Subject: Re: [lisp] lisp Digest, Vol 123, Issue 23

From: "Balaji Pitta Venkatachalapathy (bvenkata)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:39:39 +0000

I support.

Thanks
Balaji

On 2/28/19, 12:00 PM, "lisp on behalf of [email-masked]" <[email-masked] on behalf of [email-masked]> wrote:

    Send lisp mailing list submissions to
    	[email-masked]
    
    To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
    or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    	[email-masked]
    
    You can reach the person managing the list at
    	[email-masked]
    
    When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    than "Re: Contents of lisp digest..."

    Today's Topics:
    
       1. Re: WG Last Call for LISP-SEC (draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)
          (Alberto Rodriguez-Natal)

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Message: 1
    Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:24:45 -0800
    From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <[email-masked]>
    To: Luigi Iannone <[email-masked]>
    Cc: "[email-masked] list" <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
    Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for LISP-SEC
    	(draft-ietf-lisp-sec-17.txt)
    Message-ID:
    	<[email-masked]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    
    Luigi, all,
    
    I support handing this to the AD as soon as the few remaining open comments
    on this document coming from the review of 6833/30bis are closed.
    
    Thanks,
    Alberto
    
    On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:01 AM Luigi Iannone <[email-masked]> wrote:
    
    > Folks,
    >
    > this WG Last Call has been out for a while and we did not receive
    > substantial feedback.
    >
    > Note that following the discussion on the main specs (the two bis
    > documents) LISP-SEC is supposed to be MTI - Mandatory To Implement.
    >
    > Please send your support gif you want to see this happening.
    >
    > Ciao
    >
    > L.
    >
    >
    > On 28 Jan 2019, at 14:29, Luigi Iannone <[email-masked]> wrote:
    >
    > Hi All,
    >
    > since work on bis documents is re-starting to move forward it is about
    > time to move forward other pieces of the LISP ecosystem.
    >
    > As such the LISP Security document has been revised a while ago for two
    > reason:
    > - Make sure is PS quality
    > - Make sure it is compliant with latest changes in the bis documents.
    >
    > The second point has been re-checked by the authors just last week, and
    > seems we are ready to move the document forward.
    >
    > This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end
    > February 11th, 2019.
    >
    > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is
    > ready for handing to the AD.
    > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it
    > would take to address your concerns.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Luigi & Joel
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > lisp mailing list
    > [email-masked]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
    >
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/attachments/20190228/c1ad6765/attachment.html>
    
    ------------------------------
    
    Subject: Digest Footer
    
    _______________________________________________
    lisp mailing list
    [email-masked]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

    ------------------------------
    
    End of lisp Digest, Vol 123, Issue 23
    *************************************