Subject: [Hipsec] RE: Numbering of TLVs

From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:56:15 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Petri Jokela [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 1:03 AM
> To: Henderson, Thomas R
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: Numbering of TLVs
> 
> 
> > have been spaced to allow for future protocol extensions.  
> Parameters
> > numbered between 0-1023 are used in HIP handshake and 
> update procedures
> 
> Was there any reasoning ealier to put them below 512?

I do not know any such reason.  The below scheme is somewhat arbitrary
too, but one has to draw lines somewhere.

> 
> > to insert a new parameter between two existing ones, it is 
> numbered to
> > split the difference between the two, etc.
> 
> Ok. Any objections to the proposed numbering?
> 

> > ECHO_REQUEST 	1022		896
> > ECHO_RESPONSE 	1024		960
Just that these should also be bumped up by 1 (as per previous message
on critical bit for these parameters).

Tom

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec