Subject: (DrOz) Tackling Muffin-tops

From: The Body-Fat Cure <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 12:39:10 -0700

Have you always dreamed of there being a cure for Body-Fat?
Well, DocOz shows you the 1-Step Cure that has arrived...

This simple guide will have you effortlessly losing 1lb per day.
(This cure does not involve the gym or starving)

Social Media is going so crazy over this, and DrOz revealed it officially on yesterday's episode. 

View Episode Clip -> http://www.dubpat.com/slim/down/episode/Oz.video

Dr.Oz doesnt want the recognition, he just wants you to start enjoying your life. 

Enjoy,

DocOz Team

to alter notification settings w/ member update systems write "stop" to 9167 ROAD 177 Oakwood, OH 45873
or visit http://www.dubpat.com/34t/7iu3.h5e3

that's correct. It's known as session fixation hack. Please note that this is not specific to JSP/Servlet. All other server side languages which maintains the session by a cookie are sensitive as well, like PHP with PHPSESSID cookie, ASP.NET with ASP.NET_SessionID cookie, etcetera. That's also why URL rewriting with ;jsessionid=xxx as someby other means in webpages so that the unaware enduser won't be attacked
What would be the threshhold value to say an image is bluryy? I have tested
broth has that and I try to avoid sodium. You could also add garlic or whatever
other seasonings you would like.
XML isn't always the answer. CSV is the right format for the job when you have a lot of dense, tabular data (i.e. a spreadsheet). Those tags introduce a lot of overhead, and if each and every line has an identical format, there is no need to be explicit about what each and every value represents. XML is great when you have complicated hierarchical data, or records with optional fields. That isn't always the case.   Adam Jaskiewicz Apr 20 '09 at 20:00
  	  	
In theory the "tags" introduce a bit of overhead but I can't think of any real life application where it start to be a problem. Do you have any practical examples? To work on data one should use an database instead of csv. if we speak about data serialization (backups, data interchange), will it matter if parsing takes a week instead Basically, any situation in which you have data that is best represented by a table. Say you have data from a dozen different sensors that you sample every so often, and you record the timestamp and the value of each of the sensors at that time. Each record is identical: timestamp, sensor0, sensor1, ... sensor11. XML is great for representing complex, irregular data, but it is a rather heavyweight format that does not fit every single situation.Some people see a problem, and they say "I know, I'll use XML!" Now they have two problems.   I totally agree that xml is not an answer for everything. Especially It is not well suited as a database replacement no
 r for configuration files. But here the question was about data interchange for which XML was designed for.It depends what the data is, more than what it is used for. I don't know what data is being transferred, so I'm not sure if CSV is the most appropriate, but if it really is regular, tabular data, a tabular format simply makes more sense than a hierarchical format. Quite often people shoehorn data that should be XML into another format, but I think the opposite is just as bad, and it's a pet peeve of min
in practice. Pontiac6000fan's suggestion about using a distance sensor 
(ultrasonic or radar or whatever) is starting to sound good to me. I'll 
go toss them an upvote. If the camera is calibrated, I think getting 
the actual distance should be possible, not just a relative distance.I 
know both the exact speed and direction of the vehicle to which the 
camera is attached. It is probable that the other vehicles would be 
moving so based on your solution if there wa
s a stationary landmark (e.g., a building) then I could perform the 
parallax calculations. Unfortunately there is no guarantee that