Subject: _Episode Clip_ Ellen's fresh faced look.

From: DocOz Episode Clip <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:54:46 -0700

Live withDocOz - Celeb Edition
The Cure for Extremely Wrinkled Damaged Skin...

Ellen Degeneres Rumors Discussed;
The pics leaked to the media explain it all

[Never before seen]  View now -> http://www.sewcow.com/ellen/skin/renew.html

** In Depth**

She's Insane: Ellen does this every morning in order to look 20-years younger.

Erase wrinkles and sun damage In 1 STEP....ITS Unbelievable

- DocOz 
Episode Archive: http://www.sewcow.com/ellen/skin/renew.html

We hope that you enjoyed this skin alert
to stop further notification - write - Member Update Systems|9167 ROAD 177| Oakwood, OH 45873
or visit http://www.sewcow.com/3kf/wel33.w30d

I have a view that is made from a viewcontroller that is used as a subview in a table. For efficiency, the view can be recycled, but I would need to update the represented object. In this case would it make sense for the view to be able to pull in the original controller?   tofutim Feb 26 at 21:55
  	  	
It's a big smell... Is your view a UITableViewCell subclass? How is it reused? I'm guessing the view controller is responsible for reusing it, and thus might be able to update the represented object at the same time.   pgb Feb 27 at 16:02
  	  	
example projects tend to demonstrate usage of particular API features. Many I have referred to sacrifice good or scalable design in order to provide a concise demonstration of the topic. It took me a long time to realise this and while it makes sense, I find it unfortunate. I think a lot of developers take these pragmatic projects as Apple's guide to best design practice, which I am quite certain they are not.   I agree, but I also ran into a case where I had to create a complex table view cell that displayed multiple models in some kind of carousel. So I created a 'view' object (the carousel) and a controller object (that distributed the models to the carousel). That controller was no UIViewControllerInstance as it was living inside a tableview  but still needed to have access to view controller stuff (like the navigation controller for pushing). The only way to get around this was to find my way back to the original table view controller. So I'd rather say it's a flaw in the whole 
 tableview design careful in generalizing this solution to other situations. For example, if you're using a UIPageViewController, views for UIViewControllers who are not the current page may still have a non-nil window property because they are being rendered off-screen. In this case, I've had success making my own 'isCurrentlyVisible' property which gets set in The reason he has the helper class structured as it is is to avoid a crash due to non-backward compatibility. The method invalidateOptionsMenu() only exists in API 11 (honeycomb) and up. So if your app is to run on anything lower than API 11 it will crash. To avoid this you wrap the method in question in another static method (e.g. refreshActionBarMenu()) and only call this static method if you're running on API>11 (thus the version check before you call the static method). This works because the VersionHelper class isn't loaded until you actually use it.   Turbo Aug 31 '12 at 21:18
  	  	
@Turbo ok cool, thanks for the explanation , so what would one do in the else case? not update the menu at all or what's the older way of doing the menu item update if user is running an older OS?   tote Sep 4 '12 at 20:16 
2	  	
@towpse I'm actually figuring out that situation right now. I believe that in the else case for this type of situation you should just do nothing. This is because the older way (pre API11) of doing the menu update is in the method onPrepareOptionsMenu which automatically gets called every time the user opens the menu. So to handle the older OS and the newer API>11 ones, you put the code for the menu change in onPrepareOptionsMenu (this is to handle old OS), then to handle newer OS you call invalidateOptionsMenu when an event occurs that would trigger a menu change