Subject: [IPP] Errata for IPP JPS3

From: Michael Sweet <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:37:15 -0500

All,

Just noticed that the multiple-operation-timeout-action attribute should have been named multiple-operation-time-out-action since the corresponding RFC 2911 attribute is multiple-operation-time-out.  I recommend we update the IPP definition to be multiple-operation-time-out-action.

(note that the SM element is named MultipleOperationTimeout and MultipleOperationTimeoutAction, which doesn't match the normal IPP-to-SM name mapping but at least is internally consistent)

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp