Subject: Weight-Loss Wars: men vs. women

From: Weight-Loss Sabotage Prevention <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:57:38 -0700

ALERT: Women Must Stop Dieting Like Men

Did you know that weight-loss for woman is completely different than it is for men?

The factor that dramatically increases female metabolism has been discovered.

View The Female Weight-loss Factor Here

Important Facts:

Hormone that all skinny people have in Balance

Only if you need to loose at Least 10 Lbs

Dieting like a man may have you gaining weight

Before and After Photos Available Here

To stop further notifications - write Alert Center Notifications

1400 S o u t h J a m a - Goddard, KS 67052 - or visit here

final void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent sce) {

First close any background tasks which may be using the DB ...

Then close any DB connection pools ... Now deregister JDBC drivers in this context's ClassLoader: Get the webapp's ClassLoaderClassLoader cl = Thread.currentThread.getContextClassLoader(); Loop through all drivers

Enumeration<Driver> drivers = DriverManager.getDrivers();

while (drivers.hasMoreElementsriver driver = drivers.nextElement(driver.getClass().getClassLoader This driver was registered by the webapp's ClassLoader, so deregister it:

log.info("Deregistering JDBC driver {}"driveDriverManager.deregisterDriver(driver) catch (SQLException exlog.error("Error deregistering JDBC driver {}", driver, ex); else {

driver was not registered by the webapp's ClassLoader and may be in use elsewherelog.trace("Not deregistering JDBC driver {} as it does not belong Hmm... scratch that last comment. It seems that PS2 is installed, but that some features are unaccountably unavailable, and for some reason the installation directory is named '1.0'. Thanks Microsoft. Daniel Cassidy May 12 '10 at 15:43
1
@DanielCassidy - two years late to the party, but "some features are unaccountably unavailable" might be caused by only having the .Net 3.5 Compact framework installed instead of the full thing. ranomore Sep 24 '12 at 14:50
34
PSVersionTable is more reliable and returns PSVersion. You can also use PSVersionTable.PSVersion. Even if you are connected remotely to the machine running different version (invoke-command -computername myRemotePC -Credential foo {host}), it looks like host will just show the lowest version they agreed upon for serializing. While PSVersionTable will show the true version. Hope it would help someone.. vulcan raven Oct 23 '12 at 4:27
10
Seems host.Version isn't a good choice... If you remote to a machine running PowerShell 3, you get back 1.0, as the RemotingHost seems to be v1. Using PSVersionTable correctly returns 3. Danny Tuppeny Oct 30 '12 at 9:30

PSVersionTable is better: If you're using the PowerShell Inside PowerShell Server (SSH to PowerShell), it reports its own version (5.x) in host, but PSVersionTable reports that it's running version 2.0 of PowerShell, which is important for determining what features are available. BryCoBat Nov 16 '12 at 16:10

I know it's late in the day, but host.version is just plain wrong/unreliable. This gives you the version of the hosting executable (powershell.exe, powergui.exe, powershell_ise.exe, powershellplus.exe etc) and not the version of the engine itself. The engine version is psversiontable.psversion For powershell 1.0, this variable does not exist so you can assume 1.0, obviously :