Subject: Unlock anyone's background check

From: Anyverify <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:10:34 -0700

Does it seem like your "inner circle" is growing?

Check out who these people really are:

 receive a full report on the person of your choice that includes:

- criminal history
- marital history
- all registered offenses
- bankruptcy records

Search Registry below and remain anonymous:

-> / http://www.domilli.com/records/updated/july7.index 

/
/
To stop further notifications - write  Updated Notifications Services
115 Hadley Way-Counce, TN 38326 or visit http://www.domilli.com/k3r/klfi4.dhghgg

-
-
-0-

Thanks for the additions,... I really wanted to accept your answer as a very good example of there being more room for improvement than you'd expect even when everything is already 'just right'... but I thought a few concrete points would improve the answer.  
  	  	
And thanks for adding the source code reference  Yeah. Pretty amazing huh? I've only got 2 copies myself (plus 3 copies in Chinese) that I'm hanging onto., Considered allowing Google to scan it in?  I guess I don't know how to do that, also I don't know if it's allowed, especially since the publisher has been bought out a couple times over. I have scanned it myself and sent it to a couple interested people, but in jpg form it's a bit massive to email. , I would suggest telling it scanned in already. They probably already have an : Just to follow up, I did hook up with GoogleBooks, filled out all forms, and sent them a hard copy. I got an email back asking if I really really owned the copyright. The publisher Van Nostrand Reinhold, which was bought by International Thompson, which was bought by Reuters, and when I try to call or email them it's like a black hole. So it's in limbo - I haven't yet had the energy to really chase it down.   Mike Dunlavey Sep 4 '11 at 22:08 My thoughts exa
 ctly. When you start talking about "last few percents" when there is nothing left, the clearly cheapest way of making it run faster is faster hardware rather than spending a ton of programmer  hardware isn't always an option when you have software that is expected to run on hardware already out in very helpful answer to someone making consumer software: the customer isn't going to want to hear you say, "buy a faster computer." Especially if you're writing software to target something like a video game console  or for that matter, an embedded system. When the last feature is finally in and the first batch of boards are already spun is not the moment to discover that you should have used a faster CPU in the first I once had to debug a program that had a huge memory leak -- its VM size grew by about 1Mb per hour. A colleague joked that all I needed to do was add memory at a constant rate. :)   j_random_hacker Jun 27 '10 at 14:12