From nobody Mon Apr 10 00:07:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietf.org Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917D5129443; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:07:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: lime@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149180804951.3051.10807272520377774604@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:07:29 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10.txt X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:07:29 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment of the IETF. Title : Generic YANG Data Model for Connection Oriented Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols Authors : Deepak Kumar Qin Wu Michael Wang Filename : draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10.txt Pages : 52 Date : 2017-04-10 Abstract: This document presents a base YANG Data model for connection oriented OAM protocols. It provides a technology-independent abstraction of key OAM constructs for such protocols. The model presented here can be extended to include technology specific details. This guarantees uniformity in the management of OAM protocols and provides support for nested OAM workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at different levels through a unified interface) The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Apr 10 00:11:46 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006D612932A; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:11:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.222 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6Qf9u4qCACK; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA70127698; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DEK77571; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:11:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.212) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:11:29 +0100 Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.133]) by DGGEMM404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:11:20 +0800 From: wangzitao To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" CC: "lime@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10.txt Thread-Index: AQHSsckjI3XbkJJXtkOu4/H3W8JD1KG+L0gg Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:11:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <149180804951.3051.10807272520377774604@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <149180804951.3051.10807272520377774604@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.161] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.58EB3029.007E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.133, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: f0e6889c81340d95bbf0201bb007a440 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10.txt X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:11:45 -0000 RGVhciBhbGwsDQoNCkJhc2VkIG9uIHRoZSBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyBvZiBlbWFpbCBsaXN0IGFuZCBl ZGl0b3Igc2Vzc2lvbiwgd2UgdXBkYXRlIHRoZSBDb25uZWN0aW9uIE9yaWVudGVkIE9BTSBZYW5n IGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KSW4gdGhpcyB2ZXJzaW9uLCB3ZSByZXdyaXRlIHNvbWUgZGVzY3JpcHRpb25z IHRvIGF2b2lkIGNvbmZ1c2lvbiwgYWRvcHQgR3JlZ6GvcyBpbnB1dCBmb3IgdGhlIGRlZmluaXRp b25zIG9mIE9uLWRlbWFuZCAmIFByb2FjdGl2ZSwgDQpyZW1vdmUgobBsZXZlbKGxIGZyb20gobBN SVChsSBsaXN0LCBhbmQgYWRkIKGwbWQtbGV2ZWyhsSBpbiBDQyAmIENWICYgdHJhY2Vyb3V0ZSBS UENzLiANCk1vcmUgZGV0YWlscyBwbGVhc2Ugc2VlIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudC4NCg0KQmVzdCBSZWdh cmRzIQ0KLU1pY2hhZWwNCg0KLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28/i0tLS0tDQq3orz+yMs6IExpbWUgW21haWx0 bzpsaW1lLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0gaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzQGlldGYub3JnDQq3 osvNyrG85DogMjAxN8TqNNTCMTDI1SAxNTowNw0KytW8/sjLOiBpLWQtYW5ub3VuY2VAaWV0Zi5v cmcNCrOty806IGxpbWVAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFtMaW1lXSBJLUQgQWN0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLWxpbWUteWFuZy1vYW0tbW9kZWwtMTAudHh0DQoNCg0KQSBOZXcgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnQg aXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZyb20gdGhlIG9uLWxpbmUgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnRzIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVz Lg0KVGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpcyBhIHdvcmsgaXRlbSBvZiB0aGUgTGF5ZXIgSW5kZXBlbmRlbnQgT0FN IE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgaW4gdGhlIE11bHRpLUxheWVyIEVudmlyb25tZW50IG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLg0K DQogICAgICAgIFRpdGxlICAgICAgICAgICA6IEdlbmVyaWMgWUFORyBEYXRhIE1vZGVsIGZvciBD b25uZWN0aW9uIE9yaWVudGVkIE9wZXJhdGlvbnMsIEFkbWluaXN0cmF0aW9uLCBhbmQgTWFpbnRl bmFuY2UoT0FNKSBwcm90b2NvbHMNCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9ycyAgICAgICAgIDogRGVlcGFrIEt1 bWFyDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFFpbiBXdQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBNaWNoYWVsIFdhbmcNCglGaWxlbmFtZSAgICAgICAgOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWxpbWUt eWFuZy1vYW0tbW9kZWwtMTAudHh0DQoJUGFnZXMgICAgICAgICAgIDogNTINCglEYXRlICAgICAg ICAgICAgOiAyMDE3LTA0LTEwDQoNCkFic3RyYWN0Og0KICAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwcmVzZW50 cyBhIGJhc2UgWUFORyBEYXRhIG1vZGVsIGZvciBjb25uZWN0aW9uIG9yaWVudGVkDQogICBPQU0g cHJvdG9jb2xzLiAgSXQgcHJvdmlkZXMgYSB0ZWNobm9sb2d5LWluZGVwZW5kZW50IGFic3RyYWN0 aW9uIG9mDQogICBrZXkgT0FNIGNvbnN0cnVjdHMgZm9yIHN1Y2ggcHJvdG9jb2xzLiAgVGhlIG1v ZGVsIHByZXNlbnRlZCBoZXJlIGNhbg0KICAgYmUgZXh0ZW5kZWQgdG8gaW5jbHVkZSB0ZWNobm9s b2d5IHNwZWNpZmljIGRldGFpbHMuICBUaGlzIGd1YXJhbnRlZXMNCiAgIHVuaWZvcm1pdHkgaW4g dGhlIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgb2YgT0FNIHByb3RvY29scyBhbmQgcHJvdmlkZXMgc3VwcG9ydA0KICAg Zm9yIG5lc3RlZCBPQU0gd29ya2Zsb3dzIChpLmUuLCBwZXJmb3JtaW5nIE9BTSBmdW5jdGlvbnMg YXQgZGlmZmVyZW50DQogICBsZXZlbHMgdGhyb3VnaCBhIHVuaWZpZWQgaW50ZXJmYWNlKQ0KDQoN ClRoZSBJRVRGIGRhdGF0cmFja2VyIHN0YXR1cyBwYWdlIGZvciB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGlzOg0KaHR0 cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1saW1lLXlhbmctb2FtLW1v ZGVsLw0KDQpUaGVyZSBhcmUgYWxzbyBodG1saXplZCB2ZXJzaW9ucyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYXQ6DQpo dHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1saW1lLXlhbmctb2FtLW1vZGVs LTEwDQpodHRwczovL2RhdGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtbGlt ZS15YW5nLW9hbS1tb2RlbC0xMA0KDQpBIGRpZmYgZnJvbSB0aGUgcHJldmlvdXMgdmVyc2lvbiBp cyBhdmFpbGFibGUgYXQ6DQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9yZmNkaWZmP3VybDI9ZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1saW1lLXlhbmctb2FtLW1vZGVsLTEwDQoNCg0KUGxlYXNlIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkg dGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2Ygc3VibWlzc2lvbiB1bnRp bCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVyc2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBhcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmll dGYub3JnLg0KDQpJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFmdHMgYXJlIGFsc28gYXZhaWxhYmxlIGJ5IGFub255bW91 cyBGVFAgYXQ6DQpmdHA6Ly9mdHAuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzLw0KDQpfX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KTGltZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3QNCkxpbWVAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v bGltZQ0K From nobody Wed Apr 19 08:10:32 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEB6129AFF for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTmgxaSlxzIK for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA007129AEA for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:10:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ttgbDewjzU70Cbb0ydCb9p70HT3ZaR4Yyr1VO46lWKU=; b=jmJJrW7jWVa7HLrl6YnV577bhb3EaxVB99yBnfIJLVPjIK/7gw3s9MhI3sW6A3R+wmkGPTAsBKn6fYjaay958oZDcYHeoEL4U2vbMB/pyGN6pc3pw9wIA4+IJD2kLKsyWHGepyckGcBw2Z0b0z4xG8C844V+u6nm3Ty1EJaeurQ= Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) by BLUPR0501MB2052.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1047.6; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:10:27 +0000 Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.008; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:10:27 +0000 From: Ron Bonica To: "lime@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Minutes Thread-Index: AdK5HwJFGAV3T/wwT8qU7qMgYdhGIw== Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:10:27 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB2052; 7:84++plwyzXUO87jgFA7FWH6Jj+KzmhLrQVXVOjAOY4w8xH+EPKHuhSWgMwEt/ziUzsNZ478DbXsKzXBZwBAw9qhVafcsPqDCW+cOejOAX5xUOe4JJWrEJIbQc7o7JgKnb0RRt21l+fjQUKCBwZCfqHiogO7PIqPBazvd3gRRXtBMBZ0E3qJOFlcji25YkWL6+f/9egTtf2xk8J+7MxcJhWrJ4VbuPpoWSw2pxeyDwmODsLOZHhSQiOv3Crpoyb7QyugaMkk5nH4x4H6NQ+h7CUTx/6m+vayl2Noc9E4c9PviAQ2pLfGxUXZSrCbz12yNr64arQLbkmJZ+KGjff51cQ== x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 136dd79c-4ef1-4864-a5e5-08d48736366f x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; x-forefront-prvs: 028256169F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39850400002)(2900100001)(6436002)(74316002)(33656002)(5660300001)(6506006)(81166006)(77096006)(7116003)(1730700003)(86362001)(50986999)(305945005)(3480700004)(558084003)(54356999)(8676002)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(189998001)(8936002)(7696004)(110136004)(2501003)(38730400002)(25786009)(3280700002)(2906002)(9686003)(6916009)(53936002)(55016002)(99286003)(5640700003)(66066001)(122556002)(2351001)(221733001)(3660700001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2052; H:BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Apr 2017 15:10:27.5501 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB2052 Archived-At: Subject: [Lime] Minutes X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:10:30 -0000 Folks, Could the person who took minutes at IETF 98 please unicast them to me. Ron From nobody Mon Apr 24 15:05:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E430131949 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:05:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OVjjSI5f6Zm for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99AC1318D0 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:05:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2300; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1493071540; x=1494281140; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9t3WOgDnY8p/8fFZTREsuYu5d4lNN9KcbKXwfGf/9hQ=; b=YxklEx1fnTSD6YWzHfzm4tc358ObvR4Bn6PZ5kKX5odsW8LVCVNDpqXs MaLzlRaollrTBQgz3YOxpZdy8LpS0CA3M70NNGHkLzih3Y/ZW3nq8VWAm DBB7Tm/+KxoHtWqxozC4UIJ/sdnbKdaPhcvl2fDiTVy1SSXqMjQB9lp8i s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D+AABadv5Y/5tdJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBg1RhgQwHjXWnUYIPLooMPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrHQuFVlEBPkInBIovDps?= =?us-ascii?q?3ki+LHQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYZTggiKeYISHwWQC402AYcWgzGIPoIAh?= =?us-ascii?q?TOIZ4E9j1yEPAEfOIEGYxVEEQGCRYQRdQGIKIENAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,246,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="226644172" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2017 22:05:39 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3OM5dxI024404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:05:39 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:05:39 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:05:39 -0500 From: "Carl Moberg (camoberg)" To: "lime@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: YANG doctor initial review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam Thread-Index: AQHSvUbo3TQuzPqrlEKkCtj/oJ88sw== Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:05:39 +0000 Message-ID: <696928D9-33D1-47A9-AC9D-83EEE011552C@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.60.116.174] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4D1A20E1FCF8AF4697BD5B652621628A@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Lime] YANG doctor initial review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:05:42 -0000 I am the assigned YANG Doctor for the LIME YANG modules, this is the notes = from my initial review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam done with= the authors on a call last week: The module is intended to be implemented as a service model, per the module= classification draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-m= odel-classification-05) with augments to topologies, I suggest it needs mor= e description on the general concepts and how to use it. I suggest to remove the 'OAM data hierarchy' section. It does not add any i= nformation. The current version YANG module is all configuration except the 'oper' subt= ree. And there are no mandatory nodes (except list keys) which seems to all= ow for many, many combinations that likely make no sense. Please re-review = and make sure this is an informed choice. Suggest to rename tp-address-type-value to tp-address-technology-type. Why does 'grouping tp-technology' only allow 'technology-null' or 'technolo= gy-string'/'leaf ipv4-icmp' and what is the meaning of the leaf ipv4-icmp c= ontent? There are a couple of occasions of 'ordered-by user' that does not have a d= escription of the meaning of the order. Please review. Add an if-feature on path-discovery in *-methods draft. Generally I'd suggest adding more information about the various types and w= hich specifications you are picking them up from (e.g. RD, LSP ID, etc) The specification defines a typedef that is a path in another module ("rout= ing-instance-ref"). Suggest to reach out to authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-= model-02 to see if they want the -ref type in that module for reuse. Generally check whitespace and comments. Use the '-f yang' option to YANG t= o fix whitespace. Downcase "IPv4-Multicast-Group-Address", and "IPv6-Multicast-Group-Address"= , "IP-Multicast-Group-Address" Name of top container ('oper') not very helpful, suggest renaming to 'sessi= on-statistics'? Spelling of grouping (and uses) cc-session-statsitics Filename should include revision in CODE BEGINS Don't reference drafts, pleas check RFC6087 bis and well-formed drafts for = header stmts https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis#secti= on-4.9' Regards, -- Carl Moberg