From nobody Fri Apr 7 08:50:45 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82308128959; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:50:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34n-et2qWf6N; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:50:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D23791294BC; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 08:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2AD65B; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id CazyIT-xlcZw; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719542003D; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0v7xAshNaDW; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C9720033; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4590F3F15016; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:50:41 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Benoit Claise , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org Message-ID: <20170407155041.GC74131@elstar.local> Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder Mail-Followup-To: Benoit Claise , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org References: <148967599467.14149.3188235856151065534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:50:43 -0000 Benoit, can we get your OK for the revised security considerations or do we keep this document blocked until there is an official new version of the security considerations boilerplate text? It would be nice to get the two LMAP I-Ds out of the IESG process. /js On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 08:10:53PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:53:14AM -0700, Benoit Claise wrote: > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > DISCUSS: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > As agreed during the IESG telechat, holding a DISCUSS until the new YANG > > security considerations template including RESTCONF is agreed upon. > > > > I have updated the document to use the wording posted by Benoit to the > NETMOD list on March 16: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg17890.html > > Benoit, does this resolve the issue? The updated I-Ds and the diffs > can be found here: http://beadg.de/lmap/ > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From nobody Fri Apr 21 09:33:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B55127735; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:33:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8ky7t8HDRiV; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98ED5129A92; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:33:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=818; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492792420; x=1494002020; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OHdxeCO2izPXej2Jpc1tQ5bHIPE/HsqPkvRtFAvVhII=; b=Eg9qSmromxZLECBu7G7s9g725ngofZ8VCiJxyQE4GefGNi0wK8e8au61 mLBhr8IU32CFETRSLajvIpWeNTmTWWtakQlkea1vHlYps+grNC5H+yudE vX2J4Ib9akZ07Poqqf+7ySHwSwvZpEaZANv5ozhOGDtsCiT9D6YcKqrh0 g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C+AABnM/pY/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhDWBDI18c5B1aIwyiEqCDyyFLkoChEoYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgE?= =?us-ascii?q?FMgEFUQsYLlcGAQwIAQGKGA6reIsiAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR+GU4FdK?= =?us-ascii?q?4Jugj2BfQEBhgABBIk6lAeHF4tvglWIIIZiizk/iCEfOIEGJh0IGBVEhR6BTD4?= =?us-ascii?q?1AYcHgi4BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,230,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="652337310" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2017 16:33:37 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.90] (ams-bclaise-8919.cisco.com [10.60.67.90]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3LGXb47015789; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:33:37 GMT To: The IESG , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org References: <148967599467.14149.3188235856151065534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> From: Benoit Claise Message-ID: <0471a144-fa4e-c20d-30fa-d55f4d590e20@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:33:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:33:42 -0000 On 3/23/2017 8:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:53:14AM -0700, Benoit Claise wrote: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> As agreed during the IESG telechat, holding a DISCUSS until the new YANG >> security considerations template including RESTCONF is agreed upon. >> > I have updated the document to use the wording posted by Benoit to the > NETMOD list on March 16: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg17890.html > > Benoit, does this resolve the issue? Yes, thanks Jürgen. Removing my DISCUSS. > The updated I-Ds and the diffs > can be found here: http://beadg.de/lmap/ Perfect. Regards, Benoit > > /js > From nobody Fri Apr 21 09:34:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736F127735; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:34:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Benoit Claise To: "The IESG" Cc: draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com, lmap@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149279247811.22360.12232477543271032885.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:34:38 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11 X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:34:38 -0000 Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-yang/ There are no remarks associated with this position. From nobody Fri Apr 21 11:32:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C20C127F0E; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:32:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LS1Tf802AyjL; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30201129B7A; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C2B6CF; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id C_llLzlP82UN; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE77320051; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1EM34CslVnn; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E4C20050; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id DD8103F280DD; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:32:23 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Benoit Claise Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org Message-ID: <20170421183222.GB20407@elstar.local> Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder Mail-Followup-To: Benoit Claise , The IESG , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org References: <148967599467.14149.3188235856151065534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> <0471a144-fa4e-c20d-30fa-d55f4d590e20@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0471a144-fa4e-c20d-30fa-d55f4d590e20@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:32:25 -0000 On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:33:38PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: > On 3/23/2017 8:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:53:14AM -0700, Benoit Claise wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > DISCUSS: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > As agreed during the IESG telechat, holding a DISCUSS until the new YANG > > > security considerations template including RESTCONF is agreed upon. > > > > > I have updated the document to use the wording posted by Benoit to the > > NETMOD list on March 16: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg17890.html > > > > Benoit, does this resolve the issue? > Yes, thanks Jürgen. Removing my DISCUSS. > > The updated I-Ds and the diffs > > can be found here: http://beadg.de/lmap/ > Perfect. > Shall I post new I-Ds and then we are done with these two LMAP documents? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From nobody Fri Apr 21 11:39:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61627129B5B; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULUgF6mY5vue; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8867129AFF; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:39:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1070; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492799978; x=1494009578; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VBj0hcaH9hb1XC7wh4aYTuouzTfOTy7G8MhVo7RYTl0=; b=CgGnT7KOrTTDHBxBaD3+ENW7cdVkE5IE2r1a4TJP5myN5Xe+Mb0nTjyu 1yoNuFCy5l1gybttxYTp/7h5XdTF8CPVZw+kxOHF1oiHu2k86GpEzGvwI 2hrjEl3UciZZoS5wLSzkV1dhJujquq3l4sJTG0NeC96Pg5r/3vlQGuUCK c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DpAADkUPpY/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhDWBDI18c5BUIWiMMohKgg8shS5KAoRKGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRY?= =?us-ascii?q?BBTIBBVELGC5XBgEMCAEBihgOrBmLIAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEfhlOBX?= =?us-ascii?q?SsLgmOCPYF9AQGGAAEEiTqUB4cXi2+CAFWEXoNChmKLOT+IIR84gQYmHQgYFUS?= =?us-ascii?q?FHoFMPjUBhweCLgEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,230,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="652339213" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2017 18:39:35 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.90] (ams-bclaise-8919.cisco.com [10.60.67.90]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3LIdZ6J022441; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:39:35 GMT To: The IESG , draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org References: <148967599467.14149.3188235856151065534.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170323191053.GA41468@elstar.local> <0471a144-fa4e-c20d-30fa-d55f4d590e20@cisco.com> <20170421183222.GB20407@elstar.local> From: Benoit Claise Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:39:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170421183222.GB20407@elstar.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-lmap-yang-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:39:40 -0000 On 4/21/2017 8:32 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:33:38PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: >> On 3/23/2017 8:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:53:14AM -0700, Benoit Claise wrote: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> DISCUSS: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> As agreed during the IESG telechat, holding a DISCUSS until the new YANG >>>> security considerations template including RESTCONF is agreed upon. >>>> >>> I have updated the document to use the wording posted by Benoit to the >>> NETMOD list on March 16: >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg17890.html >>> >>> Benoit, does this resolve the issue? >> Yes, thanks Jürgen. Removing my DISCUSS. >>> The updated I-Ds and the diffs >>> can be found here: http://beadg.de/lmap/ >> Perfect. >> > Shall I post new I-Ds and then we are done with these two LMAP > documents? Yes please. Regards, B. > > /js > From nobody Fri Apr 21 12:12:14 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AFA129B0A; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:12:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: lmap@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149280193225.6886.13096496905578866777@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:12:12 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:12:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance of the IETF. Title : Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAP) Authors : Trevor Burbridge Philip Eardley Marcelo Bagnulo Juergen Schoenwaelder Filename : draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt Pages : 55 Date : 2017-04-21 Abstract: This Information Model applies to the Measurement Agent within a Large-Scale Measurement Platform. As such it outlines the information that is (pre-)configured on the Measurement Agent or exists in communications with a Controller or Collector within an LMAP framework. The purpose of such an Information Model is to provide a protocol and device independent view of the Measurement Agent that can be implemented via one or more Control and Report protocols. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Apr 21 12:13:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0981128BB6; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:13:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: lmap@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149280201762.6923.2314773379465732877@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:13:37 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 19:13:38 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance of the IETF. Title : A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents Authors : Juergen Schoenwaelder Vaibhav Bajpai Filename : draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt Pages : 61 Date : 2017-04-21 Abstract: This document defines a data model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAP). The data model is defined using the YANG data modeling language. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-yang/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sun Apr 30 19:35:22 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0B129B47; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:35:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Cc: The IESG , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap@ietf.org, alissa@cooperw.in, draft-ietf-lmap-yang@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <149360611165.9788.12151640399872316250.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:35:11 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 02:35:12 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents' (draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari, Benoit Claise and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-yang/ Technical Summary This document defines a data model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAP). The data model is defined using the YANG data modeling language. Working Group Summary The Working Group debated what Data Modeling Language should be used for LMAP and the consensus was to use YANG. Document Quality There is one active implementation of the DM which was presented, discussed and is available openly. There is information about at least one more implementation in progress. A YANG Doctor review was performed and comments were incorporated. During the development of the document the WG communicated and received inputs from other SDOs (as the Broadband Forum and IEEE 802) as well as from the EC projects. Personnel Dan Romascanu is the Document Shepherd. Alissa Cooper is the Responsible Area Director. From nobody Sun Apr 30 19:37:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC88129BA4; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:37:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Cc: The IESG , lmap-chairs@ietf.org, Dan Romascanu , lmap@ietf.org, alissa@cooperw.in, draft-ietf-lmap-information-model@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <149360623576.9872.11058299144278349335.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:37:15 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] Protocol Action: 'Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAP)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 02:37:16 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAP)' (draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari, Benoit Claise and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lmap-information-model/ Technical Summary This Information Model applies to the Measurement Agent within a Large-Scale Measurement Platform. As such it outlines the information that is (pre-)configured on the Measurement Agent or exists in communications with a Controller or Collector within an LMAP framework. The purpose of such an Information Model is to provide a protocol and device independent view of the Measurement Agent that can be implemented via one or more Control and Report protocols. Working Group Summary The Working Group debated the need for an Information Model and how it should be written. The consensus was that an IM is needed and the current format was adopted. Document Quality There is one active implementation of a DM based on this IM which was presented, discussed and is available openly. There is information about at least one more implementation in progress. During the development of the document the WG communicated and received inputs from other SDOs (as the Broadband Forum and IEEE 802) as well as from the EC projects. Personnel Dan Romascanu is the Document Shepherd. Alissa Cooper is the Responsible Area Director.