Subject: View eBook: Revolutionary Process

From: Step-By-Step Millwork <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:33:43 -0700

Your Hobby Lobby / Crafts
"Done For You" Woodworking Plans and Blueprints
Published - 08/22/2014

Watch This Video Till The End -> http://www.hajaround.com/ebook/delvery/aug22.index

And I Guarantee You Will Like It Just As All These Woodworkers Have.

* My plans contain: 

- Projects for Beginners - Advanced Woodworkers

It'll be a great way to get you started.
Plus my guide comes with my help when you need it, I'll be there to help you every step of the way.

DIY Woodworking Instructions - View plans Here -> http://www.hajaround.com/ebook/delvery/aug22.index
[ Ultimate DIY Woodworking (Beginners - Advanced) ]

;
;
-
To modify your message status - Alert Center Notifications - write - 1400 South Jama
Goddard, KS 67052 or visit http://www.hajaround.com/9i93rj.wmrj3
\
\
Can someone please explain this to me? "Think of the logger we programmed in section 3. 
Even if we put that in a directive, we still want to do it the "Angular Way". You dynamically 
update the DOM when new content is inserted after the DOM Tree What he means by "no 
DOM manipulation" is that your code in the directive is not directly performing DOM
 manipulations. That code knows nothing about the DOM, it is just modifying js variables
 in your model. Yes, the end result is that the DOM gets modified, but that's because outside 
of the code we write, there are bindings that react to our variables changing, but inside the
 directive we know nothing about it, making a clean separation between DOM manipulation 
and business logic. In your jQuery example you are directly changing the DOM jQuery, this 
is subjective and depends on how you write/design your JavaScript for the whole application 
or on a component/page basis. I could also say the Angular approach is messy based on the 
DOM being riddled with  AngularJS will automatically update your view so you don't have to! a
nd @OZ_ said not always, actually. And it breaks whole idea. He's right. For example, if you
 have an input element that has ng-model set on it so what you type gets displayed
 somewhere else, or filters something, etc, it's very tempting to just set the value of the input
 programmatically with (say) jQuery and expect that because you've changed the input
 element's value that it will change elsewhere, but that's not the case. How awesome would
 it be if AngularJS actually did that? ever sets an input element's value using jQuery in an 
AngularJS application, she is committing a grievous error. The only sort of exception of which
 I can think is an existing jQuery plugin that's too difficult to port that changes an input automatically,
 in which case hooking into a callback or s
etting a watch is absolutely essential anyway to bring the changes inline with the application. 
 two as equivalents and realised how wrong I was when I actually did the Angular tutorials. As
 mentioned by many here... jQuery is a library/tool whereas Angular is a framework for an 
application which can does everything - models, views, controllers and routing. As such Angular 
is not just for data-binding but much more. If you already have existing controllers and routing 
in place therefore which you are not looking to replace, it really takes a big chunk of functionality 
from what Angular can provide. you to elaborate on this point? Remember: don't design, and 
then mark up. You must architect, and then design. I'm surprised you're the first to ask. :-) But
 I meant that we must think in terms of the data rather than the markup. With jQuery, we create 
a page and then go back and make some bits dynamic through DOM manipulations. With ng, 
we want to think about what our data looks like and how our data translates into the DOM structure.
 In jQuery, the data is the DOM structure; but in ng, it's a mistake to think that way. With ng, we
 treat our data as a separate thing that the framework will sync to the DOM for us.Josh,this might 
be off the track. However can you