Subject: Drop 30.. In 30 (Days)

From: Fat-Blasting Plan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:09:14 -0700

DocOz reveals - how to Burn multiple layers of Fat
[Episode Recap 401]

- August 1, 2014 - 

Imagine This....

- Thick thighs - GONE
- Arm Jiggle - GONE
- Flabby Mid-Section - GONE

And achieving these results in days requires no exercise or food deprivation.

DocOz shows how here -> http://www.tarobsolete.com/View/Docoz/episode/clip.shtml

- Oz Blog 

'
'
-
-
To stop further wellness updates - write - Daily Updated Alerts at 
9306 Bova Court Louiseville, KY 40291 or visit http://www.tarobsolete.com/35hy/uk8/w3.hik9
-
-
OK, answer is 1000 days old, has 132 upvotes, and has comments like "Wow!!", "Awesome!", and "Wow, this is beautiful!" Maybe someone can help me. Tried this code directly, and it failed my test suite. On quick inspection, the "1LL >> 33" at the end looked wonky for a couple reasons (shifting 1 right 33 times? and the fact that it's a right shift of a signed value). Changed the shift direction, everything seems to work. Am I missing something? Not criticizing A. Rex, code seems to fly now, and I couldn't have come up with this in 25  You're right, that shift was in the wrong direction! If you look carefully, it's in the right direction in the "explanation" above the block of code, so my best guess was that it went wrong when I manually translated less-thans and greater-thans into HTML escape sequences. Sorry about that and enjoy the correct code (or let me know if you find any other mistakes)!   etter yet! What if we use the even/off property of a number as a Boolean to determine whic
 h stage we are on. Even numbers become the opposite sign and odd (subtract one) and odd numbers become the opposite sign and even (add one) this will work for every int except "1" and whatever the highest or lowest int is depending on whether it's even or odd. And even then you still should be able to fix those exceptions using a nil state and an infinity state if your language 
Rex - cool, I've had that happen too. The code is a huge help to me & I couldn't have put something like this together, so I'm grateful. Thank goodness it was only changing the shift direction -- if the change had required real understanding of the code, I would have been hopeless! 
What? Where did you get the idea that typeof f(n) === 'function', especially, where n is a number and you expect a number returned? I don't understand how could an instance case apply here. I don't speak Python well, but in JS checking argument for a function type is plain wrong in this case. Only numeric solution applies here. f is a function, f(n) is numb