From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Mon Jul 1 06:26:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B4921F99B0 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaNZMzEypXs7 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717B521F9AD6 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r61DPuF2024377 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:25:56 -0700 Received: from XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-10.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.113]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r61DPsfI024354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:25:55 -0700 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.238]) by XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.113]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:25:54 -0700 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Samu Varjonen'" , "hipsec@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:25:53 -0700 Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt Thread-Index: Ac4wQzEwxXI6peyISdSEMT0UpfRdqBGGtOew Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED6C951D5@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <20130401183023.13191.54752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515BE4B3.5070302@helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: <515BE4B3.5070302@helsinki.fi> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:26:16 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Samu Varjonen > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:14 AM > To: hipsec@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I have some cycles that I can use to get this document forward. This is > the initial submission it does not differ from the RFC6253. What would > be the next steps for this document? Has anyone raised any > comments/questions that should be fixed before this can be taken > forward? To my knowledge there are none. Samu, I reviewed this draft, compared it with the RFC, and found some small edito= rial differences (perhaps applied by the RFC Editor) that should be reappli= ed, in my opinion. Also, the document should point to the bis version of = RFC5201. I'll send those to you off list. Other than that, I do not think= any changes are needed and I think that this is ready for WGLC. - Tom From mattes@asguardnetworks.com Mon Jul 1 16:05:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11811E82F9 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:05:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.377 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_27=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ea+Rbp3DEbwt for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC28A11E82D8 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v14so3009609pde.4 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Id/vVG36Byepv8F+YSZXUUMmxtAEN6jy0zlkTVINbvY=; b=Dhj7Zp1ellpxxIc16LXANOlv3EjKqRmUl4gmapwAepHub1s08+BsiXIiwS4/jsXywB yDc3Xw+pb+Hlae/j6BzlTdqdnyAXkDLQxkLXhKnWnCRQomLa3KTJtMNnIdaKDU/A0+2S h36rXnYKBA9zk6GsgPX2NQgmLyTTMCVKOWH13EUwQNOk7d9Tnv67E379t1CGdCFHV6Lc n1fepuReGiHG8iKv9TDoZPcscsAV95kH22SRJvWMLaTMdGiYEFS1dVeUm1/A2kz4H9KD qkvKTpQFtLjrcmNzRAFKHJzpmFWp2dZcvsalW3+fqs7uIUtLltGVOpw3PQImT/fTDpYc Mgbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.186.193 with SMTP id fm1mr26053849pbc.163.1372719905437; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.244.132 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [24.18.247.105] In-Reply-To: <515BE4B3.5070302@helsinki.fi> References: <20130401183023.13191.54752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <515BE4B3.5070302@helsinki.fi> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:05:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Mattes To: Samu Varjonen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmY48v20dIljsn2zEVCq05g+EO00A1iJrLl6eVJ5DLwHen719Kdgg+jqFytrJXoBRj7371l Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-00.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:05:10 -0000 On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Samu Varjonen w= rote: > > Hi all, > > I have some cycles that I can use to get this document forward. This is t= he initial submission it does not differ from the RFC6253. What would be th= e next steps for this document? Has anyone raised any comments/questions th= at should be fixed before this can be taken forward? To my knowledge there = are none. > > BR, > Samu Varjonen > Hi Samu, I have reviewed the draft as well. I just have a couple questions/comments about Section 3. Other than this I think this is ready to move forward. Section 3, Paragraph 1: Why do you use normative MUSTs for the Issuer and Subject Alternative Names? Is it because these certificates would not otherwise have Distinguished Names? If you could add a sentence about the rationale behind these MUSTs, that would be helpful. It is not clear why I might have the situation described in paragraph 1 versus paragraph 2. Section 3, Paragraph 3: Can the MUST be changed to a SHOULD? I ask because a remote peer may be pre-configured with the CA chain, and is therefore unnecessary to send the intermediate CAs. Thank you, David -- David Mattes Founder, Asguard Networks 425-213-4691 (c) dm.asguard (skype) http://asguardnetworks.com From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Thu Jul 4 23:03:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020DE11E8242 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:03:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.654 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.595, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t-iCiqnuDmPb for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A4C21F9C2D for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:03:05 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7ef76d000004bbc-dc-51d66198caf2 Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6D.E4.19388.89166D15; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:03:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.156] (153.88.183.16) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 08:03:03 +0200 Message-ID: <51D66196.2040107@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:03:02 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrEJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6MxGuBBndWyFlMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGTN/32UteMRU8XP5PuYGxulMXYycHBICJhI//3cxQ9hiEhfu rWcDsYUEDjNKTF+o3cXIBWSvZpQ4O+8pWIJXQFuiaftVVhCbRUBF4vWudYwgNpuAhcSWW/dZ QGxRgSiJ1t6pzBD1ghInZz4Bi4sISEr03F0KZgsD9bbc3sACsVhSYsuLdnYQm1lAT2LK1RZG CFteYvvbOcwQB2lLLH/WwjKBkX8WkrGzkLTMQtKygJF5FSN7bmJmTnq5+SZGYDgd3PLbYAfj pvtihxilOViUxHk3650JFBJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cCotV2v8JPSrI67LmmN v+T+LttvlBZVsOmGlOKit4n8ISVvLfpXGne5R4Xlr7dnTDLWKju8tP9s1Hnm5Vpx90xKD7J4 T7+/Kd7l6OYGTVWBVdM4jL+tXW8mLT7z4nq92vw/8ktfKXrl7LD/U/WIVeDtSuE8lUdTrr+1 PKx7i/2Wvrymq7aNkrsSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgDU1SP09QEAAA== Subject: [Hipsec] Nomcom still beating bushes X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 06:03:11 -0000 Hi, I have been asked to distribute this email on this list: > In case you missed it, the Nomcom is still looking for volunteers for > the pool. Please consider submitting your name. You can send a > message to nomcom-chair-2013@ietf.org to do so. Some background about > the nomcom is at https://www.ietf.org/nomcom/. Cheers, Gonzalo From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Jul 10 02:56:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FAF21F9EF2; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:56:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.556 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b41uOkSwghoz; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D2721F9EE1; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:56:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2 Message-ID: <20130710095624.8522.78216.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 02:56:24 -0700 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:56:26 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of t= he IETF. Title : Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport= Format with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Author(s) : Petri Jokela Robert Moskowitz Jan Melen Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03.txt Pages : 36 Date : 2013-07-10 Abstract: This memo specifies an Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) based mechanism for transmission of user data packets, to be used with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Wed Jul 10 12:47:43 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019C21F9D5E for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddRaBoX-mKeV for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slb-mbsout-01.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-01.boeing.com [130.76.64.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DBD21F9D56 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slb-mbsout-01.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6AJlYYG006155 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:35 -0700 Received: from XCH-NWHT-01.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-01.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.70.222]) by slb-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6AJlXbo006150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:33 -0700 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.238]) by XCH-NWHT-01.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.70.222]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:33 -0700 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" , HIP Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:47:32 -0700 Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis Thread-Index: Ac5syXBZvQDOX6QAQGqsnvhcIJSsnQQ3DIJQ Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED6C9525E@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <512C6912.1070206@ericsson.com> <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2E513280A6@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1F03C185-5919-48BE-9492-90A7049A8F46@nomadiclab.com> <51C16FC5.8030900@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51C16FC5.8030900@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable Cc: "rgm@icsalabs.com" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:47:43 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 1:46 AM > To: HIP > Cc: Petri Jokela; Henderson, Thomas R; rgm@icsalabs.com > Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis >=20 > Folks, >=20 > note that we are waiting for this issue to be resolved in order to > request the publication of RFC4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Gonzalo >=20 Gonzalo and all, with the recently posted revision of rfc5202-bis, are we n= ow ready to request publication of these three drafts? - Tom From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Thu Jul 11 00:20:23 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FA421F9A29 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:20:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.945 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.346, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHvSzEgQkxvH for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF6A21F9AE9 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:20:14 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f456d000002e83-16-51de5ca0f57b Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AC.4D.11907.0AC5ED15; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:20:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.214.22.100] (153.88.183.19) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:20:00 +0200 Message-ID: <51DE5CA0.4010708@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:20:00 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6CmHuBBusnWllMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGQs+TWYumM1R8XDvfNYGxlOsXYycHBICJhJrX3yFssUkLtxb z9bFyMUhJHCUUeJnxxtGCGc1o8T/zZvAqngFtCVerb3CAmKzCKhK/Dh2hQnEZhOwkNhy6z5Y XFQgSqK1dyozRL2gxMmZT8DiIgKSEj13l4LZwgJuEhu+LWKB2CwpseVFOzuIzSygJzHlagsj hC0vsf3tHLA5QkB7lz9rYZnAyD8LydhZSFpmIWlZwMi8ipGjOLU4KTfdyGATIzCkDm75bbGD 8fJfm0OM0hwsSuK8W/TOBAoJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgtLsWdCTUcrrKraet NzZKeJVfnHGPP+7Vnyiz9VODNv/P0vj/Vkut8tzSnuR2N979rM4r4w1fPKnblp//4Jog/+Hw xNPpPc/PvxDpN3PdOLlZ89Sf7vcX/8i+0i+I2rtmRkTK8ZykN5METi3Zfznn2npb5WVp2yvS J/uKhar0HZbf9nmy3sEALiWW4oxEQy3mouJEAEBu1GP3AQAA Subject: [Hipsec] References to expired work in progress in 4843bis and 5201bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:20:23 -0000 Hi, as you know, we are preparing the publication request for 4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis. The two former drafts have references to work in progress that has expired years ago. Do we want to keep those references in the drafts (see below)? Thanks, Gonzalo http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04#section-9 [PRIVACYTEXT] Dupont, F., "A Simple Privacy Extension for Mobile IPv6", Work in Progress, July 2006. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-mip6-privacyext-04 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12#section-12 [I-D.ietf-btns-c-api] Richardson, M., Williams, N., Komu, M., and S. Tarkoma, "C-Bindings for IPsec Application Programming Interfaces", draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04 (work in progress), March 2009. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04 From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Thu Jul 11 00:25:07 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE94D21F9CCA for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:25:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.709 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.540, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82TNIYz3tZbD for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BB721F938E for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:25:02 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-4f-51de5db27aab Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 88.C2.05990.2BD5ED15; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [147.214.22.100] (153.88.183.146) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: <51DE5DB2.70408@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:24:34 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Moskowitz X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrJJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7m2HuBBl+vMFlMXTSZ2aJh3WdG ByaP3ZOa2D2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx6PkzxoKVjBWP/9xgbWDsZOxi5OSQEDCR WH3rLTuELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgcOMEp/Xz2GEcNYwShw/d5QJpIpXQFPi+tV+MJtFQFXi6Z8/ bCA2m4CFxJZb91lAbFGBKInW3qnMEPWCEidnPgGLiwhoSdy8vgGsnllAUmL5pl9gtrCArsSH ro1sEFdISmx50c4OUaMnMeVqCyOELS+x/e0csJlCAtoSy5+1sExgFJiFZMUsJC2zkLQsYGRe xciem5iZk15utIkRGHwHt/xW3cF455zIIUZpDhYlcd7NemcChQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KL DzEycXBKNTAaBqwwupKrE/DaeKXOH025pQbh3H9cDv+ZbWe0/Hbup6ZJXpfn35oiJ8v1R6rz b9uWiUGOAX9X+k7mEbhtL/FzqeB11sff/BIFE75/Zaz46HpKxtrM+9Nhm2uXfuqxS69awtZ+ I+Kt+vv0+Bjtmp5nU5IXJh7QvbhOSt3Iq4LPg/Ng7alXeYFKLMUZiYZazEXFiQCJs3C4DAIA AA== Cc: HIP Subject: [Hipsec] Status of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:25:07 -0000 Hi Bob, what is the status of 4423bis? The current draft expired a few months ago: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-05 Thanks, Gonzalo From mkomu@cs.hut.fi Thu Jul 11 01:51:04 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E5A21F9956 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:51:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1yfFsuAjS7FK for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E6321F9702 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 01:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59BC308387 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:50:57 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <51DE71F2.8050602@cs.hut.fi> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:50:58 +0300 From: Miika Komu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <51DE5DB2.70408@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51DE5DB2.70408@ericsson.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:51:04 -0000 Hi Gonzalo, On 11/07/13 10:24, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Bob, > > what is the status of 4423bis? The current draft expired a few months ago: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-05 I have promised to help with Bob with 4423bis during this summer. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jul 15 15:00:01 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39B321E816A; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:00:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.539 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVFiHW3Cni9d; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D0221E80EB; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:59:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2 Message-ID: <20130715215957.5664.89919.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:59:57 -0700 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-06.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:00:02 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of t= he IETF. Title : Host Mobility with the Host Identity Protocol Author(s) : Thomas R. Henderson Christian Vogt Jari Arkko Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-06.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2013-07-15 Abstract: This document defines mobility extensions to the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). Specifically, this document defines a general "LOCATOR_SET" parameter for HIP messages that allows for a HIP host to notify peers about alternate addresses at which it may be reached. This document also defines elements of procedure for mobility of a HIP host -- the process by which a host dynamically changes the primary locator that it uses to receive packets. While the same LOCATOR_SET parameter can also be used to support end-host multihoming, detailed procedures are out of scope for this document. This document obsoletes RFC 5206. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-06 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jul 15 16:03:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC5A11E8253; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:03:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gE+5-TEQPKi; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302FB11E822A; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:03:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2 Message-ID: <20130715230345.15805.62987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:03:45 -0700 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-03.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:03:45 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of t= he IETF. Title : Host Multihoming with the Host Identity Protocol Author(s) : Thomas R. Henderson Christian Vogt Jari Arkko Filename : draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-03.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2013-07-15 Abstract: This document defines host multihoming extensions to the Host Identity Protocol (HIP), by leveraging protocol components defined for host mobility. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-hip-multihoming-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Mon Jul 15 16:32:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D75921E8126 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:32:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtwM9-mQrWBf for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stl-mbsout-01.boeing.com (stl-mbsout-01.boeing.com [130.76.96.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094F621F9CA1 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stl-mbsout-01.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by stl-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6FNWH0f004092 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:32:17 -0500 Received: from XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-10.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.113]) by stl-mbsout-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6FNWGl2004083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:32:17 -0500 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.240]) by XCH-NWHT-10.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.113]) with mapi; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:32:16 -0700 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: HIP Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:32:16 -0700 Thread-Topic: draft refreshes Thread-Index: Ac6Bs4o6HpAM4tL3Sj2EeyichMwiXA== Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED77F18F1@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: [Hipsec] draft refreshes X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:32:32 -0000 FYI, I've refreshed these drafts today due to their impending expiration: - draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-03 - draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-06 From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Tue Jul 16 00:03:41 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5C111E8222 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:03:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.747 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.502, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZIq5zhxixej for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C0D21F9DFC for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:03:36 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7ef76d000004bbc-80-51e4f046dc68 Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0E.8D.19388.640F4E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:03:31 +0200 Message-ID: <51E4F03C.2040000@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:03:24 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP References: <51DE5CA0.4010708@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51DE5CA0.4010708@ericsson.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra7bhyeBBqsmmVlMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGR9+b2cvOCFYcfbjSpYGxgm8XYwcHBICJhJHn2t3MXICmWIS F+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjMKPFx0W1mCGc1o8SxR7tYQKp4BbQlDjcfZgaxWQRUJbY9bwKz2QQsJLbc ug9WIyoQJdHaO5UZol5Q4uTMJ2BxEQFJiZ67S8FsYYFQic17XrKB2EJAM18+v8AIYnMK6Ei0 TrjFCnGRpMSWF+3sIDazgJ7ElKstjBC2vMT2t3OYYXqXP2thmcAoOAvJullIWmYhaVnAyLyK kT03MTMnvdx8EyMw/A5u+W2wg3HTfbFDjNIcLErivJv1zgQKCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYf YmTi4JRqYFz/UFtjZ2W6LW+f7Ken98Nufc46riDyrts12vDanSDBzSyfTC5XOrMEHJ+Tfjll 25mlJ8/PMcrT/LrF5axaAnt03c3aVzc9fVxObvfwDdcTeRJZbviL6wBPvfSrRM3jR/QDJz2Y v/XlOrWXTLcWmxvIn3r/U2PSAZlQTU7OM4eZz7/dJ17xdIISS3FGoqEWc1FxIgAbka7lDQIA AA== Subject: Re: [Hipsec] References to expired work in progress in 4843bis and 5201bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:03:41 -0000 Hi, ID nits complains about the following in 4843bis. These nits need to be fixed before we request the publication of the draft: http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04.txt == Unused Reference: 'Hi3' is defined on line 433, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'NodeID' is defined on line 443, but no explicit reference was found in the text -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4773 (Obsoleted by RFC 6890) ID nits also complains about 5201bis. Could the authors please have a look at this output and fix whatever needs to be fixed? http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12.txt And the same for 5202bis: http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03.txt Thanks, Gonzalo On 11/07/2013 10:20 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > as you know, we are preparing the publication request for 4843bis, > 5201bis, and 5202bis. The two former drafts have references to work in > progress that has expired years ago. Do we want to keep those references > in the drafts (see below)? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04#section-9 > > [PRIVACYTEXT] Dupont, F., "A Simple Privacy Extension > for Mobile IPv6", Work in Progress, > July 2006. > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-mip6-privacyext-04 > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12#section-12 > > [I-D.ietf-btns-c-api] Richardson, M., Williams, N., Komu, M., > and S. Tarkoma, "C-Bindings for IPsec > Application Programming Interfaces", > draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04 (work in > progress), March 2009. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04 > > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Tue Jul 16 00:25:12 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE7711E8181 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.935 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEloP6CDA88e for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DEC11E80E2 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f456d000002e83-3c-51e4f5508ce0 Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 2B.1D.11907.055F4E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:24:56 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7g1yeBBsvO8FhMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGY8udrIVtLNWvL11la2BsZeli5GTQ0LAROLoxLOsELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hASOMkocP3afCcJZzSgx+fN5sCpeAW2Jvnm/wbpZBFQl5l/8zA5iswlYSGy5dR8s LioQJdHaO5UZol5Q4uTMJ2BxEQFJiZ67S8FsYaDeZzP+M0JslpTY8qIdbA6zgJ7ElKstjBC2 vMT2t3PA5ggB7V3+rIVlAiP/LCRjZyFpmYWkZQEj8ypGjuLU4qTcdCODTYzAkDq45bfFDsbL f20OMUpzsCiJ827ROxMoJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgVFWqvRTz/1V850zM+f8 uq7zvEPKOn3LvzWrd/E66Np/fKCuq59c3D3hcqHbtN9R6y8uNnKbXfHjWDXD4qdJyydbuISv cv0TtDb6uZL5asWpxbMk5vtHXan/cOvqi0ZDjufvayrfreU6K3598k/vaHNVVa6JitNXH2yc LFIWc/3GJI3unJeRzUZKLMUZiYZazEXFiQCGlf2s9wEAAA== Subject: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:25:12 -0000 Folks, one of the questions we need to answer when requesting the publication of the bis specs is the following: > Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant > number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? If you could send me an update on your implementation, or third-party implementations you are aware of, that would be great. In particular, it would be good to know which implementers intend to update their implementations to comply with the Standards Track bis specs (as opposed to implementations that are no being actively maintained any longer). Thanks, Gonzalo From mkomu@cs.hut.fi Tue Jul 16 01:50:28 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3860F11E8271 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OFBI4vyvq4q for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B711E8268 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA853308392 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:50:11 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <51E50941.4010208@cs.hut.fi> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:50:09 +0300 From: Miika Komu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:50:28 -0000 Hi, On 07/16/2013 10:24 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Folks, > > one of the questions we need to answer when requesting the publication > of the bis specs is the following: > >> Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant >> number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? > > If you could send me an update on your implementation, or third-party > implementations you are aware of, that would be great. In particular, it > would be good to know which implementers intend to update their > implementations to comply with the Standards Track bis specs (as opposed > to implementations that are no being actively maintained any longer). HIP for Linux has already taken steps to update it's implementation. While some things remain to be updated (e.g. DNS proxy support), RWTH Aachen contributed ECDSA code and Xin Gu has implemented ECDH and other HIPv2 extensions. The latter part is still in the merging queue, but will be merged during the summer. During the transition, HIPL is going to support both HIPv1 and HIPv2. Xin Gu's work has been documented here: http://nordsecmob.aalto.fi/en/publications/theses_2012/gu-xin_thesis.pdf His work also included extending HIP as an application-layer library. We mostly use it for loopback regression testing of the implementation. Other references: http://hipl.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Tue Jul 16 02:52:04 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AEF21E81DE for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.726 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.523, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUSqtAkxT7Co for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D387A21E81D9 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:51:53 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f826d000001766-5e-51e517b8b7c2 Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0B.70.05990.8B715E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: <51E517AE.3030400@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:51:42 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Moskowitz References: <4DB9D913.1070805@htt-consult.com> <4DCAF664.8020506@htt-consult.com> In-Reply-To: <4DCAF664.8020506@htt-consult.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupnluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3VneH+NNAg+/vlC2mLprMbNGw7jOj A5PH7klN7B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MrYuXEpc8FskYrONZ3sDYw3BLoYOTkkBEwk nnevZoSwxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcJhR4tC874wQzmpGib3P57ODVPEKaEu8Wf6cCcRmEVCVeLfr EyuIzSZgIbHl1n0WEFtUIEqitXcqM0S9oMTJmU/A4iICWhI3r29gA7GZBdQlmnvPAc3h4BAW KJX41J4DEhYSCJT4Of0jM0iYU0BfYstebYjbJCW2vGhnh+jUk5hytYURwpaX2P52DjNEq7bE 8mctLBMYhWYhWTwLScssJC0LGJlXMbLnJmbmpJcbbWIEBurBLb9VdzDeOSdyiFGag0VJnHez 3plAIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYxCvLsc8/d4Znctb5xZ87xrRWfYJzPxtmXh HGFcPh0J568JqHq9nnBA26covT6f9Z/TgY9tu86IieSJ/Vu05dveXVUz37QIFvTUaXPsuF14 9uL02xf47OV3xC/mdK+3jHzDX1LY/eDOA2mXubMz2GPb3jWV6LfvnDDJ9iCr2kTnLfM874ab RyqxFGckGmoxFxUnAgBc6Sj0IgIAAA== Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:52:04 -0000 Hi Bob, following up on this old IPR disclosure, even though the spec now mandates a co-factor of 1, I have not seen any updated to the IPR disclosure. Do you know anything else about this? What about the other two patents referenced in the disclosure? Thanks, Gonzalo On 11/05/2011 11:49 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > In some conversations here at IEEE 802 wireless interim, we have 'worked > out' that the first patent deals with EC co-factors greater than 1. > Although all of the curves we currently specify have a co-factor of 1, > we do not state anything about the co-factor in the standard. > > We only need to explicitly limit 5201-bis (and HIP-DEX) to curves with a > co-factor of 1 and avoid the first patent. > > Once we work out text on the co-factor, I guess I will send it to my old > IPsec buddy, Tony Rosati, and see if it addresses their position (I > understand other standards limit the co-factor to a value of 1). > > We are still trying to figure out the others. I hope I can get help on > working through them. > > On 04/28/2011 02:16 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I just received the following: >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org] >> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:50 PM >> To: robert.moskowitz@icsalabs.com; heer@cs.rwth-aachen.de; >> petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com; thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com >> Cc: rdroms.ietf@gmail.com; jari.arkko@piuha.net; >> "hipsec@ietf.orgdward"@juniper.net; gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com; >> ipr-announce@ietf.org; housley@vigilsec.com >> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related >> todraft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05 >> >> >> Dear Robert Moskowitz, Tobias Heer, Petri Jokela, Tom Henderson: >> >> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Host >> Identity >> Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)" (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis) was submitted >> to the >> IETF Secretariat on 2011-04-17 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of >> Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" >> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1541/). The title of the IPR >> disclosure is >> "Certicom Corp's Statement of IPR Related to >> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-05.""); >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com Tue Jul 16 03:10:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B125211E8276 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:10:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.739 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.510, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJ8LPtj9O0kB for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAFF21E81C3 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:09:53 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7ef76d000004bbc-83-51e51bf0a351 Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 74.06.19388.0FB15E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.16) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:09:51 +0200 Message-ID: <51E51BE9.2090903@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:09:45 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrEJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre4H6aeBBo8OaFtMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGTcX7GMqeMtYMWXzPeYGxj2MXYycHBICJhKX73QzQ9hiEhfu rWfrYuTiEBI4zCjRevYIK0hCSGA1o8TXFXkgNq+AtsTF+3dYQGwWAVWJvp8T2UFsNgELiS23 7oPFRQWiJFp7pzJD1AtKnJz5BCwuIiAp0XN3KZgtLGAjsbphLjvEYkmJLS/awWxmAT2JKVdb GCFseYntb+cwQ9ygLbH8WQvLBEb+WUjGzkLSMgtJywJG5lWM7LmJmTnp5eabGIHhdHDLb4Md jJvuix1ilOZgURLn3ax3JlBIID2xJDU7NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QD4zF/98BzUVNOr5T5 +fVB6eEZmrZxiu6HbZbuaBd8rL/ybMt5pqvzFJpK18+fmKPttD+1wuEq95K0ywfu90papln6 CQWvF3lR/nwFf5ifG4fG/BrN9XHMAT1SNxO+SR3Qqm3+dUcgpUe/4aiWRt7T24/PCy62DUz/ sv9rsLiAVIz7iuffDm27qMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAGCFpOn1AQAA Subject: [Hipsec] Obsoletes information in draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:10:03 -0000 Hi, 5202bis needs to have the Obsoletes information in its title header and its Abstract, and ideally also in its Introduction. Could the authors please add that information in the next revision of the draft? Thanks, Gonzalo From thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com Tue Jul 16 09:14:47 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2120711E80D5 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iW58uv+GgF22 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.32.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9031D21E805F for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6GGEdNU005324 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:39 -0700 Received: from XCH-NWHT-01.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-01.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.70.222]) by blv-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r6GGEcQ5004781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:38 -0700 Received: from XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.240]) by XCH-NWHT-01.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.70.222]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:39 -0700 From: "Henderson, Thomas R" To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" , HIP Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:14:39 -0700 Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Thread-Index: Ac6B9aG1uuhETTQyTxiM0ywk3FIzVQAScuYw Message-ID: <758141CC3D829043A8C3164DD3D593EA2ED77F18F8@XCH-NW-16V.nw.nos.boeing.com> References: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:14:47 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:25 AM > To: HIP > Subject: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation >=20 > Folks, >=20 > one of the questions we need to answer when requesting the publication > of the bis specs is the following: >=20 > > Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a > significant > > number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the > specification? >=20 > If you could send me an update on your implementation, or third-party > implementations you are aware of, that would be great. In particular, > it would be good to know which implementers intend to update their > implementations to comply with the Standards Track bis specs (as > opposed to implementations that are no being actively maintained any > longer). OpenHIP (http://www.openhip.org) plans to support the bis specs, but work h= as not yet started. - Tom