From stpeter@stpeter.im Tue Mar 27 00:32:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCE521F849C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:32:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z+AtirX3Q7Dq for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E6421F8483 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-153f.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [64.103.25.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1690140058; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:45:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4F716D27.4080507@stpeter.im> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:32:55 +0200 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: link-relations@ietf.org References: <82130373-B33B-49A8-99F2-31135F58B193@sensinode.com> <4F3AC2BD.8040701@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <4F3AC2BD.8040701@stpeter.im> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zach Shelby Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: hosts X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:32:59 -0000 Folks, I never saw any feedback on this review request. If you have any concerns, please say so. On 2/14/12 9:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > Note: I'll request an IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 > now, which will run concurrently with the expert reviews. I am doing so > in order to get all the reviews finished before IETF 83. Just FYI! > > Peter > > On 2/14/12 11:56 AM, Zach Shelby wrote: >> draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 has passed WGLC in the CoRE WG, and it defines a new link relation "hosts" in Section 7.2 (also pasted below). Thanks in advance for your comments. >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 >> >> Zach Shelby >> >> >> 7.2. New 'hosts' relation type >> >> This memo registers the new "hosts" Web Linking relation type as per >> [RFC5988]. >> >> Relation Name: hosts >> >> Description: Refers to a resource hosted by the server indicated by >> the link context. >> >> Reference: [[ this document ]] >> >> Notes: This relation is used in CoRE where links are retrieved as a >> /.well-known/core resource representation, and by default the context >> of the links is the server at coap://authority from which /.well- >> known/core was requested. >> >> Application Data: None >> >> _______________________________________________ >> link-relations mailing list >> link-relations@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations From julian.reschke@gmx.de Tue Mar 27 00:44:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C151021F87C9 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:44:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.173 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.574, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YNT8Ba8-6MDH for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A620521F87C8 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2012 07:44:44 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [IPv6:::1]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 27 Mar 2012 09:44:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+lOuh+u5mlxrlVmblv2u+tPuGK6uKKAnbDHyZH1B hwlUUETfYGNXqh Message-ID: <4F716FE7.9000003@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:44:39 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Saint-Andre References: <82130373-B33B-49A8-99F2-31135F58B193@sensinode.com> <4F3AC2BD.8040701@stpeter.im> <4F716D27.4080507@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <4F716D27.4080507@stpeter.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Zach Shelby , link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: hosts X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:44:47 -0000 On 2012-03-27 09:32, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Folks, I never saw any feedback on this review request. If you have any > concerns, please say so. > > On 2/14/12 9:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >> >> Note: I'll request an IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 >> now, which will run concurrently with the expert reviews. I am doing so >> in order to get all the reviews finished before IETF 83. Just FYI! >> >> Peter >> ... I made IETF LC comments; please consider them DE experts with respect to this as well () Best regards, Julian From stpeter@stpeter.im Tue Mar 27 00:45:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3257921F87CB for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:45:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id br+CKvTI4OQB for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C4821F87C3 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-153f.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [64.103.25.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EB4940058; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:58:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4F717030.3040006@stpeter.im> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:45:52 +0200 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <82130373-B33B-49A8-99F2-31135F58B193@sensinode.com> <4F3AC2BD.8040701@stpeter.im> <4F716D27.4080507@stpeter.im> <4F716FE7.9000003@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F716FE7.9000003@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zach Shelby , link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: hosts X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:45:55 -0000 On 3/27/12 9:44 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-27 09:32, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Folks, I never saw any feedback on this review request. If you have any >> concerns, please say so. >> >> On 2/14/12 9:23 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> >>> >>> Note: I'll request an IETF Last Call on draft-ietf-core-link-format-11 >>> now, which will run concurrently with the expert reviews. I am doing so >>> in order to get all the reviews finished before IETF 83. Just FYI! >>> >>> Peter >>> ... > > I made IETF LC comments; please consider them DE experts with respect to > this as well > () Yes, that is under discussion right now at the CORE WG meeting. :) I think your feedback is being addressed. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/