Subject: Your receipt No. 6471-35233 (Term Policy)

From: Policy Confirmation <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:00:57 -0700

Greetings Ipp-archive,

You have reached a life milestone which now qualifies you for a low Term-Life Rate.

View Rate Here: http://www.ghihae.com/view/policy/updates.index

Rate Generated on: August 22, 2014

- Please note that this rate is set to expire.
-- The available $750,000+ is immediately available.
--- To view all details of policy click here: http://www.ghihae.com/view/policy/updates.index

To stop further notifications from Alert Center Notifications
1400 South Jama- Goddard, KS 67052 or visit http://www.ghihae.com/93ur/sf322s.glo04

 Are both methods same? if yes then first is considered bad for mixing content handling logic with actual content.  The key: the former takes global-scope (e.g. window) JS, whereas ngClick takes an expression on the current scope. Also, it's what the doSomething() does that most likely mixes content and logic. With onclick, we'll likely need to get refs to DOM elements to get, e.g., input values. With ngClick, all needed values are automatically on the scope. It's okay for templates to have  Just had a thought whether is it as easy to convert jQuery Widgets,in particular,custom widgets built using jQuery widget factory into Angular directives to make them behave angular way? For example, I have several tabs on my page and in each tab I have several sections. Each of the section is supposed to contain certain types of fields which are optional and will be added on the click of the button. I have started writing  seems to contradict the nuances of point #2 and your initial comment resp
 onse to @taudep. One example where there currently is no easy and full-fledged solution for jQuery/Angular integration is jQuery DataTables. Reading the Summary by itself, one might think, "What? Now I can't use jQuery DataTables if I want to do Angular the 'right way'?", which if I read you right, is not what you would want someone to believe.  You're right about what I intend, but I think "19 times out of 20" covers just these kinds of edge should consider improving the unit test to compile a named, saved template rather than a string literal.  I'm not sure that makes sense in many circumstances. A directive could easily have dozens of unit tests taking various combinations of attributes; would we then have dozens of named, saved templates just for single-use unit tests? Or did I misunderstand your point?You make a good point. I was thrown off by the line above naming that template as the whole view. But on second reading, it's clear that you're unit-testing a small component, not
  functional testing a whole viewam with Ulises on the letter of the framework-vs-library question I see in AngularJS template-logic design patterns (specify what is special not everything that is not), encapsulated flow-of-control and state, high level of abstraction, etc. The spirit of what separates AngularJS from a DOM-banging library is that you can design/define/discuss the goal and the vital details about an AngularJS app without mentioning DOM, HTML, the web page (per se). Try doing that  Brains controllers/models are UI independent in AngularJS not jQuery, which is for creations who have brains in skin.forgive me if i'm wrong, but I thought that a selector was what you use to find the DOM element? You prefer to keep every single part of your newly loaded UI in reference, rather than simply selecting the one or 2 elements that a user may click on, on-the-fly using a selector?