Subject: [Hipsec] Base draft - 01-pre2

From: [email-masked] (Henderson, Thomas R)
Date: Thu Oct 21 11:44:00 2004

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Nikander [mailto:[email-masked]]=20
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 8:16 AM
> To: Petri Jokela
> Cc: Henderson, Thomas R; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Base draft - 01-pre2
>=20
>=20
> >> Why is CLOSE/CLOSE_ACK Packet Type value TBD?  Makes it=20
> tough to try=20
> >> to interoperate these packets.   Can we pick some values now?
> >
> > How about 10 and 11?
>=20
> I would suggest the following values, and also reordering
> Sections 7 and 8 to reflect the same logic.
>=20
> I1		1
> R1		2
> I2		3
> R2		4
> CER		5
> UPDATE	6
> NOTIFY	7
> CLOSE	8
> CACK	9
> BOS	   	  --remove--  (should be an extension, separate=20
> document)
> PAYLOAD   --remove--  (should be an extension, separate document)
>=20

I agree with the above renumbering and dropping BOS and PAYLOAD for now.

Tom=20