From nobody Thu Aug 10 12:30:51 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B6013241D for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RXP1dmjlAhys for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801A0124B18 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id i66so30842556wmg.0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dOm3X6Y3CwHaGu7p/fidNdKj/4bABnt8JhmdwcTHu2k=; b=f2FvnEhoIMpmk/Mp8qTs9zZst0no0TMiUEUh990XPlNfdn6pUaa+S9vGLW+hwma1Uc OaviQrjdgB8COM200m5IrAN4hSAba0fjKx3OiXcBOiPvd44lugnZrju3ZuGRX2yQEhw/ MjIyAzNQWU3JdCYJDNc9xDsAFrQ04rKnRRMoXINEySF90IZ5YRPWiLPD5aobwsjP+FpQ Bkh4Znbwrw98gSC9ujjKo+/OpDCaJWEKBxjVEVfzy7oQ66hHlO9Vx23RKXsIwOSosRzz AXBXiPhfrrSuEL8Yf4GX4b2ZOjYgCqj7maFin21/v82Zb92NQpITQ5mx//Z4/N+b90Oy Sp5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dOm3X6Y3CwHaGu7p/fidNdKj/4bABnt8JhmdwcTHu2k=; b=FWsIFZhpqzVgO6gq9+G+JyV/ur2YFAtCEkRod9QNQdbf35JyFikEBMbHY5FuZKAgHK HWJ9xce3+KuUaWosEzKgQj0GnsErj0e3l/u3As0Wpwt9wiMvfjTiLdX3xEwQHMJ/DU89 pRHHLiXDadjHIkLpFCVcelPnvhJaCJmtuhb5yjio2OLVdpkcAC4LX+i7SwY4vQ8kwmlb doCKiPcdvjbyUQ+slcuiam5CIJrZ+6v22vWxr6R3K5vb6UKhOjD6yxat69GOSpqq9Ss/ WGZ05E2T/iIyg1pQ4fNWq6vZuFEhGPC12jM7pIvPLsAg+eMQni1XSzGtYmGzEGwVZLPG v8bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gQSdc26E45/0IrkIdNrqsTNk6344LaBbOG6d/97qZ7YZqW6gUL H0h52cACxOtGm0Gp0volHBieRZ8vRanksFMBTQ== X-Received: by 10.28.99.11 with SMTP id x11mr7749134wmb.164.1502393446786; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.164.135 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:30:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Warren Kumari Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] Change to draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18 X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:30:50 -0000 Hi all, An issue was discovered during AUTH48 processing of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18. Section 3.11.3. Definition of ma-calendar-obj contains: object { [datetime ma-calendar-start;] [datetime ma-calendar-end;] [string ma-calendar-months<0..*>;] [string ma-calendar-days-of-week<0..*>;] [string ma-calendar-days-of-month<0..*>;] [string ma-calendar-hours<0..*>;] [string ma-calendar-minutes<0..*>;] [string ma-calendar-seconds<0..*>;] [int ma-calendar-timezone-offset;] } ma-calendar-obj; ... ma-calendar-timezone-offset: The optional timezone offest in hours. If not present, it defaults to the system's local timezone. It was noted by Philip Eardley that "There are a few countries /regions with half hour timezone offsets, and even a couple with 45 minutes! Unix offsets seem to be in >seconds. Rfc3339 mentions offsets in minutes. " and so we will be changing the definition to be: ma-calendar-timezone-offset: The optional timezone offest in minutes. If not present, it defaults to the system's local timezone. I cannot see this causing *major* issue for anyone, but please scream loudly by Monday it causes serious issues for you. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf From nobody Mon Aug 21 17:04:15 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4D01321D9; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gw83zKimRMxS; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9348F126B6E; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9588CB813BD; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:03:44 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, lmap@ietf.org Message-Id: <20170822000344.9588CB813BD@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] RFC 8193 on Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAPs) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:04:13 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8193 Title: Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAPs) Author: T. Burbridge, P. Eardley, M. Bagnulo, J. Schoenwaelder Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: August 2017 Mailbox: trevor.burbridge@bt.com, philip.eardley@bt.com, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de Pages: 53 Characters: 124022 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8193 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8193 This Information Model applies to the Measurement Agent within an LMAP framework. As such, it outlines the information that is configured or preconfigured on the Measurement Agent or exists in communications with a Controller or Collector within an LMAP framework. The purpose of such an Information Model is to provide a protocol- and device-independent view of the Measurement Agent that can be implemented via one or more Control and Report Protocols. This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Mon Aug 21 17:04:48 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA15A132AE0; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61_fxnG5-wsr; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E16F132AE4; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0F87CB813C9; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:00 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, lmap@ietf.org Message-Id: <20170822000400.0F87CB813C9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] RFC 8194 on A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:04:39 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8194 Title: A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents Author: J. Schoenwaelder, V. Bajpai Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: August 2017 Mailbox: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, bajpaiv@in.tum.de Pages: 59 Characters: 102091 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8194 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8194 This document defines a data model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAPs). The data model is defined using the YANG data modeling language. This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Tue Aug 22 00:18:42 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73700132B76 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.698 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cVBWjEoG-nvD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22EC132B75 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z18so93145422qka.4 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=U/dZRMktESJkF5rpolf256P7YX9aiQ02ps95a2JUtGE=; b=lzMJo3lzsUbeaoUfKxUjaq0FWV4WBj8enu02ZQeBQjWCbfMpSHEVH5txM49NR5d5fd pk7gnFPrlEZFltRvMTBUliURU9jFB5zGbgAFoJVW1NQwJZSNj8VTK7PgjjQm4SdzPlcM VTkJQWM31QmrhvV4Rv8wdpjLjqmOVDo2F1SHvrwhSNuG2q7bKw+lx/wuM/IvUuYSgltz dbzpm794gy6jgo2H4DMwdOxibfIDdtfH+W9pcgVRs6Kk04TlALZ1vtKqRMArZTSqVKE+ LcJ7Rgu8IM7T/T6lSVLXkYC7ubdSXzSML/91YiiJhUoOk2nzJVvzvtiE82ZufsgPIgRa ng1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=U/dZRMktESJkF5rpolf256P7YX9aiQ02ps95a2JUtGE=; b=kWWZNhgt5KmPd1XGOKbpoKaus+JMkPwMV2VQ9BKMhrr3gPOCLyAtaUs4JaRGdSPgR1 /PG8DbwfskDRolVWuSKphZw7c8ppGR3kHQsChlIr5BIR9ceShVB69sivBa2982ld0a85 PMmOpFLiFrqYqi7jBTQOEAVjHlBCedbVNWuQMCLJQG2rrZE/bdTGCzpw9BcAeKvaxE1y PwoEd0yhcqjFYf30nObT/q0o+SrbqZbyZDxhVujFYzyJWgR9Xxe/pB1ZGol3ZcckFKFi lNMb5aEKWxmoZ6PxMTv28XskC/r3jvz7m3OhlPZTqD1P93Z8jUJe57n9HK0PeABagdmM xpJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5g2cH5BjhaZAlHvDzAkqfW436DST18wRok2hK4l1vQBeNodwVTu XFjFGtIeQIREhZaY9Cq/f+X2GBKN7w== X-Received: by 10.233.216.197 with SMTP id u188mr19282364qkf.215.1503386317272; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.206 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170822000344.9588CB813BD@rfc-editor.org> References: <20170822000344.9588CB813BD@rfc-editor.org> From: Dan Romascanu Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:18:36 +0300 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04303e66bcba05575267b7" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] RFC 8193 on Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement Platforms (LMAPs) X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:18:41 -0000 --94eb2c04303e66bcba05575267b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks to the editors and authors and congratulations to the WG for the publication of this document. Regards, Dan On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:03 AM, wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 8193 > > Title: Information Model for Large-Scale Measurement > Platforms (LMAPs) > Author: T. Burbridge, P. Eardley, > M. Bagnulo, J. Schoenwaelder > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: August 2017 > Mailbox: trevor.burbridge@bt.com, > philip.eardley@bt.com, > marcelo@it.uc3m.es, > j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de > Pages: 53 > Characters: 124022 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-18.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8193 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8193 > > This Information Model applies to the Measurement Agent within an > LMAP framework. As such, it outlines the information that is > configured or preconfigured on the Measurement Agent or exists in > communications with a Controller or Collector within an LMAP > framework. The purpose of such an Information Model is to provide a > protocol- and device-independent view of the Measurement Agent that > can be implemented via one or more Control and Report Protocols. > > This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband > Performance Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and > suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > lmap mailing list > lmap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap > --94eb2c04303e66bcba05575267b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks to the editors and authors and congratula= tions to the WG for the publication of this document.

Regards= ,

Dan



On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:03 AM, <= rfc-editor@r= fc-editor.org> wrote:
A new= Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 RFC 8193

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Title:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Information Model fo= r Large-Scale Measurement
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Platf= orms (LMAPs)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Author:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0T. Burbridge, P. Ear= dley,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 M. Ba= gnulo, J. Schoenwaelder
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Status:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Standards Track
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stream:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0IETF
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Date:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0August 2017
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Mailbox:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 trevor.burbridge@bt.com,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 philip.eardley@bt.com,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 marcelo@it.uc3m.es,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-<= wbr>university.de
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pages:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 53
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Characters: 124022
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:=C2=A0 =C2=A0None

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I-D Tag:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 draft-ietf-lmap-informati= on-model-18.txt

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 URL:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 h= ttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8193

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 DOI:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 10.17487/RFC819= 3

This Information Model applies to the Measurement Agent within an
LMAP framework.=C2=A0 As such, it outlines the information that is
configured or preconfigured on the Measurement Agent or exists in
communications with a Controller or Collector within an LMAP
framework.=C2=A0 The purpose of such an Information Model is to provide a protocol- and device-independent view of the Measurement Agent that
can be implemented via one or more Control and Report Protocols.

This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Perf= ormance Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestion= s
for improvements.=C2=A0 Please refer to the current edition of the Official=
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/sta= ndards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.=C2=A0 Distribution of th= is
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
=C2=A0 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf= o/ietf-announce
=C2=A0 https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/m= ailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/s= earch
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/re= trieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.=C2=A0 Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
lmap mailing list
lmap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap

--94eb2c04303e66bcba05575267b7-- From nobody Tue Aug 22 00:19:25 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B0B132B75 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XOz7Iy0m8qw9 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D377B132B79 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 57so15390652qtu.5 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZgiD0kqJHeeSYo/mfnsetZ1DsLfXw/tzFMEIBEM995c=; b=BBQ9X9E3eJqRGshs2d+WXPmv13g6IpcjQA8YH3WrR/K3wxYy97zg8ZQRmr2hW4l1Ma b2edUG4FtmxcjrSwnqaC7Stz6p5e2UIdaiJXZX+QSJFooBCFj/EnUbU+4Jfc/gsbPwQG 80LJbuDZjPp7y5yvMEGsbwTeehGljUl+jWKb9+eqwe4q7F8XXx7KoOzFnlMAaz4lDwfg oHZltEcX9mE/U4fmQtWNilBK8LoEwxwnCHLn9px4Z/SMqsW9w2wJf9nyWTTOPb1L23lq m18jfAQtiHPz712tStHq+v0CYWaHnQijPXbSEdvzdhi4ynfPm8ydt33U26GeE5kPxhRv dVxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZgiD0kqJHeeSYo/mfnsetZ1DsLfXw/tzFMEIBEM995c=; b=LWEXRQ+KAFTCr3ZCMYR1jM7XP2rfNZuCCVKRZyG0S9FxjDaDSbKU9K+ptunO2Ol22B a3HviQSQOQGJnoS2OUbpcZLJOWVnqjP5/HliQtZGbSKs23BYL9Q1UEt8RSbzwwqgYlCw gd6ZWqg+/6F6jTOfau8pSAto0aDJtaxJes2OCvgk6HsUvHNZ4hmPmHOB4/kuq8Gl6q7D RjA8LGBlaYf1SWBfB72l+A2hb7rAHEpd3BSmNgsr91VtFOKDnKEioMjOT8klaghn2kAu xRM2Ojd7N9mM3WMMchC408m79fI84oTaz0BD4tQIYGyN9Qkaw9ebhmV8P09ZNuo/wL/0 dRug== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iuwyHHG2m9YSLzAGotgu85UZxkQE/LErJ5SeEUjhZOJnHHRGTZ hqAGgwK2Nm/asHwiJW4mz3qfGbU4CWnW X-Received: by 10.200.0.208 with SMTP id d16mr25844216qtg.69.1503386360571; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.206 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170822000400.0F87CB813C9@rfc-editor.org> References: <20170822000400.0F87CB813C9@rfc-editor.org> From: Dan Romascanu Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:19:19 +0300 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f267cfb69fa05575269d8" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] RFC 8194 on A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:19:24 -0000 --f403045f267cfb69fa05575269d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks to the editors and authors and congratulations to the WG for the publication of this document. Regards, Dan On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:04 AM, wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 8194 > > Title: A YANG Data Model for > LMAP Measurement Agents > Author: J. Schoenwaelder, V. Bajpai > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: August 2017 > Mailbox: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, > bajpaiv@in.tum.de > Pages: 59 > Characters: 102091 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8194 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8194 > > This document defines a data model for Large-Scale Measurement > Platforms (LMAPs). The data model is defined using the YANG data > modeling language. > > This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband > Performance Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and > suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > lmap mailing list > lmap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap > --f403045f267cfb69fa05575269d8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks to the editors and authors and congratula= tions to the WG for the publication of this document.

Regards= ,

Dan


On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:04 AM, <rfc-editor@rfc= -editor.org> wrote:
A new R= equest for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 RFC 8194

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Title:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 A YANG Data Model fo= r
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 LMAP = Measurement Agents
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Author:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0J. Schoenwaelder, V.= Bajpai
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Status:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Standards Track
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stream:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0IETF
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Date:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0August 2017
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Mailbox:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 bajpaiv@in.tum.de
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Pages:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 59
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Characters: 102091
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:=C2=A0 =C2=A0None

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I-D Tag:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 draft-ietf-lmap-yang-12.t= xt

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 URL:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 h= ttps://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8194

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 DOI:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 10.17487/RFC819= 4

This document defines a data model for Large-Scale Measurement
Platforms (LMAPs).=C2=A0 The data model is defined using the YANG data
modeling language.

This document is a product of the Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Perf= ormance Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestion= s
for improvements.=C2=A0 Please refer to the current edition of the Official=
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/sta= ndards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.=C2=A0 Distribution of th= is
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
=C2=A0 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf= o/ietf-announce
=C2=A0 https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/m= ailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/s= earch
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/re= trieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.=C2=A0 Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
lmap mailing list
lmap@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap

--f403045f267cfb69fa05575269d8--