Subject: [IPP] Additional comment for IPP Scan Service

From: Michael Sweet <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:31:54 -0400

All,

One other thing I noticed this morning is that the abstract says "This standard defines", but we should say "This document defines" since it isn't a standard (yet).

(This text was likely inherited from the FaxOut spec, which uses the same wording.  Another future errata...)

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp