Subject: [ipwave] Feedback from 6MAN WG about ANIMA WG and Homenet WG for vehicular networks

From: Alexandre Petrescu <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:42:07 +0200

Dear participants to IPWAVE WG,

In a discussion in the 6MAN Working Group, I have been referred to works 
in ANIMA WG and Homenet WG.  That discussion was around the use of 
link-local addresses compared to the use of names in DNS.

I think it makes sense to identify the relevant mechanisms from these 
WGs that may apply to vehicular networks, and OCB.

These mechanisms and their relevance to Vehicular Networks and OCB could 
be described in the IPWAVE Problem Statement draft.

Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Smith <[email-masked]> wrote:

[...]

> There may be other options that better suit or can be better made to
> suit what you're trying to do, such as the work done in the Homenet or
> the ANIMA Working Groups.
>
> Autonomic networking (the focus of ANIMA WG), sounds like it might be
> working on solutions to your problem domain.
>
> "Autonomic networking refers to the self-managing characteristics
> (configuration, protection, healing, and optimization) of distributed
> network elements, adapting to unpredictable changes while hiding
> intrinsic complexity from operators and users."