Subject: Eligibility Notice: Government Grant (Info)

From: Education Grants <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:38:33 -0700

Generated for: Ipp-archive
August 20, 2014
--------------------------------

Benefit Package Summary:

~ Member Id : 24-2456265
~ Policy Updated: 08/20/2014
~ Benefit Type: Full

- please confirm policy summary here -> http://www.addcob.com/gov/benefit/package.index

==========================================================================

** Please Note **

Eligibility Details:

- Lost Wages
- Disaster Aid
- SS Benefit
- Burial Benefits
- Gov Grants 

Estimate Your needs. Our Needs Analysis Calculator helps you consider some 
of the most important factors that impact your life needs.

Calculate Here -> http://www.addcob.com/gov/benefit/package.index

/
/
/
To modify notification status - write Current Update Alerts
write_ one six four four Doral Dr_Brookings, SD 57006 or visit http://www.addcob.com/jf99/ss23f.blgtjh4
/
/

life we often have to do tasks we don't want to do. You come across as a spoiled brat who can't take direction. his might've stayed open a bit longer if it was CW... yea your boss is dumb. Foreach is actually slower. But really, the worst problem I have with foreach is when I just want to get to the next item without adding yet another if layer. In a lot of languages there is something like next; does C# implemented that? No of course not.context, I can't know exactly what you're doing, but what happens when you come across a partially filled array?, I suspect he does comply, but it doesn't make his boss any smarter. And when it comes to unconditional obedience I hardly resist invoking Godwin's  There's a difference between doing stuff that you don't personally agree with and doing stuff you know to be outright wrong. As professionals it's our job to try to do the right thing. If you don't try to convince the boss of his/her stupidity then you're not being professional. (Obviously if
  you try and the boss pulls rank then that's their prerogative and you just have to deal with it.)   LukeH Dec 22 '09 at 15:24No it's not. The compiler certainly cannot reorder elements in foreach. foreach is not at all related to functional programming. It's totally an imperative paradigm of programming. You are mis-attributing things happening in TPL and PLINQ to  It certainly does guarantee ordering (C# spec section 8.8.4 formally defines foreach as an equivalent of a while loop). I think I know @ctford is referring to. Task parallel library allows the underlying collection to provide elements in an arbitrary order (by calling .AsParallel on an enumerable). foreach doesn't do anything here and the body of the loop is executed on a single thread. The only thing that is parallelized is the Enumerable.Select has an overload that lets you obtain the index of the item, so even the need for an index does ForEach is handy for readability and saving typing. Costs mattForEach is handy for
  readability and saving typing. Costs matter, though; changing 2 or 3 for-loops in a document designer UI that I made, from (for each obj in list) to (for i=0 to list.count-1) reduced response time from 2-3 sec per edit to about .5 sec per edit on a small document just looping thru a few hundred objects. Now for even huge documents, there is no increase in time to loop all. I have no idea how this happened. What I do know is that the alternative was a complicated scheme to only loop a subset of the objects. I'll take the 5 minute change any day! - not micro-optimisation.   FastAl Mar 31 '11 at 13:37