the list wit= h one of the following options that would be great!


+1 - l= et's have a meeting - please indicate if you think it should be 1 hour = or 2 hours, and please indicate what other meetings you want to avoid.

-1 - let's not have a physical meeting - any other comment yo= u can make in support of this would be helpful.



T= hanks!

Jim and Antoin


--047d7bdc10ec41955304efdfa169-- From shollenbeck@verisign.com Mon Jan 13 14:59:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47E1A1F4A for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:59:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jb7jwOxz2d9z for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:59:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og123.obsmtp.com (exprod6og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCE01AE00A for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:59:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob123.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUtRvtkBtrIvfpNKu4YJlCg3FK8dNUUzM@postini.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:59:03 PST Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0DMx1Y9007306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:59:01 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:59:01 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: James Galvin Thread-Topic: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents Thread-Index: AQHPEJpK7IPQiW1ns0OaYnjup8x9VJqDROMy Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:58:59 +0000 Message-ID: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_88E976B258C64013834A2F4825ECDF96verisigncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:59:16 -0000 --_000_88E976B258C64013834A2F4825ECDF96verisigncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 on adopting all of the documents. Scott On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" > wrote: Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by = adopting them as a group. In the future we should expect to make a decisio= n on each document separately. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working grou= p document? If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why. We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this = case. We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems re= asonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us. If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere W= ednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting you= r objection that would be great! Thanks! Jim and Antoin _______________________________________________ EppExt mailing list EppExt@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext --_000_88E976B258C64013834A2F4825ECDF96verisigncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 on adopting all of the documents.

Scott

On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com> wrote:

Since these documents were included in the charter we're g= oing to start by adopting them as a group.  In the future we should ex= pect to make a decision on each document separately.
Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working= group document?  If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all = why.

We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in = this case.  We have all known about these documents for some time so i= t seems reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews t= akes us.

If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywh= ere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a= message noting your objection that would be great!

Thanks!

Jim and Antoin

_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org
https://www.= ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
--_000_88E976B258C64013834A2F4825ECDF96verisigncom_-- From wil@cloudregistry.net Mon Jan 13 17:23:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843E41ACCE2 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:23:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.978 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BWi3_P8dfBH1 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515751ACCD9 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ex4so88662wid.15 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:22:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cHTrquvcVGP/MlAhOYj75dxiY3FNVqUhKFi1B4weUBY=; b=YSfkkehaKlS7yuzxxSpUs1OqtizBMjsnujCkGL7yDZuuN8KJApCoTJ2dF4t/w+Onwo GVGFA4538eDFuHVXou7tcPrEXqkAa2a6IeHV7r50t0lu8AH9wqC9mpR8ja9pS4795mDH aDNUCJ5ZNW+8NM512nSZ8l22xC/6ruzdoIP0FQAKDeXSKvgUzknfTzwGlBvzyilNuiVc EFtanxXffojWlSi9tiC3zHXtiWTTZI5On83M8OBYsUje/QHmOyMgV5BTd/QG3Izi0Mnr ISQUz3bi0RM2j6xA52PSJLM5njPkplLcrs+TRukAAHcmkGe/QXvpEjDWubfCPxZVpjaT EBgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnENxv/483uKlEu1iCciXyCYIh5usK0gFUU2PSguVcJGdbj26v5QoV6OJ5zy+LBWQUIOve3 X-Received: by 10.194.62.70 with SMTP id w6mr6206895wjr.55.1389662572343; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:22:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.58.138 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:22:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> References: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> From: Wil Tan Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:22:12 +1100 Message-ID: To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86e4cafb866a04efe4074e Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" , James Galvin Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:23:06 -0000 --047d7b86e4cafb866a04efe4074e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > +1 on adopting all of the documents. > > +1 .wil > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ > > --047d7b86e4cafb866a04efe4074e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --047d7b86e4cafb866a04efe4074e-- From mcanix@gmail.com Mon Jan 13 19:05:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858901AE1F5 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:05:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkApDMl1nNx0 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com (mail-ea0-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203AE1AE1EF for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:05:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l9so3077276eaj.14 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:04:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=E3EgV76BJ7SMah9ss8grOBsVI2IwCE8Vae9+LvxFduA=; b=WTQQY7vuJucIjKcEszsFv7lZYsJAT4wXw9xJ05TuiQgNH9OcZt8sVP+dGbA6ff+ynr I4pixCzPAG5vZ4c04UB/jCdjIlUseo6gg8v7Vyx/sxMlpjaCL5lGatlBAvrs2hH7Acem YQvhvMsUU3IkW/hTNzg6ezNJxiZzxUfb+qLK79p/acTgloeZ/JaOPK/Rezi7xr5MChd4 cY7gQZpfKcUWy5Jq5XuN1fX1XZTBRQQ59WBPSAnRPytWVc5GTOj8NBmrAIZeVQyEhznv pWYqRyCBiWYUjwIxrF3+QWHyR84yITHRgEkqWlElNr9TxZ993bRmmuskhgnsAIaulnBQ XQaQ== X-Received: by 10.14.174.129 with SMTP id x1mr31534477eel.19.1389668672172; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.192.25] (41-135-207-193.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.207.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm44761454eef.9.2014.01.13.19.04.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) References: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-729CCE64-08A0-458F-9ECD-61C5435F628A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7598C163-4918-41A2-A98F-96A0E2FA07FB@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) From: mike Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:04:25 +0200 To: James Galvin Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:05:21 -0000 --Apple-Mail-729CCE64-08A0-458F-9ECD-61C5435F628A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 > On 14 Jan 2014, at 0:58, "Hollenbeck, Scott" wr= ote: >=20 > +1 on adopting all of the documents. >=20 > Scott >=20 > On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" wrote: >=20 >> Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start b= y adopting them as a group. In the future we should expect to make a decisi= on on each document separately. >>=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ >>=20 >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ >>=20 >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ >>=20 >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ >>=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ >>=20 >> Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working gr= oup document? If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why. >>=20 >> We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in thi= s case. We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems r= easonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us. >>=20 >> If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere= Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting yo= ur objection that would be great! >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >> Jim and Antoin >> _______________________________________________ >> EppExt mailing list >> EppExt@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext > _______________________________________________ > EppExt mailing list > EppExt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext --Apple-Mail-729CCE64-08A0-458F-9ECD-61C5435F628A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+1

On 14 Jan 2014, at 0:58, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:

+1 on adopting all of the documents.

Scott

On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com> wrote:

Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by adopting them as a group.  In the future we should expect to make a decision on each document separately.
Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working group document?  If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why.

We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this case.  We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us.

If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting your objection that would be great!

Thanks!

Jim and Antoin

_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
--Apple-Mail-729CCE64-08A0-458F-9ECD-61C5435F628A-- From shollenbeck@verisign.com Tue Jan 14 04:03:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DCB1AE056 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:03:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owWJxs9zKToE for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og116.obsmtp.com (exprod6og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F111AE04D for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob116.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUtUnkVzhDWrIPx0u8YlDqisuT3hDQwvK@postini.com; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:03:30 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0EC3T0E005850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:03:29 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:03:28 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] meeting during London Thread-Index: Ac8RIKJ7PKNaj8BbQM+RF3luYY8exw== Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:03:28 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49319A93@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49319A93BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] meeting during London X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:03:43 -0000 --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49319A93BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RnJvbTogRXBwRXh0IFttYWlsdG86ZXBwZXh0LWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBP ZiBKYW1lcyBHYWx2aW4NClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgSmFudWFyeSAxMywgMjAxNCAzOjA4IFBNDQpU bzogZXBwZXh0QGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbZXBwZXh0XSBtZWV0aW5nIGR1cmluZyBMb25k b24NCg0KQXMgcHJldmlvdXNseSBub3RlZCwgd2UgaGF2ZSB1bnRpbCB0aGlzIEZyaWRheSB0byBk ZWNpZGUgaWYgd2Ugd2FudCBhIG1lZXRpbmcgc2xvdCBkdXJpbmcgdGhlIExvbmRvbiBJRVRGLg0K V2UncmUgaW5jbGluZWQgdG8gYXNrIGZvciBhIG1lZXRpbmcgc2xvdCBidXQgZm9sa3Mgc2hvdWxk IGZlZWwgZnJlZSB0byBkaXNhZ3JlZS4NCkl0J3Mgbm90IGhhcmQgdG8gaW1hZ2luZSB0aGF0IHdp dGggNSBkb2N1bWVudHMgd2UgY291bGQgdXNlIGFuIG9wcG9ydHVuaXR5IHRvIGRpc2N1c3MgYW55 IHJldmlldyBpc3N1ZXMuICBPZiBjb3Vyc2UsIHdlIGNvdWxkIGFsc28gY2hvb3NlIHRvIGRvIGFs bCBvdXIgd29yayBvbiB0aGUgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0IHJhdGhlciB0aGFuIHVzaW5nIGEgbWVldGlu ZyBzbG90Lg0KDQpJZiB3ZSBkbyBhc2sgZm9yIGEgc2xvdCB0aGUgbmV4dCBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBk byB3ZSB3YW50IGEgc2hvcnQgc2xvdCBvZiAxIGhvdXIgb3IgZG8gd2Ugd2FudCB0byBhc2sgZm9y IGEgbW9yZSB0eXBpY2FsICIyIGhvdXIiIHNsb3Q/DQpGaW5hbGx5LCB0aGUgbW9zdCBjcml0aWNh bCB0aGluZyB0byBjYXJlIGFib3V0IGlmIHdlIGRvIGFzayBmb3IgYSBzbG90IGlzIHdoYXQgb3Ro ZXIgbWVldGluZ3MgZG8gd2Ugd2FudCB0byBhdm9pZD8gIFdlIGhhdmUgdG8gbGlzdCB0aGUgY29u ZmxpY3RzIHdlIGNhcmUgYWJvdXQuDQpTbywgaWYgZm9sa3Mgd291bGQgcGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQg dG8gdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0IHdpdGggb25lIG9mIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgb3B0 aW9ucyB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIGdyZWF0IQ0KKzEgLSBsZXQncyBoYXZlIGEgbWVldGluZyAtIHBs ZWFzZSBpbmRpY2F0ZSBpZiB5b3UgdGhpbmsgaXQgc2hvdWxkIGJlIDEgaG91ciBvciAyIGhvdXJz LCBhbmQgcGxlYXNlIGluZGljYXRlIHdoYXQgb3RoZXIgbWVldGluZ3MgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gYXZv aWQuDQotMSAtIGxldCdzIG5vdCBoYXZlIGEgcGh5c2ljYWwgbWVldGluZyAtIGFueSBvdGhlciBj b21tZW50IHlvdSBjYW4gbWFrZSBpbiBzdXBwb3J0IG9mIHRoaXMgd291bGQgYmUgaGVscGZ1bC4N CltTQUhdICBXZWFrICsxLiBXZSBkb27igJl0IGN1cnJlbnRseSBoYXZlIGFueXRoaW5nIHRvIGNy ZWF0ZSBhbiBhZ2VuZGEsIGJ1dCBhcyB3ZSBzdGFydCB3b3JrIHRoYXQgd2lsbCBwcm9iYWJseSBj aGFuZ2UuIDEgaG91ciBuZXZlciBzZWVtcyB0byBiZSBlbm91Z2ggdGltZSwgc28gbGV04oCZcyBh c2sgZm9yIGEgdHdvLWhvdXIgc2xvdCBhbmQgc3RyaXZlIHRvIGF2b2lkIGNvbmZsaWN0cyB3aXRo IGFueSBvdGhlciBhcHBhcmVhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXBzIC0gZXNwZWNpYWxseSBXRUlSRFMuDQpT Y290dA0K --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49319A93BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJ e2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQov KiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1z b05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTps aW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6 Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29I eXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxl Ow0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNv LXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEOw0KCWZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDsNCglmb250LXN0 eWxlOm5vcm1hbDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25s eTsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0O30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWlu IDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0 aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxlPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5 XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIgc3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4N CjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlv dXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286 c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJFTi1V UyIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEi Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPkZy b206PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTom cXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90OyI+IEVwcEV4dCBbbWFpbHRv OmVwcGV4dC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXQ0KPGI+T24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIDwvYj5KYW1lcyBHYWx2 aW48YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gTW9uZGF5LCBKYW51YXJ5IDEzLCAyMDE0IDM6MDggUE08YnI+ DQo8Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IGVwcGV4dEBpZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxiPlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBbZXBwZXh0 XSBtZWV0aW5nIGR1cmluZyBMb25kb248bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0i TXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxk aXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5 bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5BcyBwcmV2aW91c2x5IG5vdGVkLCB3ZSBoYXZlIHVu dGlsIHRoaXMgRnJpZGF5IHRvIGRlY2lkZSBpZiB3ZSB3YW50IGEgbWVldGluZyBzbG90IGR1cmlu ZyB0aGUgTG9uZG9uIElFVEYuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+V2UncmUgaW5jbGluZWQgdG8gYXNr IGZvciBhIG1lZXRpbmcgc2xvdCBidXQgZm9sa3Mgc2hvdWxkIGZlZWwgZnJlZSB0byBkaXNhZ3Jl ZS48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkl0 J3Mgbm90IGhhcmQgdG8gaW1hZ2luZSB0aGF0IHdpdGggNSBkb2N1bWVudHMgd2UgY291bGQgdXNl IGFuIG9wcG9ydHVuaXR5IHRvIGRpc2N1c3MgYW55IHJldmlldyBpc3N1ZXMuJm5ic3A7IE9mIGNv dXJzZSwgd2UgY291bGQgYWxzbyBjaG9vc2UgdG8gZG8gYWxsIG91ciB3b3JrIG9uIHRoZSBtYWls aW5nIGxpc3QgcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gdXNpbmcgYSBtZWV0aW5nIHNsb3QuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwv cD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIu MHB0Ij5JZiB3ZSBkbyBhc2sgZm9yIGEgc2xvdCB0aGUgbmV4dCBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBkbyB3ZSB3 YW50IGEgc2hvcnQgc2xvdCBvZiAxIGhvdXIgb3IgZG8gd2Ugd2FudCB0byBhc2sgZm9yIGEgbW9y ZSB0eXBpY2FsICZxdW90OzIgaG91ciZxdW90OyBzbG90PzxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbToxMi4wcHQiPkZpbmFs bHksIHRoZSBtb3N0IGNyaXRpY2FsIHRoaW5nIHRvIGNhcmUgYWJvdXQgaWYgd2UgZG8gYXNrIGZv ciBhIHNsb3QgaXMgd2hhdCBvdGhlciBtZWV0aW5ncyBkbyB3ZSB3YW50IHRvIGF2b2lkPyZuYnNw OyBXZSBoYXZlIHRvIGxpc3QgdGhlIGNvbmZsaWN0cyB3ZSBjYXJlIGFib3V0LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+ PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTox Mi4wcHQiPlNvLCBpZiBmb2xrcyB3b3VsZCBwbGVhc2UgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2Ug b24gdGhlIGxpc3Qgd2l0aCBvbmUgb2YgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBvcHRpb25zIHRoYXQgd291bGQg YmUgZ3JlYXQhPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0 eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+JiM0MzsxIC0gbGV0J3MgaGF2ZSBhIG1lZXRpbmcg LSBwbGVhc2UgaW5kaWNhdGUgaWYgeW91IHRoaW5rIGl0IHNob3VsZCBiZSAxIGhvdXIgb3IgMiBo b3VycywgYW5kIHBsZWFzZSBpbmRpY2F0ZSB3aGF0IG90aGVyIG1lZXRpbmdzIHlvdSB3YW50IHRv IGF2b2lkLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAg Y2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij4tMSAtIGxldCdz IG5vdCBoYXZlIGEgcGh5c2ljYWwgbWVldGluZyAtIGFueSBvdGhlciBjb21tZW50IHlvdSBjYW4g bWFrZSBpbiBzdXBwb3J0IG9mIHRoaXMgd291bGQgYmUgaGVscGZ1bC48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9y OiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0 eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90 O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEIj5bU0FI XSAmbmJzcDtXZWFrICYjNDM7MS4gV2UgZG9u4oCZdCBjdXJyZW50bHkgaGF2ZSBhbnl0aGluZyB0 byBjcmVhdGUgYW4gYWdlbmRhLCBidXQgYXMgd2Ugc3RhcnQgd29yayB0aGF0IHdpbGwgcHJvYmFi bHkgY2hhbmdlLiAxIGhvdXIgbmV2ZXIgc2VlbXMgdG8gYmUgZW5vdWdoDQogdGltZSwgc28gbGV0 4oCZcyBhc2sgZm9yIGEgdHdvLWhvdXIgc2xvdCBhbmQgc3RyaXZlIHRvIGF2b2lkIGNvbmZsaWN0 cyB3aXRoIGFueSBvdGhlciBhcHBhcmVhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXBzIC0gZXNwZWNpYWxseSBXRUlS RFMuPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1h cmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJy aSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPlNjb3R0PG86cD48 L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2JvZHk+ DQo8L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49319A93BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_-- From gavin.brown@centralnic.com Tue Jan 14 05:42:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264021AE0D1 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:42:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.437 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9r78hXjP0L_T for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.centralnic.com (smtp.centralnic.com [193.105.170.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1431AE056 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.146] (unknown [31.68.203.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.centralnic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4A8B720835 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:41:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Brown Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7100CB9E-7212-45B5-A802-191250831A59 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a) Message-Id: <50172D22-BFE6-4B37-A6DC-533CF129A778@centralnic.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:40:54 +0000 To: "eppext@ietf.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [eppext] meeting during London X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:42:07 -0000 --Apple-Mail-7100CB9E-7212-45B5-A802-191250831A59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 - I generally agree with Scott: I'd very much like to avoid a conflict wi= th WEIRDS. G. -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC) Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with compa= ny number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR. > On 14 Jan 2014, at 12:03, "Hollenbeck, Scott" w= rote: >=20 > From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 3:08 PM > To: eppext@ietf.org > Subject: [eppext] meeting during London > =20 > As previously noted, we have until this Friday to decide if we want a meet= ing slot during the London IETF. >=20 > We're inclined to ask for a meeting slot but folks should feel free to dis= agree. >=20 > It's not hard to imagine that with 5 documents we could use an opportunity= to discuss any review issues. Of course, we could also choose to do all ou= r work on the mailing list rather than using a meeting slot. > =20 > If we do ask for a slot the next question is do we want a short slot of 1 h= our or do we want to ask for a more typical "2 hour" slot? >=20 > Finally, the most critical thing to care about if we do ask for a slot is w= hat other meetings do we want to avoid? We have to list the conflicts we ca= re about. >=20 > So, if folks would please respond to this message on the list with one of t= he following options that would be great! >=20 > +1 - let's have a meeting - please indicate if you think it should be 1 ho= ur or 2 hours, and please indicate what other meetings you want to avoid. >=20 > -1 - let's not have a physical meeting - any other comment you can make in= support of this would be helpful. >=20 > [SAH] Weak +1. We don=E2=80=99t currently have anything to create an agen= da, but as we start work that will probably change. 1 hour never seems to be= enough time, so let=E2=80=99s ask for a two-hour slot and strive to avoid c= onflicts with any other apparea working groups - especially WEIRDS. >=20 > Scott >=20 > _______________________________________________ > EppExt mailing list > EppExt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext --Apple-Mail-7100CB9E-7212-45B5-A802-191250831A59 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 - I generally agree with Scott: I'd= very much like to avoid a conflict with WEIRDS.

G.=

--
Gavin Brow= n
Chief T= echnology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry S= ervices
= for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in E= ngland and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moor= gate, London, EC2R 6AR.

On 14 Jan 2014, at 12:03, "Holle= nbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@ve= risign.com> wrote:

From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Galvin
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 3:08 PM
To: eppext@ietf.org
Subject: [eppext] meeting during London

 

As previously noted, w= e have until this Friday to decide if we want a meeting slot during the Lond= on IETF.

We're inclined to ask f= or a meeting slot but folks should feel free to disagree.

It's not hard to imagine that with 5 documents we cou= ld use an opportunity to discuss any review issues.  Of course, we coul= d also choose to do all our work on the mailing list rather than using a mee= ting slot.

 

If we do ask for a slo= t the next question is do we want a short slot of 1 hour or do we want to as= k for a more typical "2 hour" slot?

Finally, the most crit= ical thing to care about if we do ask for a slot is what other meetings do w= e want to avoid?  We have to list the conflicts we care about.

So, if folks would ple= ase respond to this message on the list with one of the following options th= at would be great!

+1 - let's have a meet= ing - please indicate if you think it should be 1 hour or 2 hours, and pleas= e indicate what other meetings you want to avoid.

-1 - let's not have a p= hysical meeting - any other comment you can make in support of this would be= helpful.

[SAH]  W= eak +1. We don=E2=80=99t currently have anything to create an agenda, but as= we start work that will probably change. 1 hour never seems to be enough time, so let=E2=80=99s ask for a two-hour slot and strive to avoid conflict= s with any other apparea working groups - especially WEIRDS.

Scott

____________________= ___________________________
EppExt mailing list
EppExt@ietf.org
<= a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext">https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/eppext
= --Apple-Mail-7100CB9E-7212-45B5-A802-191250831A59-- From gavin.brown@centralnic.com Tue Jan 14 07:35:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BF51A1F3F for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:35:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.439 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ik28JKYohWiN for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.centralnic.com (smtp.centralnic.com [193.105.170.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2FF1ADFC9 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from Gavins-iMac.local (82-68-174-118.in-addr.centralnic.net [82.68.174.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.centralnic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 547B272083E; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52D55916.3010304@centralnic.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:34:46 +0000 From: Gavin Brown Organization: CentralNic Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike , James Galvin References: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> <7598C163-4918-41A2-A98F-96A0E2FA07FB@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7598C163-4918-41A2-A98F-96A0E2FA07FB@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=F923B4CE Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rtfgnfrcpM28DQ9FlFxBwHkibexb4Iksf" Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:35:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rtfgnfrcpM28DQ9FlFxBwHkibexb4Iksf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1. I would also like to ask the group to adopt this one: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brown-epp-fees-01 Thanks, G. On 14/01/2014 03:04, mike wrote: > +1 >=20 > On 14 Jan 2014, at 0:58, "Hollenbeck, Scott" > wrote: >=20 >> +1 on adopting all of the documents. >> >> Scott >> >> On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" > > wrote: >> >>> Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to >>> start by adopting them as a group. In the future we should expect to= >>> make a decision on each document separately. >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ >>> >>> Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a >>> working group document? If you, now is the time to speak up and tell= >>> us all why. >>> >>> We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in= >>> this case. We have all known about these documents for some time so >>> it seems reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed >>> reviews takes us. >>> >>> If folks would please respond to the list by close of business >>> everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a >>> message noting your objection that would be great! >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Jim and Antoin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EppExt mailing list >>> EppExt@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext >> _______________________________________________ >> EppExt mailing list >> EppExt@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > EppExt mailing list > EppExt@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext >=20 --=20 Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC) Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR. --rtfgnfrcpM28DQ9FlFxBwHkibexb4Iksf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLVWRYACgkQ6H45IPkjtM7fFgCfX5EruHWw7FdVapQxrJ+wQfn+ 53EAnA//ODlY4VUTy/opWTiXrPj+ftW8 =fj9g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rtfgnfrcpM28DQ9FlFxBwHkibexb4Iksf-- From shollenbeck@verisign.com Tue Jan 14 07:37:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCDB1AE026 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:37:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxfX9ohrbIKM for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:37:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og119.obsmtp.com (exprod6og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B471ADFC5 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob119.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUtVZswqMClEEWLcr7YrHUhk22sD3OxNx@postini.com; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:37:27 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0EFbM8K012201 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:37:22 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:37:22 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: Gavin Brown , mike , "James Galvin" Thread-Topic: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents Thread-Index: AQHPET4xM5Vq0q90dUOj4RFUjU50zJqEWjIw Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:21 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931A53D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <88E976B2-58C6-4013-834A-2F4825ECDF96@verisign.com> <7598C163-4918-41A2-A98F-96A0E2FA07FB@gmail.com> <52D55916.3010304@centralnic.com> In-Reply-To: <52D55916.3010304@centralnic.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:39 -0000 PiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBFcHBFeHQgW21haWx0bzplcHBl eHQtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mIEdhdmluIEJyb3duDQo+IFNlbnQ6IFR1 ZXNkYXksIEphbnVhcnkgMTQsIDIwMTQgMTA6MzUgQU0NCj4gVG86IG1pa2U7IEphbWVzIEdhbHZp bg0KPiBDYzogZXBwZXh0QGlldGYub3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbZXBwZXh0XSBhZG9wdCBk b2N1bWVudHMgYXMgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBkb2N1bWVudHMNCj4gDQo+ICsxLiBJIHdvdWxkIGFs c28gbGlrZSB0byBhc2sgdGhlIGdyb3VwIHRvIGFkb3B0IHRoaXMgb25lOg0KPiANCj4gaHR0cDov L3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtYnJvd24tZXBwLWZlZXMtMDENCg0KTm8gY2FuIGRv LiBGcm9tIG91ciBjaGFydGVyIChodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL3dnL2VwcGV4 dC9jaGFydGVyLyk6DQoNCiJPbmx5IHRoZSBkZXZlbG9wbWVudCBvZiB0aGUgcmVnaXN0cmF0aW9u IHByb2Nlc3MgYW5kIHRoZSBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbi9yZWdpc3RyYXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIGZvdXIgZXh0 ZW5zaW9ucyBub3RlZCBhYm92ZSBhcmUgaW4gc2NvcGUgZm9yIHRoZSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwLiBU aGUgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBjYW4gY2hvb3NlIG5vdCB0byBwdWJsaXNoIG9yIHJlZ2lzdGVyIG9u ZSBvciBtb3JlIG9mIHRoZSBleHRlbnNpb25zIG5vdGVkIGFib3ZlLCBidXQgaXQgaXMgb3V0IG9m IHNjb3BlIHRvIHdvcmsgb24gb3RoZXIgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy4iDQoNClNjb3R0DQo= From galvin@elistx.com Thu Jan 16 13:23:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB521AC85E for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j665jvPQ7_il for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8059B1AC4AB for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id lx4so4546728iec.19 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S0F+veO8K8AlcWBgE7wL0y5ZDwb4IL+/LTNmEIPj08E=; b=j2+K9QD9F7DMlum0NHCtnlU3C/HWciIj92beoooNYQNq7jBEEhhjF68Zq3On0NEdu1 NS7DrghD7RRPqWOQ8hwr/6O0NknsM6OA+SsxIJ2srIDA4IWLXT4LAOSuGSCymw4N3WlT SlstpQOlNdu52lW/zZj8diAOXPHyQ95HPcsa6Tc0pSTk1E0y8l2v3UP1Qm2JGP3CiTVA CEVcoSxwyf+ZWRixUYyye+dk31QjhyDLIc4QffYkKsypw8q/RhnDb0wkg0mkSQCdJSEm 38ONIWsAGDfT1rWLRrOA51y2Q7YmCdCrmUMidF0/rEL0odZifRkB1RJYiHAC/NlNVM4i msgg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl5qVAUW6ChyUoPD3N8XhvAl6AxfojY2KmTjdih8fnfbcOy5e+64fP3wxeV3L7ShdPYKut5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.147.72 with SMTP id ti8mr12188431igb.20.1389907380338; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:23:00 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122a310ad1f6304f01d07e8 Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:23:15 -0000 --089e0122a310ad1f6304f01d07e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We've gotten all "+1" on these 5 documents so I'm going to make the entries in the datatracker to adopt these documents. Jim On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, James Galvin wrote: > Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by > adopting them as a group. In the future we should expect to make a > decision on each document separately. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ > > Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working > group document? If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why. > > We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this > case. We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems > reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us. > > If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere > Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting > your objection that would be great! > > Thanks! > > Jim and Antoin > > --089e0122a310ad1f6304f01d07e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We've gotten all "+1" on these 5 docume= nts so I'm going to make the entries in the datatracker to adopt these = documents.

Jim


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, James Galvin <= galvin@elistx.com> wrote:
Since these documents were included in the charter we'= re going to start by adopting them as a group.=C2=A0 In the future we shoul= d expect to make a decision on each document separately.
Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as= a working group document?=C2=A0 If you, now is the time to speak up and te= ll us all why.

We'd like to suggest a relatively shor= t time period for objections in this case.=C2=A0 We have all known about th= ese documents for some time so it seems reasonable to just get started and = see where the detailed reviews takes us.

If folks would please respond to the list by close of busine= ss everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all document= s or a message noting your objection that would be great!

Thanks!

Jim and Antoin


--089e0122a310ad1f6304f01d07e8-- From galvin@elistx.com Thu Jan 16 13:32:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE441AD8CD for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ck3nJwgg6pc2 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1041AD8C4 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uq10so8758361igb.5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SOYlQtU736+R74ROe3ikFZBNuKtsM3MWHEe7hdmJAIY=; b=HWv+2XOlwJKn2GBh9U6HnQXnxVLGHSpmuE6NdUBbzaY8f368UFT/Et7Cuv4gLHF0P6 AHKflzeZ2DUSmDBv8dLDtj4yTCS378SKs7E/GScC9VzWGynUIvej8YIckeJAaKjRzW93 TOvFA19JEHDF7HcGEdeXCxulLZ8lS9ekC6eClWK494D2PNjJi8BzIVM7jZy278eYEM6P ats2zCW6e6Rgh36Hgz+uQGdz1BkCeuWQ5tOTHr0+H40VYTw/Dw5UXktlil97t5NTqdxm SL0ZTwXp43B3+PCLUyHgYrCe1H16wbDXUm0lDvMz2i3lb94Hx/GU8PgO+qRxP/s9Nuuo BmAA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNM9n7nIlYyT6kjCI+xwOaNe3MPG02SGYkzoTLXdV8ThM/srdbzqxDJK95vkVgQt5Uc1vi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.147.72 with SMTP id ti8mr12227189igb.20.1389907946654; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:32:26 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:32:26 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122a3106e51c404f01d2921 Subject: [eppext] meeting slot for London X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:32:40 -0000 --089e0122a3106e51c404f01d2921 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 My apologies. I only just realized this message seems to have gotten stuck in my outbox. We need to decide if we want a meeting slot during the London IETF. As previously suggested we're inclined to request a slot but we're very interested in what others think. Early discussions suggested we might be able to get by without meeting at all during an IETF but people change their minds and we may have different people on this working group mailing list than have been involved previously. The concern we have with asking for a meeting slot is we don't have a well defined agenda. It's probably reasonable to expect there will be a set of issues available for discussion but, then again, there's nothing worse than asking for a meeting slot and not making effective use of it. Finally, there is the question of whether to ask for a "short" slot or a "long" slot, i.e., 1 hour or 2 hours. We need to make a decision about a meeting slot by Friday, 18 January, so please respond as soon as you can. We're inclined to ask for a short slot during the next IETF in London. We'd appreciate if folks would indicate their preferences as follows. Do you agree we should have a meeting London? If so, do you agree with the 1 hour time slot? If so, what other groups do you want to make sure we do not conflict with? Thanks, Jim and Antoin --089e0122a3106e51c404f01d2921 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My apologies.= =C2=A0 I only just realized this message seems to have gotten stuck in my o= utbox.

We need to decide if we want a meeting slot during the = London IETF.=C2=A0 As previously suggested we're inclined to request a = slot but we're very interested in what others think.=C2=A0 Early discus= sions suggested we might be able to get by without meeting at all during an= IETF but people change their minds and we may have different people on thi= s working group mailing list than have been involved previously.

The concern we have with asking for a meeting slot is we don'= t have a well defined agenda.=C2=A0 It's probably reasonable to expect = there will be a set of issues available for discussion but, then again, the= re's nothing worse than asking for a meeting slot and not making effect= ive use of it.

Finally, there is the question of whether to ask for a "shor= t" slot or a "long" slot, i.e., 1 hour or 2 hours.

We need to make a decision about a meeting slot by Friday, 18 Janu= ary, so please respond as soon as you can.

We're inclined to ask for a short slot during the = next IETF in London.=C2=A0 We'd appreciate if folks would indicate thei= r preferences as follows.

Do you agree we should have a meetin= g London?

If so, do you agree with the 1 hour time slot?

If so= , what other groups do you want to make sure we do not conflict with?
Thanks,

Jim and Antoin

--089e0122a3106e51c404f01d2921-- From Marco.Davids@sidn.nl Fri Jan 17 01:17:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51AD1ADF60 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:17:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.444 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Szj_7f2on8Eb for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:17:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ede1-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099391ADF4F for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 01:17:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn_nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:x-originating-ip; bh=asMS28KXMgBXlx4Rf3RKSqp2GDf1l/BXyI+VRg3Xbfs=; b=QfMnS305eWtPtK4Fd0sZaOu4isLyIij2+VCzZiamykuTTjnqRmE+Ucbu51DSq8/Ku62AxwGJOz8o6dYot1mCdgj8uF4+iRCROXuLgQbz6Q127QRyK1VdwZsGtTACkeIqN826qJH9ywPLCxnPbMhrRr/LCRpd5i/Ot2Ojyls7UDY= Received: from kahubcasn01.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.73]) by ede1-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id s0H9HIWM001719-s0H9HIWO001719 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL) for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:17:18 +0100 Received: from [94.198.152.214] (94.198.152.214) by kahubcasn01.SIDN.local (192.168.2.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: <52D8F51C.9090807@sidn.nl> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0100 From: "Marco Davids (SIDN)" Organization: SIDN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=9F781B52 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms030508050500030200080704" X-Originating-IP: [94.198.152.214] Subject: Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:17:35 -0000 --------------ms030508050500030200080704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/13/14 21:01, James Galvin wrote: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/ >=20 > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ +1 -- Marco --------------ms030508050500030200080704 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIMZjCC BiowggUSoAMCAQICAwa6NTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNV BAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRl IFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlh dGUgQ2xpZW50IENBMB4XDTEzMDUzMTExMDk0MloXDTE0MDYwMjAzMjc1NFowRDEdMBsGA1UE AwwUbWFyY28uZGF2aWRzQHNpZG4ubmwxIzAhBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWFG1hcmNvLmRhdmlkc0Bz aWRuLm5sMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyajTCa3uBAPAiQrrqCDe mzW5wvxaovW3h1/dCzfEuR/OZRYlgQg0dRsrGPMs+Wg2wwqPvvjsF/YQ2AeXxpzAIQVHywI5 zgZwptg0+Lv4UvFZFwHw5xdB2STvVIXFG7fuTyk5D0MkhhsO/MHjOmSucDzkH6CW/TgiBxkJ bSXIc+YOKZlI1E1q9V10rR2NW4VD27/AO71Va6sfA33qbY2MGvjR9UPB9bBjwsczeCulpNhE rIU7K4tWhgcd1DTUgz8P6pHw5bqRMzxfIQW3yHg5SnXjugCxLIfKBxIN7uXrqVmf0+haU3K/ tc6Wjl9JYjzXsdhempN1eRI3clyl6jS8YQIDAQABo4IC2jCCAtYwCQYDVR0TBAIwADALBgNV HQ8EBAMCBLAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1UdDgQWBBRn3ugN 5hkGkJ5A8hb1D6n4GcsppTAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBRTcu2SnODaywFcfH6WNU7y1LhRgjAfBgNV HREEGDAWgRRtYXJjby5kYXZpZHNAc2lkbi5ubDCCAUwGA1UdIASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYLKwYB BAGBtTcBAgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xp Y3kucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhv cml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0 aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRDb20gQ0Eg cG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBjb21w bGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCug KaAnhiVodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcB AQSBgTB/MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNz MS9jbGllbnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRz L3N1Yi5jbGFzczEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0 c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBALqkjS+NnMxn/trjz71UHJEeiNJ7rbgNxk1+ RdhMw2TKiGocYa2Ql7TfCjgknCaakk7m54Spmr7AdbSVKVffmxQFzUaq5Or5HAMtqRfWJLh1 A94gOMPaRErdoRF0PLGPrwJPbxMAH4lTOIwpRqSVnUepG4pJKEBYFMXRWBW6nSs4/RJSscAP 70qoyX/MOPWFZjuxRU9d/gqQt4rNjf3Ojq+j3omI3oS/LgVUAyCdEsg7M0SEC5eG/kxLTCH9 bzY7A98/g55OENAsVQlP43GNr+hojOva9VDyeYQTktt0AtYheb29Za/Grw7cP9UAFzOdlsDA 5uL4TzfzDsk2BIwt2ZEwggY0MIIEHKADAgECAgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNV BAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRh bCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9u IEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYDVQQG EwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwg Q2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5 IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIB AQDHCYPMzi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6ERKKnu8zP f1Jwuk0tsvVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1PKHG /FaR/wpbfuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxahNvur yGaC/o2/ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//jdiSy rrSMTGKkDiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGtMIIB qTAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg2ssB XHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYBBQUH AQEEWjBYMCcGCCsGAQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYIKwYB BQUHMAKGIWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBSMCeg JaAjhiFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9j cmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECATBm MC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsG AQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY1o95 CfegFJTwqBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnSqN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7Er1A +hKMIzEzcduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy+pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQoCRcL N5A0t4DkuVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4YjCl/Pd4MXU91y0vTipgr/ O75CDUHDRHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586YoRD9Dy3OHQgWI27 0g+5MYA8GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3a0LwZrp8MQ+Z 77U1uL7TelWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0qZW2Niy/Q vVNKbb43A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjxkJh8 BYtv9ePsXklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhdGwXV 27ioRKbj/cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jGCA90wggPZAgEBMIGU MIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2Vj dXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xh c3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECAwa6NTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIC HTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xNDAxMTcwOTE3 MTZaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBSxkR3BkBHlZoh6p610Qix77vo+mTBsBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x XzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwIC AgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMIGlBgkrBgEEAYI3 EAQxgZcwgZQwgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYD VQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFy dENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBro1MIGnBgsq hkiG9w0BCRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0 ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNV BAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMG ujUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAql6D/wES4/7JfrDQybRvBWELzQPdvqc5quOjJBES0Mtl yiOiy7I+kBqFXiP7gPQetixXnaQhKzty8JpJHDF1gpI2FiwD9Kxz074/iDXyFdw96PDA4an4 q9g7oFa7L5bEaOXTcGkaoIODGH2+aaEMyOTtLQwvJvDrMp+4v3+eP92C4k9RVH1vbwuvChYd PjM5PTIHx1FwE7CeZSby4FetEBjt1+dNWMN2sp3QPpcigrS5UotNphFoRz3ReH+7LW0CMHSH PdLjIuYKEqfaF+bGDl031H1L/MbfrxCJV5eb67vdXYUojaPIUxouBJFoTKIa+9Y0eyMeSt7P AgDNxTJnTgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms030508050500030200080704-- From galvin@elistx.com Fri Jan 17 12:18:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D827A1AC829 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:18:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d0PVSJRppQBc for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0C71AC3FA for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j1so2575317iga.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VoPGbzSD92oabh9hUjtr1PheGhEH54mZ/lWJ2I5HdWI=; b=TunPXVRZKE6BDFVOMZyE0x0qm31pBIfXdgnbxuvrzNaMi1tzGqNesIFJMUOdps4I4m X9RCFa9BvhYEJ8zXJvX01RF1aEqJh7tVZjzFrK1gCZhc8waYiBN3XqAL8MKdmgGfEx0j 2LSspk0vsL/5Ut/WXE3n//IdpfO2MxlowgIHtFcfjpvrnp2IN8QHwd2aq9OtQLqm4bIY Mm7KCFz31FG6YbUHa3wMBelzDcG+ibq0hSMQJAUwoxJ5Y8GEQYxu35NRLfXnvy/02uNQ 6LP/DSDkU8mpQZjxpHDY2VgbMjjFfZ/pUeSdozgHMn0TlEj+FvLXA56vF3kXxxnhPzzI Z7rA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoQOxHpsJQ/Jva1F377G2ljQrj7KUA43zT6Pizf6g2w0hvXQBOLl20EeeRuxvdz4JWhUnx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.51.65 with SMTP id vh1mr3598873icb.24.1389989870558; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.72.132 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.49.97.93] Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:17:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: James Galvin To: eppext@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5299ad779f28304f0303cb7 Subject: [eppext] working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:18:05 -0000 --bcaec5299ad779f28304f0303cb7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All documents have been adopted and pre-approved in the datatracker as working group documents. The names have been mapped as follows: draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ --> draft-ietf-eppext-reg draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ --> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay draft-obispo-epp-idn/ --> draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap draft-tan-epp-launchphase/ --> draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ --> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd If the authors would please resubmit their documents as working group documents we can get started talking about documents. As each document is announced folks should feel free to send comments to the list. The chairs will start a thread for each document if necessary to keep things moving. Jim --bcaec5299ad779f28304f0303cb7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All documents have been adopted and pre-approved in t= he datatracker as working group documents.

The names have been= mapped as follows:

draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/ =C2=A0--> = draft-ietf-eppext-reg
draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/ =C2=A0--> =C2=A0draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelaydraft-obispo-epp-idn/ =C2=A0--> =C2=A0draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap
draft= -tan-epp-launchphase/ =C2=A0 --> =C2=A0draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase
= draft-lozano-tmch-smd/ =C2=A0--> =C2=A0draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd

If the authors would please resubmit their documents as work= ing group documents we can get started talking about documents.

As each document is announced folks should feel free to send comment= s to the list.=C2=A0 The chairs will start a thread for each document if ne= cessary to keep things moving.

Jim

--bcaec5299ad779f28304f0303cb7-- From Antoin.Verschuren@sidn.nl Fri Jan 17 12:39:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948E11ACC81 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:39:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.444 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ywjae--lte5 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:39:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ede1-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EF91AC3FA for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:39:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn_nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; bh=KnJrIOa4i5f1f6+Tbd0PKRFly6e9Dq9Tl+x9vohrtoQ=; b=yfz96chjtTsxjGKXxLIpYG8nNZak1kUdSIJ0+yfM5kSZ319kdFppisabmrUFen79mFUlJdfuOXhfPR2s1lB0P153mm82+bWRvUm4e9O0g7hABhKVamKT/J1Vo8cShynyHZEUKp1W48ea9qVEckBJmQlltnw3sgrH7Gxu8R6tKRk= Received: from kahubcasn01.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.73]) by ede1-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id s0HKdHBX009630-s0HKdHBZ009630 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL) for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:39:17 +0100 Received: from [94.198.152.221] (94.198.152.221) by kahubcasn01.SIDN.local (192.168.2.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:39:12 +0100 Message-ID: <52D994EF.3020000@sidn.nl> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:39:11 +0100 From: Antoin Verschuren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [94.198.152.221] Subject: [eppext] IETF 89 session and agenda items request X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:39:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Colleagues, Following the guidance on the mailinglist, your chairs have requested a 1,5 hour session to meet in London for IETF 89. There has not been much discussion on the list yet, but lets start that in the coming weeks now that the documents from our charter have been adopted. I think the most important document to start with is the registry document, so let's all read that and start sending in comments. Since we will meet, we will need agenda items. It would be great if you have suggestions, so please send them to eppext-chairs@tools.ietf.org voluntarily so we don't have to harass you any further :-) Jim and Antoin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2ZTvAAoJEDqHrM883AgneCYH/3e2ywaLwnPk8IQsi4hSW8Of MV/P+4I1ruS+tL0Lvc/TVt3tilUloYYYzH7dadKreQhELnk2S5xWrVzmZgBZsbtB MomDOFSqQ23n3ColBauuLcBTrY3UaEG/LDn1jzbKj8+lZ4oISrSLCFXCiJWP4QIg cizhmAjL9udnt/VsORjfsgT1X+Fcl3/YaAlwSyxlqdl9VOcrU9RFOGgkjT8xTenq zy4Rw1+Waph+CQ72/F8ea8sUMFdsqHQsh7etn+tJ2TjkcJdskDlpVd2yGixQMgkB weiE//BgTa/k9/bhpI3iLJYXlzHMP+U2sy0awmNU7h10gty+M+1a3RmIl5DO8vU= =xFGt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From shollenbeck@verisign.com Fri Jan 17 13:19:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197311AD67A for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:19:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTGmgzPFnpUX for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com (exprod6og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3821AD66E for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUtmeUguo3ylAhRLwcLUcxvS6PUrZ/E3z@postini.com; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:19:14 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0HLJDV1030799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:19:13 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:19:13 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] working group documents Thread-Index: AQHPE8E1v+ZiagSi7kOFWA2/xaAQT5qJa7Ag Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:19:13 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931D42A@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931D42ABRN1WNEXMBX01vc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] working group documents X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:19:29 -0000 --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931D42ABRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBqdXN0IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWVwcGV4dC1yZWctMDAuDQoNClNjb3R0DQoNCkZy b206IEVwcEV4dCBbbWFpbHRvOmVwcGV4dC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2Yg SmFtZXMgR2FsdmluDQpTZW50OiBGcmlkYXksIEphbnVhcnkgMTcsIDIwMTQgMzoxOCBQTQ0KVG86 IGVwcGV4dEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KU3ViamVjdDogW2VwcGV4dF0gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBkb2N1bWVu dHMNCg0KQWxsIGRvY3VtZW50cyBoYXZlIGJlZW4gYWRvcHRlZCBhbmQgcHJlLWFwcHJvdmVkIGlu IHRoZSBkYXRhdHJhY2tlciBhcyB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGRvY3VtZW50cy4NClRoZSBuYW1lcyBo YXZlIGJlZW4gbWFwcGVkIGFzIGZvbGxvd3M6DQoNCmRyYWZ0LWhvbGxlbmJlY2stZXBwLWV4dC1y ZWcvICAtLT4gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1lcHBleHQtcmVnDQpkcmFmdC1naWViZW4tZXBwLWtleXJlbGF5 LyAgLS0+ICBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWVwcGV4dC1rZXlyZWxheQ0KZHJhZnQtb2Jpc3BvLWVwcC1pZG4v ICAtLT4gIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0LWlkbm1hcA0KZHJhZnQtdGFuLWVwcC1sYXVuY2hwaGFz ZS8gICAtLT4gIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0LWxhdW5jaHBoYXNlDQpkcmFmdC1sb3phbm8tdG1j aC1zbWQvICAtLT4gIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0LXRtY2gtc21kDQpJZiB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyB3 b3VsZCBwbGVhc2UgcmVzdWJtaXQgdGhlaXIgZG9jdW1lbnRzIGFzIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgZG9j dW1lbnRzIHdlIGNhbiBnZXQgc3RhcnRlZCB0YWxraW5nIGFib3V0IGRvY3VtZW50cy4NCkFzIGVh Y2ggZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgYW5ub3VuY2VkIGZvbGtzIHNob3VsZCBmZWVsIGZyZWUgdG8gc2VuZCBj b21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgbGlzdC4gIFRoZSBjaGFpcnMgd2lsbCBzdGFydCBhIHRocmVhZCBmb3Ig ZWFjaCBkb2N1bWVudCBpZiBuZWNlc3NhcnkgdG8ga2VlcCB0aGluZ3MgbW92aW5nLg0KSmltDQo= --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931D42ABRN1WNEXMBX01vc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTQgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 Q2FsaWJyaTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJ e2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlRhaG9tYTsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDExIDYgNCAzIDUgNCA0IDIgNDt9DQov KiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1z b05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNp emU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLCJzZXJpZiI7fQ0KYTps aW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluaw0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6 Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCmE6dmlzaXRlZCwgc3Bhbi5Nc29I eXBlcmxpbmtGb2xsb3dlZA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7DQoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxl Ow0KCXRleHQtZGVjb3JhdGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcNCgl7bXNv LXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbGlicmkiLCJzYW5z LXNlcmlmIjsNCgljb2xvcjojMUY0OTdEOw0KCWZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDsNCglmb250LXN0 eWxlOm5vcm1hbDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25s eTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsInNhbnMtc2VyaWYiO30NCkBwYWdlIFdvcmRTZWN0 aW9uMQ0KCXtzaXplOjguNWluIDExLjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW46MS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4waW4gMS4w aW47fQ0KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQ0KCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT48L3N0eWxl PjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVkZWZhdWx0cyB2OmV4dD0iZWRpdCIg c3BpZG1heD0iMTAyNiIgLz4NCjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPjwhLS1baWYgZ3RlIG1zbyA5XT48 eG1sPg0KPG86c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiPg0KPG86aWRtYXAgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQi IGRhdGE9IjEiIC8+DQo8L286c2hhcGVsYXlvdXQ+PC94bWw+PCFbZW5kaWZdLS0+DQo8L2hlYWQ+ DQo8Ym9keSBsYW5nPSJFTi1VUyIgbGluaz0iYmx1ZSIgdmxpbms9InB1cnBsZSI+DQo8ZGl2IGNs YXNzPSJXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEiPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZv bnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZxdW90Oztjb2xv cjojMUY0OTdEIj5JIGp1c3Qgc3VibWl0dGVkIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0LXJlZy0wMC48bzpw PjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9y OiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90O3Nh bnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDs7Y29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RCI+U2NvdHQ8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+ DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2Fs aWJyaSZxdW90OywmcXVvdDtzYW5zLXNlcmlmJnF1b3Q7O2NvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0QiPjxvOnA+Jm5i c3A7PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImJvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0 OnNvbGlkIGJsdWUgMS41cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowaW4gMGluIDBpbiA0LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRp diBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLXRvcDpzb2xpZCAjQjVDNERGIDEuMHB0O3BhZGRp bmc6My4wcHQgMGluIDBpbiAwaW4iPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5 bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7VGFob21hJnF1b3Q7LCZxdW90 O3NhbnMtc2VyaWYmcXVvdDsiPkZyb206PC9zcGFuPjwvYj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtUYWhvbWEmcXVvdDssJnF1b3Q7c2Fucy1zZXJpZiZx dW90OyI+IEVwcEV4dCBbbWFpbHRvOmVwcGV4dC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXQ0KPGI+T24gQmVo YWxmIE9mIDwvYj5KYW1lcyBHYWx2aW48YnI+DQo8Yj5TZW50OjwvYj4gRnJpZGF5LCBKYW51YXJ5 IDE3LCAyMDE0IDM6MTggUE08YnI+DQo8Yj5Ubzo8L2I+IGVwcGV4dEBpZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxi PlN1YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBbZXBwZXh0XSB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGRvY3VtZW50czxvOnA+PC9vOnA+ PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZu YnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9 Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5BbGwgZG9jdW1lbnRzIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBhZG9wdGVkIGFu ZCBwcmUtYXBwcm92ZWQgaW4gdGhlIGRhdGF0cmFja2VyIGFzIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgZG9jdW1l bnRzLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5UaGUgbmFt ZXMgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIG1hcHBlZCBhcyBmb2xsb3dzOjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+PGJyPg0KZHJh ZnQtaG9sbGVuYmVjay1lcHAtZXh0LXJlZy8gJm5ic3A7LS0mZ3Q7IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0 LXJlZzxicj4NCmRyYWZ0LWdpZWJlbi1lcHAta2V5cmVsYXkvICZuYnNwOy0tJmd0OyAmbmJzcDtk cmFmdC1pZXRmLWVwcGV4dC1rZXlyZWxheTxicj4NCmRyYWZ0LW9iaXNwby1lcHAtaWRuLyAmbmJz cDstLSZndDsgJm5ic3A7ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1lcHBleHQtaWRubWFwPGJyPg0KZHJhZnQtdGFuLWVw cC1sYXVuY2hwaGFzZS8gJm5ic3A7IC0tJmd0OyAmbmJzcDtkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWVwcGV4dC1sYXVu Y2hwaGFzZTxicj4NCmRyYWZ0LWxvemFuby10bWNoLXNtZC8gJm5ic3A7LS0mZ3Q7ICZuYnNwO2Ry YWZ0LWlldGYtZXBwZXh0LXRtY2gtc21kPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbToxMi4wcHQiPklmIHRoZSBh dXRob3JzIHdvdWxkIHBsZWFzZSByZXN1Ym1pdCB0aGVpciBkb2N1bWVudHMgYXMgd29ya2luZyBn cm91cCBkb2N1bWVudHMgd2UgY2FuIGdldCBzdGFydGVkIHRhbGtpbmcgYWJvdXQgZG9jdW1lbnRz LjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5 bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5BcyBlYWNoIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIGFubm91bmNlZCBm b2xrcyBzaG91bGQgZmVlbCBmcmVlIHRvIHNlbmQgY29tbWVudHMgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QuJm5ic3A7 IFRoZSBjaGFpcnMgd2lsbCBzdGFydCBhIHRocmVhZCBmb3IgZWFjaCBkb2N1bWVudCBpZiBuZWNl c3NhcnkgdG8ga2VlcCB0aGluZ3MgbW92aW5nLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2 Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5KaW08 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0K PC9odG1sPg0K --_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931D42ABRN1WNEXMBX01vc_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Jan 17 13:18:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996F71ACCFF; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:18:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkq_EBVXsfJ2; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5715E1ACC8B; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:18:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140117211854.31879.59178.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:18:54 -0800 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 05:28:47 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:18:56 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisionin= g Protocol Author : Scott Hollenbeck Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00.txt Pages : 7 Date : 2014-01-17 Abstract: The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) includes features to add functionality by extending the protocol. It does not, however, describe how those extensions are managed. This document describes a procedure for the registration and management of extensions to EPP and it specifies a format for an IANA registry to record those extensions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-reg/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun Jan 19 06:12:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1E51AD68A; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:12:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxBCI2YaPPST; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FE81ADDD0; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:12:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140119141236.21720.2158.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:12:37 -0800 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:19:47 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 14:12:39 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Key Relay Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning= Protocol Authors : R. (Miek) Gieben M. Groeneweg Rik Ribbers Antoin Verschuren Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-00.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2014-01-19 Abstract: This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the purpose of relaying DNSSEC key material from one DNS operator to another, by using the administrative registration channel through the registrant, registrar and registry. The mapping introduces "" as a new command in EPP. This command will help facilitate changing the DNS operator of a domain while keeping the DNSSEC chain of trust intact. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From pawal@blipp.com Mon Jan 20 13:44:35 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05E81A021C for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:44:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.736 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3w2ggslsGKI for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from vic20.blipp.com (cl-682.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:2a9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB61E1A01BB for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.158] (h236n9-asp-a13.ias.bredband.telia.com [2.248.172.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by vic20.blipp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 778E838075 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:44:32 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_Wallstr=F6m?= Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_71C59140-631C-469E-9015-78965318C744"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Message-Id: <6E1B455B-FDB5-4C22-9EB1-C4BBBFF41F0A@blipp.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:44:31 +0100 To: eppext@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Subject: [eppext] draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem-statement-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:44:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_71C59140-631C-469E-9015-78965318C744 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I just realised that it took such a long time finishing this text to not = read up on the provreg mailing list and just now figured out that there = was both a new working group and a new mailing list. However, I have = been looking at the registry lock issues, and think this alternative can = be of some interest. Name: draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem-statement Revision: 00 Title: EPP Registrant Security Problem Statement Document date: 2014-01-20 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 6 URL: = http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem= -statement-00.txt Status: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem-st= atement/ Htmlized: = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wallstrom-epp-registrant-problem-statemen= t-00 Abstract: This document collects a number of requirements on securing the provisioning of DNS data between a Registrant and a Registry. The most common attack in the chain of Registrant-Registrar-Registry is to inject false information into the Registrar system, which in turn forwards the injected data to the Registry using EPP, the Extensible Provisioning Protocol. --Apple-Mail=_71C59140-631C-469E-9015-78965318C744 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS3Zi/AAoJENv/4te3YknyMhMP/iCkd+x278+MAxClor/exlfp qIFJa9kN1exsoCkD6E4bz9TceUQfAmO8GPW3Tli8v8rHDWRn32bCyhYps7U7vk6q 1lSlRERfleaqIxU4n2ewMrX5E8YgrEekJSxzHa8WpeVphkQk3FSkEd31qPoBENGX pEZjy17Gfk36sSFLTLdvnt1aqoWPHA7gxgS/rwLw+SXSBpvBh+lJE1XM6cdKcGMg gov///mVbkvaxMfAvlrrPY8xmCj/rNa6+8U6bsHXwgrMjs9SFjl8kzxVUPSkN9X5 EnzVZyrVS3pE22Pmb2Gn/nJQCVl2GqvtDYPEHfNFsJbcwxRA2F8z1XJ11CjrH5Wy iAJVMp8sRqRIPeg9pyDchT0STeLX775knbdF5aD1UsxUo8Xs+Y0/B+VB7Z2MJmqH tUCeN40zTuRSNvzLdiL6NdELzbe6DzcUD1z9qg9E1Fbe9ggPNZ0t7SJP2rV5X704 gdFB874TjIxvtnx9DPT/DaocwiTd3gQfOQDyOuF1rA2435ChhrcNZ4g9hUvOXpxj v24FZo9+qLZRqSQewaOVtqSZQKJkJl1Hou2g2K7C5K0shtcNG9lC6TGHUc1H5LVL uPQAySJxh/KId5E4HViFsHISMbEkJSqW4GUWsglQY6Po47zmMXhRZHSKaxbZJrJL KsvWWlGMVmX8E9M9swjR =nM6o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_71C59140-631C-469E-9015-78965318C744-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Jan 21 07:03:40 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDF71A02C8; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:03:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpXjbE4m2Xh1; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B0D1A017E; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:03:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140121150338.10179.76576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:03:38 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:03:40 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Launch Phase Mapping for the Extensible Provision= ing Protocol (EPP) Authors : James Gould Wil Tan Gavin Brown Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-00.txt Pages : 51 Date : 2014-01-21 Abstract: This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the provisioning and management of domain name registrations and applications during the launch of a domain name registry. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From shollenbeck@verisign.com Wed Jan 22 05:54:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4071A018B for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 05:54:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8r9mbnOfId1 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 05:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og111.obsmtp.com (exprod6og111.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20491A00D6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 05:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob111.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUt/NlFT/KGetHPfnOKJQsk8lRTQzFUOn@postini.com; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 05:54:28 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0MDsReu015649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:27 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:54:27 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry Thread-Index: Ac8XeXatToMizGpTTg2N+BnTs/yFWg== Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:54:26 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931FFA5@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:54:30 -0000 Re: section 4 of draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00 IANA's registration procedures allow for a registry to be created with a se= t of initial assignments. The document currently says "None", but I don't t= hink that's optimal because there are some extensions that already exist in= RFC form. I'd like to suggest that these extensions be included as a set o= f initial assignments: RFC 3915, "Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisio= ning Protocol (EPP)" RFC 4114, "E.164 Number Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (E= PP)" RFC 5076, "ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provision= ing Protocol" RFC 5910, "Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Ext= ensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" Given that all of these documents have already been through IETF review the= y're not extensions to be reviewed by EPPEXT that aren't specified in the W= G's charter. Does this seem reasonable? Scott From JGould@verisign.com Wed Jan 22 11:28:37 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394D21A03EF for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:28:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xvYy2N64OhW6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og127.obsmtp.com (exprod6og127.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D58A1A02D5 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob127.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUuAb4gUdLfLaplZbAMIwhWLYL9KgBpXe@postini.com; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:28:34 PST Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0MJSYoS026498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:28:34 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:28:33 -0500 From: "Gould, James" To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" , "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry Thread-Index: Ac8XeXatToMizGpTTg2N+BnTs/yFWgALqE4A Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:28:33 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931FFA5@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613 x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:28:37 -0000 That sounds reasonable to me. --=20 =20 JG =20 =20 James Gould Principal Software Engineer jgould@verisign.com =20 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com On 1/22/14, 8:54 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: >Re: section 4 of draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00 > >IANA's registration procedures allow for a registry to be created with a >set of initial assignments. The document currently says "None", but I >don't think that's optimal because there are some extensions that already >exist in RFC form. I'd like to suggest that these extensions be included >as a set of initial assignments: > >RFC 3915, "Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible >Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" > >RFC 4114, "E.164 Number Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol >(EPP)" > >RFC 5076, "ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible >Provisioning Protocol" > >RFC 5910, "Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the >Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" > >Given that all of these documents have already been through IETF review >they're not extensions to be reviewed by EPPEXT that aren't specified in >the WG's charter. Does this seem reasonable? > >Scott >_______________________________________________ >EppExt mailing list >EppExt@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext From Marc.Groeneweg@sidn.nl Fri Jan 24 05:39:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BBB1A035F for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:39:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.441 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnUjO5AhjwBO for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ede1-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD891A037A for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:39:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn_nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-originating-ip:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=RsfNLI1twqY80YKi9wMOCS0b7j7V32/FCgd7fPKk03c=; b=ECvkfnG9bkUGY0xwWOnFXc2MhoIh4jLQ7rLESuyfjUvPJjui3Fm81pOeatOYrnHC6ayEO3qbKKUCDPBAb29BbvQJryb1kStbSnc8CNX05J7l57AAZCwfFhzliGyEr6O4KysC+RTtJS/YMLFhjQ0i2yPVlGgDCtwRnI7OvdEVBH4= Received: from kahubcasn02.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.74]) by ede1-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id s0ODdMTr027682-s0ODdMTt027682 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL) for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:39:22 +0100 Received: from KAMBX1.SIDN.local ([fe80::5cc9:593d:1302:cd69]) by kahubcasn02 ([192.168.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:39:16 +0100 From: Marc Groeneweg To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry Thread-Index: Ac8XeXatToMizGpTTg2N+BnTs/yFWgALqE4AAFg3rrA= Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:39:16 +0000 Message-ID: <5BFD186DCB661E4D951017B0818285AE93284D3A@kambx1.SIDN.local> References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4931FFA5@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.155] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:39:26 -0000 Scott, I agree. There is no need for a review by the EPPEXT, and can be included i= n the initial assignment to the registry. Regards, Marc Groeneweg SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | Postbus 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM T +31 (0)26 352 55 66 | M +31 (0)6 15 06 32 09 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05=20 marc.groeneweg@sidn.nl | www.sidn.nl -----Original Message----- From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gould, James Sent: woensdag 22 januari 2014 20:29 To: Hollenbeck, Scott; eppext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [eppext] Initial Registrations for the Extension Registry That sounds reasonable to me. --=20 =20 JG =20 =20 James Gould Principal Software Engineer jgould@verisign.com =20 703-948-3271 (Office) 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com On 1/22/14, 8:54 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: >Re: section 4 of draft-ietf-eppext-reg-00 > >IANA's registration procedures allow for a registry to be created with=20 >a set of initial assignments. The document currently says "None", but I=20 >don't think that's optimal because there are some extensions that=20 >already exist in RFC form. I'd like to suggest that these extensions be=20 >included as a set of initial assignments: > >RFC 3915, "Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible=20 >Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" > >RFC 4114, "E.164 Number Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning=20 >Protocol (EPP)" > >RFC 5076, "ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible=20 >Provisioning Protocol" > >RFC 5910, "Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the=20 >Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" > >Given that all of these documents have already been through IETF review=20 >they're not extensions to be reviewed by EPPEXT that aren't specified=20 >in the WG's charter. Does this seem reasonable? > >Scott >_______________________________________________ >EppExt mailing list >EppExt@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext _______________________________________________ EppExt mailing list EppExt@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Jan 24 05:51:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5A51A037D; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:51:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkfX-vUSBy6p; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4CB1A0238; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:51:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140124135105.15610.83715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:51:05 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:51:06 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisionin= g Protocol Author : Scott Hollenbeck Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2014-01-24 Abstract: The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) includes features to add functionality by extending the protocol. It does not, however, describe how those extensions are managed. This document describes a procedure for the registration and management of extensions to EPP and it specifies a format for an IANA registry to record those extensions. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-reg/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-eppext-reg-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From shollenbeck@verisign.com Fri Jan 24 05:55:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8921A1A02DD for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:55:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ILo3DssjlgN for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og104.obsmtp.com (exprod6og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB001A0215 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:55:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUuJw2+82cIeuk/Dua2EV5CaClJOs/6IT@postini.com; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 05:55:39 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0ODtcOS025251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:55:38 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:55:38 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHPGQtW/ll1oZgryE2hE1iQ/knURpqT5Vlw Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:37 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933291B@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <20140124135105.15610.83715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20140124135105.15610.83715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:55:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 8:51 AM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: eppext@ietf.org > Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol > Extensions Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > Title : Extension Registry for the Extensible > Provisioning Protocol > Author : Scott Hollenbeck > Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2014-01-24 This version contains initial registry entries for the four RFCs described = in this message: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/current/msg00025.html Scott From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jan 27 07:48:12 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6524C1A0251; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IKlMv8J-g6JV; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97261A021B; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:48:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140127154810.5734.96703.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:48:10 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:48:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Internationalized Domain Name Mapping Extension f= or the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Authors : Francisco Obispo Luis Enrique Munoz Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2014-01-27 Abstract: This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the provisioning of Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) stored in a shared central repository. This mapping extends the EPP domain name mapping to provide additional features required to implement registrations of domain names in characters sets other than ASCII. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From fobispo@uniregistry.com Mon Jan 27 07:51:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D0C1A0228 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:51:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Tp20KVOeSC7 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:51:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.hostingnet.com (mail.hostingnet.com [208.87.35.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9B81A021B for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:51:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.15] (ip72-211-217-143.oc.oc.cox.net [72.211.217.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fobispo@uniregistry.com) by mail.hostingnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 821B8469D5C for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:51:26 -0800 (PST) From: Francisco Obispo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:51:23 -0800 References: <20140127154811.5734.15595.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: eppext@ietf.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Subject: [eppext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:52:04 -0000 Just re-submitted the following: Begin forwarded message: > Name: draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap > Revision: 00 > Title: Internationalized Domain Name Mapping Extension = for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) > Document date: 2014-01-27 > Group: eppext > Pages: 10 > URL: = http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00.txt > Status: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-00 -- Francisco Obispo CTO - Registry Operations fobispo@uniregistry.com PGP Key ID: 0xB38DB1BE =20 From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jan 27 08:08:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6079C1A02F1; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:08:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKsXnI32N1_E; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796621A02E8; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:08:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140127160846.14597.38966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:08:46 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:08:50 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Internationalized Domain Name Mapping Extension f= or the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Authors : Francisco Obispo Luis Enrique Munoz Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2014-01-27 Abstract: This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) extension mapping for the provisioning of Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) stored in a shared central repository. This mapping extends the EPP domain name mapping to provide additional features required to implement registrations of domain names in characters sets other than ASCII. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From fobispo@uniregistry.com Mon Jan 27 08:12:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457771A02C5 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:12:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkZTOBUcJKom for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.hostingnet.com (mail.hostingnet.com [208.87.35.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE421A029F for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.15] (ip72-211-217-143.oc.oc.cox.net [72.211.217.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fobispo@uniregistry.com) by mail.hostingnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E12EB469C60 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:12:41 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Francisco Obispo In-Reply-To: <20140127160846.14597.38966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:12:38 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <198D66DD-B9BE-40C6-A792-DF570D900963@uniregistry.com> References: <20140127160846.14597.38966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Subject: Re: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:12:46 -0000 Had to re-submit because we (the authors) are now working for = Uniregistry, and noticed that the organization =93abbrev=94 field was = still reading ISC. Apologies. Francisco On Jan 27, 2014, at 8:08 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. > This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol = Extensions Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > Title : Internationalized Domain Name Mapping = Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) > Authors : Francisco Obispo > Luis Enrique Munoz > Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-01.txt > Pages : 10 > Date : 2014-01-27 -- Francisco Obispo CTO - Registry Operations fobispo@uniregistry.com PGP Key ID: 0xB38DB1BE =20 From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jan 27 14:34:33 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7641A03D8; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:34:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QA4XZXDF7w59; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:34:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356761A0068; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:34:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140127223431.22157.94216.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:34:31 -0800 Cc: eppext@ietf.org Subject: [eppext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-00.txt X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:34:33 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensio= ns Working Group of the IETF. Title : Mark and Signed Mark Objects Mapping Author : Gustavo Lozano Filename : draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-00.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2014-01-27 Abstract: This document describes the format of a mark and a digitally signed mark, referred to as a signed mark and the Signed Mark Data (SMD) file as defined by the ICANN Trademark Clearinghouse. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From shollenbeck@verisign.com Wed Jan 29 05:32:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9D1A0266 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:32:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fckQIkta5UpB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF191A020D for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUukDAM0fbQCb7ouRovFpaaQAgx+0BK8G@postini.com; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:32:49 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0TDWmKt008789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:32:48 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:32:47 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Specification Required Thread-Index: Ac8c9pkm56wGri8HR2ecRGtQHvliDA== Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:32:47 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933A5F9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [eppext] Specification Required X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:32:54 -0000 Reference this WG document: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01 It's also helpful to review Section 4.1 of RFC 5226: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1 Section 3.1 of reg-01 says that 'The "Specification Required" policy descri= bed in RFC 5226 [RFC5226] MUST be followed' and 'Note that the "Specificati= on Required" policy implies review by a Designated Expert'. I want to expli= citly call this out for discussion because it gets to the crux of how exten= sions will eventually be reviewed prior to registration by IANA. Is this th= e right approach? We could also require discussion on a mailing list; is it= worth suggesting that eppext@ietf.org be used for that purpose even after = the WG completes its work and is closed? There are other options for IANA registration policies, including Private U= se, Experimental Use, Hierarchical Allocation, First Come First Served, Exp= ert Review, RFC Required, IETF Review, Standards Action, and IESG Approval.= I proposed "Specification Required" because I think it makes sense to have= extensions documented in a publicly-visible specification *and* public rev= iew will help us prevent extension duplication. Scott From james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au Wed Jan 29 05:55:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767251A02C8 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:55:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.197 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxFI8MeqsGoc for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx01.ausregistry.net.au (mx01.ausregistry.net.au [120.29.249.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454961A0367 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 05:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO ausregistry.com.au) ([10.30.220.61]) by iron01.off08.stkildard.vic.ausregistry.com.au with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2014 00:54:08 +1100 Received: from MELEX01.ausregistrygroup.local ([10.11.220.61]) by OFFEX01.ausregistrygroup.local ([169.254.2.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:55:35 +1100 From: James Mitchell To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" , "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] Specification Required Thread-Index: AQHPHPnIs6zaqDEELUmiNoIrogZ+9w== Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:55:34 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-AU, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030 x-originating-ip: [180.181.200.123] x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <5F2CC9652DE5EA49B378A97421665612@ausregistry.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] Specification Required X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:55:41 -0000 It was my understanding that one of the goals of eppext is to promote publication of _existing_ EPP extensions as a mechanism to prevent further duplication. Several registries have =B3key-value pair=B2 extensions, howev= er your last sentence suggests that the public will identify duplication within these and allow only one to be registered with IANA? James On 30/01/2014 12:32 am, "Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: >Reference this WG document: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-reg-01 > >It's also helpful to review Section 4.1 of RFC 5226: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226#section-4.1 > >Section 3.1 of reg-01 says that 'The "Specification Required" policy >described in RFC 5226 [RFC5226] MUST be followed' and 'Note that the >"Specification Required" policy implies review by a Designated Expert'. I >want to explicitly call this out for discussion because it gets to the >crux of how extensions will eventually be reviewed prior to registration >by IANA. Is this the right approach? We could also require discussion on >a mailing list; is it worth suggesting that eppext@ietf.org be used for >that purpose even after the WG completes its work and is closed? > >There are other options for IANA registration policies, including Private >Use, Experimental Use, Hierarchical Allocation, First Come First Served, >Expert Review, RFC Required, IETF Review, Standards Action, and IESG >Approval. I proposed "Specification Required" because I think it makes >sense to have extensions documented in a publicly-visible specification >*and* public review will help us prevent extension duplication. > >Scott >_______________________________________________ >EppExt mailing list >EppExt@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext From bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch Wed Jan 29 06:22:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747F41A039C for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.435 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWaMLqhNUUv8 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51B01A0207 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8W2E-0001ev-5W; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:22:34 +0100 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:22:34 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933A5F9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933A5F9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [eppext] Specification Required X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:22:29 -0000 Hi Scott et al. As the IETF Designated Expert for ENUM I could shortly outline, how this works for ENUM. In fact, I see a lot of similarities in process between IANA registration of EPP Extensions and Enumservices. [RFC 6117] defines the IANA registration process for Enumservices with policy "Specification Required" (which includes Expert Review). Further comments inline. On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > Section 3.1 of reg-01 says that 'The "Specification Required" policy > described in RFC 5226 [RFC5226] MUST be followed' and 'Note that the > "Specification Required" policy implies review by a Designated Expert'. > I want to explicitly call this out for discussion because it gets to the > crux of how extensions will eventually be reviewed prior to registration > by IANA. Is this the right approach? We could also require discussion on > a mailing list; is it worth suggesting that eppext@ietf.org be used for > that purpose even after the WG completes its work and is closed? In ENUM we require [RFC 6117] discussion on the (kept-open ENUM) mailing list from the begining. This ensures gathering of early comments by the community, and thus leads to better quality of the specification at the time of Expert Review. In addition, as IESG Designated Expert, I inform the ENUM mailing list about the start of the Expert Review process to allow for (late) comments on the to be reviewed version. After conclusion of the Expert Review, I also post its results to the ENUM mailing list. (While both these steps are not required, I consider it as good practice to keep the process as transparent and open as possible.) > There are other options for IANA registration policies, including > Private Use, Experimental Use, Hierarchical Allocation, First Come First > Served, Expert Review, RFC Required, IETF Review, Standards Action, and > IESG Approval. I proposed "Specification Required" because I think it > makes sense to have extensions documented in a publicly-visible > specification *and* public review will help us prevent extension > duplication. I agree with you and suggest to apply a similar policy and practices as used for Enumservices [RFC 6117]. cheers, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Tech Consulting for Internet Technology From shollenbeck@verisign.com Wed Jan 29 06:36:44 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBE41A03E0 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:36:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Je95J5d5CD7s for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og122.obsmtp.com (exprod6og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB681A03DF for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob122.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUukR9H8VDA4UIwZ42hAvZuxiCWH94xAk@postini.com; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 06:36:40 PST Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s0TEaaAb000819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:36:36 -0500 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:36:35 -0500 From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" To: "james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au" , "eppext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [eppext] Specification Required Thread-Index: AQHPHPnIs6zaqDEELUmiNoIrogZ+95qbw7TA Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:36:34 +0000 Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933A77E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [eppext] Specification Required X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: EPPEXT List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:36:45 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:james.mitchell@ausregistry.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:56 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott; eppext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [eppext] Specification Required >=20 > It was my understanding that one of the goals of eppext is to promote > publication of _existing_ EPP extensions as a mechanism to prevent > further duplication. Several registries have =B3key-value pair=B2 > extensions, however your last sentence suggests that the public will > identify duplication within these and allow only one to be registered > with IANA? Specific recommendations are a matter for the designated expert and review = process to decide, but I do not think our purpose is to create a registry t= hat does nothing more than list existing extensions. Scott