From nobody Thu Jul 2 22:02:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B051B2BD8 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 22:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.81 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MX452pBzrQu4 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B796E1B2BD9 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 22:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail-4.mappi.helsinki.fi (webmail-4.mappi.helsinki.fi [128.214.20.218]) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t63527kb003799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:02:07 +0300 Received: from 62-78-245-228.bb.dnainternet.fi (62-78-245-228.bb.dnainternet.fi [62.78.245.228]) by webmail.helsinki.fi (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:02:07 +0300 Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:02:07 +0300 Message-ID: <20150703080207.Horde.wl-syF7jr-K1aalkYow-Xw1@webmail.helsinki.fi> From: Samu Varjonen To: Gonzalo Camarillo References: <5583BF80.8060304@ericsson.com> <55891588.80604@helsinki.fi> <559240CB.9050005@ericsson.com> <5593855C.4070002@helsinki.fi> <55938B37.4050905@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <55938B37.4050905@ericsson.com> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.6) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_c9ZqmcLMV21MKKa5MfaYxA2" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 05:02:18 -0000 This message is in MIME format. --=_c9ZqmcLMV21MKKa5MfaYxA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Description: Muotoilematon teksti Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Gonzalo, In my opinion yes BR, Samu Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo : > Hi Samu, > > to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group > Last Call, is that right? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401. >> Review and comments would still be welcome. >> >> -Samu >> >> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> Hi Samu, >>> >>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>> >>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it >>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed >>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Samu Varjonen >>>> >>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, >>>>> >>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 >>>>> >>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that >>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a >>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the >>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, >>>>> and RFC5205bis). >>>>> >>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on >>>>> your plans to revise this document? >>>>> >>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated >>>>> reference? >>>>> >>>>>     draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Gonzalo >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>   > >   --=_c9ZqmcLMV21MKKa5MfaYxA2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Description: HTML Viesti Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Gonzalo,

In my opinion yes

BR,
Samu

Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>:

Hi Samu,

to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group
Last Call, is that right?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:

Hi,

to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401.
Review and comments would still be welcome.

-Samu

On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:

Hi Samu,

thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/

Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it
has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed
overall before the draft is ready for WGLC.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:

Hi all,

yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.

BR,
Samu Varjonen

On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:

Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,

the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01

RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that
it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis,
and RFC5205bis).

Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
your plans to revise this document?

Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
reference?

    draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401

Thanks,

Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
 

 
--=_c9ZqmcLMV21MKKa5MfaYxA2-- From nobody Fri Jul 3 01:08:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F76C1A9040 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:08:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbDC4RiNkYP0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD4F1A9056 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:08:15 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79176d00000321c-5e-559642eb5a9e Received: from ESESSHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D1.67.12828.BE246955; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:08:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.36] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:08:11 +0200 Message-ID: <559642EB.6030508@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:08:11 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje5rp2mhBgtOmVpMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGbPnpBV0MlXM/nCArYHxKmMXIyeHhICJxK5Ly9ghbDGJC/fW s4HYQgJHGSX275btYuQCslczSjw7dBisiFdAW+LyqoNgNouAisT0jossIDabgIXEllv3wWxR gSiJiV8PsUDUC0qcnPkEzBYRkJToubsUzBYW0JSY8uIVE4jNLGAgcWTRHFYIW15i+9s5zBBH aEssf9bCMoGRbxaSUbOQtMxC0rKAkXkVo2hxanFxbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmBAHdzy W3cH4+rXjocYBTgYlXh4F7yZGirEmlhWXJl7iFGag0VJnHfG5rxQIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLS nNTiQ4xMHJxSDYzdZ8zO6sZ6qPtx8M+Yc6j8kFPrhqthYQut+L2lli35sJnpk8B5pqN3Pi59 tSmy9HFxyMHASzHqjVuvmqV1FS+bFvh0re/CiPq5lbcttF/barP/X3z90VsR2WpTyQa+Pe+D zqhxauzhPJ1yZWJI10s31zv63aJL7u94+/VSw+3Jzx+nq34+H5CqxFKckWioxVxUnAgAMrcw YgkCAAA= Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:08:28 -0000 Folks, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo From nobody Fri Jul 3 01:11:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0263D1A8FD2 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZcyTdiOizpN for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8781A8F48 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:40 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79706d000007227-9f-559643bbd088 Received: from ESESSHC010.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F0.F2.29223.BB346955; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:11:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.36] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:11:38 +0200 Message-ID: <559643BA.6080906@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:11:38 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samu Varjonen References: <5583BF80.8060304@ericsson.com> <55891588.80604@helsinki.fi> <559240CB.9050005@ericsson.com> <5593855C.4070002@helsinki.fi> <55938B37.4050905@ericsson.com> <20150703080207.Horde.wl-syF7jr-K1aalkYow-Xw1@webmail.helsinki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20150703080207.Horde.wl-syF7jr-K1aalkYow-Xw1@webmail.helsinki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje5u52mhBueeS1pMXTSZ2eLGzxns Dkwe/Sv3s3ssWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjxKblTAWbRCuevGlkamA8LtjFyMkhIWAi MaHhICOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEvNe9zJDOKsZJZ5OOskCUsUroC3R0fqIHcRmEVCR2PK0 hw3EZhOwkNhy6z5YjahAlMTEr4eg6gUlTs58AmaLCOhKrLizg7WLkYODWUBUYvusKhBTWMBa YvaXTIhVrxglNp9YC3YQp4C/xLHNj5ggyjUl1u/SBwkzC8hLbH87hxnEFgK6ZvmzFpYJjIKz kCybhdAxC0nHAkbmVYyixanFSbnpRkZ6qUWZycXF+Xl6eaklmxiBoXpwy2+DHYwvnzseYhTg YFTi4V3wZmqoEGtiWXFl7iFGaQ4WJXHeGZvzQoUE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw Rj25kPB98u6TNo8Vt1yQ1nkx9crJ5kcia+vrll4U1PA8FzTF8/VyjVmG7z2n/N8+Ry/sjsiL JdOuFi9bGpzCqnh/4YdQ6zUxVuEi3TsfKTD+vGH6cOnB1isrnl4sqilf+XzJ82l/XL+8OPXG ZX7l99nfbwitsNX+0lRycPHqfWbW197GL105vf+MEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA/sgUbTYCAAA= Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:11:43 -0000 Hi Samu, thanks. I have just started a WGLC on the draft. Cheers, Gonzalo On 03/07/2015 8:02 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: > Hi Gonzalo, > > In my opinion yes > > BR, > Samu > > Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo >: > >> Hi Samu, >> >> to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group >> Last Call, is that right? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401. >>> Review and comments would still be welcome. >>> >>> -Samu >>> >>> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Samu, >>>> >>>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis: >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>>> >>>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it >>>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed >>>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Gonzalo >>>> >>>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible. >>>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Samu Varjonen >>>>> >>>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, >>>>>> >>>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 >>>>>> >>>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that >>>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a >>>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the >>>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, >>>>>> and RFC5205bis). >>>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on >>>>>> your plans to revise this document? >>>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated >>>>>> reference? >>>>>> >>>>>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gonzalo >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>> >> >> From nobody Fri Jul 3 08:08:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201511A88FA for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:08:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0jiymXlOLDV for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout25.s.uw.edu (mxout25.s.uw.edu [140.142.234.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 780721A8831 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (hymn02.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.71]) by mxout25.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t63F4QUA014839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:04:26 -0700 Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t63F4PU5026678; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:04:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 20280@localhost) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t63F4PVU026675; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:04:25 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn02.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 08:04:25 PDT Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Henderson To: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1903409400-1521102189-1435935865=:21265" X-PMX-Version: 6.1.0.2415318, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.3.145716 X-PMX-Server: mxout25.s.uw.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MP_MIXED 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1800_1899 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_MIXED 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:08:22 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1903409400-1521102189-1435935865=:21265 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Gonzalo, I had a look at the criteria here: https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html and it states that this condition should be satisfied to log an erratum: Only errors that could cause implementation or deployment problems or significant confusion should be Verified. I'm wondering about whether this meets the criteria. On the one hand, this is a mainstream state transition (I1-SENT gets to I2-SENT upon receiving an R1, not an R2). On the other hand, this section is clearly informational (section 4.4) and the transition is correctly noted in the Table 3 in this section (also informative) and in the normative Section 6.8. So, I wonder whether this is in the category of "could cause significant confusion" or rather whether an implementer would just recognize this as an obvious typo in conflict with other parts of the specification. Any opinions about this? - Tom On 06/29/2015 01:36 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Yes, please log an erratum. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 29/06/2015 11:20 PM, Tom Henderson wrote: >> >> >> On 06/28/2015 09:51 AM, Darren Lissimore wrote:> Hey all; >>> >>> Read through 7401, got to section 4.4.4 >>> ​page 36. >>> There's an error in the transition from I1-SENT to I2-SENT >>> ​.​ >>> The draft has it as recv R2, send I2 and >>> ​it ​ >>> should be >>> ​probably be ​ >>> recv R1, send I2 >>> ​as per Table 3 page 29 "recevie r1, process" trigger. >>> >>> ​Darren Lissimore ---1903409400-1521102189-1435935865=:21265-- From nobody Fri Jul 3 12:24:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F319A1A6F39 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:24:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Up1Isprc57dz for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B7F1A6F30 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79176d00000321c-27-5596e1724bbc Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 13.C7.12828.271E6955; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 21:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ESESSMB207.ericsson.se ([169.254.7.244]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 21:24:33 +0200 From: Gonzalo Camarillo To: Tom Henderson Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine Thread-Index: AQHQtaIXxLetKz8g90+qHAFzGugcX53KIIQx Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:24:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, es-ES Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ororae35mhvddokj89i3su9m1435951468706emailandroidcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7xw2mhBivtLKYumsxsMfP8QTYH Jo8lS34yebRcjwlgiuKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKeNk3k63grFHF6VXnWBsYJxt2MXJySAiYSEw5 +5cVwhaTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMBRRolXqxcwQTiLGSVuXLkEVMXBwSZgIdGx2gykQURAR+LSiy1g zcwC6hLNveeYQGxhAVeJc9shbBEBN4mNn++yQdhGElM7D7GD2CwCKhIvpr1kBLF5gWouPdoO ZgsJeEps/DcLrIZTwEvi4IxjLCA2o4CsxLv586F2iUvcejKfCeJoAYkle84zQ9iiEi8f/4Oq yZHou7afGWK+oMTJmU9YJjCKzELSPgtJ2SwkZbOAvmQW0JRYv0sfokRRYkr3Q3YIW0Oidc5c dmTxBYzsqxhFi1OLi3PTjYz1Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjECI+rglt+6OxhXv3Y8xCjAwajEw7vg zdRQIdbEsuLK3EOM0hwsSuK8MzbnhQoJpCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpg5E8rDJHo 9skOWe601Zfvzd5oSaf7S142HXKP7HD/HX/FtODWib+S2mwNZ2OudjRkVFpv/b742NqjC+qZ XK2kmAvu6eZNWdif+8uCMfxstvkpicNvogq62UQlUnk3PfqRwGNRb7z+xtYSxZ0XxL8+Ej65 85rJrNkbLH5uuSzFuN/vquH38tLdSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAMQfioIkCAAA= Archived-At: Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:24:40 -0000 --_000_ororae35mhvddokj89i3su9m1435951468706emailandroidcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgVG9tLA0KDQpZZXMsIHRoZSB0cmVuZCBpcyB0byBvbmx5ICJ2ZXJpZnkiIGVycmF0YSB0aGF0 IGNhbiBjbGVhcmx5IGxlYWQgdG8gaW50ZXJvcCBwcm9ibGVtcy4gT3RoZXIgZXJyYXRhIGFyZSB0 eXBpY2FsbHkgImhlbGQgZm9yIGRvY3VtZW50IHVwZGF0ZSIuDQoNCkNoZWVycywNCg0KR29uemFs bw0KDQpTZW50IGZyb20gbXkgbW9iaWxlDQoNCg0KLS0tLSBUb20gSGVuZGVyc29uIHdyb3RlIC0t LS0NCg0KR29uemFsbywNCkkgaGFkIGEgbG9vayBhdCB0aGUgY3JpdGVyaWEgaGVyZToNCg0KaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaWVzZy9zdGF0ZW1lbnQvZXJyYXRhLXByb2Nlc3NpbmcuaHRtbA0K DQphbmQgaXQgc3RhdGVzIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBjb25kaXRpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIHNhdGlzZmllZCB0 byBsb2cgYW4gZXJyYXR1bToNCg0KIE9ubHkgZXJyb3JzIHRoYXQgY291bGQgY2F1c2UgaW1wbGVt ZW50YXRpb24gb3IgZGVwbG95bWVudCBwcm9ibGVtcyBvciBzaWduaWZpY2FudCBjb25mdXNpb24g c2hvdWxkIGJlIFZlcmlmaWVkLg0KDQpJJ20gd29uZGVyaW5nIGFib3V0IHdoZXRoZXIgdGhpcyBt ZWV0cyB0aGUgY3JpdGVyaWEuICBPbiB0aGUgb25lIGhhbmQsIHRoaXMgaXMgYSBtYWluc3RyZWFt IHN0YXRlIHRyYW5zaXRpb24gKEkxLVNFTlQgZ2V0cyB0byBJMi1TRU5UIHVwb24gcmVjZWl2aW5n IGFuIFIxLCBub3QgYW4gUjIpLiAgT24gdGhlIG90aGVyIGhhbmQsIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiBpcyBj bGVhcmx5IGluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgKHNlY3Rpb24gNC40KSBhbmQgdGhlIHRyYW5zaXRpb24gaXMg Y29ycmVjdGx5IG5vdGVkIGluIHRoZSBUYWJsZSAzIGluIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiAoYWxzbyBpbmZv cm1hdGl2ZSkgYW5kIGluIHRoZSBub3JtYXRpdmUgU2VjdGlvbiA2LjguDQoNClNvLCBJIHdvbmRl ciB3aGV0aGVyIHRoaXMgaXMgaW4gdGhlIGNhdGVnb3J5IG9mICJjb3VsZCBjYXVzZSBzaWduaWZp Y2FudCBjb25mdXNpb24iIG9yIHJhdGhlciB3aGV0aGVyIGFuIGltcGxlbWVudGVyIHdvdWxkIGp1 c3QgcmVjb2duaXplIHRoaXMgYXMgYW4gb2J2aW91cyB0eXBvIGluIGNvbmZsaWN0IHdpdGggb3Ro ZXIgcGFydHMgb2YgdGhlIHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24uDQoNCkFueSBvcGluaW9ucyBhYm91dCB0aGlz Pw0KDQotIFRvbQ0KDQpPbiAwNi8yOS8yMDE1IDAxOjM2IFBNLCBHb256YWxvIENhbWFyaWxsbyB3 cm90ZTo+IFllcywgcGxlYXNlIGxvZyBhbiBlcnJhdHVtLg0KPg0KPiBUaGFua3MsDQo+DQo+IEdv bnphbG8NCj4NCj4gT24gMjkvMDYvMjAxNSAxMToyMCBQTSwgVG9tIEhlbmRlcnNvbiB3cm90ZToN Cj4+DQo+Pg0KPj4gT24gMDYvMjgvMjAxNSAwOTo1MSBBTSwgRGFycmVuIExpc3NpbW9yZSB3cm90 ZTo+IEhleSBhbGw7DQo+Pj4NCj4+PiBSZWFkIHRocm91Z2ggNzQwMSwgZ290IHRvIHNlY3Rpb24g NC40LjQNCj4+PiDigItwYWdlIDM2Lg0KPj4+IFRoZXJlJ3MgYW4gZXJyb3IgaW4gdGhlIHRyYW5z aXRpb24gZnJvbSBJMS1TRU5UIHRvIEkyLVNFTlQNCj4+PiDigIsu4oCLDQo+Pj4gVGhlIGRyYWZ0 IGhhcyBpdCBhcyAgcmVjdiBSMiwgc2VuZCBJMiBhbmQNCj4+PiDigItpdCDigIsNCj4+PiBzaG91 bGQgYmUNCj4+PiDigItwcm9iYWJseSBiZSDigIsNCj4+PiByZWN2IFIxLCBzZW5kIEkyDQo+Pj4g 4oCLYXMgcGVyIFRhYmxlIDMgcGFnZSAyOSAgICJyZWNldmllIHIxLCBwcm9jZXNzIiB0cmlnZ2Vy Lg0KPj4+DQo+Pj4g4oCLRGFycmVuIExpc3NpbW9yZQ0K --_000_ororae35mhvddokj89i3su9m1435951468706emailandroidcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIgY29udGVudD0i dGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRvciIgY29udGVu dD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IEV4Y2hhbmdlIFNlcnZlciI+DQo8IS0tIGNvbnZlcnRlZCBmcm9tIHRleHQg LS0+PHN0eWxlPjwhLS0gLkVtYWlsUXVvdGUgeyBtYXJnaW4tbGVmdDogMXB0OyBwYWRkaW5nLWxl ZnQ6IDRwdDsgYm9yZGVyLWxlZnQ6ICM4MDAwMDAgMnB4IHNvbGlkOyB9IC0tPjwvc3R5bGU+DQo8 L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keT4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBkaXI9Imx0ciI+SGkgVG9tLDwvcD4NCjxwIGRpcj0i bHRyIj5ZZXMsIHRoZSB0cmVuZCBpcyB0byBvbmx5ICZxdW90O3ZlcmlmeSZxdW90OyBlcnJhdGEg dGhhdCBjYW4gY2xlYXJseSBsZWFkIHRvIGludGVyb3AgcHJvYmxlbXMuIE90aGVyIGVycmF0YSBh cmUgdHlwaWNhbGx5ICZxdW90O2hlbGQgZm9yIGRvY3VtZW50IHVwZGF0ZSZxdW90Oy48L3A+DQo8 cCBkaXI9Imx0ciI+Q2hlZXJzLDwvcD4NCjxwIGRpcj0ibHRyIj5Hb256YWxvPC9wPg0KPHAgZGly PSJsdHIiPlNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBtb2JpbGU8L3A+DQo8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQotLS0tIFRvbSBIZW5k ZXJzb24gd3JvdGUgLS0tLTxicj4NCjxicj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0iMiI+PHNwYW4g c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMHB0OyI+DQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJQbGFpblRleHQiPkdvbnphbG8s PGJyPg0KSSBoYWQgYSBsb29rIGF0IHRoZSBjcml0ZXJpYSBoZXJlOjxicj4NCjxicj4NCjxhIGhy ZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2llc2cvc3RhdGVtZW50L2VycmF0YS1wcm9jZXNzaW5n Lmh0bWwiPmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2llc2cvc3RhdGVtZW50L2VycmF0YS1wcm9jZXNz aW5nLmh0bWw8L2E+PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KYW5kIGl0IHN0YXRlcyB0aGF0IHRoaXMgY29uZGl0aW9u IHNob3VsZCBiZSBzYXRpc2ZpZWQgdG8gbG9nIGFuIGVycmF0dW06PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KJm5ic3A7 T25seSBlcnJvcnMgdGhhdCBjb3VsZCBjYXVzZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBvciBkZXBsb3ltZW50 IHByb2JsZW1zIG9yIHNpZ25pZmljYW50IGNvbmZ1c2lvbiBzaG91bGQgYmUgVmVyaWZpZWQuDQo8 YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpJJ20gd29uZGVyaW5nIGFib3V0IHdoZXRoZXIgdGhpcyBtZWV0cyB0aGUgY3Jp dGVyaWEuJm5ic3A7IE9uIHRoZSBvbmUgaGFuZCwgdGhpcyBpcyBhIG1haW5zdHJlYW0gc3RhdGUg dHJhbnNpdGlvbiAoSTEtU0VOVCBnZXRzIHRvIEkyLVNFTlQgdXBvbiByZWNlaXZpbmcgYW4gUjEs IG5vdCBhbiBSMikuJm5ic3A7IE9uIHRoZSBvdGhlciBoYW5kLCB0aGlzIHNlY3Rpb24gaXMgY2xl YXJseSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsIChzZWN0aW9uIDQuNCkgYW5kIHRoZSB0cmFuc2l0aW9uDQogaXMg Y29ycmVjdGx5IG5vdGVkIGluIHRoZSBUYWJsZSAzIGluIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbiAoYWxzbyBpbmZv cm1hdGl2ZSkgYW5kIGluIHRoZSBub3JtYXRpdmUgU2VjdGlvbiA2LjguPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KU28s IEkgd29uZGVyIHdoZXRoZXIgdGhpcyBpcyBpbiB0aGUgY2F0ZWdvcnkgb2YgJnF1b3Q7Y291bGQg Y2F1c2Ugc2lnbmlmaWNhbnQgY29uZnVzaW9uJnF1b3Q7IG9yIHJhdGhlciB3aGV0aGVyIGFuIGlt cGxlbWVudGVyIHdvdWxkIGp1c3QgcmVjb2duaXplIHRoaXMgYXMgYW4gb2J2aW91cyB0eXBvIGlu IGNvbmZsaWN0IHdpdGggb3RoZXIgcGFydHMgb2YgdGhlIHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24uPGJyPg0KPGJy Pg0KQW55IG9waW5pb25zIGFib3V0IHRoaXM/PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KLSBUb208YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpP biAwNi8yOS8yMDE1IDAxOjM2IFBNLCBHb256YWxvIENhbWFyaWxsbyB3cm90ZTomZ3Q7IFllcywg cGxlYXNlIGxvZyBhbiBlcnJhdHVtLjxicj4NCiZndDsgPGJyPg0KJmd0OyBUaGFua3MsPGJyPg0K Jmd0OyA8YnI+DQomZ3Q7IEdvbnphbG88YnI+DQomZ3Q7IDxicj4NCiZndDsgT24gMjkvMDYvMjAx NSAxMToyMCBQTSwgVG9tIEhlbmRlcnNvbiB3cm90ZTo8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsm Z3Q7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsgT24gMDYvMjgvMjAxNSAwOTo1MSBBTSwgRGFycmVuIExpc3NpbW9y ZSB3cm90ZTomZ3Q7IEhleSBhbGw7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsmZ3Q7PGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsmZ3Q7 IFJlYWQgdGhyb3VnaCA3NDAxLCBnb3QgdG8gc2VjdGlvbiA0LjQuNDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7Jmd0 OyDigItwYWdlIDM2Ljxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7Jmd0OyBUaGVyZSdzIGFuIGVycm9yIGluIHRoZSB0 cmFuc2l0aW9uIGZyb20gSTEtU0VOVCB0byBJMi1TRU5UPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsmZ3Q7IOKAiy7i gIs8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyZndDsgVGhlIGRyYWZ0IGhhcyBpdCBhcyZuYnNwOyByZWN2IFIyLCBz ZW5kIEkyIGFuZDxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7Jmd0OyDigItpdCDigIs8YnI+DQomZ3Q7Jmd0OyZndDsg c2hvdWxkIGJlPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsmZ3Q7IOKAi3Byb2JhYmx5IGJlIOKAizxicj4NCiZndDsm Z3Q7Jmd0OyByZWN2IFIxLCBzZW5kIEkyPGJyPg0KJmd0OyZndDsmZ3Q7IOKAi2FzIHBlciBUYWJs ZSAzIHBhZ2UgMjkmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsgJnF1b3Q7cmVjZXZpZSByMSwgcHJvY2VzcyZxdW90OyB0 cmlnZ2VyLjxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7Jmd0Ozxicj4NCiZndDsmZ3Q7Jmd0OyDigItEYXJyZW4gTGlz c2ltb3JlPGJyPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pg0KPC9ib2R5Pg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_ororae35mhvddokj89i3su9m1435951468706emailandroidcom_-- From nobody Fri Jul 3 12:43:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3FD1A7011 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:43:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.845 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2DnhooXZbU4O for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.96.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5EC1A7008 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (bill@poise.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.2.209]) by oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (envelope-from william.atwood@concordia.ca) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t63Jh1qU009862; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 15:43:01 -0400 Message-ID: <5596E5C4.2030904@concordia.ca> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:43:00 -0400 From: William Atwood Organization: Concordia University, Montreal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gonzalo Camarillo , Tom Henderson References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca at 2015-07-03 15:43:02 EDT Archived-At: Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:43:07 -0000 As someone who ended up as interim Document Shepherd for a document that had over 100 errata pending from the previous version of the specification, I encourage you to file the erratum, even though it will be classified as "held for document update". The set of such errata provides the preparers of the next revision with a convenient, easy-to-find list of "things to fix". No one is going to go through the entire email archive of hipsec to (re)discover the error that you are now reporting, but if it is in the errata list, it will be easy to find when the time comes. Bill Atwood On 03/07/2015 3:24 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Yes, the trend is to only "verify" errata that can clearly lead to > interop problems. Other errata are typically "held for document update". > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > Sent from my mobile > > > > ---- Tom Henderson wrote ---- > > Gonzalo, > I had a look at the criteria here: > > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html > > and it states that this condition should be satisfied to log an erratum: > > Only errors that could cause implementation or deployment problems or > significant confusion should be Verified. > > I'm wondering about whether this meets the criteria. On the one hand, > this is a mainstream state transition (I1-SENT gets to I2-SENT upon > receiving an R1, not an R2). On the other hand, this section is clearly > informational (section 4.4) and the transition is correctly noted in the > Table 3 in this section (also informative) and in the normative Section 6.8. > > So, I wonder whether this is in the category of "could cause significant > confusion" or rather whether an implementer would just recognize this as > an obvious typo in conflict with other parts of the specification. > > Any opinions about this? > > - Tom > > On 06/29/2015 01:36 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Yes, please log an > erratum. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 29/06/2015 11:20 PM, Tom Henderson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 06/28/2015 09:51 AM, Darren Lissimore wrote:> Hey all; >>>> >>>> Read through 7401, got to section 4.4.4 >>>> ​page 36. >>>> There's an error in the transition from I1-SENT to I2-SENT >>>> ​.​ >>>> The draft has it as recv R2, send I2 and >>>> ​it ​ >>>> should be >>>> ​probably be ​ >>>> recv R1, send I2 >>>> ​as per Table 3 page 29 "recevie r1, process" trigger. >>>> >>>> ​Darren Lissimore > > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email:william.atwood@concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8 From nobody Fri Jul 3 19:52:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1063B1B3322 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:52:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_Vtfz6znytZ for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout21.s.uw.edu (mxout21.s.uw.edu [140.142.32.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200EB1B3320 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (hymn03.u.washington.edu [140.142.9.111]) by mxout21.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t642nuPR032716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:49:56 -0700 Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t642nsts002873; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:49:54 -0700 Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 15833@localhost) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t642nsOv002864; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:49:54 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn03.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:49:54 PDT Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:49:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Henderson To: William Atwood Message-ID: User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.4.24217 X-PMX-Server: mxout21.s.uw.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:52:30 -0000 On 07/03/2015 12:43 PM, William Atwood wrote: > As someone who ended up as interim Document Shepherd for a document that > had over 100 errata pending from the previous version of the > specification, I encourage you to file the erratum, even though it will > be classified as "held for document update". The set of such errata > provides the preparers of the next revision with a convenient, > easy-to-find list of "things to fix". No one is going to go through the > entire email archive of hipsec to (re)discover the error that you are > now reporting, but if it is in the errata list, it will be easy to find > when the time comes. > > Bill Atwood Bill, thanks for the guidance; I've submitted the report just now. - Tom From nobody Sun Jul 5 13:51:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47FC1B3318 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:48:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hv0r2n4skyb5 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621411B3317 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CB0DD180092; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:44:40 -0700 (PDT) To: rgm@labs.htt-consult.com, tobias.heer@belden.com, petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, tomhend@u.washington.edu, brian@innovationslab.net, terry.manderson@icann.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150704024440.CB0DD180092@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:51:05 -0700 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Hipsec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7401 (4408) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:48:01 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7401, "Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7401&eid=4408 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Tom Henderson Section: 4.4.4 Original Text ------------- . +---------+ recv I2, send R2 | | +---->| I1-SENT |--------------------------------------+ | | | +---------+ +----------------------+ | | | | | recv R2, | recv I2, send R2 | | | | | v send I2 | v v v | | +---------+ | +---------+ | | +--->| I2-SENT |----------+ +--------------| R2-SENT |<---+ | | | +---------+ | +---------+ | | Corrected Text -------------- . +---------+ recv I2, send R2 | | +---->| I1-SENT |--------------------------------------+ | | | +---------+ +----------------------+ | | | | | recv R1, | recv I2, send R2 | | | | | v send I2 | v v v | | +---------+ | +---------+ | | +--->| I2-SENT |----------+ +--------------| R2-SENT |<---+ | | | +---------+ | +---------+ | | Notes ----- This state machine figure is informative. Normative (correct) specification for the I1-SENT to I2-SENT state transition (due to recv R1 event) is in Section 6.8. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7401 (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-20) -------------------------------------- Title : Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) Publication Date : April 2015 Author(s) : R. Moskowitz, Ed., T. Heer, P. Jokela, T. Henderson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Host Identity Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Sun Jul 19 23:21:35 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1091B3003 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8c5dCe-x7TCN for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17EA1ACD85 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9726029B for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 02:21:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tQ7k+ihDygo6 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 02:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [77.241.230.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B97235FA11 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 02:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55AC9356.2010900@htt-consult.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:21:10 +0200 From: Robert Moskowitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <20150720061557.13511.22137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150720061557.13511.22137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150720061557.13511.22137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020006000108020304010804" Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 06:21:34 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020006000108020304010804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I invite you all to review hip-dex-04. Rene has worked very hard getting the last edit changes done. Zigbee has hip-dex in their profile for mesh security, plus it is reference in 802.15.9 which is entering Sponsor Balloting. So I hope Rene and I have done a good job here, but we do need the review. I will be working with the ADs on steps to get this through the process. See you all soon at the IETF (sitting in Schipol; missed my connection) Arriving in Prague around 5:30 today. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:15:57 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Rene Hummen , Rene Hummen , Robert Moskowitz , Robert Moskowitz A new version of I-D, draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Rene Hummen and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-moskowitz-hip-dex Revision: 04 Title: HIP Diet EXchange (DEX) Document date: 2015-07-20 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 46 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04 Abstract: This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP DEX), a variant of the Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2). The HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash functions. In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar security properties to HIPv2. The HIP DEX protocol is primarily designed for computation or memory- constrained sensor/actuator devices. Like HIPv2, it is expected to be used together with a suitable security protocol such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) for the protection of upper layer protocol data. In addition, HIP DEX can also be used as a keying mechanism for security primitives at the MAC layer, e.g., for IEEE 802.15.4 networks. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat --------------020006000108020304010804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I invite you all to review hip-dex-04.  Rene has worked very hard getting the last edit changes done.

Zigbee has hip-dex in their profile for mesh security, plus it is reference in 802.15.9 which is entering Sponsor Balloting.

So I hope Rene and I have done a good job here, but we do need the review.  I will be working with the ADs on steps to get this through the process.

See you all soon at the IETF (sitting in Schipol; missed my connection)  Arriving in Prague around 5:30 today.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 23:15:57 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Rene Hummen <hummen@comsys.rwth-aachen.de>, Rene Hummen <hummen@comsys.rwth-aachen.de>, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> 


A new version of I-D, draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Rene Hummen and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-moskowitz-hip-dex
Revision:	04
Title:		HIP Diet EXchange (DEX)
Document date:	2015-07-20
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		46
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04

Abstract:
   This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP
   DEX), a variant of the Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2).  The
   HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed
   cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash
   functions.  In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar
   security properties to HIPv2.

   The HIP DEX protocol is primarily designed for computation or memory-
   constrained sensor/actuator devices.  Like HIPv2, it is expected to
   be used together with a suitable security protocol such as the
   Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) for the protection of upper layer
   protocol data.  In addition, HIP DEX can also be used as a keying
   mechanism for security primitives at the MAC layer, e.g., for IEEE
   802.15.4 networks.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--------------020006000108020304010804-- From nobody Wed Jul 22 15:46:15 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEDA1B2B52; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:46:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7LhVlM5MahZ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EF31A014B; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:46:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.1.0.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150722224611.30156.22288.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:46:11 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:46:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Mobility with the Host Identity Protocol Authors : Thomas R. Henderson Christian Vogt Jari Arkko Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09.txt Pages : 34 Date : 2015-07-22 Abstract: This document defines mobility extensions to the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). Specifically, this document defines a general "LOCATOR_SET" parameter for HIP messages that allows for a HIP host to notify peers about alternate addresses at which it may be reached. This document also defines elements of procedure for mobility of a HIP host -- the process by which a host dynamically changes the primary locator that it uses to receive packets. While the same LOCATOR_SET parameter can also be used to support end-host multihoming, detailed procedures are out of scope for this document. This document obsoletes RFC 5206. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Jul 22 16:20:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0D71A1BD7 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vueAumFgSwe for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout23.cac.washington.edu (mxout23.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFA11B2F4B for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (hymn04.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.72]) by mxout23.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t6MNJxAY021673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:20:00 -0700 Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t6MNJwXD023707 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 10745@localhost) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t6MNJwNM023698 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn04.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 PDT Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:19:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Henderson To: hipsec@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.22.231517 X-PMX-Server: mxout23.cac.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1100_1199 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:20:04 -0000 On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks, > > I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end > on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ > > Please, send your comments to this list. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > Below are my (minor) comments on this draft. It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed. - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343 - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification. - in Section 3, replace IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 with IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 Tom From nobody Wed Jul 22 17:23:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08E21B2FE2 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiAchjL7JOsM for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout22.s.uw.edu (mxout22.s.uw.edu [128.95.242.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4BF1A8862 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (hymn02.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.71]) by mxout22.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t6N0MQkN014007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:26 -0700 Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t6N0MNXW028208 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700 Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 20280@localhost) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t6N0MN5Z028205 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn02.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 PDT Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Henderson To: hipsec@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.23.1216 X-PMX-Server: mxout22.s.uw.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:23:07 -0000 On 07/22/2015 03:46 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ > This draft version provides some new text regarding the double jump mobility problem, which is listed as one of the open issues on this draft: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/12 This is in the new section 3.2.3 linked below: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09#section-3.2.3 Comments/review would be appreciated. Otherwise, the rest of the draft is a refresh. - Tom From nobody Wed Jul 22 17:29:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F8E1B2FE7; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqK4VZbyg4mW; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3141B2FE6; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.1.0.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150723002913.12024.90860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:29:13 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-06.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:29:15 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Multihoming with the Host Identity Protocol Authors : Thomas R. Henderson Christian Vogt Jari Arkko Filename : draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-06.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2015-07-22 Abstract: This document defines host multihoming extensions to the Host Identity Protocol (HIP), by leveraging protocol components defined for host mobility. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Jul 22 17:38:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA971B3012 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TIx_3vIlb5gz for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout23.cac.washington.edu (mxout23.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6A51B300E for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (hymn04.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.72]) by mxout23.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t6N0cKDw007657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:20 -0700 Received: from hymn04.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t6N0cG60031468 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 10745@localhost) by hymn04.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t6N0cGZg031465 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:16 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn04.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:16 PDT Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:38:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Henderson To: Hipsec@ietf.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.23.2717 X-PMX-Server: mxout23.cac.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_100_199 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, SMALL_BODY 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-06.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:38:52 -0000 > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/ This one is a document refresh. - Tom From nobody Thu Jul 23 07:03:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A971A1B17; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:02:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18GL6BjulhDt; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9485B1A905A; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:02:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.1.0.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150723140251.10886.44377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:02:51 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:57 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Native NAT Traversal Mode for the Host Identity Protocol Authors : Ari Keranen Jan Melen Filename : draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2015-07-23 Abstract: This document specifies a new Network Address Translator (NAT) traversal mode for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The new mode is based on the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) methodology and UDP encapsulation of data and signaling traffic. The main difference from the previously specified modes is the use of HIP messages for all NAT traversal procedures. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Jul 23 07:05:04 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990D91A6F7A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:05:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qtnTX8ZXiXZ for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7471A1BB9 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:04:59 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79046d000007f53-ba-55b0f489cfbb Received: from ESESSHC024.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5F.83.32595.984F0B55; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:04:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:04:57 +0200 Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8FE6062A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:05:10 +0300 (EEST) Received: from dhcp-b1ef.meeting.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F0259661 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:05:10 +0300 (EEST) To: References: <20150723140251.10886.44377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ari_Ker=c3=a4nen?= Message-ID: <55B0F487.1040901@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:04:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150723140251.10886.44377.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7nlw2hBj+6dSymLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujGWH/jMXLOSr6Nl9ga2BsZO7i5GTQ0LAROLZmitMELaYxIV7 69lAbCGBo4wSzR06XYxcQPY2RonTk26zQjhHGCU+rbzPjuBs6GIHaREW8JH4fm8KWLuIgKjE lA+nmSFGOUpcOHGWEcRmE7CV+N2+B2wdr4C2RNOJTrBeFgFViaZr21hBbFGBNInFlxtYIGoE JU7OfAJmcwo4Scz+1gNkc3AwC9hLPNhaBhJmFpCX2P52DjPEB2oSV89tglqrKnH13yvGCYzC s5BMmoXQPQtJ9wJG5lWMosWpxUm56UbGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgaF8cMtv1R2Ml984HmIU 4GBU4uF90LQhVIg1say4MvcQozQHi5I474zNeaFCAumJJanZqakFqUXxRaU5qcWHGJk4OKUa GLX63siU2Jt/Zd0moLB6x4H357Yn37zOqae3b9r2sqlrxSNO7rkX52xwuPJ99gtFg6IeaVfV 89O5JEL9N08+OWNC3kv5k4UKCQ9EeLRXKmk9OPmeqeBv2knWIF2hPaIfFSKubWnzO+9Xk13s HfWi89XVgzel9rqy9yv6bNrd7rbFSdPg4wnHHUosxRmJhlrMRcWJAFnpzilGAgAA Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:05:02 -0000 Keep-alive update with updated references to the RFCs. Cheers, Ari On 23/07/15 16:02, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Native NAT Traversal Mode for the Host Identity Protocol > Authors : Ari Keranen > Jan Melen > Filename : draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2015-07-23 > > Abstract: > This document specifies a new Network Address Translator (NAT) > traversal mode for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The new mode is > based on the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) methodology > and UDP encapsulation of data and signaling traffic. The main > difference from the previously specified modes is the use of HIP > messages for all NAT traversal procedures. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-09 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From nobody Mon Jul 27 00:40:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9371ACEBE for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:40:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFFOrIyIbA0I for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D851ACEBC for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:40:14 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79706d000007227-68-55b5e05c236a Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F1.32.29223.C50E5B55; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:40:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.101] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:40:11 +0200 To: Tom Henderson , References: From: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: <55B5E05C.3010507@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:40:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7sg62hBpu7mSymLprMbDHz/EE2 ByaPJUt+Mnm0XI8JYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyvh97RtTwWnuiomftjM3MG7i7GLk5JAQMJHY 8205M4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBo4wSj/9vZ4Vw1jJKPFk8jwmkSljATKLh1QOWLkYODhEBe4mZ S+tBwkICnhJ7l+0AG8QmYCGx5dZ9FhCbV0BbovvrS7BWFgFVie6jX8BsUYEYifkrpjND1AhK nJz5BKyeU8BL4syuf2wgNrOAgcSRRXNYIWx5ie1v5zBD7NKWWP6shWUCo8AsJO2zkLTMQtKy gJF5FaNocWpxUm66kZFealFmcnFxfp5eXmrJJkZgUB7c8ttgB+PL546HGAU4GJV4eBMitoYK sSaWFVfmHmKU5mBREuedsTkvVEggPbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVANjomuR4szL84qi 7j5+L7u/TNKpyLorKV+u833wAROFfB0LK0f3uPmFsfk9UTxLLu32nPRVeI2GjCnvJv4baXXT bju3+7OsbLJOVCsNzr8pLWXBZqZZ8iymNsBR1qlFrbPy087dHyXdny2dUJRa5ZXTNGHyCv4C 0VPHXmSf+Nm+ke3oCnbrT0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAMDOYbQrAgAA Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:40:17 -0000 Authors, could you please address Tom's comments below and revise the draft accordingly? Thanks, Gonzalo On 23/07/2015 1:19 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: > > > On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks, >> >> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end >> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >> >> Please, send your comments to this list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > > Below are my (minor) comments on this draft. It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed. > > - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343 > > - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification. > > - in Section 3, replace > IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 > with > IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 > > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From nobody Mon Jul 27 01:54:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BFC1AD244; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:54:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-JV9dbfh9DM; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677691AD213; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:54:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.1.0.p3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150727085423.5211.83863.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:54:23 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-03.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:54:24 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Certificates Authors : Tobias Heer Samu Varjonen Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-03.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2015-07-27 Abstract: The Certificate (CERT) parameter is a container for digital certificates. It is used for carrying these certificates in Host Identity Protocol (HIP) control packets. This document specifies the certificate parameter and the error signaling in case of a failed verification. Additionally, this document specifies the representations of Host Identity Tags in X.509 version 3 (v3) and Simple Public Key Infrastructure (SPKI) certificates. The concrete use cases of certificates, including how certificates are obtained, requested, and which actions are taken upon successful or failed verification, are specific to the scenario in which the certificates are used. Hence, the definition of these scenario- specific aspects is left to the documents that use the CERT parameter. This document extends [RFC7401]. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Jul 27 01:55:36 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38701AD21C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:55:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6bePF3s874-9 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:55:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F7D1AD1BA for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.214.10.115] (hpf-7.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.10.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6R8tUET016254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:55:30 +0300 Message-ID: <55B5F202.1070206@helsinki.fi> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:55:30 +0300 From: Samu Varjonen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <55B5E05C.3010507@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <55B5E05C.3010507@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:55:35 -0000 Hi, Addressed the comments from T. Henderson in the version 03. BR, Samu Varjonen On 27/07/15 10:40, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Authors, > > could you please address Tom's comments below and revise the draft > accordingly? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 23/07/2015 1:19 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: >> >> On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks, >>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end >>> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>> >>> Please, send your comments to this list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hipsec mailing list >>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>> >> Below are my (minor) comments on this draft. It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed. >> >> - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343 >> >> - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification. >> >> - in Section 3, replace >> IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 >> with >> IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec