Subject: [IPP] Editorial change for PWG Safe G-Code (in formal vote)

From: Michael Sweet via ipp <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:13:01 -0400

All,

I noticed as I was updating the IPP registry today that the PWG Safe G-Code Subset for 3D Printing best practice document is registering an IPP attribute named "safe-gcode-supported".  Since this is a PWG document I think we should use "pwg-safe-gcode-supported", much as we use "pwg-raster-document-xxx" for the PWG Raster attributes.

Any objections?

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp