From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Thu Feb 21 23:29:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6DC21F8EF7 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:29:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.189 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fT1YRXCaTWV for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E3C21F8439 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:29:32 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-7e-51271e5bfc06 Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D7.7D.10459.B5E17215; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:29:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.44] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: <51271E5B.1030904@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:29:31 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrOJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW6MnHqgweN57BZTF01mtlh4bx6r A5PH4Qv3WTyWLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXRtmwWU8F7jopDX1ayNTC2sXcxcnJICJhI rF/fzAZhi0lcuLceyObiEBI4ySgx9+YNRghnDaPE/rXNzF2MHBy8AtoSnU+iQRpYBFQlnp66 CjaITcBCYsut+ywgJaICURJX9lmChHkFBCVOznzCAmKLCEhK9NxdCmYzA7VOXb0WrFVYwFbi 5J3bTBA3SEosmtYJVaMnMeVqCyOELS+x/e0cZhBbCOiC5c9aWCYwCsxCsmIWkpZZSFoWMDKv YmTPTczMSS833MQIDLyDW37r7mA8dU7kEKM0B4uSOG+Y64UAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTi Q4xMHJxSwJB6uKrtvfK8g8GT7auz39+JsKvz3SHr1HhTdJuo+PlZX24mSoScy9Dvl360rV5B /8pi/lcM221uJmfXhXN/ln81uahv46r5M6PTO8Tvs+uzbhSvevbT2cjj1tc8vbfeG6araFzU mr7urqOxjOHpZieDTXWSq5bwRFsxb9kkIp/tnLk1y9lRRYmlOCPRUIu5qDgRAJRubioKAgAA Cc: Leo Vegoda Subject: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:29:34 -0000 Folks, note Leo's message below. He sent it to the original authors, who are not reachable under those email addresses any longer. Please, provide Leo with an answer. Cheers, Gonzalo > -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Vegoda > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:01 AM > To: 'pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com'; 'julien.ietf@laposte.net'; > 'Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr' > Subject: ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 > > Dear RFC 4843 Authors, > > 2001:10::/28 was allocated on a temporary basis in line with the > instructions in RFC 4843. The allocation is due to expire in March 2014 and > we plan to remove the registration for 2001:10::/28 in April 2014. > > I am sending this note now, so that you know we plan to remove the > registration. The new registration procedures for the IANA IPv6 Special > Purpose Address Registry require IETF Review for a renewal or new > registration and as that could take some time I thought it was best to > provide a year's notice. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Kind regards, > > Leo Vegoda > ICANN/IANA From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Feb 25 12:56:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C2B21F91ED; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:56:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.533 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKV-iFzyrAJs; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A8121F922F; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:56:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.40 Message-ID: <20130225205602.10859.40074.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:56:02 -0800 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-11.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:56:03 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of t= he IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) Author(s) : Robert Moskowitz Tobias Heer Petri Jokela Thomas R. Henderson Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-11.txt Pages : 125 Date : 2013-02-25 Abstract: This document specifies the details of the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). HIP allows consenting hosts to securely establish and maintain shared IP-layer state, allowing separation of the identifier and locator roles of IP addresses, thereby enabling continuity of communications across IP address changes. HIP is based on a SIGMA- compliant Diffie-Hellman key exchange, using public key identifiers from a new Host Identity namespace for mutual peer authentication. The protocol is designed to be resistant to denial-of-service (DoS) and man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. When used together with another suitable security protocol, such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP), it provides integrity protection and optional encryption for upper-layer protocols, such as TCP and UDP. This document obsoletes RFC 5201 and addresses the concerns raised by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It also incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-11 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Mon Feb 25 14:12:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2A021F9251 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thh3pmX04JPb for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.96.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC1C21F9036 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r1PMCpEx013062 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:12:52 -0600 Received: from XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-05.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.109]) by stl-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r1PMCoKn013051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:12:51 -0600 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.240]) by XCH-NWHT-05.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.109]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:50 -0800 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" , HIP Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:12:50 -0800 Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 Thread-Index: Ac4QzmF1rszN6/KsScqlINd9fCi5AwC1eZYw Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CE@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <51271E5B.1030904@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51271E5B.1030904@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: No Cc: 'Julien Laganier' , Leo Vegoda , "'fdupont@isc.org'" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:12:57 -0000 Gonzalo and Leo,=20 I believe that this issue can be addressed by submitting RFC4843-bis for IE= SG review. The latest draft [*] contains a proposal in the IANA Considerat= ions section to allocate a new block to replace the experimental one. =20 My understanding is that RFC4843-bis is ready for WGLC and has no open issu= es against it; perhaps Julien and Francis can confirm. - Tom [*] http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-03.txt > -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:30 PM > To: HIP > Cc: Leo Vegoda > Subject: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 >=20 > Folks, >=20 > note Leo's message below. He sent it to the original authors, who are > not reachable under those email addresses any longer. Please, provide > Leo with an answer. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Gonzalo >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Leo Vegoda > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:01 AM > > To: 'pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com'; 'julien.ietf@laposte.net'; > > 'Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr' > > Subject: ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 > > > > Dear RFC 4843 Authors, > > > > 2001:10::/28 was allocated on a temporary basis in line with the > > instructions in RFC 4843. The allocation is due to expire in March > 2014 and > > we plan to remove the registration for 2001:10::/28 in April 2014. > > > > I am sending this note now, so that you know we plan to remove the > > registration. The new registration procedures for the IANA IPv6 > > Special Purpose Address Registry require IETF Review for a renewal or > > new registration and as that could take some time I thought it was > > best to provide a year's notice. > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Leo Vegoda > > ICANN/IANA >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Mon Feb 25 14:29:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930D021F9292 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ll8DiIZHMHIz for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3042021F9239 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r1PMTia6001391 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:44 -0800 Received: from XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.114]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r1PMThnH001383 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:44 -0800 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.240]) by XCH-NWHT-11.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.114]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:43 -0800 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:29:43 -0800 Thread-Topic: WG draft status check Thread-Index: Ac4Tp5vZFaMeHg83QbC+2nv66He9Bg== Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CF@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: No Cc: HIP Subject: [Hipsec] WG draft status check X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:29:45 -0000 Gonzalo, I closed the last remaining issues from WGLC on the 5201-bis draft, and pos= ted a new revision (-11) today. It seems to me that the following two drafts are ready for IESG review: - RFC 5201-bis - RFC 5202-bis We need RFC 4843-bis to complete the set of base specifications, but as I m= entioned in the previous post, this appears to be ready now for WGLC and pe= rhaps will also soon be ready for IESG review. Could you let us know the sequence of next steps, whether to start with IES= G review of RFC 5201/02 by themselves, or hold them until 4843-bis can also= be submitted with them? As for our other drafts, my understanding of the status is as follows: - 4423-bis has a number of unresolved comments against it; however, this is= not normative specification and although it has been associated with the a= bove three in our charter milestones, I do not think it should block moving= forward on the other three - Julien posted last year that bis versions of RFC5203-05 were close to bei= ng ready for WGLC, and there was some light discussion of them and no major= issues seemed to be present, so it seems to me that the WG would be able t= o review them in WGLC shortly if draft updates could be posted.=20 - Ari has been refreshing the RELOAD and native NAT traversal drafts waitin= g for review on the base documents to clear - we will need also to pick up the mobility, multihoming, and certs specifi= cations, all of which I can support if we can clear the queue of the base s= pecs Tom From leo.vegoda@icann.org Mon Feb 25 14:36:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B2821E80D4 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:36:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ES41PWRGZNi0 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CB321E80CA for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:36:15 -0800 From: Leo Vegoda To: "Henderson, Thomas R" , 'Gonzalo Camarillo' , HIP Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:36:14 -0800 Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 Thread-Index: Ac4QzmF1rszN6/KsScqlINd9fCi5AwC1eZYwAAD92KA= Message-ID: <5648A8908CCB564EBF46E2BC904A75B15EFE3B569E@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <51271E5B.1030904@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CE@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> In-Reply-To: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CE@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE1365.76ACBDE0" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:27:01 -0800 Cc: 'Julien Laganier' , "'fdupont@isc.org'" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:36:16 -0000 ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE1365.76ACBDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Tom, Thanks for letting us know about this. It would be helpful if you could update the IANA Considerations section to include all the values specified in 2.2.1 of RFC-to-be-bonica-special-purpose-07. Thanks, Leo -----Original Message----- From: Henderson, Thomas R [mailto:thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:13 PM To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo'; HIP Cc: Leo Vegoda; 'Julien Laganier'; 'fdupont@isc.org' Subject: RE: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 Gonzalo and Leo, I believe that this issue can be addressed by submitting RFC4843-bis for IESG review. The latest draft [*] contains a proposal in the IANA Considerations section to allocate a new block to replace the experimental one. My understanding is that RFC4843-bis is ready for WGLC and has no open issues against it; perhaps Julien and Francis can confirm. - Tom [*] http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-03.txt > -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:30 PM > To: HIP > Cc: Leo Vegoda > Subject: [Hipsec] ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 > > Folks, > > note Leo's message below. He sent it to the original authors, who are > not reachable under those email addresses any longer. Please, provide > Leo with an answer. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Leo Vegoda > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:01 AM > > To: 'pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com'; 'julien.ietf@laposte.net'; > > 'Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr' > > Subject: ORCHID 2001:10::/28 allocation expires in March 2014 > > > > Dear RFC 4843 Authors, > > > > 2001:10::/28 was allocated on a temporary basis in line with the > > instructions in RFC 4843. The allocation is due to expire in March > 2014 and > > we plan to remove the registration for 2001:10::/28 in April 2014. > > > > I am sending this note now, so that you know we plan to remove the > > registration. The new registration procedures for the IANA IPv6 > > Special Purpose Address Registry require IETF Review for a renewal or > > new registration and as that could take some time I thought it was > > best to provide a year's notice. > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Leo Vegoda > > ICANN/IANA > > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE1365.76ACBDE0 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIRfzCCA7cw ggKfoAMCAQICEAzn4OUX2Eb+j+Vg/BvwMDkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwZTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx FTATBgNVBAoTDERpZ2lDZXJ0IEluYzEZMBcGA1UECxMQd3d3LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbTEkMCIGA1UE AxMbRGlnaUNlcnQgQXNzdXJlZCBJRCBSb290IENBMB4XDTA2MTExMDAwMDAwMFoXDTMxMTExMDAw MDAwMFowZTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxFTATBgNVBAoTDERpZ2lDZXJ0IEluYzEZMBcGA1UECxMQd3d3 LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbTEkMCIGA1UEAxMbRGlnaUNlcnQgQXNzdXJlZCBJRCBSb290IENBMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEArQ4VzuRDgFyxh/O3YPlxEqWu3CaUiKr0zvUgOShY YAz4gNqpFZUyYTy1sSiEiorcnwoMgxd6j5Csiud5U1wxhCr2D5gyNnbM3t08qKLvavsh8lJh358g 1x/isdn+GGTSEltf+VgYNbxHzaE2+Wt/1LA4PsEbw4wz2dgvGP4oD7Ong9bDbkTAYTWWFv5ZnIt2 bdfxoksNK/8LctqeYNCOkDXGeFWHIKHP5W0KyEl8MZgzbCLph9AyWqK6E4IR7TkXnZk6cqHm+qTZ 1Rcxda6FfSKuPwFGhvYoecix2uRXF8R+HA6wtJKmVrO9spftqqfwt8WoP5UW0P+hlusIXxh3TwID AQABo2MwYTAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUReuir/SS y4IxLVGLp6chnfNtyA8wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUReuir/SSy4IxLVGLp6chnfNtyA8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEFBQADggEBAKIOvN/i7fDjcnN6ZJS/93Jm2DLkQnVirofr8tXZ3lazn8zOFCi5DZdgXBJMWOTT PYNJRViXNWkaqEfqVsZ5qxLYZ4GE338JPJTmuCYsIL09syiJ91//IuKXhB/pZe+H4N/BZ0mzXeuy CSrrJu14vn0/K/O3JjVtX4kBtklbnwEFm6s9JcHMtn/C8W+GxvpkaOuBLZTrQrf6jB7dYvG+UGe3 bL3z8R9rDDYHFn83fKlbbXrxEkZgg9cnBL5Lzpe+w2cqaBHfgOcMM2a/Ew0UbvN/H2MQHvqNGyVt bI+lt2EBsdKjJqEQcZ2t4sP5w5lRtysHCM4u5lCyp/oKRS+i8PIwggbNMIIFtaADAgECAhAG/fkD lgOt6gAK6z8nu7obMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMGUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxEaWdp Q2VydCBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEHd3dy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20xJDAiBgNVBAMTG0RpZ2lDZXJ0IEFz c3VyZWQgSUQgUm9vdCBDQTAeFw0wNjExMTAwMDAwMDBaFw0yMTExMTAwMDAwMDBaMGIxCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxEaWdpQ2VydCBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEHd3dy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20x ITAfBgNVBAMTGERpZ2lDZXJ0IEFzc3VyZWQgSUQgQ0EtMTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAOiCLZn5ysJClaWAc0Bw0p5WVFypxNJBBo/JM/xNRZFcgZ/tLJz4FlnfnrUkFcKY ubR3SdyJxArar8tea+2tsHEx6886QAxGTZPsi3o2CAOrDDT+GEmC/sfHMUiAfB6iD5IOUMnGh+s2 P9gww/+m9/uizW9zI/6sVgWQ8DIhFonGcIj5BZd9o8dD3QLoOz3tsUGj7T++25VIxO4es/K8DCuZ 0MZdEkKB4YNugnM/JksUkK5ZZgrEjb7SzgaurYRvSISbT0C58Uzyr5j79s5AXVz2qPEvr+yJIvJr GGWxwXOt1/HYzx4KdFxCuGh+t9V3CidWfA9ipD8yFGCV/QcEogkCAwEAAaOCA3owggN2MA4GA1Ud DwEB/wQEAwIBhjA7BgNVHSUENDAyBggrBgEFBQcDAQYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMDBggrBgEF BQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwgwggHSBgNVHSAEggHJMIIBxTCCAbQGCmCGSAGG/WwAAQQwggGkMDoGCCsG AQUFBwIBFi5odHRwOi8vd3d3LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbS9zc2wtY3BzLXJlcG9zaXRvcnkuaHRtMIIB ZAYIKwYBBQUHAgIwggFWHoIBUgBBAG4AeQAgAHUAcwBlACAAbwBmACAAdABoAGkAcwAgAEMAZQBy AHQAaQBmAGkAYwBhAHQAZQAgAGMAbwBuAHMAdABpAHQAdQB0AGUAcwAgAGEAYwBjAGUAcAB0AGEA bgBjAGUAIABvAGYAIAB0AGgAZQAgAEQAaQBnAGkAQwBlAHIAdAAgAEMAUAAvAEMAUABTACAAYQBu AGQAIAB0AGgAZQAgAFIAZQBsAHkAaQBuAGcAIABQAGEAcgB0AHkAIABBAGcAcgBlAGUAbQBlAG4A dAAgAHcAaABpAGMAaAAgAGwAaQBtAGkAdAAgAGwAaQBhAGIAaQBsAGkAdAB5ACAAYQBuAGQAIABh AHIAZQAgAGkAbgBjAG8AcgBwAG8AcgBhAHQAZQBkACAAaABlAHIAZQBpAG4AIABiAHkAIAByAGUA ZgBlAHIAZQBuAGMAZQAuMAsGCWCGSAGG/WwDFTASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMHkGCCsGAQUF BwEBBG0wazAkBggrBgEFBQcwAYYYaHR0cDovL29jc3AuZGlnaWNlcnQuY29tMEMGCCsGAQUFBzAC hjdodHRwOi8vY2FjZXJ0cy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20vRGlnaUNlcnRBc3N1cmVkSURSb290Q0EuY3J0 MIGBBgNVHR8EejB4MDqgOKA2hjRodHRwOi8vY3JsMy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20vRGlnaUNlcnRBc3N1 cmVkSURSb290Q0EuY3JsMDqgOKA2hjRodHRwOi8vY3JsNC5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20vRGlnaUNlcnRB c3N1cmVkSURSb290Q0EuY3JsMB0GA1UdDgQWBBQVABIrE5iymQftHt+ivlcNK2cCzTAfBgNVHSME GDAWgBRF66Kv9JLLgjEtUYunpyGd823IDzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEARlA+ybcoJKc4HbZb Ka9Sz1LpMUerVlx71Q0LQbPv7HUfdDjyslxhopyVw1Dkgrkj0bo6hnKtOHisdV0XFzRyR4WUVtHr uzaEd8wkpfMEGVWp5+Pnq2LN+4stkMLA0rWUvV5PsQXSDj0aqRRbpoYxYqioM+SbOafE9c4deHaU JXPkKqvPnHZL7V/CSxbkS3BMAIke/MV5vEwSV/5f4R68Al2o/vsHOE8Nxl2RuQ9nRc3Wg+3nkg2N sWmMT/tZ4CMP0qquAHzunEIOz5HXJ7cW7g/DvXwKoO4sCFWFIrjrGBpN/CohrUkxg0eVd3HcsRtL SxwQnHcUwZ1PL1qVCCkQJjCCBu8wggXXoAMCAQICEAmikGzxxvIMBd9PYyGKsbkwDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxFTATBgNVBAoTDERpZ2lDZXJ0IEluYzEZMBcGA1UECxMQd3d3 LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbTEhMB8GA1UEAxMYRGlnaUNlcnQgQXNzdXJlZCBJRCBDQS0xMB4XDTEyMDQx OTAwMDAwMFoXDTE1MDQxOTEyMDAwMFowgZ0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYDVQQIEwpDYWxpZm9y bmlhMRcwFQYDVQQHEw5NYXJpbmEgZGVsIFJleTE8MDoGA1UEChMzSW50ZXJuZXQgQ29ycG9yYXRp b24gZm9yIEFzc2lnbmVkIE5hbWVzIGFuZCBOdW1iZXJzMQ0wCwYDVQQLEwRJQU5BMRMwEQYDVQQD EwpMZW8gVmVnb2RhMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAsIUmGgavivswQIL8 JZT5Wgt+ngArvy8YrEUqVehgVTeefuv8Xcnf5Fe4gXakjLAV99amHl7fQd0i+K6pwHsQSNi5ffqd z1xae39j7Apn8A64LatEuKlMhEKKGHp8z0KNQHp4U1zSTCrmda2Cp6orzKonYWw3hD6U4+uSTwVR Hsar6LLXWskzrsWKfLzgDuGXXorTj/CsIfd1RqmSa9q/gQ8gWFf/gkkV0a9uSpLVyLEeltCV7krf VJ01gCZbptxToKoqCHKR50YpmW9E66BlTeB33rL00gLfE2WrwiEm6t5f8NRelY82TMkQxxgR99p5 frIEx6XWhG0V4xs5TdMDEQIDAQABo4IDYzCCA18wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUFQASKxOYspkH7R7for5X DStnAs0wHQYDVR0OBBYEFE4+04DSX9o5Qv6xycNaafTyRJVZMB8GA1UdEQQYMBaBFGxlby52ZWdv ZGFAaWNhbm4ub3JnMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUH AwIwfQYDVR0fBHYwdDA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybDMuZGlnaWNlcnQuY29tL0RpZ2lDZXJ0QXNz dXJlZElEQ0EtMS5jcmwwOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmw0LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbS9EaWdpQ2VydEFz c3VyZWRJRENBLTEuY3JsMIIBxQYDVR0gBIIBvDCCAbgwggG0BgpghkgBhv1sBAECMIIBpDA6Bggr BgEFBQcCARYuaHR0cDovL3d3dy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20vc3NsLWNwcy1yZXBvc2l0b3J5Lmh0bTCC AWQGCCsGAQUFBwICMIIBVh6CAVIAQQBuAHkAIAB1AHMAZQAgAG8AZgAgAHQAaABpAHMAIABDAGUA cgB0AGkAZgBpAGMAYQB0AGUAIABjAG8AbgBzAHQAaQB0AHUAdABlAHMAIABhAGMAYwBlAHAAdABh AG4AYwBlACAAbwBmACAAdABoAGUAIABEAGkAZwBpAEMAZQByAHQAIABDAFAALwBDAFAAUwAgAGEA bgBkACAAdABoAGUAIABSAGUAbAB5AGkAbgBnACAAUABhAHIAdAB5ACAAQQBnAHIAZQBlAG0AZQBu AHQAIAB3AGgAaQBjAGgAIABsAGkAbQBpAHQAIABsAGkAYQBiAGkAbABpAHQAeQAgAGEAbgBkACAA YQByAGUAIABpAG4AYwBvAHIAcABvAHIAYQB0AGUAZAAgAGgAZQByAGUAaQBuACAAYgB5ACAAcgBl AGYAZQByAGUAbgBjAGUALjB3BggrBgEFBQcBAQRrMGkwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3Nw LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbTBBBggrBgEFBQcwAoY1aHR0cDovL2NhY2VydHMuZGlnaWNlcnQuY29tL0Rp Z2lDZXJ0QXNzdXJlZElEQ0EtMS5jcnQwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEA VN4mVoZkm08GF7JKGVvt2zFb/aFODAeOjG85lmeIM9HtarJeTrFJ6ww+Xtui3k6KW+36ZNEkymAI XmCwusEHEGCcTdJOHUkeS2euySQPZe7ztBD1e7UUmn1YOS0FbZZlLLkgDIsKtYbs637SVe7Oiyax L+JrHiWao8AsnJyl5MuYh9OnuYJG30MdnPAuUeLhzpG3PfqaMYimVDjgjW4rlhW6TuDOmEHB+VQX yy/izPxyibwR6Mn7VsaNJ35tkJBy+lhOG6QllfW2dqHg8R3/+a1eyyhKQMR2lz3EGmC5MtRGA0Ta 1tSgOaIAlvQfcmyyI6zZmi4ujjve0aPdaZQb8zGCA74wggO6AgEBMHYwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx FTATBgNVBAoTDERpZ2lDZXJ0IEluYzEZMBcGA1UECxMQd3d3LmRpZ2ljZXJ0LmNvbTEhMB8GA1UE AxMYRGlnaUNlcnQgQXNzdXJlZCBJRCBDQS0xAhAJopBs8cbyDAXfT2MhirG5MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCg ggIdMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEzMDIyNTIyMzYx NFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFF9KbJQpE6V72iNbAbukH/VGJ0SnMIGFBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxeDB2 MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxEaWdpQ2VydCBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEHd3dy5kaWdp Y2VydC5jb20xITAfBgNVBAMTGERpZ2lDZXJ0IEFzc3VyZWQgSUQgQ0EtMQIQCaKQbPHG8gwF309j IYqxuTCBhwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxeKB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxEaWdpQ2Vy dCBJbmMxGTAXBgNVBAsTEHd3dy5kaWdpY2VydC5jb20xITAfBgNVBAMTGERpZ2lDZXJ0IEFzc3Vy ZWQgSUQgQ0EtMQIQCaKQbPHG8gwF309jIYqxuTCBqwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMYGdMIGaMAsGCWCGSAFl AwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEARYwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIA gDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAHBgUrDgMCGjALBglghkgB ZQMEAgMwCwYJYIZIAWUDBAICMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQCATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQArVkgT25lV qqT9WVvbUHKJd5fsH3cLg5XBTDbOvOdHekBn2Kk+TWajKItwQTrHBLQ9XsHXERXuBd4bFqOWjwd6 hiuyr23jR66DwNH/AEnnCpGVTVBDSpdaDx8KtJwwBR8oDK0xsMzCR0Tm34V9aRlDw+uvzeKfVQxw xNV5pWHkXkqkpYKkXBtPC6Mq2d0mdLc/hvPb607/cFk72GRvbUkvadDdfQNpbeTRD+0ofjqPUKkG vXF1NVQKp9iZcUXoucl+ZXssxxJY3NhDEyHap+mz8NohMOat7D0Kopxhmo2ixKufxjQj1nAnNOdO F90RQ+jXo7OIdRW+8D59TlvJvRu1AAAAAAAA ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01CE1365.76ACBDE0-- From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Mon Feb 25 23:49:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E022D21F8652 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:49:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuEfD9PUFZJ3 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FC121F8651 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:49:40 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-9d-512c69127ab4 Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0C.61.19728.2196C215; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:49:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.33] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:49:38 +0100 Message-ID: <512C6912.1070206@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:49:38 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrAJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja5wpk6gwae5PBZTF01mdmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxsFZD1kLnjBWzHoxg62BcQtjFyMnh4SAicSmvT9YIWwxiQv3 1rN1MXJxCAmcZJTYsWseO4SzhlHi6ZEmoA4ODl4BbYmzb11BTBYBVYm/F6tBetkELCS23LrP AhIWFYiSuLLPEiTMKyAocXLmExYQW0RAUqLn7lIwW1hAU2LamR1QayUlFk3rBIszC+hJTLna wghhy0tsfzuHGcQWAlq6/FkLywRG/llIxs5C0jILScsCRuZVjOy5iZk56eVGmxiBoXRwy2/V HYx3zokcYpTmYFES5w13vRAgJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgVGz++ht/mOv6t6G LHJe/0fcf7ez2borCnl/Xy+t87q0c5dImJ6Tg1qr8HSdJqv9ljkt8f0MBxvEHoRtmrhg0wWP 91uqD/CFbzt4bUWecsDC5/u2O63PFva8elNHaR/3gg1l7xbH6wm6bkl9aROVvbZN/e+RjuPm dc9v7eWMn9rmfEWMqTbI84MSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgCS+Mww8wEAAA== Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:49:41 -0000 Hi, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on March 12th: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Mon Feb 25 23:52:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1427421F8673 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:52:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.197 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9-EPQEQDuOE for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEF121F8659 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:52:20 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-9a-512c69b2a8ac Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0F.52.10459.2B96C215; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:52:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.33] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:52:17 +0100 Message-ID: <512C69B1.9010307@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:52:17 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrEJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6mTJ1Ag5vN0hZTF01mdmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxs/2b0wFjxkrjp+ex9jAuJmxi5GTQ0LARKJ/3R9mCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgInGSUerT/FDuGsYZSYt6sZrINXQFui52QjC4jNIqAq0X/rCSuIzSZgIbHl1n2g OAeHqECUxJV9lhDlghInZz4BKxcRkJToubsUzBYWMJJY8/0Y1BGSEoumdYLFmQX0JKZcbWGE sOUltr+dA3acENDa5c9aWCYw8s9CMnYWkpZZSFoWMDKvYmTPTczMSS833MQIDKeDW37r7mA8 dU7kEKM0B4uSOG+Y64UAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYzd4ts3z+0WcHwaNHX3 JuXmic/KV+zYOvUizzMLBuNCTXPrt7+TF/278kltosPOfM/15Zlt/06dVrO/m+3eJGanfO8g X3+pcbrs1awD8UdfL7h1Uqel8dRdTzX2/m5tg+XK5nMFFf7l9V512iQ1J+n5kbBkm4k2ofo/ OJn/CpYYumZb8y6S9lBiKc5INNRiLipOBABO30M39QEAAA== Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:52:22 -0000 Hi, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on March 12th: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Mon Feb 25 23:58:59 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5308621F8891 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:58:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.198 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nALAZUVJT1Kx for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4E621F8890 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:58:58 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-91-512c6b418578 Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id CE.43.19728.14B6C215; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:58:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.33] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:58:56 +0100 Message-ID: <512C6B40.2080508@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:58:56 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Henderson, Thomas R" References: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CF@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> In-Reply-To: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E507880CF@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3RtcxWyfQ4Oh8CYupiyYzW0z7cJ7F gcnj98E3zB5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MpYsuUua8FHoYp5jdUNjB/5uhg5OSQETCTW tF9lhrDFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwklHictcNdghnDaPElkPzWEGqeAW0JTZNvQvWwSKgKnFr2wEm EJtNwEJiy637LF2MHByiAlESV/ZZQpQLSpyc+YQFxBYRsJS49rONDcRmFpCUWL7pF5gtLKAk 8fVLA9hIIYFQiZtz5oDFOQXCJDq/PGGDOE5SYtG0ThaIXj2JKVdbGCFseYntb+dA9WpLLH/W wjKBUWgWktWzkLTMQtKygJF5FSN7bmJmTnq50SZGYKAe3PJbdQfjnXMihxilOViUxHnDXS8E CAmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamDczK7495bfr5RiVQ8FsR1Vv5nTz0xaWXX6x5nn rzPlM3e+YXp6xibs7by+P8+ueHsvuxuw5tUcp0cyCQk90Z0LDi49PMXx8Rq27U/Lt50yMny0 bfoM32NMUmGuaYsWlb2S2bH1l2rg+e1ubXuN1X48/na+5/PeL1I3n2j78ueVcSzO3/3IeOVi LyWW4oxEQy3mouJEAJyczBIiAgAA Cc: HIP Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WG draft status check X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 07:58:59 -0000 Hi Tom, thanks for your email. RFC 5202bis and RFC 4843bis have not had their WGLCs yet. I have just started both of them. The idea was to get the IESG to review RFC 4423bis, RFC 5201bis, RFC 5202bis, and RFC 4843bis as a group. However, if RFC 4423bis is not ready in time, we can take the other three to the IESG. With respect to the native NAT traversal draft, it will be updated when the base specs are stable. The RELOAD draft will be updated shortly because I requested the approval of the base RELOAD spec yesterday. I hope RFC5203-06bis and the multihoming draft will be ready for WGLC after the IETF... but as usual, the accurateness of all these estimations depends heavily on how many cycles editors and reviewers are willing to put into this. Cheers, Gonzalo On 26/02/2013 12:29 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: > Gonzalo, > > I closed the last remaining issues from WGLC on the 5201-bis draft, and posted a new revision (-11) today. > > It seems to me that the following two drafts are ready for IESG review: > - RFC 5201-bis > - RFC 5202-bis > > We need RFC 4843-bis to complete the set of base specifications, but as I mentioned in the previous post, this appears to be ready now for WGLC and perhaps will also soon be ready for IESG review. > > Could you let us know the sequence of next steps, whether to start with IESG review of RFC 5201/02 by themselves, or hold them until 4843-bis can also be submitted with them? > > As for our other drafts, my understanding of the status is as follows: > - 4423-bis has a number of unresolved comments against it; however, this is not normative specification and although it has been associated with the above three in our charter milestones, I do not think it should block moving forward on the other three > - Julien posted last year that bis versions of RFC5203-05 were close to being ready for WGLC, and there was some light discussion of them and no major issues seemed to be present, so it seems to me that the WG would be able to review them in WGLC shortly if draft updates could be posted. > - Ari has been refreshing the RELOAD and native NAT traversal drafts waiting for review on the base documents to clear > - we will need also to pick up the mobility, multihoming, and certs specifications, all of which I can support if we can clear the queue of the base specs > > Tom > > > > From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Tue Feb 26 00:04:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC3F21F88C8 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:04:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZaFlhvNnL6F for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:04:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6054F21F88B1 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:04:15 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-b1-512c6c7ed30c Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 70.34.19728.E7C6C215; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:04:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.33] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:04:11 +0100 Message-ID: <512C6C7B.3050104@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:04:11 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Moskowitz References: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E4C38C07D@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <50644F67.7060000@htt-consult.com> In-Reply-To: <50644F67.7060000@htt-consult.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW59jk6gwepNzBZTF01mtmhY95nR YtqH8ywOzB6/D75h9tg9qYndY8mSn0wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGc2fV7EWnGKtuPT6K3MD 406WLkZODgkBE4klx3sZIWwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAmcZJS4tvoaI4SzhlHi8rSDzF2MHBy8AtoS s58qgJgsAqoSsx+WgfSyCVhIbLl1nwUkLCoQJXFlnyVImFdAUOLkzCdgq0QEtCRuXt/ABmIz C4RJLNvUzgxiCwMNfHX1MBNIq5BAhcTOXawgYU4BfYnGszOgrpSUWDStkwWiVU9iytUWRghb XmL72zlgY4SAxix/1sIygVFoFpLNs5C0zELSsoCReRUje25iZk56udEmRmDgHtzyW3UH451z IocYpTlYlMR5w10vBAgJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgXF5ny1GoMC1Hu3KL0mnN 4imCmb2RjOdXtZ6Qff3lU1LkgjP7vVOT+8wfyZ04+Oluw/zLjvZr5OIUbXYe7WxQTt2a1T3r 0uOb//c5/Pohpfui9tPdc806vQUNoYpX5u2/Zy1iqdoQl28yX9TykHSxtGlF6Hn30kdBpmfj XrVo7fNsir3SN7VLiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAv4bpFCoCAAA= Cc: HIP WG Subject: Re: [Hipsec] review of RFC4423-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:04:27 -0000 Hi, >> Regarding whether it should be published as Informational or PS RFC, I don't have a strong opinion. I guess I would lean towards Informational since it is not normative specification, but I would yield to whatever is best current practice in the IETF for documents such as these. > > Same here. These sorts of RFCs have traditionally been informational. > Don't know what the current IESG position is. We have been having similar discussions within the IESG lately. The current trend makes me lean towards Informational as well. When I pub request this document, I will note that regardless of what our charter says, we want it published as an Informational RFC. Cheers, Gonzalo