Subject: [Iptel] Few comments on tel-enumdi-00

From: Cullen Jennings <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:58:33 -0800

Two really trivial and irrelevant comments ....

In 3.1, an elements that does not know about this conventions will still end
up doing the dip. That makes me wonder if it should be a "SHOULD NOT"
instead of "MUST NOT" do a ENUM dip. Just a thought, not sure it makes any
difference one way or another.

In the examples, should use invalid phone number and example.com instead of
provider.net.

idnits says "No nits found" :-) Congratulations.

_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel