From chitukku341@rastamall.com Sat Jan 5 01:54:39 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7498B21F87CD for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 01:54:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -69.894 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-69.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=4.395, HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP=3.493, HELO_EQ_IP_ADDR=1.119, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, SARE_SUB_ENC_KOI8R=0.67, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJbmtvKYTIy8 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 01:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from 102.132.198.203.static.netvigator.com (102.132.198.203.static.netvigator.com [203.198.132.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD0321F86A5 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 01:54:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [108.122.84.102] (helo=ivlqkisc.eatoegsvjdocttj.su) by 102.132.198.203.static.netvigator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMIU8-2496ek-TU for ipp-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:54:38 +0800 From: To: Subject: =?koi8-r?B?7/P07/Lv9u7vICEhISEhIOvp5OHs+SAhISEhISE=?= Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:54:38 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: bkutzf 37 Message-ID: <4286021686.JEPOVNUL706959@txjxtgzyjhe.xxnveghoesu.tv> Здаствуйте! Извените меня за спам но у меня есть очень важная для Вас инфармация! Я пророботал в фирме Билдинг Регион один год,но меня уволели не выплотив положеную мне зорплату! Если Вы хатите чтобы Вас кинули то нимедлено оброщайтесь в эту фирму!Я не один недавольный нас много,вот сдесь Вы можите посматреть и убедица в этом! http://orabote.net/feedback/list/company/25962 http://orabote.net/feedback/show/id/71370 еще рас извените за спам!Досведание! From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 7 08:18:04 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FB421F8903 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:18:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2imRBR4hKihC for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBF521F87DF for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:18:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95882791A3; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:17:48 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BFC791A1 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:17:36 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MG900KX9JW44OI1@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:17:33 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7fc26d00000623e-65-50eaf51beef8 Received: from [17.153.48.251] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.48.251]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 03.0D.25150.D15FAE05; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:17:33 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 11:17:31 -0500 To: "PWG Announcements Inc." Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1502) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiONPgt67s11cBBmdPalkc+RZrsa51NbMD k8fWkz/YPOYtns4UwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlXH7zEemghvsFVd+HmFqYFzF1sXIySEhYCLx 7vddKFtM4sK99UA2F4eQwFQmiZULpzCDJNgE1CR+T+pjBbGZBbQkbvx7yQRha0ssW/garIZF QEXi+5qnYHFhAUeJ4wt+MoLYIgLGEjva94It4BWwkfg36wM7hK0nsebBWXaIxbISExaeZp/A yDMLyYpZSFbMQtKygJF5FaNgUWpOYqWhqV5iQUFOql5yfu4mRlCwNBSa7WDc8VfuEKMAB6MS D+8lg1cBQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR4vz0ACvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREuf9bfs8QEgg PbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cC4bunSvXOstlVLr+5Yt5R3xppNWSFbvbgb/Fec0naMPimsd0mq QijNfG/anKf2UbZLRbbICN/X5Zp9f+e9rd9/Xf1wQqn+hbr+11hl7iNTns49tHFhXtxm2VfM /d8e/hM8dDCUJ+2Ww/dy6U9cy4IOvn1Qecl79zTH2k36Lb0i7GlryzQ+zV3wSYmlOCPRUIu5 qDgRANkIRL4SAgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG February 2013 Face-to-Face Meeting in El Segundo, CA X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 95882791A3.AD02F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org All, The PWG face-to-face meeting page for February 2013 is now available. The agenda and venue information can be found at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/meeting-info/february_2013_elsegundo.html This page will be updated with document links as the material becomes available. Please visit the February 2013 survey page PRIOR TO February 1, 2013 and indicate whether you plan to participate in person or call in: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/3CF6XHM For those not able to attend in person, the usual telephone bridge number will be provided. The details of the conference call are: Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): +1 866 469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 650 429-3300 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 408 856-9570 Attendee access code: Please request from the PWG Chair (msweet@apple.com) if you need it. __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 7 13:21:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D381921F88F1 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:21:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4uyAar6qFee for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB2321F854D for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDAD791DB; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:21:08 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr004.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.13]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03907791D4 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:20:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) by USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Jan 2013 15:20:51 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.134]) by USA7109HT001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:20:27 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Thread-Topic: PWG Last Call for Thread-Index: Ac3tHMDo+kMA+wRtRZSMzbgQ4TlXvg== Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:20:27 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD4D5@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.97] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last Call for X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0066338006==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 3BDAD791DB.AD93B X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0066338006== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD4D5USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD4D5USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All - This note is a reminder of the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for= the HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec, HCD-NAP Spec and PWG-LOG Spec. The lin= ks to the three specs are: * HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd= -idsattributes10-20121113.pdf * HCD-NAP Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-2012= 1112.pdf * PWG-LOG Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf The PWG Last Call period for these three specs ends Friday January 18, 2013= at 10pm US PST. For the PWG Log specification all required entries and values defined in th= is document have been prototyped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensi= ve review of the various revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. Please keep in mind that the PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) o= f PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comm= ents), before any document can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last = Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf Alan Sukert on behalf of Joe Murdock --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD4D5USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All –
 
This note is a reminder of the formal announcement of the PWG Last Cal= l for the HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec, HCD-NAP Spec and PWG-LOG Spec. Th= e links to the three specs are:
 
The PWG Last Call period for these three specs ends Friday January 18,= 2013 at 10pm US PST.

For the PWG Log specification all required entries and values defined in th= is document have been prototyped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensi= ve review of the various revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call= .

Please keep in mind that the PWG Process/3.0 requires that a<= b> quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call = (with or without comments), before any document can progress to PWG Formal = Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG = Chair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)
msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Lo= g Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

            &nb= sp;   http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_doc= s/pwg-process30.pdf
 
 
Alan S= ukert on behalf of Joe Murdock
 
 
 
--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD4D5USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============0066338006== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0066338006==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 7 13:47:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC76221F88CA for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnpgEgL0tO4h for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBD721F880B for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4661E791E5; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:46:52 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr002.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.11]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAE6791E4 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:46:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) by USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Jan 2013 15:46:12 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.134]) by USA7109HT004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:46:09 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Thread-Topic: PWG Last Call for Thread-Index: Ac3tHMDo+kMA+wRtRZSMzbgQ4TlXvgAA1Z/Q Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:46:08 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD557@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.97] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] RE: PWG Last Call for X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0376308212==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 4661E791E5.ACF08 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0376308212== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD557USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD557USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just a clarification - this is a reminder to the initial PWG Last call anno= uncements for these three specs that were sent out on 11/12/12. _____________________________________________ From: Sukert, Alan Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 4:20 PM To: 'pwg-announce@pwg.org' Subject: PWG Last Call for All - This note is a reminder of the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for= the HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec, HCD-NAP Spec and PWG-LOG Spec. The lin= ks to the three specs are: * HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd= -idsattributes10-20121113.pdf * HCD-NAP Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-2012= 1112.pdf * PWG-LOG Spec: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf The PWG Last Call period for these three specs ends Friday January 18, 2013= at 10pm US PST. For the PWG Log specification all required entries and values defined in th= is document have been prototyped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensi= ve review of the various revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. Please keep in mind that the PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) o= f PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comm= ents), before any document can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last = Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf Alan Sukert on behalf of Joe Murdock --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD557USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just a clarification – this is a reminde= r to the initial PWG Last call announcements for these three specs that wer= e sent out on 11/12/12.
 
_____= ________________________________________
From: Sukert, Alan
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 4:20 PM
To: 'pwg-announce@pwg.org'
Subject: PWG Last Call for
 
 
All –
 
This note is a reminder of the formal announcement of the PWG Last Cal= l for the HCD-Assessment-Attributes Spec, HCD-NAP Spec and PWG-LOG Spec. Th= e links to the three specs are:
 
The PWG Last Call period for these three specs ends Friday January 18,= 2013 at 10pm US PST.

For the PWG Log specification all required entries and values defined in th= is document have been prototyped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensi= ve review of the various revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call= .

Please keep in mind that the PWG Process/3.0 requires that a<= b> quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call = (with or without comments), before any document can progress to PWG Formal = Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG = Chair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)
msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Lo= g Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

            &nb= sp;   http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_doc= s/pwg-process30.pdf
 
 
Alan S= ukert on behalf of Joe Murdock
 
 
 
--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DD557USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============0376308212== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0376308212==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 06:50:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EAB21F89FC for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:50:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id op87jCK87HHj for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:50:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F8D21F8953 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ABE791EE; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:50:19 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015E7791E3 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:50:04 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MGB008WKAIRJNE1@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:49:46 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7fc26d00000623e-94-50ec3208bace Received: from [17.153.32.202] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.32.202]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id E8.FA.25150.9023CE05; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:49:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [IPP] IPP FaxOut Issues from Canon From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:49:44 -0500 Message-id: <6AA103E1-93F8-4E06-A6E3-36E0152E5324@apple.com> References: To: "Yardumian, Rick" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPhlC6n0ZsAg/NN5hbH9r1ksTjyLdbi 0LzLjA7MHltP/mDz+HZ1KYvHvMXTmQKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyjrwWLfgrXvH2+k72BsZz wl2MHBwSAiYSHxemdDFyApliEhfurWcDsYUEpjJJnPlTAmILC+hLnJ91iAnE5hXQkzjcuZ0V xGYW0JK48e8lWJxNQE3i96Q+sDinQIjE41dnwWwWARWJVWvuQtUrSiyb/gfK1pZYtvA1M8RM G4mGmVMZQc4REgiW+DxZEsQUETCUmP6SFeIyWYkVU3uZJjDyz0JyxCwkR8xCMnQBI/MqRsGi 1JzESkNTvcSCgpxUveT83E2MoPBrKDTbwbjjr9whRgEORiUe3isxrwOEWBPLiitzDzFKcDAr ifDa7wMK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES512aB5QSSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUwCknJ qdxxCir3VpR5d0FylUEW69TFvG8yCre/qvVknP172jqFrfVtKv/sf1566NfyVZ2tZNeJz85s bazLyxTy4/5PfTex18LkvJ/2sw13v2z+LVDC7mLJmPAv9KDiQtWmxWtTjt+c2mGysstprdCu PH2P7Dc/mbpeSK2ZWPbvTnXeU49HL/WPKrEUZyQaajEXFScCALINCYI7AgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "" X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 59ABE791EE.A868F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Rick, Thanks for the feedback. See my responses inline below. On Dec 28, 2012, at 2:43 PM, "Yardumian, Rick" wrote: > Hi, > > Canon has the following issues with the current IPP FaxOut specification "wd-ippfaxout10-20121128-rev.pdf". > > 1. We think that cover page in section 3.4 Design Requirements should be generated not by the printer but the client. We think that it is not preferable for users that each vendor has different cover page formats. If the client generates the cover page, it is unnecessary to have a language font on the printer. Requiring the printer to generate cover sheets means the printer must do localization which is a big burden for low cost MFDs. Therefore we would like printer generated cover sheets to be optional. Based on our discussions at the F2F, I think we have consensus to make printer-generated cover pages conditionally required when the printer supports PDF or OpenXPS (which provide the necessary font support and resources for generating the cover pages... > 2. For 6.1.2.7 to (text(255)) we should follow each country's rule where the printer is located. For example, in USA, 40 valid characters from the beginning is required. So, we would like to take (text(the maximum number of valid characters from the beginning)) instead of (text(255)) for this requirement. Is that OK? At the protocol level we need to set a maximum, but I can add wording about country-specific limits. However, this is the cover page and not the header added to each page of the output - do country-specific limits even apply to cover pages? And how do we get/set the sender text that is part of this header (configuration of the MFD, not a job attribute)? > 3. Can we ignore 6.1.3.4 t33-subaddress (integer(0:MAX)) for a printer that cannot use this information? t33-subaddress is optional. I will add some text about all of the optional fields, a new "destination-uri-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)" Printer attribute that lists the supported collection member attributes, and some text about what a printer does if member attributes are specified but not supported (i.e. successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes or client-error-attributes-or-values-not-supported depending on ipp-attribute-fidelity, job-mandatory-attributes, and the destination-uri scheme) > 4. 6.1.4 number-of-retries (integer(0:MAX)) and 6.1.5 retry-interval (integer(1:MAX)) might sometimes be ignored by following each country rule where the printer is located. Is that OK? There are several reasons why this might be ignored, but the printer needs to reflect the supported values in the corresponding xxx-supported values. I will add wording about this, along with a reminder of what to do with an out-of-range value (see previous comments). ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 06:56:05 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18E521F847F for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:56:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWslhlP-ivvz for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099C721F8439 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700E3791F5; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:55:44 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357E791EE; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:55:31 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGB00EBXAPRSXL0@mail-out.apple.com>; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:55:31 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7fe96d000000e2b-a6-50ec3362d4f2 Received: from [17.153.32.202] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.32.202]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 20.EB.03627.2633CE05; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:55:31 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:55:29 -0500 To: "" , "mfd@pwg.org" Message-id: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPhlG6y8ZsAgyVvZSyO7XvJYrG1/wyT xZFvsQ7MHltP/mDzmLd4OlMAUxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxoz2aUwFLQoVj252szcwtsl0MXJy SAiYSNw49pENwhaTuHBvPZDNxSEkMJVJ4tC3xcwgCTYBNYnfk/pYQWxmgQSJz5sPgNksAioS x1/8Amrg4BAGslfvUQIJiwg4SLTvb2MHsXkFbCSO7XjICGHrSRzu3M4KsUtWYsXUXqYJjNyz kEydhaQMIq4tsWzha+ZZQBuYBXQkJi9kRBWGsD+eP8K0gJFtFaNgUWpOYqWhiV5iQUFOql5y fu4mRlCINRSa7GA8+JP/EKMAB6MSD29V1OsAIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK89vuAQrwpiZVVqUX5 8UWlOanFhxilOViUxHkX5wGlBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjC1N3+/wtVYuPVdwy37fMvsL uhdZly/juTz7xFEd6dBvC9N2ph7ZleJwSaP17PYrVT9TqqNOP6rqrHicdvGiXUH09QmLn98o XvNYV1c095x16LJ/xr3GHKftNSwbZ9enzpopvJr3xad72rfmzn1iPGmD5LN1ee3XZkWExsm3 vZt2WyfSKvDis81KLMUZiYZazEXFiQC0ERa/LQIAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] Question for FaxOut Service X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0065596095==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 700E3791F5.A90C5 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0065596095== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_S3zNOnr1pQFLbPLbgU9YUA)" --Boundary_(ID_S3zNOnr1pQFLbPLbgU9YUA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT [Cross-posted to IPP and Semantic Model] All, Canon's latest comments bring up a question about how the FaxOut service populates the transmission header at the top of each page. The source and destination phone numbers are easy, as are date, time, and page number. However, where do we get the sender's name? Normally this information is configured into the MFD as part of the installation/setup, e.g., "Foo Corp". However, I don't see a corresponding SM element for the service owner name or device owner name that would be used here. Thoughts? ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_S3zNOnr1pQFLbPLbgU9YUA) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
[Cross-posted to IPP= and Semantic Model]

All,

Canon's la= test comments bring up a question about how the FaxOut service populates th= e transmission header at the top of each page. The source and destination p= hone numbers are easy, as are date, time, and page number. However, where d= o we get the sender's name?

Normally this informat= ion is configured into the MFD as part of the installation/setup, e.g., "Fo= o Corp". However, I don't see a corresponding SM element for the service ow= ner name or device owner name that would be used here.

=
Thoughts?

_______________________________________________________= _________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer,= PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_S3zNOnr1pQFLbPLbgU9YUA)-- --===============0065596095== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0065596095==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 07:03:01 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969A321F8B48 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:03:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PXMsXeZwedxi for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4980921F8B2E for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80346791F5; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:02:38 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12D7791EE; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:02:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k27so412245iad.30 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:02:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A5iakQAQ9UQp9A+8mxPNFwKtNTeUeOH8dbt55YpTLD0=; b=UZ42BrfUy7byTBV/Qk05g+9vT6TXZ6RsCywxAHfqBzyfZmGkHVgO3Q83M9fsl55TqT G8zursxMLnogNKIbtsn9XuXbpbSkSkNhrDlHvly7RP7P5vlrb8CQh9ab9hsbOiXDvmNH DiEszMdTkPsZToYPBPVIcxIjUWmshRETfBKBYeUsE4xiibc1zU1OVlqhfJC8nlsaYcMC EK7oXtVu9D95R9H4SdUlcxAe8TdO+Hhz1OAS7RNI7KcBnvQeJiisFyAA+vWD1UYdtDYz dyoivYQYhzjRPE8oyflisgJij7NCcSKrt0vtnLWjc/wlLcm38th0AI4r2YfJgrlccFQr NdhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.11.136 with SMTP id q8mr9366399igb.87.1357657344131; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.17.73 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:02:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> References: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:02:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: Michael Sweet , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "" , "mfd@pwg.org" Subject: [IPP] Re: [MFD] Question for FaxOut Service X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2001355110==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 80346791F5.A93B4 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============2001355110== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f5029bab9429d04d2c83bcd --e89a8f5029bab9429d04d2c83bcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Take a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course contains a human-readable name) element. There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]" elements - this is a bug, IMHO. Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName" simple elements that inherit from RequestingUserName that created / administered them. Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Michael Sweet wrote: > [Cross-posted to IPP and Semantic Model] > > All, > > Canon's latest comments bring up a question about how the FaxOut service > populates the transmission header at the top of each page. The source and > destination phone numbers are easy, as are date, time, and page number. > However, where do we get the sender's name? > > Normally this information is configured into the MFD as part of the > installation/setup, e.g., "Foo Corp". However, I don't see a corresponding > SM element for the service owner name or device owner name that would be > used here. > > Thoughts? > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > mfd mailing list > mfd@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --e89a8f5029bab9429d04d2c83bcd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Take a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course
= contains a human-readable name) element.

There are no comparable &qu= ot;ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]"
elements - this is a bug, IMHO.

Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName"
simple eleme= nts that inherit from RequestingUserName
that created / administered the= m.

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musi= cian / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer = Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted = Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF D= esignated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites= .google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://si= tes.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Winter=A0 579 Park Place=A0 Saline, MI=A0 48176=A0 = 734-944-0094
Summer=A0 PO Box 221=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839=A0 906-494-2= 434



On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Michael = Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
[Cross-posted to IPP and Semantic = Model]

All,

Canon's latest comme= nts bring up a question about how the FaxOut service populates the transmis= sion header at the top of each page. The source and destination phone numbe= rs are easy, as are date, time, and page number. However, where do we get t= he sender's name?

Normally this information is configured into the MFD as= part of the installation/setup, e.g., "Foo Corp". However, I don= 't see a corresponding SM element for the service owner name or device = owner name that would be used here.

Thoughts?

______________________________________________________________________= __
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


= --=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
mfd mailing list
mfd@pwg.org
http= s://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd



--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --e89a8f5029bab9429d04d2c83bcd-- --===============2001355110== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============2001355110==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 07:47:39 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0380C21F8B64 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:47:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1Kc91kx+dB7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CA021F8900 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135167920A; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:47:16 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC4079209; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:47:01 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGB008KGD1SJNT1@mail-out.apple.com>; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f466d000004340-ae-50ec3f7395ee Received: from [17.153.32.202] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.32.202]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id CB.68.17216.47F3CE05; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:46:56 -0500 Message-id: <95158FE9-EEE8-4753-90E8-64720EB91D31@apple.com> References: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> To: Ira McDonald X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPhlG6p/ZsAg3dTOSxev1rKbnFs30sW i639Z5gsjnyLdWDx2HryB5vHzll32T3mLZ7OFMAcxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWx4O9jxoKXvhVX jnM1MJ536WLk5JAQMJF40vKUCcIWk7hwbz0biC0kMJVJ4ltjMIgtLKAn8fXPXFYQmxfIPty5 HcxmFkiQePrsGlgvm4CaxO9JfUBxDg5OgUCJmTsyQUwWARWJxqUyENUOEs/uL4WaYiNxeWU/ cxcjF9CmRkaJzS/bGEHqRQS0JJY8V4S4RlZixdRepgmMfLOQLJ6FZDGErS2xbOFrZghbT+Jl 0zt2THFdiYvrJjEuYGRbxShYlJqTWGlorJdYUJCTqpecn7uJERS6DYWyOxj3/+Q/xCjAwajE w1sV9TpAiDWxrLgy9xCjBAezkgiv/T6gEG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcd55eUApgfTE ktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QD4yGHCrFPAlwHA3lU7Pku5O8vm7SGU87WZIV23EdW5bv9K3d3npR/ 1s2X9+2NX6DfJquyK8zvO9uZl+Yecq+pXbrpDv9Fs9jNc3R1J9Z8N+jwmLFDZEm96DX5ydx1 cc5qDzsSziknXuPM+/CiRH5/5sIy7j89Zp8L36v2aZhYJ1y3fveaf1u2EktxRqKhFnNRcSIA VPlQ51kCAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "" , "mfd@pwg.org" Subject: [IPP] Re: [MFD] Question for FaxOut Service X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1804083416==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 135167920A.A91D9 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1804083416== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_9nrV2mYHmzF9Raa1WKBVvA)" --Boundary_(ID_9nrV2mYHmzF9Raa1WKBVvA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Ira, Thanks, I will look and expose the corresponding Printer attributes in the next update of the IPP FaxOut spec. On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Ira McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > Take a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course > contains a human-readable name) element. > > There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]" > elements - this is a bug, IMHO. > > Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName" > simple elements that inherit from RequestingUserName > that created / administered them. > > Cheers, > - Ira > > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG > Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group > Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG > Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG > Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG > IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB > Blue Roof Music/High North Inc > http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic > http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc > mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com > Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 > Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Michael Sweet wrote: > [Cross-posted to IPP and Semantic Model] > > All, > > Canon's latest comments bring up a question about how the FaxOut service populates the transmission header at the top of each page. The source and destination phone numbers are easy, as are date, time, and page number. However, where do we get the sender's name? > > Normally this information is configured into the MFD as part of the installation/setup, e.g., "Foo Corp". However, I don't see a corresponding SM element for the service owner name or device owner name that would be used here. > > Thoughts? > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > mfd mailing list > mfd@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd > > ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_9nrV2mYHmzF9Raa1WKBVvA) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Ira,

Thanks, I will look and expose the corresponding Printer attributes in the= next update of the IPP FaxOut spec.


On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Take a look at= "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course
contains a human-readable name) ele= ment.

There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]"
elements = - this is a bug, IMHO.

Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName"
simple elements that i= nherit from RequestingUserName
that created / administered them.

= Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Sof= tware Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer = Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted = Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF D= esignated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites= .google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://si= tes.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  = 48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI = 49839  906-494-2434



On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Michael = Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
[Cross-posted to IPP and Semantic = Model]

All,

Canon's latest comments = bring up a question about how the FaxOut service populates the transmission= header at the top of each page. The source and destination phone numbers a= re easy, as are date, time, and page number. However, where do we get the s= ender's name?

Normally this information is configured into the MFD as= part of the installation/setup, e.g., "Foo Corp". However, I don't see a c= orresponding SM element for the service owner name or device owner name tha= t would be used here.

Thoughts?

______________________________________________________________________= __
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


= --=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
mfd mailing list
mfd@pwg.org
http= s://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd



_______________________________________________________= _________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer,= PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_9nrV2mYHmzF9Raa1WKBVvA)-- --===============1804083416== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1804083416==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 07:56:01 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B9221F88DA for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:56:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bhGhExXasO37 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F9121F89CB for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302EB7920A; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:55:33 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC5D791FC; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:55:19 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGB00E6FDH4SXV0@mail-out.apple.com>; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:55:19 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f466d000004340-f1-50ec4164f7ca Received: from [17.153.32.202] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.32.202]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 0C.BB.17216.5614CE05; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:55:18 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:55:16 -0500 Message-id: References: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> To: Ira McDonald X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPhlG6a45sAg2u71S1ev1rKbnFs30sW i639Z5gsjnyLdWDx2HryB5vHzll32T3mLZ7OFMAcxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx5NI9xoIezYqL h74yNjA+Uu5i5OCQEDCROPhZpIuRE8gUk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAVCaJe7uPMoEkhAX0JL7+mcsK YvMC2Yc7t4PZzAIJEotXvWAGsdkE1CR+T+pjBZnJKRAoMXNHJkiYRUBF4teLpYwQ5Q4Sz+4v hRpjIzF/7lFGiF2NjBKbX7YxgvSKCGhJLHmuCHGPrMSKqb1MExj5ZiHZPAvJZghbW2LZwtdQ tp7Ey6Z37JjiuhIX101iXMDItopRsCg1J7HS0FgvsaAgJ1UvOT93EyMofBsKZXcw7v/Jf4hR gINRiYe3Kup1gBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiURXvt9QCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK88/KA UgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsa1U/Osv3aamm37dsjdKNZy1jzGlf73FXjaviy7/SpIaeFC 5eOHt6k7hj6cn8lTxeGq/6wgY3NC7Fq/5vvtajdu3Xzn2D/v2WbD39snPtScqH9wc82eRxNe RJ1XOaaq1JiSGKSuLSA25XxvZqaWyDVxgfeMc3SWudYVHl4xq/TiIVfTPdOVj8oosRRnJBpq MRcVJwIAeZYSbVsCAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "" , "mfd@pwg.org" Subject: [IPP] Re: [MFD] Question for FaxOut Service X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0428606646==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 302EB7920A.A86E1 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0428606646== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Sq6nETjV+BczOinRDr1sKw)" --Boundary_(ID_Sq6nETjV+BczOinRDr1sKw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Ira, One more question, below... On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Ira McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > Take a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course > contains a human-readable name) element. > > There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]" > elements - this is a bug, IMHO. > > Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName" > simple elements that inherit from RequestingUserName > that created / administered them. >From the perspective of the fax header information, we want the organization name from the vcard, which should be the same as the "printer-organization (1setOf text(MAX))" value(s) we added in JPS3, correct? The person name is only useful for personal devices, but there the organization can be the same as the person's full name, e.g., "John Doe". So I think the correct action here is to require printer-organization in IPP FaxOut, and document its usage. The rest of the device/service elements can be addressed later, perhaps as part of the System Control Service and/or IPP Multifunction specs. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_Sq6nETjV+BczOinRDr1sKw) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Ira,

One more question, below...

On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:= 02 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroof= music@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Ta= ke a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course
contains a human-readab= le name) element.

There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]"<= br>elements - this is a bug, IMHO.

Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName"
simple elements that i= nherit from RequestingUserName
that created / administered them.

From the perspective of the fax header inform= ation, we want the organization name from the vcard, which should be the sa= me as the "printer-organization (1setOf text(MAX))" value(s) we added in JP= S3, correct? The person name is only useful for personal devices, but there= the organization can be the same as the person's full name, e.g., "John Do= e".

So I think the correct action here is to requi= re printer-organization in IPP FaxOut, and document its usage. The rest of = the device/service elements can be addressed later, perhaps as part of the = System Control Service and/or IPP Multifunction specs.

_______________________________________________________= _________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer,= PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_Sq6nETjV+BczOinRDr1sKw)-- --===============0428606646== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0428606646==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 07:58:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4B021F8505 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:58:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tR98M0RD8fxk for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84D121F8431 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BD579214; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:58:13 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEC67920A; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:57:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so686104iea.2 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:57:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Nxa9uGjmAQ86n0Rn8ff93Tbfc1zLqIduxKXwrn48ULU=; b=jyksso7UGHxSOfva9D8EqJxeIuLAKkBejQx5xKI1Vv2g3SSG+TjFTD6tqvFPpR+d9c vcglgH9+dcqpNxO6V568JIXEEuaK8EFMHambILKJlbqd2QRZG6N05q2uQ4h9SmbYwGmp HZDKPx+p5akbYtzD0acuM+J7oPohxr7+ZBrFFjrHK7gVGoN8BDsAJNuPGJKIfRG2SEjz bQjL/771ofRmAKAXghcIcX+8SfbLvnIjRsI17ueh75j8EoYInsDuAIoYMzpX9wo6/1I2 iabKCxurYX/ry9XVHA6eJiH/Xe9SSDeKqcuBpXrvtRQ85RfCfGNfeMvWcyMxBT3QV7sp 2ksA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.42.197 with SMTP id q5mr9374766igl.91.1357660678984; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.17.73 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:57:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <46172E87-DC56-45AC-B2BA-562285F059B8@apple.com> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:57:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: Michael Sweet , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "" , "mfd@pwg.org" Subject: [IPP] Re: [MFD] Question for FaxOut Service X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1831072322==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 53BD579214.A90A4 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1831072322== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93410c57f14ac04d2c90288 --14dae93410c57f14ac04d2c90288 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I agree w/ all of your comments below. Cheers, - Ira On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Michael Sweet wrote: > Ira, > > One more question, below... > > On Jan 8, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Ira McDonald wrote: > > Hi, > > Take a look at "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course > contains a human-readable name) element. > > There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard]" > elements - this is a bug, IMHO. > > Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName" > simple elements that inherit from RequestingUserName > that created / administered them. > > > From the perspective of the fax header information, we want the > organization name from the vcard, which should be the same as the > "printer-organization (1setOf text(MAX))" value(s) we added in JPS3, > correct? The person name is only useful for personal devices, but there the > organization can be the same as the person's full name, e.g., "John Doe". > > So I think the correct action here is to require printer-organization in > IPP FaxOut, and document its usage. The rest of the device/service elements > can be addressed later, perhaps as part of the System Control Service > and/or IPP Multifunction specs. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --14dae93410c57f14ac04d2c90288 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

I agree w/ all of your comments below.

Cheers,
- Ira

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Michael= Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
Ira,

One more questi= on, below...

On Jan 8, 2013, at 1= 0:02 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Take a look at= "DeviceOwnerVCard" (which of course
contains a human-readable= name) element.

There are no comparable "ServiceOwner[Uri/VCard= ]"
elements - this is a bug, IMHO.

Also, I think we need "[Device/Service]OwnerName"
simple eleme= nts that inherit from RequestingUserName
that created / administered the= m.

From the perspective of the f= ax header information, we want the organization name from the vcard, which = should be the same as the "printer-organization (1setOf text(MAX))&quo= t; value(s) we added in JPS3, correct? The person name is only useful for p= ersonal devices, but there the organization can be the same as the person&#= 39;s full name, e.g., "John Doe".

So I think the correct action here is to require printe= r-organization in IPP FaxOut, and document its usage. The rest of the devic= e/service elements can be addressed later, perhaps as part of the System Co= ntrol Service and/or IPP Multifunction specs.

______________________________________________________________________= __
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair



--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --14dae93410c57f14ac04d2c90288-- --===============1831072322== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1831072322==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 8 10:18:26 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181781F0CFA for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:18:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7XRifnAUZHF for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C30B1F0CB3 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451CC79211; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:17:45 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr002.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.11]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88DB7920E for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:17:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) by USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Jan 2013 12:17:22 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.134]) by USA7109HT004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:17:22 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Index: Ac3ME5mC2PJLQX/MRrmzrZHncO9VLQhqtXMA Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:17:21 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DEA92@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.92] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1832157281==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 451CC79211.ADF46 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1832157281== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DEA92USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DEA92USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe - I reviewed the HCDE-Assessment-Attributes spec and have the following offic= ial Xerox comments (since I'm coming in new many of these may have already = been discussed with the IDS WG; feel free to reject any of these comments o= n that basis): 1. General comment: Some of the text has different type font from the= rest of the text (e.g., Lines 301 and 308), Make sure to check all the typ= e fonts in the document for uniformity. 2. The following RFCs are referenced in the body of the document but = are not listed in either Sections 9 or 10: [XMLTYPES] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, = Line 318), [RFC2579] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, Line 321), [RFC2578] (Section 2.3= , pg. 9, Line 321), [RFC3411] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, Line 321) and [RFC5646] = (Section 4.1, pg. 14, description of AttributesNaturalLanguage). 3. The following acronyms are used in the body of the document but ar= e not defined in Section 2.4: RFC (Section 9, pg. 17, Line 525), URL (Secti= on 4.1, pg. 14, description of TimeSource), I2C (Section 4.1, pg. 14, descr= iption of TimeSource), MFD (Section 9, pg. 17, Line 525), XML (Section 9, p= g. 17, Line 526), SM (Section 6, pg. 16, Line 517) 4. The following acronyms listed in Section 2.4 are not used anywhere= else in the document: TLS and URI. 5. Section 3.2.2, page 11, Line 419: The sentence "To mitigate this b= reach, IT administrators decide corporate policy is that ALL devices must..= ." It is not clear why 'ALL' is capitalized here because ALL is not one of = the conformance technology terms discussed in Section 2.1. 6. Section 4.1, page 13, definition of FirmwareStringVersion attribut= e: The second sentence uses the term "String Versions". It is not clear wha= t is meant by this term - did you mean Firmware String Versions here? 7. Section 4.1, page 13, definition of FirewallSetting attribute: The= Data Type is listed as being an OctetArray, but the description indicates = that this is a variable length field. Given that the definition of an Octet= Array is a "variable number of octets containing binary data" a variable le= ngth field could be something other than octets. Please clarify the data ty= pe description of the FirewallSetting attribute. 8. Section 5.2.2.1, page 16, Line 495: 'HCDUserApplicationVersion' sh= ould be 'UserApplicationVersion'. 9. Section 5.2.2.3, page 16, Line 507: Since the table has been remov= ed indicate there are no attributes that MUST be supported if the condition= described is present in the HCD. 10. Section 5.2.3, page 16, Line 512: 'CertificationStat' should be 'Cert= ificationState'. A side comment - the other lists in Section 5.2 are alphab= etical; why isn't the list in Section 5.2.3 alphabetical? 11. The following references listed in Section 10 are not referenced anyw= here else in the document: [RFC3766] and [RFC4086]. Let me know if you have any questions on my comments. Alan Alan Sukert Xerox Certified Green Belt Product Security Specialist Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-2012111= 3.pdf A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes specific= ation and has [no] comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-A= ssessment-Attributes Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DEA92USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Joe –=

 

I reviewed the HCDE-As= sessment-Attributes spec and have the following official Xerox comments (si= nce I’m coming in new many of these may have already been discussed w= ith the IDS WG; feel free to reject any of these comments on that basis):

1. &nbs= p;     General commen= t: Some of the text has different type font from the rest of the text (e.g.= , Lines 301 and 308), Make sure to check all the type fonts in the document= for uniformity.

2. &nbs= p;     The following = RFCs are referenced in the body of the document but are not listed in eithe= r Sections 9 or 10: [XMLTYPES] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, Line 318), [RFC2579] (S= ection 2.3, pg. 9, Line 321), [RFC2578] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, Line 321), [RFC3411] (Section 2.3, pg. 9, Line 321) a= nd [RFC5646] (Section 4.1, pg. 14, description of AttributesNaturalLanguage= ).

3. &nbs= p;     The following = acronyms are used in the body of the document but are not defined in Sectio= n 2.4: RFC (Section 9, pg. 17, Line 525), URL (Section 4.1, pg. 14, descrip= tion of TimeSource), I2C (Section 4.1, pg. 14, description of TimeSource), MFD (Section 9, pg. 17, Line 525)= , XML (Section 9, pg. 17, Line 526), SM (Section 6, pg. 16, Line 517)<= /o:p>

4. &nbs= p;     The following = acronyms listed in Section 2.4 are not used anywhere else in the document: = TLS and URI.

5. &nbs= p;     Section 3.2.2,= page 11, Line 419: The sentence “To mitigate this breach, IT adminis= trators decide corporate policy is that ALL devices must…” It i= s not clear why ‘ALL’ is capitalized here because ALL is not one of the conformance technology terms discussed in Section 2.1. &= nbsp; 

6. &nbs= p;     Section 4.1, p= age 13, definition of FirmwareStringVersion attribute: The second sentence = uses the term “String Versions”. It is not clear what is meant = by this term – did you mean Firmware String Versions here?

7. &nbs= p;     Section 4.1, p= age 13, definition of FirewallSetting attribute: The Data Type is listed as= being an OctetArray, but the description indicates that this is a variable= length field. Given that the definition of an OctetArray is a “variable number of octets containing binary d= ata” a variable length field could be something other than octets. Pl= ease clarify the data type description of the FirewallSetting attribute.

8. &nbs= p;     Section 5.2.2.= 1, page 16, Line 495: ‘HCDUserApplicationVersion’ should be = 216;UserApplicationVersion’.

9. &nbs= p;     Section 5.2.2.= 3, page 16, Line 507: Since the table has been removed indicate there are n= o attributes that MUST be supported if the condition described is present i= n the HCD.

10. &nb= sp; Section 5.2.3,= page 16, Line 512: ‘CertificationStat’ should be ‘Certif= icationState’. A side comment – the other lists in Secti= on 5.2 are alphabetical; why isn’t the list in Section 5.2.3 alphabet= ical?

11. &nb= sp; The following = references listed in Section 10 are not referenced anywhere else in the doc= ument: [RFC3766] and [RFC4086].

 

Let me know if you hav= e any questions on my comments.

 

Alan=

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Produc= t Security Specialist

Alan.Suker= t@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-20121113.pdf

A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes sp= ecification and has [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-Assessment-Attributes Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DEA92USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1832157281== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1832157281==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Wed Jan 9 12:32:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574BD21F849A for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:32:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQX3zFdCov5G for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:32:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1A321F8488 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975637921B; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:31:17 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr004.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.13]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C24379215 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:30:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht002.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.32]) by USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 09 Jan 2013 14:30:52 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.134]) by USA7109HT002.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.32]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:30:44 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Index: Ac3MFMSAHVOAe5hcTVKlJ5YMXFqRngicFDbA Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:30:43 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DFD13@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.92] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1671568782==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 975637921B.AE844 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1671568782== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DFD13USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DFD13USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe - Below are the official Xerox comments to the PWG Last Call review of the HC= D-NAP Spec (note that many of the comments relate to inconsistencies with t= he HCD-ATTR spec which may require changes in the HCD-ATTR spec to implemen= t): 1. General Comment: This document uses a lot of acronyms but there is= no List of Acronyms like there is in the HCD-ATTR spec. Such a list is def= initely needed in the HCD-NAP spec. To help out generating the list, here a= re the acronyms I found (can't claim it is all of them) - PWG, HCD, PC, MAC= , IP, NAP, SHA, SSoH, SoH, SoHR, SHV, DHCP, DNS, VLAN, ID, EAP, PEAP, RADIU= S, PPP, IPsec, HCEP, HRA, PKCS, IDS, TCP, UDP, SCTP, SMI, IANA, TLV, WCCE, = RNAP, WSH, TLS, CHAP and MS. 2. General Comment: I found several instances where there was no line= between paragraphs. Be consistent - either include a line between paragrap= hs in all cases or do not do so. 3. Section 2, pg. 6, Line 240: The [IDS-ATTR] spec referenced here is= not listed in Section 10. 4. Section 4.5.1, pg. 8, Line 334: section4.6. 4.3 -missing a space a= nd not sure if you meant 4.6, 4.3 or 4.6.4.3 here. 5. Section 4.6.1, pg. 9, Line 352: The end of the sentence should rea= d "....and gateway (0.0.0.0) settings." 6. Section 4.6.1, pg. 9, Line 353: [RFC3442] referenced here is not l= isted in Section 10. 7. This is more of a question than a comment. In Section 4.6.2, pg. 9= , Line 369 the HCD-NAP spec provides a reference to a document that describ= es IEEE 802.1x. Since the HCD-ATTR spec also discusses 802.1x, shouldn't it= also provide the same reference to a document that describes 802.1x? 8. Section 4.6.2, pg. 9, Line 376: The definition of PEAP in the text= is incorrect; it should be Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (E= xtensible was missing). 9. Section 4.7, pg. 10, Line 417: This line references Section 4.3 fo= r discussion of NAP access protocols. Confirm that is the correct section t= o reference here because Section 4.3 talks about 'Protocol Transport'. 10. Section 4.7.4, pg. 11, Line 432: Grammatically, I think this sentence= should read "...will be revoked and limit network access to a restricted n= etwork." 11. Section 5.1.1.2, pg. 12, Line 458: It is not clear what the 'HRESULT'= value mentioned here refers to. 12. Section 5.1.1.4, pg. 12, Line 471: The description of the ForwardingE= nabled attribute here ("...indicates whether the device is configured to fo= rward data between interfaces") is inconsistent with the corresponding desc= ription of the ForwardingEnabled attribute ("...indicates whether any exter= nal-facing interface is being used as a bridge, route or proxy from any oth= er external-facing interface including itself')) on pg. 13 of the HCD-ATTR = spec. For example, the description in HCD-NAP doesn't address the aspect of= the device interfacing with itself. 13. Section 5.1.1.4, pg. 13, Line 478: The HCD-ATTR spec and the HCD-ATTR= spec are inconsistent on the size of the ForwardingEnabled attribute. The = HCD-ATTR spec (see pg. 13) says that this attribute is a single-bit field b= ut the HCD-NAP spec says that this attribute is represented in two bytes. N= ote that this exact same inconsistency between the HCD-NAP and HCD-ATTR spe= cs applies to the following attributes: DefaultPasswordEnabled, PSTNFaxEnab= led, UserApplicationEnabled and UserApplicationPersistenceEnabled. 14. Section 5.1.1.10, pg. 12, Line 471: The description of the VendorSMIC= ode attribute here ("...indicates the name of the manufacturer of the HCD")= is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the ForwardingEnable= d attribute ("...contains a globally unique SMI Network Management Private = Enterprise Code of the vendor...")) on pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec. 15. Section 5.1.1.14, pg. 18, Line 606: The description of the FirmwarePa= tches ttribute here ("...all patches must be listed in the order in which t= hey were applied, beginning with the first patch and ending with the last p= atch applied") is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the Fi= rmwarePatches attribute ("...all patches must be listed in the order in whi= ch they were applied, beginning with the first patch and ending with the mo= st current patch")) on pg. 13 of the HCD-ATTR spec. The issue is that the m= ost current patch may not always be (nor does it have to be) the last patch= applied. Note that this exact same inconsistency between the HCD-NAP and H= CD-ATTR specs applies to the following attributes: UserApplicationPatches a= nd ResidentApplicationPatches. 16. Section 5.1.1.15, pg. 18, Line 619: The description of the Attributes= NaturalLanguage attribute here ("...indicates the local language used for t= he string attributes within this SOH") is inconsistent with the correspondi= ng description of the AttributesNaturalLanguage attribute ("...indicates th= e local language used for all HCD string attribute values")) on pg. 14 of t= he HCD-ATTR spec. 17. Section 5.1.1.15, pg. 18, Line 619: The reference to 'rfc5646' should= be '[RFC5646]'. 18. General Observation: The list of Mandatory, Conditionally Mandatory a= nd Optional attributes in the HCD-NAP spec does not agree with the list of = the list of Mandatory, Conditionally Mandatory and Optional attributes in S= ection 5 of the HCD-ATTR spec (e.g., UserApplicationEnabled is Conditionall= y Mandatory in the HCD-NAP spec but is Mandatory in the HCD-ATR spec). 19. Section 5.1.2.1, pg. 19, Line 637: The description of the UserApplica= tionEnabled attribute here ("...indicates whether the device is configured = to allow execution of User Applications") is inconsistent with the correspo= nding description of the UserApplicationEnabled attribute ("...indicates wh= ether the HCD supports (or currently has enabled) the ability to download o= r execute applications intended to dynamically downloaded by users and exec= uted in the device")) on pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec. 20. Section 5.1.2.2, pg. 19, Line 648: The description of the UserApplica= tionPersistenceEnabled attribute here ("...indicates whether the device is = configured to allow User Applications to remain available in the system aft= er use") is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the UserAppl= icationPersistenceEnabled attribute ("...indicates whether user-downloadabl= e applications can persist outside the boundary of a single job")) on pg. 1= 4 of the HCD-ATTR spec. 21. Section 5.1.2.3, pg. 20, Lines 661 and 670: To be consistent with wha= t is in the HCD-ATTR spec for the UserApplicationName attribute I would sug= gest that the description on both these lines be changed to read "...identi= fies the name of a User Application that has been loaded..." Same comment a= pplies to the ResidentApplicationName attribute in Section 5.1.2.7, pg. 22,= Lines 722 & 732. 22. Section 5.1.2.8, pg. 23, Line 743: To be consistent with what is in t= he HCD-ATTR spec for the ResidentApplicationVersion attribute I would sugge= st that the description be changed to read "...uniquely identifies the curr= ent Resident Application version." 23. Section 5.1.3.1, pg. 25, Line 800: To be consistent with what is in t= he HCD-ATTR spec for the ConfigurationState attribute I would suggest that = the description be changed to read "...uniquely identifies the state of any= configuration settings that..." 24. Section 5.1.3.1, pg. 25, Line 808: The text here refers to "Imaging D= evice". Since this is the HCD-NAP spec, this reference should probably be t= o HCD instead. Same comment applies to Section 5.1.3.2, pg. 25, Line 820 an= d Section 6.4, pg. 26, Line 856. 25. Section 6.1, pg. 26, Line 831: The sentence was changed to refer to S= ection 5.1.1.6; I believe the reference here should be changed back to refe= r to Section 5.1.2. 26. Section 6.4, pg. 26, Line 856: This sentence refers to Section 4.6. G= iven the title of Section 4.6 the text should be changed to read "...at lea= st one of the NAP Access protocols described in 4.6." 27. Section 6.5, pg. 27, Line 862: The following attributes are not menti= oned as requiring revalidation either immediately or at the earliest opport= unity - ResidentApplicationPatches, ForwardingEnabled, DefaultPasswordEnabl= ed, MichanieTypeModel, PSTNFaxEnabled, UserApplicationEnabled, UserApplicat= ionPersistenceEnabled, VendorName, VendorSMICode and AttributesNaturalLangu= age. I just want to confirm whether these were left out deliberately or lef= t out by mistake. 28. Section 7, pg. 27, Line 886: The title for the HCD-ATTR spec listed h= ere is incorrect. It should be PWG Hardcopy Device Health Assessment Attrib= utes. 29. Section 8, pg. 27, Line 890: The [ISO10646] document referenced here = is not listed in Section 10. 30. Section 10.1, pg. 28, Line 906: The following documents listed as Nor= mative References here are not referenced anywhere else in the spec - [IEEE= 2600], [RFC3748], [RFC4330] and [TLS-CIPHER]. I know there are a lot of comments; let me know if you have questions. Alan From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.p= df All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-N= AP Binding Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DFD13USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Joe –=

 

Below are the official= Xerox comments to the PWG Last Call review of the HCD-NAP Spec (note that = many of the comments relate to inconsistencies with the HCD-ATTR spec which= may require changes in the HCD-ATTR spec to implement):

1. &nbs= p;     General Commen= t: This document uses a lot of acronyms but there is no List of Acronyms li= ke there is in the HCD-ATTR spec. Such a list is definitely needed in the H= CD-NAP spec. To help out generating the list, here are the acronyms I found (can’t claim it is all of th= em) – PWG, HCD, PC, MAC, IP, NAP, SHA, SSoH, SoH, SoHR, SHV, DHCP, DN= S, VLAN, ID, EAP, PEAP, RADIUS, PPP, IPsec, HCEP, HRA, PKCS, IDS, TCP, UDP,= SCTP, SMI, IANA, TLV, WCCE, RNAP, WSH, TLS, CHAP and MS.

2. &nbs= p;     General Commen= t: I found several instances where there was no line between paragraphs. Be= consistent – either include a line between paragraphs in all cases o= r do not do so.

3. &nbs= p;     Section 2, pg.= 6, Line 240: The [IDS-ATTR] spec referenced here is not listed in Section = 10.

4. &nbs= p;     Section 4.5.1,= pg. 8, Line 334: section4.6. 4.3 –missing a space and not sure if yo= u meant 4.6, 4.3 or 4.6.4.3 here.

5. &nbs= p;     Section 4.6.1,= pg. 9, Line 352: The end of the sentence should read “….and ga= teway (0.0.0.0) settings.”

6. &nbs= p;     Section 4.6.1,= pg. 9, Line 353: [RFC3442] referenced here is not listed in Section 10.

7. &nbs= p;     This is more o= f a question than a comment. In Section 4.6.2, pg. 9, Line 369 the HCD-NAP = spec provides a reference to a document that describes IEEE 802.1x. Since t= he HCD-ATTR spec also discusses 802.1x, shouldn’t it also provide the same reference to a document that desc= ribes 802.1x?

8. &nbs= p;     Section 4.6.2,= pg. 9, Line 376: The definition of PEAP in the text is incorrect; it shoul= d be Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (Extensible was missing).

9. &nbs= p;     Section 4.7, p= g. 10, Line 417: This line references Section 4.3 for discussion of NAP acc= ess protocols. Confirm that is the correct section to reference here becaus= e Section 4.3 talks about ‘Protocol Transport’.

10. &nb= sp; Section 4.7.4,= pg. 11, Line 432: Grammatically, I think this sentence should read “= …will be revoked and limit network access to a restricted network.”

11. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 2, pg. 12, Line 458: It is not clear what the ‘HRESULT’ value m= entioned here refers to.

12. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 4, pg. 12, Line 471: The description of the ForwardingEnabled attribute her= e (“…indicates whether the device is configured to forward data= between interfaces”) is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the ForwardingEnabled attribute (“̷= 0;indicates whether any external-facing interface is being used as a bridge= , route or proxy from any other external-facing interface including itself&= #8217;)) on pg. 13 of the HCD-ATTR spec. For example, the description in HCD-NAP doesn’t address the aspect of the device = interfacing with itself.

13. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 4, pg. 13, Line 478: The HCD-ATTR spec and the HCD-ATTR spec are inconsiste= nt on the size of the ForwardingEnabled attribute. The HCD-ATTR spec (see p= g. 13) says that this attribute is a single-bit field but the HCD-NAP spec says that this attribute is repres= ented in two bytes. Note that this exact same inconsistency between the HCD= -NAP and HCD-ATTR specs applies to the following attributes: DefaultPasswor= dEnabled, PSTNFaxEnabled, UserApplicationEnabled and UserApplicationPersistenceEnabled.

14. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 10, pg. 12, Line 471: The description of the VendorSMICode attribute here (= “…indicates the name of the manufacturer of the HCD”) is = inconsistent with the corresponding description of the ForwardingEnabled attribute (“…contains a globally unique SMI = Network Management Private Enterprise Code of the vendor…”)) on= pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec.

15. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 14, pg. 18, Line 606: The description of the FirmwarePatches ttribute here = (“…all patches must be listed in the order in which they were a= pplied, beginning with the first patch and ending with the last patch applied”) is inconsistent with the corresp= onding description of the FirmwarePatches attribute (“…all patc= hes must be listed in the order in which they were applied, beginning with = the first patch and ending with the most current patch”)) on pg. 13 of the HCD-ATTR spec.= The issue is that the most current patch may not always be (nor does it ha= ve to be) the last patch applied. Note that this exact same inconsistency b= etween the HCD-NAP and HCD-ATTR specs applies to the following attributes: UserApplicationPatches and ResidentAp= plicationPatches.

16. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 15, pg. 18, Line 619: The description of the AttributesNaturalLanguage attr= ibute here (“…indicates the local language used for the string = attributes within this SOH”) is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the AttributesNaturalLanguage attribute (= “…indicates the local language used for all HCD string attribut= e values”)) on pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec.

17. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.1.= 15, pg. 18, Line 619: The reference to ‘rfc5646’ should be R= 16;[RFC5646]’.

18. &nb= sp; General Observ= ation: The list of Mandatory, Conditionally Mandatory and Optional attribut= es in the HCD-NAP spec does not agree with the list of the list of Mandator= y, Conditionally Mandatory and Optional attributes in Section 5 of the HCD-ATTR spec (e.g., UserApplicationEnabled= is Conditionally Mandatory in the HCD-NAP spec but is Mandatory in the HCD= -ATR spec).

19. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.2.= 1, pg. 19, Line 637: The description of the UserApplicationEnabled attribut= e here (“…indicates whether the device is configured to allow e= xecution of User Applications”) is inconsistent with the corresponding description of the UserApplicationEnabled attribute= (“…indicates whether the HCD supports (or currently has enable= d) the ability to download or execute applications intended to dynamically = downloaded by users and executed in the device”)) on pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec.

20. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.2.= 2, pg. 19, Line 648: The description of the UserApplicationPersistenceEnabl= ed attribute here (“…indicates whether the device is configured= to allow User Applications to remain available in the system after use”) is inconsistent with the corresponding des= cription of the UserApplicationPersistenceEnabled attribute (“…= indicates whether user-downloadable applications can persist outside the bo= undary of a single job”)) on pg. 14 of the HCD-ATTR spec.

21. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.2.= 3, pg. 20, Lines 661 and 670: To be consistent with what is in the HCD-ATTR= spec for the UserApplicationName attribute I would suggest that the descri= ption on both these lines be changed to read “…identifies the name of a User Application tha= t has been loaded…” Same comment applies to the ResidentApplica= tionName attribute in Section 5.1.2.7, pg. 22, Lines 722 & 732.

22. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.2.= 8, pg. 23, Line 743: To be consistent with what is in the HCD-ATTR spec for= the ResidentApplicationVersion attribute I would suggest that the descript= ion be changed to read “…uniquely identifies the current Resident Application version.”

23. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.3.= 1, pg. 25, Line 800: To be consistent with what is in the HCD-ATTR spec for= the ConfigurationState attribute I would suggest that the description be c= hanged to read “…uniquely identifies the state of any configuration settings that…”

24. &nb= sp; Section 5.1.3.= 1, pg. 25, Line 808: The text here refers to “Imaging Device”. = Since this is the HCD-NAP spec, this reference should probably be to HCD in= stead. Same comment applies to Section 5.1.3.2, pg. 25, Line 820 and Section 6.4, pg. 26, Line 856.

25. &nb= sp; Section 6.1, p= g. 26, Line 831: The sentence was changed to refer to Section 5.1.1.6; I be= lieve the reference here should be changed back to refer to Section 5.1.2.<= o:p>

26. &nb= sp; Section 6.4, p= g. 26, Line 856: This sentence refers to Section 4.6. Given the title of Se= ction 4.6 the text should be changed to read “…at least one of = the NAP Access protocols described in 4.6.”

27. &nb= sp; Section 6.5, p= g. 27, Line 862: The following attributes are not mentioned as requiring re= validation either immediately or at the earliest opportunity – Reside= ntApplicationPatches, ForwardingEnabled, DefaultPasswordEnabled, MichanieTypeModel, PSTNFaxEnabled, UserApplication= Enabled, UserApplicationPersistenceEnabled, VendorName, VendorSMICode and A= ttributesNaturalLanguage. I just want to confirm whether these were left ou= t deliberately or left out by mistake.

28. &nb= sp; Section 7, pg.= 27, Line 886: The title for the HCD-ATTR spec listed here is incorrect. It= should be PWG Hardcopy Device Health Assessment Attributes.

29. &nb= sp; Section 8, pg.= 27, Line 890: The [ISO10646] document referenced here is not listed in Sec= tion 10.

30. &nb= sp; Section 10.1, = pg. 28, Line 906: The following documents listed as Normative References he= re are not referenced anywhere else in the spec – [IEEE2600], [RFC374= 8], [RFC4330] and [TLS-CIPHER].

 

I know there are a lot= of comments; let me know if you have questions.

 

Alan=

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding<= /span>

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.pdf

All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-NAP Binding Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880DFD13USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1671568782== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1671568782==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 10 07:31:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AED821F87A9 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:31:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OK+J0MaA5ECL for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C806B21F862D for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1407922D; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:31:00 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr004.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.13]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1841E7922B for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:30:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht003.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.29]) by USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Jan 2013 09:30:24 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.134]) by USA7109HT003.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.29]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:30:10 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Michael Sweet (msweet@apple.com) (msweet@apple.com)" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Index: Ac3MFRdvvcLakKIcThSXn2gGloTSiQjL6fzg Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:30:09 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880E0CDF@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.92] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "pwg-announce@pwg.org" X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0616524148==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 6D1407922D.AD718 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0616524148== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880E0CDFUSA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880E0CDFUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael - Below are the official Xerox comments against the PWG Last Call for the PWG= Log Spec: 1. This document doesn't have as many acronyms as other specs, but it= does have some acronyms so a List of Acronyms should be provided in Sectio= n 2. To help, here are the acronyms I spotted in the document - FQDN, MFD, = RFC, PWG, HIPAA, IP, IPP, IANA, MIB, URI, IDS, UUID 2. Section 1, pg. 9, Line 155: The reference to IEEE Std 2600 in the = text here is incorrect; it should be IEEE Std 2600(tm)-2008. 3. Section 4.1, pg. 13, Line 245: This is a suggestion. I think gramm= atically this sentence is incorrect as written; it should be "The value"-" = MAY be used; however, Imaging Devices SHOULD make reasonable attempts..." 4. The following documents listed in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 are not r= eferenced elsewhere in the document - [IEEE2600.1], [IEEE2600.2], [IEEE2600= .3], [IEEE2600.4], [RFC2277], [RFC3998], [RFC5246], [RFC5425] and [RFC5426]. 5. Section 5.1.2, pg. 17, Line 347: Again this is a suggestion. I thi= nk grammatically this sentence is incorrect as written; it should be "Most = log events map directly from the corresponding IPP notification events; how= ever, logged events are sent both for success and failure." 6. Section 5.1.8, pg. 18, Line 377: I believe grammatically this shou= ld read ""Administrator", a user who is authorized to manage all aspects of= a device or service," Alan From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880E0CDFUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Michael –

 

Below are the official= Xerox comments against the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log Spec:<= /span>

1. &nbs= p;     This document = doesn’t have as many acronyms as other specs, but it does have some a= cronyms so a List of Acronyms should be provided in Section 2. To help, her= e are the acronyms I spotted in the document – FQDN, MFD, RFC, PWG, HIPAA, IP, IPP, IANA, MIB, URI, IDS, UUID

2. &nbs= p;     Section 1, pg.= 9, Line 155: The reference to IEEE Std 2600 in the text here is incorrect;= it should be IEEE Std 2600™-2008.

3. &nbs= p;     Section 4.1, p= g. 13, Line 245: This is a suggestion. I think grammatically this sentence = is incorrect as written; it should be “The value”-“ MAY b= e used; however, Imaging Devices SHOULD make reasonable attempts…”

4. &nbs= p;     The following = documents listed in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 are not referenced elsewhere in = the document – [IEEE2600.1], [IEEE2600.2], [IEEE2600.3], [IEEE2600.4]= , [RFC2277], [RFC3998], [RFC5246], [RFC5425] and [RFC5426].

5. &nbs= p;     Section 5.1.2,= pg. 17, Line 347: Again this is a suggestion. I think grammatically this s= entence is incorrect as written; it should be “Most log events map di= rectly from the corresponding IPP notification events; however, logged events are sent both for success and failure.̶= 1;

6. &nbs= p;     Section 5.1.8,= pg. 18, Line 377: I believe grammatically this should read “”A= dministrator”, a user who is authorized to manage all aspects = of a device or service,”

 

Alan=

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf<= /u>

All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG = Chair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Mic= hael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880E0CDFUSA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============0616524148== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0616524148==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 10 12:50:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F76D21F8855 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:50:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbxwL0m+04Zo for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA321F8799 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B99C79233; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:49:52 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA077922C for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:49:38 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGF000FYGHITYC1@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:49:38 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f466d000004340-e9-50ef2960de4d Received: from [17.153.16.227] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.16.227]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 04.76.17216.1692FE05; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:49:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:49:36 -0500 Message-id: <8C69C023-FB15-4F39-82F0-8472F4068BC3@apple.com> References: To: "PWG Announcements Inc." X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPgsW6i5vsAg67z2hZHvsVarGtdzezA 5LH15A82j3mLpzMFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZSzd9Yy9YFFqxbL1m1gaGH+FdzFycEgImEjM eGLdxcgJZIpJXLi3ng3EFhKYyiRxpaUUxGYWSJD4+Xs3I4jNK6AncbhzOytIqzBQ643N0iBh NgE1id+T+lhBbE6BYIlVr3awgNgsAqoSyzZOYYNotZHYPmsCI8T4IIk3mxaB1YgIGEvsaN/L BnGCrMSKqb1MExh5ZyHZPAvJZoi4tsSyha+ZIWwDiaedr7CI60u8eTeHaQEj2ypGwaLUnMRK Q2O9xIKCnFS95PzcTYygMGwolN3BuP8n/yFGAQ5GJR5eJfX3AUKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEeFsW vAsQ4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzvuRFyglkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpg7GCPCore NsMsvPv+fEnV8nO/1on/Yrs8e+HrEwdPr5lywUIzyFSVefoFtdm7mQ6u48lpMFLfknGjsiBi r/uBjFedvPm8927NiSwQ/5K9tvSoJHvd29WxJ16fWL4uxDeEu3+KzTc9HgWfk0nMYbN/vbP+ rn/qm8P2pq0264I+2WvsODGL6eYZCSWW4oxEQy3mouJEAM0h/ac/AgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1324221839==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 3B99C79233.AE87F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1324221839== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_lSEMeOPuT6Lnr+3oqxKpwg)" --Boundary_(ID_lSEMeOPuT6Lnr+3oqxKpwg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable All, We need 3 more members to send in their notice that they have reviewed the = PWG Log spec, with or without comments, in order to advance this to PWG For= mal Vote. Thank you in advance for your review! On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:47 PM, "Murdock, Joe" wrote: > All, >=20 > [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday= January 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] >=20 > This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log spec= ification, located at: >=20 > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf >=20 > All required entries and values defined in this document have been protot= yped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various rev= isions of this document and an IDS WG last call. >=20 > The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members mu= st acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any docum= ent can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vo= te but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. >=20 >=20 > HOW TO RESPOND >=20 > Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: > Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [n= o] comments >=20 >=20 > WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE >=20 > Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (repl= acing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): >=20 > =93ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) > jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) > alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) > msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) >=20 > Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email= there - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. >=20 > Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. >=20 > Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0= is located at: >=20 > http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf >=20=20 >=20=20 >=20=20 >=20=20 >=20=20 > --------------------------------------- > Joe Murdock > Principal Engineer and Researcher > Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security > Sharp Labs of America > 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd > Camas, WA 98607 > (360) 817-7542 > jmurdock@sharplabs.com >=20=20 >=20 > --=20 > This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is=20 > believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ > pwg-announce mailing list > pwg-announce@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_lSEMeOPuT6Lnr+3oqxKpwg) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable All,

We need 3 more members to send in their noti= ce that they have reviewed the PWG Log spec, with or without comments, in o= rder to advance this to PWG Formal Vote. Thank you in advance for your revi= ew!


On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:47 PM, "Mu= rdock, Joe" <jmurdock@sharplab= s.com> wrote:

All,

[This PWG Last= Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday January 18, 201= 3 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last C= all for the PWG Log specification, located at:

           = ;     ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf
All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototy= ped by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revi= sions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 = requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG L= ast Call (with or without comments), before any document can progress to PW= G Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES re= quire your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an = email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Com= pany Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no] comments<= br>

WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to = *all* of the following email addresses (replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" w= ith '@'):

=93ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must = be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG C= hair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary)
msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet= , PWG-Log Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mai= ling list to send email there - otherwise your email will be silently disca= rded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce li= st.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Ve= rsion 3.0 is located at:

  =             &nb= sp; http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_doc= s/pwg-process30.pdf
 =
 
 = ;
 
 
----= -----------------------------------
Joe Murdock
Principal Engineer and Resear= cher
Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security
Sharp Labs= of America
5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd
Camas, WA 98607
<= div style=3D"margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibr= i, sans-serif; ">(360) 817-7542=
 

--=  
This message has bee= n scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. ______________________= _________________________
pwg-announce mailing list
http= s://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce

_______________________________________________________= _________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer,= PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_lSEMeOPuT6Lnr+3oqxKpwg)-- --===============1324221839== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1324221839==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 10 13:59:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD8E21F87DF for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:59:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7bYTpzZoxMX for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C1D21F87D3 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB67E79232; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:59:06 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09F79230 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:58:52 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGF000TMGV1TYC1@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:57:06 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f466d000004340-d3-50ef2b219e7e Received: from [17.153.16.227] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.16.227]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 69.2B.17216.22B2FE05; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:57:06 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:57:05 -0500 To: "PWG Announcements Inc." Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFPgsa6S9vsAg2UNuhZHvsVarGtdzezA 5LH15A82j3mLpzMFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZezbu5a1YI9Axak7W1gbGJfwdjFyckgImEjM ON7AAmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgKpPEqalL2UESbAJqEr8n9bGC2MwCWhI3/r1kgrC1JZYtfM0M YrMIqEq0/O8GiwsLZEn0T38M1isiYCyxo30vG4jNK2AjcfHHFChbT+Jw53ZWiMWyEium9jJN YOSZhWTFLCQrZiFpWcDIvIpRsCg1J7HS0FgvsaAgJ1UvOT93EyMoWBoKZXcw7v/Jf4hRgINR iYdXSf19gBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiUR3pYF7wKEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ837kBUoJ pCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoY1TlfX8/IVdX8ubr3x6GrFxg+J7toPypRYstp8RWWyo7bEsMW Jpd5Y6tcYb7z63Mp3yT++Qh/VnadzJMZZ8aYbOPCOPkKf/u6Tr3OadObt23jU569b/HVSpdZ my6Kfqt+s7DO3GbGxqyFZ93PJ0yP/qsfPmFTc3XjqcdVCv77d7wMjOHhyf+gxFKckWioxVxU nAgAruxYOBICAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] EXTENDED: PWG Last Call of PWG Media Standardized Names Version 2.0 (MSN2) (11/26/12 to 01/25/13) X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: EB67E79232.AC637 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [This last call has been extended in order to obtain at least two more responses - note that non-voting members may respond to a PWG Last Call and count towards the quorum] All, [This PWG Last Call started Monday November 26, 2012 and now ends Friday January 25, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Media Standardized Names Version 2.0 (MSN2) specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf All required attributes and values defined in this document have been prototyped by Apple and/or other vendors. The IPP WG has completed extensive review of the various revisions of this document and an IPP WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any document can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the MSN2 specification and has [no] comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): ipp "at" pwg "dot" org (IPP WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) blueroofmusic "at" gmail "dot" com (Ira McDonald, IPP WG Co-Chair) ptykodi "at" tykodi "dot" com (Paul Tykodi, IPP WG Co-Chair) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, IPP WG Secretary and MSN2 Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IPP WG mailing list to send email there - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce From wu@wu.com Fri Jan 11 00:26:03 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB9421F89C0 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:26:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.39 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, SARE_FROM_SPAM_MONEY2=0.89, TVD_PH_SUBJ_META=0] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYf2UV8DmA7v for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.md.go.th (mail.md.go.th [119.46.92.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E5C21F8A50 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from md.go.th (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.md.go.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13460B620FE; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:19:02 +0700 (ICT) From: "Western Union Money Transfer" Reply-To: wu.western.un10@hotmail.com Subject: Notice!!! Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:19:02 +0700 Message-Id: <20130111071903.M44786@wu.com> X-Mailer: Chaotha WebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 41.190.3.192 (technical) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: undisclosed-recipients:; You were selected as a winner of Western Union New Year Customers Award. Five Hundred and Fifty Thousand United States Dollars and I personally advise that you use the funds wisely. However, we need your information as stated below to commence the transaction due process: 1. Receiver's Full Name: 2. Receiver's Address: 3. Receiver's Country: 4.Receiver's Telephone Number: 5. Receiver's Occupation:, with the requested data we can commence the facilitation of your funds transfer to you. Marine Department From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sun Jan 13 16:26:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EF621F86AA for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7m1thcIALhj for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6737821F86AE for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D841B791E9; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:26:35 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-ia0-f178.google.com (mail-ia0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2B3791E5 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:26:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ia0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k25so3220340iah.9 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JgXdUbkHDtluAyKMzWjav4M4odYJM2w77Ar+2wPoA5w=; b=B0ETfUChxF/RsesdZ7tQmyw2Cxssw4rHTDHxkrqOndbHWY5dGeRFuAtgVKaIpzHjMh l11IBAxKAJTUuGdqmeh7RPPLLNbGVOkCzshUrDdBIbGFfrTrZeWe4qPCgnFcvzZYx0lV ENfM2Dd1hEB22fu6HRlOnD5yl3/fNQTbBIDwARXfQq4znliaTh+6ZlVMfFiTdEnrduKH o11Xi7Wx1ssTiy4a4DqyJQuB4mYPJPmWd5CndldNzdRpntsKEyL0cnMqTb12+Utec4mJ WUF1h6Pi180YPDFRVbAfZhyZqfvN2URZte9GgihWnYDfn41/CozZTWaoAprnnMY40/rc aVzA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.184.164 with SMTP id ev4mr830750igc.91.1358123179932; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.17.73 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:26:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:26:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: ipp@pwg.org, Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] IPP Agenda - 3-5pm Eastern 14 January 2013 X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0022259509==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: D841B791E9.A8517 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0022259509== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340793b37b1304d334b1a9 --14dae9340793b37b1304d334b1a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Our next IPP WG call will be this Monday! Monday 14 January 12-2pm US Pacific / 3-5pm US Eastern Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) Attendee Access Code: *******# Attendee ID Code: # (empty) ------------------------------------------------------- Meeting information ------------------------------------------------------- Topic: IPP/Cloud Imaging WG Telecon Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no end date Time: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco) Meeting Number: 624 587 312 Meeting Password: pwg123 ------------------------------------------------------- To start or join the online meeting ------------------------------------------------------- Go to https://appleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.php?ED=204995427&UID=504472682&PW= NNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=MiM0 ------------------------------------------------------- Agenda: (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker - Mike? (2) Approve IPP minutes from PWG F2F in December - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20121206.pdf (3) Status of PWG Formal Vote on IPP Everywhere - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippeve10-20121116.pdf - approved (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain) - Mike - issue PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012 (4) Status of PWG Last Call on MSN2 (extended to end on 25 January) - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf - pending (6 review acknowledgments) - All - send your review comments! (5) Status of Canon issues for IPP FaxOut - see email thread (Rick Yardumian, Mike Sweet) - Mike - issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut (6) Next steps - IPP/Cloud joint call on Monday 28 January - slide review - IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursday 7 February Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --14dae9340793b37b1304d334b1a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Our next IPP WG call will be this Monday!

Monday 14 Janua= ry 12-2pm US Pacific / 3-5pm US Eastern

Call-in toll-free number (US= /Canada): 1-866-469-3239
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300= (Primary)
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

Attendee Ac= cess Code: *******#
Attendee ID Code: # (empty)
-------------------------------------------------------
Meeting inform= ation
-------------------------------------------------------
Topic: IPP/Cloud= Imaging WG Telecon
Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no = end date
Time: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco)
Meetin= g Number: 624 587 312
Meeting Password: pwg123
-----------------------------------------------= --------
To start or join the online meeting
------------------------= -------------------------------
Go to https://ap= pleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.php?ED=3D204995427&UID=3D504472682&PW= =3D
NNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=3DMiM0
--------------------------------------------= -----------

Agenda:
(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
- Mike?=

(2) Approve IPP minutes from PWG F2F in December
- ftp://f= tp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20121206.pdf

(3) Status of PWG Formal Vote on IPP Everywhere
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/p= wg/ipp/wd/wd-ippeve10-20121116.pdf
- approved (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstai= n)
- Mike - issue PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012

(4) Status o= f PWG Last Call on MSN2 (extended to end on 25 January)
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf
- pending (6 review acknowledgments)
- All - send your review comments!<= br>
(5) Status of Canon issues for IPP FaxOut
- see email thread (Ric= k Yardumian, Mike Sweet)
- Mike - issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut

(6) Next steps
- IPP/Cloud joint call on Monday 28 January - slide r= eview
- IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursday 7 February

Cheers,<= br>- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair -= Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP= WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded= Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites= .google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://si= tes.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Winter=A0 579 Park Place=A0 Saline, MI=A0 48176=A0 = 734-944-0094
Summer=A0 PO Box 221=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839=A0 906-494-2= 434


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --14dae9340793b37b1304d334b1a9-- --===============0022259509== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0022259509==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 14 11:59:21 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF0421F8B1A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:59:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTwYjDaAWYXR for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:59:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC83121F8B19 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:59:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FC9791EA; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:59:02 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70205791E8 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:58:48 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGM00JB0STDVHR2@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:58:44 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f466d000004340-32-50f463731c45 Received: from da0704a-dhcp70.apple.com (da0704a-dhcp70.apple.com [17.197.43.70]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 73.B2.17216.37364F05; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:58:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [IPP] IPP Agenda - 3-5pm Eastern 14 January 2013 From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:58:43 -0800 Message-id: <9D330B0F-2AD9-4584-BA59-D2CE6B806821@apple.com> References: To: Ira McDonald X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieFTbTbc4+UuAwc73VhavXy1ltzi27yWL xZFvsQ7MHltP/mDz2DnrLrvHvMXTmQKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgydrQ2sRec8qrYN8+rgXGm YxcjJ4eEgIlE24m7LBC2mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQEljNJ9D1czgaSEBawlXi+tokRxOYV0JM43Lmd FcRmFkiQuNd/HMxmE1CT+D2pD8zmFAiU2PX+NpjNIqAqsWrXTqh6fomDvR+YIebYSKza9poJ xBYSCJB4f+0y0HwODhEBLYklzxUh7pGVWDG1l2kCI98sJJtnIdkMYWtLLFv4mhnC1pN42fSO HVNcV+LiukmMCxjZVjEKFqXmJFYaGuslFhTkpOol5+duYgQFbUOh7A7G/T/5DzEKcDAq8fAa GXwJEGJNLCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCuzMSKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZw3JwwoJZCeWJKa nZpakFoEk2Xi4JRqYHTk/pz2Jycut6vz5TKpZWnnX8v0dLJvX3WP/4xri1/88uSM3vgt8Zsk St4vnDMv9G7Rv1UNSSIpXws520w3TPq7Ok5d2auUeYqPtlXk/O48v6IevrvPX99YYhUlUnVs Q+M+1deLert33bp3pSNj5xrO6afXVMfosrgmp5zYnjqtlN2N/cH8b0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAHGR qaBWAgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0061953224==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 68FC9791EA.A96A1 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0061953224== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_uslvz043QImHUSf+dLbcHQ)" --Boundary_(ID_uslvz043QImHUSf+dLbcHQ) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FYI, no WebEx today due to Java security issues preventing me from running it... :/ On 2013-01-13, at 4:26 PM, Ira McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > Our next IPP WG call will be this Monday! > > Monday 14 January 12-2pm US Pacific / 3-5pm US Eastern > > Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 > Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) > Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) > > Attendee Access Code: *******# > Attendee ID Code: # (empty) > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Meeting information > ------------------------------------------------------- > Topic: IPP/Cloud Imaging WG Telecon > Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no end date > Time: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco) > Meeting Number: 624 587 312 > Meeting Password: pwg123 > ------------------------------------------------------- > To start or join the online meeting > ------------------------------------------------------- > Go to https://appleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.php?ED=204995427&UID=504472682&PW= > NNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=MiM0 > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Agenda: > (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker > - Mike? > > (2) Approve IPP minutes from PWG F2F in December > - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20121206.pdf > > (3) Status of PWG Formal Vote on IPP Everywhere > - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippeve10-20121116.pdf > - approved (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain) > - Mike - issue PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012 > > (4) Status of PWG Last Call on MSN2 (extended to end on 25 January) > - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf > - pending (6 review acknowledgments) > - All - send your review comments! > > (5) Status of Canon issues for IPP FaxOut > - see email thread (Rick Yardumian, Mike Sweet) > - Mike - issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut > > (6) Next steps > - IPP/Cloud joint call on Monday 28 January - slide review > - IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursday 7 February > > Cheers, > - Ira > > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG > Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group > Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG > Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG > Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG > IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB > Blue Roof Music/High North Inc > http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic > http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc > mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com > Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 > Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > ipp@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_uslvz043QImHUSf+dLbcHQ) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable FYI, no WebEx today due= to Java security issues preventing me from running it... :/

<= div>On 2013-01-13, at 4:26 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Our next IPP = WG call will be this Monday!

Monday 14 January 12-2pm US Pacific / 3= -5pm US Eastern

Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239=
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary)
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

Attendee Ac= cess Code: *******#
Attendee ID Code: # (empty)
-------------------------------------------------------
Meeting inform= ation
-------------------------------------------------------
Topic: IPP/Cloud= Imaging WG Telecon
Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no = end date
Time: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco)
Meetin= g Number: 624 587 312
Meeting Password: pwg123
-----------------------------------------------= --------
To start or join the online meeting
------------------------= -------------------------------
Go to https://ap= pleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.php?ED=3D204995427&UID=3D504472682&PW= =3D
NNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=3DMiM0
--------------------------------------------= -----------

Agenda:
(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
- Mike?=

(2) Approve IPP minutes from PWG F2F in December
- ftp://f= tp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20121206.pdf

(3) Status of PWG Formal Vote on IPP Everywhere
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/p= wg/ipp/wd/wd-ippeve10-20121116.pdf
- approved (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstai= n)
- Mike - issue PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012

(4) Status o= f PWG Last Call on MSN2 (extended to end on 25 January)
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf
- pending (6 review acknowledgments)
- All - send your review comments!<= br>
(5) Status of Canon issues for IPP FaxOut
- see email thread (Ric= k Yardumian, Mike Sweet)
- Mike - issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut

(6) Next steps
- IPP/Cloud joint call on Monday 28 January - slide r= eview
- IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursday 7 February

Cheers,<= br>- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair -= Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP= WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded= Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites= .google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://si= tes.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  = 48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI = 49839  906-494-2434


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/l= istinfo/ipp

_________________________________________________= ________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair<= /div>


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_uslvz043QImHUSf+dLbcHQ)-- --===============0061953224== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0061953224==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 14 12:41:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8FA21F8B5E for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:41:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c6u2r9PQvxm5 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3D521F8B48 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AF7791F8; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:40:59 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA019791F6 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:40:46 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MGM00JL3URFVH23@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:40:44 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7fe96d000000e2b-5c-50f46d4bc43f Received: from da0704a-dhcp70.apple.com (da0704a-dhcp70.apple.com [17.197.43.70]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 26.53.03627.B4D64F05; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:40:43 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:40:42 -0800 To: "ipp@pwg.org" Message-id: <1B82490F-02E6-466C-BA06-F73AF138DA1D@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieFTbTdc790uAwYRj0hbH9r1ksTjyLdaB yWPryR9sHvMWT2cKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyvg9+xpTwXXRivZtL1kbGHuFuxg5OSQETCTu rJrLDmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgOZPE68XrWEESbAJqEr8n9YHZzAIJEl8b7rGA2CwCqhKLLp4A axYWMJD42r6XCcQWEZCXWNs2FczmFbCR+PpqNjOErSdxuHM7K8QyWYkVU3uZJjByz0IydhaS Moi4tsSyha+ZZzFyANk6EpMXMqIKQ9gfzx9hWsDItopRsCg1J7HS0EQvsaAgJ1UvOT93EyMo tBoKTXYwHvzJf4hRgINRiYf3lu6XACHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivDsjgUK8KYmVValF+fFFpTmp xYcYpTlYlMR5i8KAUgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsaVoV0/cnNOiiw8l1bZ9cU03/Xzr2KR 07MYttdf+HBy/oSVs/M4ogJTT8+f0R/d0cq20WvmlaCTIr0yHzRW25163qJ/fHbDDNXOlrM3 Tafp6LElSHJuKhZnqNBfdPwhQ4Drdrcrr+WYtd0f9nvlHp3VsjCg4VHx7y9Kd6+qyG9UnF23 aPErnmlKLMUZiYZazEXFiQAl0UgKKQIAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's IPP concall X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1062341407==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 93AF7791F8.A86FD X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1062341407== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_qKlLtp2paIEybx/NmeODHw)" --Boundary_(ID_qKlLtp2paIEybx/NmeODHw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, I have posted the minutes from today's IPP conference call to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20130114.pdf Our next conference call will be a joint meeting with the Cloud Imaging Model WG on January 28, 2013 at 3pm ET. New action items: - Ira to encourage IETF ADs to get IPPS and LDAP RFCs pushed through - Mike to publish IPP Everywhere as PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012 - Mike to issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_qKlLtp2paIEybx/NmeODHw) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable All,

I= have posted the minutes from today's IPP conference call to:

Our next conference call will be a j= oint meeting with the Cloud Imaging Model WG on January 28, 2013 at 3pm ET.=

New action items:

<= span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-space:pre"> - Ira = to encourage IETF ADs to get IPPS and LDAP RFCs pushed through
- M= ike to publish IPP Everywhere as PWG Candidate Standards PWG 5100.14-2012
- Mike to issue revised draft of IPP FaxOut

____________________= _____________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing Sys= tem Engineer, PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_qKlLtp2paIEybx/NmeODHw)-- --===============1062341407== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1062341407==-- From babyingw@acm.org Fri Jan 18 06:26:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336B221F8887 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:26:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -50.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOa8XBWHilyX for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fetnet.net (unknown [27.51.148.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B2021F8862 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from apache by tcukdvaghfvchcjjtivaigh. with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 2DSP5W-RH8DI9-6E for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:26:29 +0800 To: Subject: Russian bitches wanna to suck for you Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:26:29 +0800 From: "Bill Bowles" Message-ID: <906BBF4833259C41CF29F23E450C6857@tcukdvaghfvchcjjtivaigh.> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.1 (phpmailer.sourceforge.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------02090900706050903030204" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------02090900706050903030204 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Free Registration --------------02090900706050903030204 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1250"

Free Registration

--------------02090900706050903030204-- From gpolidora@aol.com Sun Jan 20 20:36:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0B321F87EE for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:36:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.5 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.041, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iz8GZGIWDvd2 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from oms-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (oms-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com [205.188.255.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F14121F879A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.134]) by oms-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTP id 9C65638000073; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:36:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from xaap (unknown [123.11.168.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 97553E0000BC; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:36:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <7F86AC6B2060310FF64E51E0A333EE16@xaap> From: "hi" To: Subject: Hello Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:36:55 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 x-aol-global-disposition: S DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1358742991; bh=F6r32hd4+ynj9cGG9jVhLsjHD3FrDHlogOQlma8G/n0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CunS49mBz6Pdma9p1WhQ01yQ2hdPjMDviZP3GsMc9ibpS6NtUKoKNsxQVCZ+tJ5AD OH4RNFdJ9/PXsl4MoMPCOFLt1pF2179pQ1Y11/B+vzOX1w1rB2Qtbb7Aa9GZ6udMAs mU4DLUnZM6+V4QE+GM3F+9dn8DOxXtQvPGRDWMzA= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:111498216:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338650fcc5cb46a4 X-AOL-IP: 123.11.168.60 PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMCBUcmFuc2l0aW9uYWwv L0VOIj4NCjxIVE1MPjxIRUFEPg0KPE1FVEEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj1Db250ZW50LVR5cGUgY29udGVu dD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxNRVRBIGNvbnRlbnQ9Ik1TSFRNTCA2LjAw LjI5MDAuNjMxNSIgbmFtZT1HRU5FUkFUT1I+PC9IRUFEPg0KPEJPRFk+DQo8RElWIGNsYXNzPWFs bW9zdF9oYWxmX2NlbGwgY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfMmx2ejBwPSIxMzAiPjxTUEFOIGxhbmc9aXQgdmc9 IjQiIA0KQmM9InVuZGVmaW5lZCIgY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfcjR1OTFkPSIxMjkiPjxTUEFOIGNsYXNz PWhwcyB0aXRsZT3ngrnlh7vlj6/mmL7npLrlhbbku5bnv7vor5EgDQpjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF9yNHU5 MWQ9IjEwNCI+PFNQQU4gbGFuZz1wdCB2Zz0iNCIgQmM9InVuZGVmaW5lZCIgDQpjbG9zdXJlX3Vp ZF9leGJpbTc9IjEzMCI+PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9aHBzIHRpdGxlPeeCueWHu+WPr+aYvuekuuWFtuS7 lue/u+ivkSANCmNsb3N1cmVfdWlkX2V4YmltNz0iNDM3MiI+PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9aHBzIHRpdGxl PeeCueWHu+WPr+aYvuekuuWFtuS7lue/u+ivkSANCmNsb3N1cmVfdWlkX2JrNTR6ND0iMjA0NTEi PjxTUEFOIGxhbmc9ZnIgdmc9IjQiIEJjPSJ1bmRlZmluZWQiIA0KY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfaGR5eGRy PSIxOTkiPjxTUEFOIGNsYXNzPWhwcyB0aXRsZT3ngrnlh7vlj6/mmL7npLrlhbbku5bnv7vor5Eg DQpjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF9oZHl4ZHI9IjE3MCI+PFNQQU4gbGFuZz1lcyB2Zz0iNCIgQmM9InVuZGVm aW5lZCIgDQpjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF9mZ3hxZj0iMTQzIj48U1BBTiBjbGFzcz1ocHMgdGl0bGU954K5 5Ye75Y+v5pi+56S65YW25LuW57+76K+RIA0KY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfZmd4cWY9IjEyMyI+PFNQQU4g Y2xhc3M9aHBzIHRpdGxlPeeCueWHu+WPr+aYvuekuuWFtuS7lue/u+ivkSANCmNsb3N1cmVfdWlk X3VzbTNvND0iMjk5NSI+PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9aHBzIA0Kc3R5bGU9IldPUkQtU1BBQ0lORzogMHB4 OyBGT05UOiAxNnB4IGFyaWFsLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmOyBURVhULVRSQU5TRk9STTogbm9uZTsgQ09M T1I6IHJnYig1MSw1MSw1MSk7IFRFWFQtSU5ERU5UOiAwcHg7IFdISVRFLVNQQUNFOiBub3JtYWw7 IExFVFRFUi1TUEFDSU5HOiBub3JtYWw7IEJBQ0tHUk9VTkQtQ09MT1I6IHJnYigyNDUsMjQ1LDI0 NSk7IFdJRE9XUzogMjsgT1JQSEFOUzogMjsgd2Via2l0LXRleHQtc2l6ZS1hZGp1c3Q6IGF1dG87 IHdlYmtpdC10ZXh0LXN0cm9rZS13aWR0aDogMHB4Ij48Rk9OVCANCnN0eWxlPSJCQUNLR1JPVU5E LUNPTE9SOiAjZmZmZmZmIiBmYWNlPSJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iIA0KY29sb3I9IzAwMDAwMD5I ZWxsbzxCUj5nb29kIGNoYW5jZSBmb3IgeW91PEJSPmlQaG9uZSA1LDMwNmV1cm8saXBhZCAyLCDi gqwgDQoxNjA8QlI+TGFwdG9wLCBUViwgY29tcHV0ZXIsIHRlbGV2aXNpb24gLi4uLiB0aGUgcHJp Y2UgaXMgdmVyeSANCmxvdzxCUj48L0ZPTlQ+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L1NQQU4+PC9TUEFOPjwv U1BBTj48L1NQQU4+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L1NQQU4+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L0RJVj4NCjxE SVYgY2xhc3M9YWxtb3N0X2hhbGZfY2VsbCBjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF8ybHZ6MHA9IjEzMCI+PFNQQU4g bGFuZz1pdCB2Zz0iNCIgDQpCYz0idW5kZWZpbmVkIiBjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF9yNHU5MWQ9IjEyOSI+ PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9aHBzIHRpdGxlPeeCueWHu+WPr+aYvuekuuWFtuS7lue/u+ivkSANCmNsb3N1 cmVfdWlkX3I0dTkxZD0iMTA0Ij48U1BBTiBsYW5nPXB0IHZnPSI0IiBCYz0idW5kZWZpbmVkIiAN CmNsb3N1cmVfdWlkX2V4YmltNz0iMTMwIj48U1BBTiBjbGFzcz1ocHMgdGl0bGU954K55Ye75Y+v 5pi+56S65YW25LuW57+76K+RIA0KY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfZXhiaW03PSI0MzcyIj48U1BBTiBjbGFz cz1ocHMgdGl0bGU954K55Ye75Y+v5pi+56S65YW25LuW57+76K+RIA0KY2xvc3VyZV91aWRfYms1 NHo0PSIyMDQ1MSI+PFNQQU4gbGFuZz1mciB2Zz0iNCIgQmM9InVuZGVmaW5lZCIgDQpjbG9zdXJl X3VpZF9oZHl4ZHI9IjE5OSI+PFNQQU4gY2xhc3M9aHBzIHRpdGxlPeeCueWHu+WPr+aYvuekuuWF tuS7lue/u+ivkSANCmNsb3N1cmVfdWlkX2hkeXhkcj0iMTcwIj48U1BBTiBsYW5nPWVzIHZnPSI0 IiBCYz0idW5kZWZpbmVkIiANCmNsb3N1cmVfdWlkX2ZneHFmPSIxNDMiPjxTUEFOIGNsYXNzPWhw cyB0aXRsZT3ngrnlh7vlj6/mmL7npLrlhbbku5bnv7vor5EgDQpjbG9zdXJlX3VpZF9mZ3hxZj0i MTIzIj48U1BBTiBjbGFzcz1ocHMgdGl0bGU954K55Ye75Y+v5pi+56S65YW25LuW57+76K+RIA0K Y2xvc3VyZV91aWRfdXNtM280PSIyOTk1Ij48U1BBTiBjbGFzcz1ocHMgDQpzdHlsZT0iV09SRC1T UEFDSU5HOiAwcHg7IEZPTlQ6IDE2cHggYXJpYWwsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7IFRFWFQtVFJBTlNGT1JN OiBub25lOyBDT0xPUjogcmdiKDUxLDUxLDUxKTsgVEVYVC1JTkRFTlQ6IDBweDsgV0hJVEUtU1BB Q0U6IG5vcm1hbDsgTEVUVEVSLVNQQUNJTkc6IG5vcm1hbDsgQkFDS0dST1VORC1DT0xPUjogcmdi KDI0NSwyNDUsMjQ1KTsgV0lET1dTOiAyOyBPUlBIQU5TOiAyOyB3ZWJraXQtdGV4dC1zaXplLWFk anVzdDogYXV0bzsgd2Via2l0LXRleHQtc3Ryb2tlLXdpZHRoOiAwcHgiPjxGT05UIA0Kc3R5bGU9 IkJBQ0tHUk9VTkQtQ09MT1I6ICNmZmZmZmYiIGZhY2U9IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIgY29sb3I9 IzAwMDAwMD53d3cgDQouJm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7ZHVkcmVkYS4mbmJzcDsmbmJz cDsgDQpjb208L0ZPTlQ+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L1NQQU4+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L1NQQU4+ PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L1NQQU4+PC9TUEFOPjwvU1BBTj48L0RJVj48L0JPRFk+PC9IVE1MPg0K From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 21 12:26:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE2B21F84E8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:26:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.139 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSOJqAbCGEVT for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:26:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6FE21F877B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:25:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5543E791A6; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:25:32 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr001.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.9]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998B5791A6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:25:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) by USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 Jan 2013 14:25:15 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:25:14 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Index: Ac3ME5mC2PJLQX/MRrmzrZHncO9VLQsAUcjw Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:25:14 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02D@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.83] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1068338613==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 5543E791A6.AECB5 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1068338613== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02DUSA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02DUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The PWG Last call period for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been fo= rmally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not rev= iewed this document yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the s= pec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the docu= ment. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-2012111= 3.pdf A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes specific= ation and has [no] comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-A= ssessment-Attributes Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02DUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been formally extended to Fri= day, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document ye= t and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having revi= ewed the document.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Suker= t@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

 

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-20121113.pdf

A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes sp= ecification and has [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-Assessment-Attributes Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02DUSA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1068338613== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1068338613==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 21 12:28:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12F321F852C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:28:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.324 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hkwu3SNLTI+z for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992F521F84F4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472A791FE; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:26:12 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR005.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr005.acs-inc.com [63.87.171.174]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E69791CC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:25:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) by USA7109MR005.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 Jan 2013 14:25:47 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT004.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.30]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:25:47 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Index: Ac3MFMSAHVOAe5hcTVKlJ5YMXFqRngsAKBEg Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:25:46 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.83] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0426319495==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: D472A791FE.AEBE0 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0426319495== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The PWG Last call period for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to= Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this documen= t yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have= the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the document. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.p= df All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-N= AP Binding Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 a= t 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document yet and you are a PW= G Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the documen= t.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Suker= t@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding<= /span>

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.pdf

All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-NAP Binding Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============0426319495== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0426319495==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 21 12:32:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF32521F84FD for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:32:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.232 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.092, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-PtpWnABXnC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE2321F84F8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282CD791EC; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:29:07 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from usa7109mr007.acs-inc.com (usa7109mr007.acs-inc.com [63.87.171.176]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283DF79214 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:26:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht003.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.29]) by usa7109mr007.acs-inc.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 21 Jan 2013 14:26:28 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT003.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.29]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:26:27 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Index: Ac3MFRdvvcLakKIcThSXn2gGloTSiQsAGE2Q Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:26:26 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04B@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.83] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0896037757==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 282CD791EC.AD191 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0896037757== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04BUSA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04BUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The PWG Last call period for the PWG Log spec has been formally extended to= Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this documen= t yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have= the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the document. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04BUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The PWG Last call peri= od for the PWG Log spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 a= t 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document yet and you are a PW= G Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the documen= t.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Suker= t@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf<= /u>

All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG = Chair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Mic= hael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04BUSA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============0896037757== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0896037757==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 21 17:28:21 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75471F0C42 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:28:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.739 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KGgyC4nC9RsG for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F1A1F0C3E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EBC791D8; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:28:07 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail4.sharplabs.com (mail4.sharplabs.com [216.65.151.214]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F436791D3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:27:51 -0500 (EST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1358818069-0208080874288290001-ml9GHW Received: from WABCASP2.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.252]) by mail4.sharplabs.com with ESMTP id TKF3U22p1exmClmc; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:27:49 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jmurdock@sharplabs.com Received: from WABEXCHP1.sharpamericas.com ([fe80::f930:84ca:49e6:2cbd]) by WABCASP2.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.3]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:27:49 -0800 From: "Murdock, Joe" X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: fe80::f930:84ca:49e6:2cbd To: "ipp@pwg.org" , "Ira McDonald (blueroofmusic@gmail.com)" , "ptykodi@tykodi.com" , "Michael Sweet (msweet@apple.com)" Thread-Topic: Sharp has reviewed the MSN2 specification and has no comments X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Sharp has reviewed the MSN2 specification and has no comments Thread-Index: Ac34P5etpLhfNECtTiSpuwY+qve90w== Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:27:49 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.229.74] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[172.29.224.252] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1358818069 X-Barracuda-URL: http://mail4.enet.sharplabs.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: none (sharplabs.com: jmurdock@sharplabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sharplabs.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO, HTML_MESSAGE, THREAD_INDEX, THREAD_TOPIC X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.120532 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 THREAD_INDEX thread-index: AcO7Y8iR61tzADqsRmmc5wNiFHEOig== 0.01 THREAD_TOPIC Thread-Topic: ...(Japanese Subject)... 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] Sharp has reviewed the MSN2 specification and has no comments X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1282014703==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 58EBC791D8.A9971 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1282014703== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703174E664wabexchp1sharpa_" --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703174E664wabexchp1sharpa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703174E664wabexchp1sharpa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703174E664wabexchp1sharpa_-- --===============1282014703== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1282014703==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 22 11:49:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9404F21F87C8 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bQY1KTvW9ZyM for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000A121F8A93 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:49:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899C0791E8; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:49:19 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28A2791E7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:49:03 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MH100FCULOS5XG3@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:48:38 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f676d000004e79-17-50feed15aa89 Received: from [17.151.66.249] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.66.249]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id AB.A5.20089.61DEEF05; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:48:38 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:48:36 -0500 To: "ipp@pwg.org" Message-id: <663AEDE2-A071-4A20-B100-1F67066567F5@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON3pp67Y238BBqs+mlgc2/eSxeLIt1gH Jo+tJ3+wecxbPJ0pgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK6P72S3mgqcsFbufzmZrYOxi6WLk5JAQMJHY Mu0fO4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBqUwSXy+1s4Ik2ATUJH5P6gOzmQW0JG78e8kEYWtLLFv4mhnE ZhFQlZi94xEbiC0soC+xauIksAUiAvISa9umgtXzCthI9E89xQ5h60lc+/YVarGsxOvnb1gm MPLMQrJiFpIVs5C0LGBkXsUoWJSak1hpaKyXWFCQk6qXnJ+7iREULA2FsjsY9//kP8QowMGo xMOb/uxfgBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiURXuWNQCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hwsSuK8Vzt+BAgJ pCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoY2/VSnp6zf+mQv3NtaXgN44W/v555Ff1xFjsm8OhA4uL+C+4t vzJW1bVVf7dnW9xXFO53WvFMi2Y7h+xka5GL+QfTpLTVrxUv38ayOipCy+hOjq+ezbE0tntH I69eNlFYtWHj+u6cOK/WwkPnt8/z+mukKfa2a+2bcqNDm4p+7Wi00kmbGsuuxFKckWioxVxU nAgANHWq8xICAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] New draft of IPP FaxOut Service posted X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 899C0791E8.A97DE X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted an updated draft of the IPP FaxOut Service to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfaxout10-20130122.docx ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfaxout10-20130122.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfaxout10-20130122-rev.pdf There are several pending issues (see the -rev version) that we'll talk about at the F2F. I have also posted a question to the SM group regarding SM FaxOut and having an input document ticket (a la Copy service). _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 24 14:08:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBFB11E809B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:08:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yiiXXAGY2f7i for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDA011E8099 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D43C791E9; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:07:57 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2076791E4 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:07:42 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MH5001B1HF20QH3@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:07:42 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7fe36d0000066c0-59-5101b0acc6ad Received: from [17.151.71.40] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.71.40]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id BB.6E.26304.DA0B1015; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:07:41 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:07:40 -0500 To: "ipp@pwg.org" Message-id: <7E4EE7A8-DEDE-45FC-AAF8-62D3CCC74B6D@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1dQ3ftBsZAgwk/9S2O7XvJYnHkW6wD k8fWkz/YPOYtns4UwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlfHpylWWglOsFSdmT2NsYLzI0sXIySEhYCKx 6fF5NghbTOLCvfVANheHkMBkJollN/+zgiTYBNQkfk/qA7OZBbQkbvx7yQRha0ssW/iaGcRm EVCVeL/6IdhQYQELiWM3roHZIgLyEmvbpoLV8wrYSPRMmsIIYetJXPv2lR1isazE6+dvWCYw 8sxCsmIWkhWzkLQsYGRexShYlJqTWGloopdYUJCTqpecn7uJERQsDYUmOxgP/uQ/xCjAwajE w2uXxhgoxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYTXJQIoxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnFdEBiglkJ5Y kpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgZPrIF/tK/KT8vRfytny+mdMzfidMVo/sMFyjuLXyDiuL84RvrCzR 8o8iquNz2Yu/ML3uajA+nHWycsrvareSPPFNuqsjDs//oXhlxq9nc+60v+640vFieyavxKpY He9rHU2fn9edna118sql/ls2XJ5i37ve3vAKf5Bxe279FodvTedNFil/UWIpzkg01GIuKk4E AA2NFKgSAgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Draft slides, IPP Everywhere self-certification X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 2D43C791E9.A8941 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted some draft slides for the Feb 2013 F2F to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/ipp-wg-agenda-february-12d1.pdf Aside from the usual content, I have included several slides on IPP Everywhere self-certification, which has been an ongoing action item for me since our October 22, 2012 conference call. While I would like to discuss self-certification at-length at the face-to-face, I would also appreciate some early discussion to perhaps fill in some of the missing information. Your comments and participation will be greatly appreciated! _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 24 15:35:47 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B3221F84BF for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyG1J9Z4ufEm for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3530E21F84BA for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0BA791FD; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:35:29 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E39B791FD for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:35:14 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MH5001EELHVN0A4@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:10 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7fe36d0000066c0-ff-5101c52ba198 Received: from kencur (kencur.apple.com [17.151.62.38]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 2B.47.26304.C25C1015; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.48] (208-96-65-222.eastlink.ca [208.96.65.222]) by kencur.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0MH500DSMLIIE000@kencur.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:35:07 -0800 (PST) References: <7E4EE7A8-DEDE-45FC-AAF8-62D3CCC74B6D@apple.com> From: Michael Sweet X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A550) In-reply-to: <7E4EE7A8-DEDE-45FC-AAF8-62D3CCC74B6D@apple.com> Message-id: <6EA1263C-6CFE-46AD-943A-AFFDF7C067C3@apple.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:35:08 -0500 To: "ipp@pwg.org" X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON1OTVfvKGOgwb92JYtj+16yODB6zFs8 nSmAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro/PvbNaCD+wV/19MZ25g3MfWxcjJISFgIjH/zRlmCFtM4sK9 9UBxLg4hgXYmifXzP0A5y5gkHjc8A+sQFrCRuLO/nwXEFgKyb/Q3g9lsAmoSvyf1sYLYzAJa Eut3HmfqYuQAmioj8fOcHojJKWArsWOtEUgFL1DnxQkXwTpZBFQlumbcBbNFBOQl1rZNZYKY oi3x5N0FVoh6cYnXR6cwTmDkn4VkwSwkZbOQlC1gZF7FKFiUmpNYaWiil1hQkJOql5yfu4kR FGANhSY7GA/+5D/EKMDBqMTDa5fGGCjEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhNclAijEm5JYWZValB9fVJqT WnyIUZqDRUmcV0QGKCWQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamCsrL7w99OsRCG2LqYKlp6rSUvr+l1c lqheeP7SLSrkzB6ZrREcSbU6815VzV78c9u1zCZ1z2Xr/s/uFbhvfe3KvuTg8/lWs3fvXDTb 60a+gESpYaFsgty5menMU7JlVhy7xxL4SDpN0M1j55zvyg/Pd95/FBG2u+Hi5DOb1n++fPHr BNE/B6V9lFiKMxINtZiLihMB102XEiwCAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Re: Draft slides, IPP Everywhere self-certification X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 0E0BA791FD.A819E X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Err, it was pointed out to me that the link is to last year's slides. The correct link is: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/ipp-wg-agenda-february-13d1.pdf Sent from my iPad On 2013-01-24, at 5:07 PM, Michael Sweet wrote: > All, > > I have posted some draft slides for the Feb 2013 F2F to: > > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/ipp-wg-agenda-february-12d1.pdf > > Aside from the usual content, I have included several slides on IPP Everywhere self-certification, which has been an ongoing action item for me since our October 22, 2012 conference call. While I would like to discuss self-certification at-length at the face-to-face, I would also appreciate some early discussion to perhaps fill in some of the missing information. Your comments and participation will be greatly appreciated! > > _________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sat Jan 26 10:30:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F7D21F88CA for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:30:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhWU2dRTJKtr for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB8B21F845D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4987279212; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:30:07 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2F7791AB; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u8so2343647iag.3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:29:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=j+o0rzoy/4bbG9Fi9mYaUmqlqMRJvgmz2Zo6Vam5DkQ=; b=o3VjB2tm1+aq0LUkArMUK0y8ZT77ewFCEEDXhD1lm313SMml1acBHzNmZNTZbCpU3D EyqKeNRR9Z9Su0BR3g1ZHb83/VOHxhtBpAsF3zD2+F+0sqTtWWlwkNwQt4hAc8YIgBN0 0/CR09kbuxhkku7MmvopfoDZGP+FZtustKEHvlIiap13VX9ybvrpzHOOb5CxaaKc4H2V qOZMdvo2SAqWcAA5mobmyEKvMp74z5DFpzIa6TLtBM5ULrDNA+Annf0FKeUBWAa57yHF ITCxKEjyurxydNh5ii2FAeYPhNaA9t+W+eSbjc/I0UymQ8mA6Jmo5+FvvbuEKcsxereQ qaCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.184.164 with SMTP id ev4mr1519016igc.91.1359224988603; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.17.73 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:29:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:29:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: ipp@pwg.org, cloud@pwg.org, Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] IPP/Cloud Agenda - 3-5pm Eastern 28 January 2013 X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0775968170==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 4987279212.A8260 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0775968170== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93407939d96be04d4353a55 --14dae93407939d96be04d4353a55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Our next IPP/Cloud joint call will be this Monday! Monday 28 January 12-2pm US Pacific / 3-5pm US Eastern Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) Attendee Access Code: *******# Attendee ID Code: # (empty) ------------------------------------------------------- Meeting information ------------------------------------------------------- Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no end date Time: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco) Meeting Number: 624 587 312 Meeting Password: pwg123 ------------------------------------------------------- To start or join the online meeting ------------------------------------------------------- Go to https://appleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.php?ED=204995427&UID=504472682&PW=NNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=MiM0 ------------------------------------------------------- Agenda: (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker - Mike? (2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20130114.pdf (3) Status of PWG Last Call on MSN2 (ended on 25 January) - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf - quorum achieved (8 review acknowledgments, 1 with comments) (4) Review Cloud WG slides for February F2F - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Plenary-Feb-2013.pdf - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-Meeting-Feb-2013.pdf (5) Review IPP WG slides for February F2F - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/ipp-wg-agenda-february-13d1.pdf (6) Next steps - Cloud Imaging WG session at PWG F2F on Wednesday 6 February - IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursday 7 February - Cloud Imaging WG teleconference on Monday 18 February - IPP WG teleconference on Monday 25 February Cheers, - Ira Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --14dae93407939d96be04d4353a55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Our next IPP/Cloud joint call will be = this Monday!

Monday 28 January 12-2pm US Pacific / 3-5pm US Eastern<= br>
Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary)
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

Attendee A= ccess Code: *******#
Attendee ID Code: # (empty)

--= -----------------------------------------------------
Meeting information
-------------------------------------------------------<= /span>
Date: Every Monday, from Monday, July 9, 2012 to no end date
T= ime: 12:00 pm, Pacific Daylight Time (San Francisco)
Meeting Number: 624= 587 312
Meeting Password: pwg123
-----------------------------------------------= --------
To start or join the online meeting
------------------------= -------------------------------
Go to https://appleinc.webex.com/appleinc/j.ph= p?ED=3D204995427&UID=3D504472682&PW=3DNNzM5MmRlMzBl&RT=3DMiM0
-------------------------------------------------------

Agenda:
(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
- Mike?
=
(2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting=
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-c= oncall-minutes-20130114.pdf

(3) Status of PWG Last Call on MSN2 (ended on 25 January)
- ftp://ftp.pw= g.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20121116.pdf
- quorum achieved (8 r= eview acknowledgments, 1 with comments)

(4) Review Cloud WG slides for February F2F- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG= -Plenary-Feb-2013.pdf
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/Cloud-WG-M= eeting-Feb-2013.pdf

(5) Review IPP WG slides for February F2F
- ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp<= /span>/slides/ipp-wg-ag= enda-february-13d1.pdf

(6) Next steps
- Cloud Imaging WG session at PWG F2F on Wednesday 6 = February
- IPP WG session at PWG F2F on Thursd= ay 7 February
- Cloud Imaging WG teleconference on Monday 18 February
- IPP WG teleconference on Monday 25 February

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Li= nux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Gr= oup
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solution= s WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert = - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthincmailto:bluer= oofmusic@gmail.com
Winter=A0 579 Park Place=A0 Saline, MI=A0 48176=A0 734-944-0094
Summer= =A0 PO Box 221=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839=A0 906-494-2434


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --14dae93407939d96be04d4353a55-- --===============0775968170== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0775968170==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 28 11:54:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C3321F88B9 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:54:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id glbkbOnUFdD9 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD84021F8967 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBE779224; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:53:45 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEB879223 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:53:32 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MHC00FWYPTVQFI2@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:53:32 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7f5e6d000000e0b-d0-5106e5491187 Received: from [17.151.74.101] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.101]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id CE.03.03595.B45E6015; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:32 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:53:29 -0500 To: "PWG Announcements Inc." Message-id: <1F5B62A4-F6A0-408D-8C0C-02CE64A8048D@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON0rVdfnKVugwa5uHosj32It1rWuZnZg 8th68gebx7zF05kCmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mq5f/sdY8JKponH5a8YGxs1MXYycHBICJhK3 b3ezQthiEhfurWfrYuTiEBKYyiRxr+cdO0iCTUBN4vekPrAiZgEtiRv/XjJB2NoSyxa+Zgax WQRUJTa0rGcBsYUFbCXmLPgD1isiYCyxo30vG4jNK2Aj0XFpExOErSdx7dtXdojFshKvn79h mcDIMwvJillIVsxC0rKAkXkVo2BRak5ipaGpXmJBQU6qXnJ+7iZGULA0FJrtYNzxV+4QowAH oxIP78R1bIFCrIllxZW5hxglOJiVRHhvFwOFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ855RAkoJ pCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoYY7lefxM//qRp3vyghjNfTvw8ULIvb8GJjdozrnFnn/gT5pqr td/8R9kt3fown1MGEU9DLmUW5HmWrdjwT5Fp88mj7hzinNZv1vbeEvl0xd9VRstptuNSq363 E/93OJ06fXzFsV+t1xXrf9hzpp025swP+i82+X+dWORxVUXhFX+/N15rD5NKVWIpzkg01GIu Kk4EAP5CKB0SAgAA X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Candidate Standard 5100.14-2013 - IPP Everywhere X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: CFBE779224.AC2C8 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org All, The PWG Candidate Standard 5100.14-2013 - IPP Everywhere was recently approved. It is now available at: http://www.pwg.org/standards.html and: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-ippeve10-20130128-5100.14.pdf _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 28 12:01:01 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C871121F87FA for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:01:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.13 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.868, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXOkHKCFtB1e for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319FF21F87A4 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97447922A; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:00:05 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr004.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.13]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550E67921B for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:59:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht002.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.32]) by USA7109MR004.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Jan 2013 13:59:44 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT002.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.32]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:59:43 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Index: Ac3ME5mC2PJLQX/MRrmzrZHncO9VLQsAUcjwAV8qX/A= Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:59:43 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107932@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02D@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02D@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.99] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1068326998==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E97447922A.AD587 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1068326998== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107932USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107932USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This note is just a reminder that the PWG Last Call period for the HCD Asse= ssment Attributes spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at= 10 pm US PST. As of today we only have 5 responses and 8 are needed for a = quorum to approve this spec. Please respond by the deadline if you have not done so already. Alan Sukert Secretary, PWG IDS Working Group From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Sukert, Alan Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:25 PM To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes The PWG Last call period for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been fo= rmally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not rev= iewed this document yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the s= pec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the docu= ment. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [ma= ilto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-2012111= 3.pdf A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes specific= ation and has [no] comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-A= ssessment-Attributes Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107932USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This note is just a re= minder that the PWG Last Call period for the HCD Asses= sment Attributes spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at = 10 pm US PST. As of today we only have 5 responses and 8 are needed for a q= uorum to approve this spec.

 

Please respond by the = deadline if you have not done so already.

 

Alan Sukert=

Secretary, PWG IDS Wor= king Group

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Sukert, Alan
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:25 PM
To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attribut= es

 

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been formally extended to Fri= day, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document ye= t and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having revi= ewed the document.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.42= 7.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

 

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.or= g [mailto:pwg-announce-= bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org=
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-20121113.pdf

A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes sp= ecification and has [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-Assessment-Attributes Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107932USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1068326998== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1068326998==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 28 12:02:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6633A21F8523 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:02:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.347 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.651, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQzNHIZSulXJ for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C60521F8501 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A66679259; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:00:52 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr002.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.11]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2B879232 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:00:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) by USA7109MR002.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Jan 2013 14:00:20 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:00:18 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Index: Ac3MFMSAHVOAe5hcTVKlJ5YMXFqRngsAKBEgAV8lpGA= Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:00:17 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D308810793F@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.99] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1471312917==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 3A66679259.AD6FC X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1471312917== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D308810793FUSA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D308810793FUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This note is just a reminder that the PWG Last Call period for the HCD-NAP = spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. As = of today we only have 5 responses and 8 are needed for a quorum to approve = this spec. Please respond by the deadline if you have not done so already. Alan Sukert Secretary, PWG IDS Working Group From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Sukert, Alan Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:26 PM To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding The PWG Last call period for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to= Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this documen= t yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have= the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the document. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [ma= ilto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.p= df All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-N= AP Binding Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D308810793FUSA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This note is just a re= minder that the PWG Last Call period for the HCD-NAP s= pec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. As o= f today we only have 5 responses and 8 are needed for a quorum to approve t= his spec.

 

Please respond by the = deadline if you have not done so already.

 

Alan Sukert=

Secretary, PWG IDS Wor= king Group

 

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Sukert, Alan
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:26 PM
To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding

 

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 a= t 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document yet and you are a PW= G Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the documen= t.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.42= 7.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.or= g [mailto:pwg-announce-= bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org=
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding<= /span>

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.pdf

All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-NAP Binding Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D308810793FUSA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1471312917== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1471312917==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 28 12:06:13 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D5B21F8967 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:06:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.477 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.521, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCEuwYlxAUGd for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B07A21F89C0 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BF279237; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:05:28 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr001.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.9]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E531D7928C for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:01:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa7109ht001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) by USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Jan 2013 14:01:22 -0600 Received: from USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net ([169.254.5.67]) by USA7109HT001.na.xerox.net ([13.41.230.31]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:01:22 -0600 From: "Sukert, Alan" To: "Murdock, Joe" , "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log Thread-Index: Ac3MFRdvvcLakKIcThSXn2gGloTSiQsAGE2QAV8lccA= Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:01:21 +0000 Message-ID: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107974@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> References: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04B@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB04B@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [13.41.230.99] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1595651593==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 62BF279237.AE000 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1595651593== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107974USA7109MB006naxer_" --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107974USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This note is just a reminder that the PWG Last Call period for the PWG Log = spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. As = of today we only have 6 responses and 8 are needed for a quorum to approve = this spec. Please respond by the deadline if you have not done so already. Alan Sukert Secretary, PWG IDS Working Group From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On= Behalf Of Sukert, Alan Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:26 PM To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log The PWG Last call period for the PWG Log spec has been formally extended to= Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this documen= t yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have= the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the document. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [ma= ilto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG Chair) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107974USA7109MB006naxer_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This note is just a re= minder that the PWG Last Call period for the PWG Log spec has been formally= extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. As of today we only have = 6 responses and 8 are needed for a quorum to approve this spec.

 

Please respond by the = deadline if you have not done so already.

 

Alan Sukert=

Secretary, PWG IDS Wor= king Group

 

From: pwg-anno= unce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Sukert, Alan
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:26 PM
To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log

 

The PWG Last call peri= od for the PWG Log spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 a= t 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document yet and you are a PW= G Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the documen= t.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.42= 7.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.or= g [mailto:pwg-announce-= bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:47 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org=
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of PWG-Log

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the PWG Log specif= ication, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-log10-20121112.pdf<= /u>

All required entries and values defined in this document have been prototyp= ed by Apple. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revis= ions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the PWG-Log specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS WG = Chair)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

msweet "at" apple "dot" com (Mic= hael Sweet, PWG-Log Editor)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D3088107974USA7109MB006naxer_-- --===============1595651593== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1595651593==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon Jan 28 13:27:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7EC21F84C7 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:27:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HW8U6B0azxy for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C6321F84BC for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3937924D; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:26:58 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA19791F2; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:26:40 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MHC00FF2U2QQF13@mail-out.apple.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:26:27 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7f676d000004e79-48-5106ed0122be Received: from [17.151.74.101] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.101]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 55.79.20089.30DE6015; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:26:27 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:26:23 -0500 Message-id: To: "ipp@pwg.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRnO6Vqsv8li3QoP2+ssXl7QdYLY7te8li ceRbrAOzx9aTP9g85i2ezhTAFMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVcXapZMF8loqW3hOMDYz7mLsYOTgk BEwkdh+S7mLkBDLFJC7cW8/WxcjFISQwlUni+qF5TCAJZgEtiRv/XoLZvAJ6Ete+fWUHsYUF zCSeHt8IFmcTUJP4PamPFWQmi4CqxNp1VRCtyhLfPm6EGqMtsWzha2aIMTYSt/dfYAGxRQTk Jda2TWWCuEFW4vXzNywTGHlnIdk8C8nmWUhGLWBkXsUoWJSak1hpaKyXWFCQk6qXnJ+7iREU SA2FsjsY9//kP8QowMGoxMPbs4AtUIg1say4MvcQowQHs5II7+1ioBBvSmJlVWpRfnxRaU5q 8SFGaQ4WJXHeNU+BUgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBsZehi8Ho6SOF0f8O1jDEW6hb7PoY/ev +ytq53SEu8n/MT1bncWw/LVrg2xuU9c5/1cWdV92n3QyZi6df+/m2h3iV1y+Xu6d19SbtXPx j+JdnM7FghmMTfd/zG24GrbgSdqleXxbr1Z01YVZKpzbNjdkWdi1PUWG35Z03tDqMo3Ywlt6 ra+4ZakSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgCQvlwsIAIAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "cloud@pwg.org" Subject: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's IPP/Cloud concall X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: AA3937924D.A87D6 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted the minutes from today's joint IPP/Cloud conference call to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20130128.pdf Our next meetings are February 6 and 7, 2013 at the PWG face-to-face, followed by a Cloud Imaging Model WG conference call on February 18, 2013 at 3pm and an IPP WG conference call on February 25, 2013 at 3pm. There were no new action items. _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue Jan 29 16:30:44 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C51B21F86FF for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:30:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rp3VXlZ-d2AP for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6141421F86F6 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920547922E; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:30:19 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59AF79201 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:30:03 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPS id <0MHE00L7QXAMD2F2@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:30:02 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7fe36d0000066c0-22-51086988e2ae Received: from [17.151.79.63] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.79.63]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 91.E8.26304.A8968015; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:30:02 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:30:00 -0500 To: "ipp@pwg.org" Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON3fXrcrkyPQYNscE4tj+16yWBz5FuvA 5LH15A82j3mLpzMFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZUw5Z1rwirXi9udHzA2MH1m6GDk5JARMJBre zGeHsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJDCZSeJq42lWkASbgJrE70l9YDazgJbEjX8vmSBsbYllC18zg9gs AqoSJ9fcZuxi5OAQFtCReHikAiQsIiAvsbZtKlg5r4CNxMqX15khbD2Ja9++Qu2VlXj9/A3L BEaeWUg2zEKyYRaSlgWMzKsYBYtScxIrDU30EgsKclL1kvNzNzGCAqWh0GQH48Gf/IcYBTgY lXh4F79gDxRiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawkwqugxhEoxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnNebDSgl kJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTZeLglGpgnPGt77+Vaevs5an68zYUsC47x+vU4ZmzivNfwfSq+4JaTcU9 F981XV3jEedr8WrG3TduGzUrZt261fevut2LfVFO6JcJpXbT6p+kbLndtrcotJBr7of8306s kf+6jAK/cdSdeyDq/T7ry/mA2dxhAt1vneuuZF99ysPN8kum9LbOJZ7oLNEOJZbijERDLeai 4kQAXwCdBxACAAA= X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Updated stable draft of MSN2 posted X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 920547922E.A8BE7 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted an updated stable draft of the PWG Media Standardized Names 2.0 (MSN2) that addresses the single comment that was posted for the PWG Last Call to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20130125.docx ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20130125.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-pwgmsn20-20130125-rev.pdf The last call responses are summarized in: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/lcrc-pwgmsn20.txt Once the steering committee approves the process, we will announce the completion of the PWG Last Call of MSN2 and start the PWG Formal Vote. _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Wed Jan 30 13:42:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1229221F88E2 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:42:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXoGS6uftkR3 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012B221F88C7 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6F67923F; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:42 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3D77923C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z13so3056327iaz.30 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CnFBb7TdFWnL/N2PUof4UXmqv7JAnFXmTF5dIanEWK0=; b=F6xYb+l3ntwSAIpE9e/pU0/fLQdl0Ur1kQfn+8YxQ9B5EiuDDP4s8cqkt/6IpzFDDA PvHMaiFcfomK1mDsDDpzdfCffYMghSpYIljzjqZ7DxysISU5URICZCeqG0tJdk/VWmXo JTkDnK2ijysK/hmbOjNTbunhRVQ2nL19tKDc2x7NGzBxtIX/I2j7FC0OWvQFrcVzBzze JK5dDelwP2WEb3xsE73mZhnwamVjB6OcnwjadzHhd7aRTnD8MqK5QYhuttFpcehz9gEz 7NFx7gJTpceGmUQ8vExkmbzyTOhESZ6T7hgfNynTIcefQKiowKO4+h0KPJ/wDFeixzLu ahDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.42.232 with SMTP id r8mr4730601igl.100.1359582085557; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.17.73 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201301302136.r0ULaaJI030708@smtp1.lax.icann.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: ipp@pwg.org, Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] Fwd: [IANA #654971] AutoReply: General Request for Assignment X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0239960091==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 4D6F67923F.A8A67 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0239960091== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340a0940af1304d4885f53 --14dae9340a0940af1304d4885f53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: IANA General Enquiries via RT Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:36 PM Subject: [IANA #654971] AutoReply: General Request for Assignment To: blueroofmusic@gmail.com To whom it may concern: This is an automatically generated message to notify you that we have received your request, and it has been recorded in our ticketing system with a reference number of 654971. There is no need to reply to this message right now. IANA staff will review your message shortly. If this message is in reply to a previously submitted ticket, it is possible that the previous ticket has been marked as closed. As we review this ticket, we will also review previous correspondence and take appropriate action. To expedite processing, and ensure our staff can view the full history of this request, please make sure you include the follow exact text in the subject line of all future correspondence on this issue: [IANA #654971] You can also simply reply to this message, as this tag is already in the subject line. Thank you, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority iana-questions@iana.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact Name: Ira McDonald Contact Email: blueroofmusic@gmail.com Type of Assignment: Permanent registration updates in IPP Registry Copy of revised IANA XML registry is at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/IANA-IPP-registrations/ in the file ipp-registrations-20130130.xml Changes: - Added PWG 5100.14 (IPP Everywhere) and registered keyword. - Removed extraneous [PWG5100.x] text from attribute syntax strings. - Fixed references to PWG 5100.13 (were 5100.X) - Fixed job-accounting-user-id (was job-account-user-id) - Fixed job-accounting-user-id-default (missing -default) Printer Description attribute - Fixed job-password-supported (was boolean, should have been integer(0:255) - Registered all requested-attributes group keywords Registry: IANA IPP Registry http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registrations/ipp-registrations.xml Description: Proposed: Mike Sweet (Apple) Reviewed: By IETF Designated Experts for IPP Registry Approved: 30 January 2013 By: Ira McDonald (IETF Designated Expert for IPP Registry) Additional Info: New operations, attributes, values, and status codes defined in IPP Everywhere (PWG 5100.14-2013), edited by Mike Sweet (Apple, joint IETF Designated Expert for IPP Registry) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --14dae9340a0940af1304d4885f53 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
---------- Forwarded message ----------
F= rom: IANA General Enquiries via RT <iana-questions@i= ana.org>
Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:36 PM
Subject: [IANA #654971] AutoReply: Ge= neral Request for Assignment
To: blueroofmusic@gmail.com


To whom it may concern:

This is an automatically generated message to notify you that we have
received your request, and it has been recorded in our ticketing
system with a reference number of 654971.

There is no need to reply to this message right now. IANA staff will
review your message shortly.

If this message is in reply to a previously submitted ticket, it is
possible that the previous ticket has been marked as closed. As we
review this ticket, we will also review previous correspondence and
take appropriate action.

To expedite processing, and ensure our staff can view the full history
of this request, please make sure you include the follow exact text in
the subject line of all future correspondence on this issue:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0[IANA #654971]

You can also simply reply to this message, as this tag is already in
the subject line.

Thank you,

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
iana-questions@iana.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact Name:
Ira McDonald

Contact Email:
blueroofmusic@gmail.com

Type of Assignment:
Permanent registration updates in IPP Registry

Copy of revised IANA XML registry is at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/IANA-IPP-registrations/
in the file ipp-registrations-20130130.xml

Changes:
- Added PWG 5100.14 (IPP Everywhere) and registered keyword.
- Removed extraneous [PWG5100.x] text from attribute syntax strings.
- Fixed references to PWG 5100.13 (were 5100.X)
- Fixed job-accounting-user-id (was job-account-user-id)
- Fixed job-accounting-user-id-default (missing -default) Printer Descripti= on attribute
- Fixed job-password-supported (was boolean, should have been integer(0:255= )
- Registered all requested-attributes group keywords

Registry:
IANA IPP Registry
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registration= s/ipp-registrations.xml

Description:
Proposed: Mike Sweet (Apple)
Reviewed: By IETF Designated Experts for IPP Registry
Approved: 30 January 2013
By: Ira McDonald (IETF Designated Expert for IPP Registry)

Additional Info:
New operations, attributes, values, and status codes defined in IPP Everywh= ere (PWG 5100.14-2013), edited by Mike
Sweet (Apple, joint IETF Designated Expert for IPP Registry)




--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --14dae9340a0940af1304d4885f53-- --===============0239960091== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0239960091==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Wed Jan 30 17:15:38 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E94A21F881C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:15:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.624 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.115, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vhOcoAqLN-Qz for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3FA21F87B3 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1679258; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:15:06 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail4.sharplabs.com (mail4.sharplabs.com [216.65.151.214]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF027924C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:14:47 -0500 (EST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1359594885-0208086fcb3e1c0001-asKuw5 Received: from WABCASP1.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.253]) by mail4.sharplabs.com with ESMTP id seUQzYey2C1ojC1p for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:14:45 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jmurdock@sharplabs.com Received: from WABEXCHP2.sharpamericas.com ([fe80::5138:5dde:abf1:5db8]) by Wabcasp1 ([172.29.224.2]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:14:46 -0800 From: "Murdock, Joe" X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: fe80::5138:5dde:abf1:5db8 To: "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes Thread-Index: Ac3ME5mC2PJLQX/MRrmzrZHncO9VLQsAUcjwAc7QiGA= Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:14:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02D@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB02D@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.229.74] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[172.29.224.253] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1359594885 X-Barracuda-URL: http://mail4.enet.sharplabs.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: none (sharplabs.com: jmurdock@sharplabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sharplabs.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.15 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=CN_BODY_332, HTML_MESSAGE, INFO_TLD, THREAD_INDEX, THREAD_TOPIC X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.121375 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 THREAD_INDEX thread-index: AcO7Y8iR61tzADqsRmmc5wNiFHEOig== 0.01 THREAD_TOPIC Thread-Topic: ...(Japanese Subject)... 0.12 CN_BODY_332 BODY: CN_BODY_332 0.00 INFO_TLD URI: Contains an URL in the INFO top-level domain 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0932004557==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 56F1679258.AE639 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============0932004557== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F276WABEXCHP2sharpa_" --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F276WABEXCHP2sharpa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, We need one (1) more member to send in their notice that they have reviewed= the HCD Assessment Attributes specification, with or without comments, in = order to advance this to PWG Formal Vote. This Last Call has been extended until Feb 1, 2013, so there is still time = to get your response in. Thank you in advance for your review! From: Sukert, Alan [mailto:Alan.Sukert@xerox.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:25 PM To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes The PWG Last call period for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been fo= rmally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not rev= iewed this document yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the s= pec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the docu= ment. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [ma= ilto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-2012111= 3.pdf A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes specific= ation and has [no] comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-A= ssessment-Attributes Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F276WABEXCHP2sharpa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,=

 

We need one (1) more m= ember to send in their notice that they have reviewed the HCD Assessment At= tributes specification, with or without comments, in order to advance this = to PWG Formal Vote.

This Last Call has bee= n extended until Feb 1, 2013, so there is still time to get your response i= n.

 

Thank you in advance f= or your review!

 

 

From: Sukert, = Alan [mailto:Alan.Sukert@xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:25 PM
To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attribut= es

 

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD Assessment Attributes spec has been formally extended to Fri= day, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document ye= t and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having revi= ewed the document.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.42= 7.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

 

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.or= g [mailto:pwg-announce-= bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org=
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD Assessment Attributes

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-Assessment= -Attributes specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-idsattributes10-20121113.pdf

A supporting binding document (HCD-NAP) has been prototyped and is in PWG l= ast call. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various revision= s of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-Assessment-Attributes sp= ecification and has [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-Assessment-Attributes Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F276WABEXCHP2sharpa_-- --===============0932004557== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0932004557==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Wed Jan 30 17:19:27 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F6A21F8757 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:19:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.382 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.242, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T25FVrNpzoZP for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E349321F8738 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1ED79269; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:18:46 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail4.sharplabs.com (mail4.sharplabs.com [216.65.151.214]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988E579269 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:18:21 -0500 (EST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1359595099-0208086fbf3e290001-asKuw5 Received: from WABCASP2.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.252]) by mail4.sharplabs.com with ESMTP id DhmgW2zzVYFIbX26 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:18:19 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jmurdock@sharplabs.com Received: from WABEXCHP2.sharpamericas.com ([fe80::5138:5dde:abf1:5db8]) by WABCASP2.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.3]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:18:19 -0800 From: "Murdock, Joe" X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: fe80::5138:5dde:abf1:5db8 To: "pwg-announce@pwg.org" Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding Thread-Index: Ac3MFMSAHVOAe5hcTVKlJ5YMXFqRngsAKBEgAc6/fBA= Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:18:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <772924F5A52E6846866619AB345D30880FB038@USA7109MB006.na.xerox.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.29.229.74] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[172.29.224.252] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1359595099 X-Barracuda-URL: http://mail4.enet.sharplabs.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: none (sharplabs.com: jmurdock@sharplabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sharplabs.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.15 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=CN_BODY_332, HTML_MESSAGE, INFO_TLD, THREAD_INDEX, THREAD_TOPIC X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.121375 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 THREAD_INDEX thread-index: AcO7Y8iR61tzADqsRmmc5wNiFHEOig== 0.01 THREAD_TOPIC Thread-Topic: ...(Japanese Subject)... 0.12 CN_BODY_332 BODY: CN_BODY_332 0.00 INFO_TLD URI: Contains an URL in the INFO top-level domain 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1305770020==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 1A1ED79269.ADA13 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1305770020== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F288WABEXCHP2sharpa_" --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F288WABEXCHP2sharpa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, We need two (2) more members to send in their notice that they have reviewe= d the HCD NAP specification, with or without comments, in order to advance = this to PWG Formal Vote. This Last Call has been extended until Feb 1, 2013, so there is still time = to get your response in. Thank you in advance for your review! From: Sukert, Alan [mailto:Alan.Sukert@xerox.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:26 PM To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding The PWG Last call period for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to= Friday, Feb 1, 2013 at 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this documen= t yet and you are a PWG Voting member please review the spec so we can have= the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the document. Thanks. Alan Sukert Xerox Global Development Group Product Security Office Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 or= 8*707-1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 "The right angle from which to approach a problem is a try-angle" From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [ma= ilto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding All, [This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.] This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.p= df All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call. The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote= but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. HOW TO RESPOND Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: Subject: has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and has [no]= comments WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): "ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!) jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Chair and current HCD-N= AP Binding Editor) alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG Secretary) Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F288WABEXCHP2sharpa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,=

 

We need two (2) more m= embers to send in their notice that they have reviewed the HCD NAP specific= ation, with or without comments, in order to advance this to PWG Formal Vot= e.

This Last Call has bee= n extended until Feb 1, 2013, so there is still time to get your response i= n.

 

Thank you in advance f= or your review!

 

 

From: Sukert, = Alan [mailto:Alan.Sukert@xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:26 PM
To: Murdock, Joe; pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding

 

The PWG Last call peri= od for the HCD-NAP spec has been formally extended to Friday, Feb 1, 2013 a= t 10 pm US PST. If you have not reviewed this document yet and you are a PW= G Voting member please review the spec so we can have the necessary quorum of members having reviewed the documen= t.

 

Thanks.

 

Alan Sukert

Xerox = Global Development Group Product Security Office

Xerox = Certified Green Belt

Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.42= 7.1413 or 8*707-1413

MS 011= 1-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580“The right angle= from which to approach a problem is a try-angle”

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.or= g [mailto:pwg-announce-= bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Murdock, Joe
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:45 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org=
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last call of HCD-NAP Binding<= /span>

 

All,

[This PWG Last Call starts today Monday November 26, 2012 and ends Friday J= anuary 18, 2013 at 10pm US PST.]

This is the formal announcement of the PWG Last Call for the HCD-NAP Bindin= g specification, located at:

       &n= bsp;        ftp://ftp.pwg.org/p= ub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20121112.pdf

All required attributes and values defined in this document have been proto= typed by a vendor. The IDS WG has completed extensive review of the various= revisions of this document and an IDS WG last call.

The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must= acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any documen= t can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal= Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.


HOW TO RESPOND

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the HCD-NAP specification and ha= s [no] comments


WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE

Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses (replac= ing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

“ids "at" pwg "dot" org (IDS WG mailing list - yo= u must be subscribed!)
jmurdock "at" sharplabs "dot" com (Joe Murdock, IDS Cha= ir and current HCD-NAP Binding Editor)
alan.sukert "at" xerox "dot" com (Alan Sukert, IDS WG S= ecretary)

Note that you must be subscribed to the IDS WG mailing list to send email t= here - otherwise your email will be silently discarded.

Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.

Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 i= s located at:

       &n= bsp;        http://www.pwg.org/chair/= membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

 

 

--------------------= -------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer a= nd Researcher

Chair IEEE/ISTO Prin= ter Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Americ= a

5750 NW Pacific Rim = Blvd

Camas, WA 98607=

(360) 817-7542<= /o:p>

jmurdock@sharplabs.com

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanne= r, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --_000_E301B2F12DBCCF4394DEA69FD0E703703777F288WABEXCHP2sharpa_-- --===============1305770020== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1305770020==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Thu Jan 31 09:09:22 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2B821F841D for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:09:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-UtI-X46QF3 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFDD21F8436 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD0679272; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:09:02 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA4179269 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:08:46 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MHI006RX26IST44@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:08:38 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7f156d000005a91-78-510aa5155767 Received: from [17.151.71.14] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.71.14]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 0A.89.23185.615AA015; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:08:38 -0800 (PST) From: Michael Sweet Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:08:36 -0500 To: "ipp@pwg.org" Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrHJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON2dT1dsKVegwaMTUhbH9r1ksTjyLdaB yWPryR9sHvMWT2cKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgypj727/gMUdF49qdLA2M09m7GDk5JARMJH7f 7GKCsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJDCZSeJ5yzmwBJuAmsTvSX2sIDazgJbEjX8vmSBsbYllC18zg9gs AqoSv9beYgOxhQXMJOZ/mQO2QERAXmJt21Swel4BG4mWz+fYIWw9iWvfvkIdISvx+vkblgmM PLOQrJiFZMUsJC0LGJlXMQoWpeYkVhqa6SUWFOSk6iXn525iBIVKQ6H5Dsbtf+UOMQpwMCrx 8Go6cgYKsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuG9O4krUIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjjvp0aOQCGB 9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgsEwenVANjuYakizeXc5jA7D2vgo6o/Cnik1Wf/sB7kod7Vh77sWBZDgXV d0lmRt4H99jX75nk4/Fa5l+UqxajhHmd00a5FJ1VC/Y+yXsdlvxQ4XvetU2+RbO9A2NWbklX Tv6dZdq7/9urV3M2nW5nNd6w0/zSkf4bvSvfleqyaKaudumepr7+eEc6w2slluKMREMt5qLi RABvLNHJEQIAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] January 2013 Release of ipptool Now Available X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 7FD0679272.A7E99 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org The January 2013 release of ipptool for Windows, Linux (32-bit and 64-bit Intel), and Mac OS X is now available at: http://www.cups.org/software.php This release of ipptool adds several new features and a preliminary IPP Everywhere test file. The IPP Everywhere test file uses the sample PWG Raster files published by the Printer Working Group, which due to their size are available separately at the following location: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/examples/ Changes include: - Added support for DEFINE-MATCH and DEFINE-NO-MATCH as STATUS predicates. - Added support for WITH-VALUE and resolution values. - Added support for SKIP-IF-MISSING (skip test if file is missing) - Added support for octetString values. - Added support for document compression in Print-Job and Send-Document requests. - Fixed REPEAT-MATCH for STATUS and EXPECT - was incorrectly erroring out. - Fixed a bug where bad IPP responses would cause ipptool to crash. Enjoy! _________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp