From nobody Wed Sep 13 08:32:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2154133072 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.448 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-pD0S5QORs7 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C623C13306E for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c82so631554vkd.4 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uyo68Tdje/1VQwT4nOv4ffweoUWYfSbZG11p/MlxVt4=; b=QcPFyYIIeXTx68zA3nTZqkLiSDTMw8q2N8G/um0jQuMYKrz4Jxm+jwEnjU1imQi4xI wwCwZ7XL27tFIYA+Lxwhf3Ge/XJze6X6kDX9UDsdd/CwwhXe9P/94Q/RYAonkY1snREQ mba8aOPbqbuPPsUEwwJHBpdmsm03Bc5yIL1YmdBInuVfBxR5+KmCW/5KKVfqVlR4a75l XMGpJTts+kiDHVB9X6EcluE53JUZalfkVwCCmB+oM0ySDDL3qJtX2DrV3O1/bR1bEhUB rhq3F4ARQLH8RsQrVcRfdRSCaIw3WSHtZe3854tPu3rMWxuBZVxU08FzgFL4Cw8I1Jwo QWuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uyo68Tdje/1VQwT4nOv4ffweoUWYfSbZG11p/MlxVt4=; b=ehcWWsTTa9qf28iON4mQKD+WrNN48jDpnxDtZWflMYdFs5pD30tl9LhHC1pDzHc1D6 LnpUJpXOvHtcD4m34HJL6RuqvgIJu8PO/WxmxNgxGOyaT6JQSUDMV9aa1rf88RiyeuKx LsjPKj9EnCLkpXwSaFd4vX4WffSZrxvUKqdenzhnV3gTrD8GEuQhiu3Mnt+oI3WLijK7 Ms+mYqTOVNUqIhqYVLPa/lndBVTMf0wYF4+0g2Fx9epN1pnABvF+/Sa+8UONgJBcW2k6 8yVfD2vLvlxL7nCmCEWogco7MWTSZmcDf/+X+fcQAxFtVCT2iKCrG91X1u8Iju12W5kH V3sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUim+FqS4o01Esi3ENWUAoHTD66zi6Mn+IUhVeNKvpOOzzA1DoiI 93hU7RJyYK/jHp/tKIZPzz3zMugkw3/Hp7FAwTD7QQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA3CX4hpoa/CgNJYO1Ao5gBZQmISVjFbgYsY5xdAv9DXqHhZkv5Mq/aaZKCPNd6zZFnmUpHTem5aHD6E/4wbeI= X-Received: by 10.31.229.1 with SMTP id c1mr11620985vkh.140.1505316772479; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.82.195 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:32:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Weil Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114db7bc7f9bcc055913dfe1" Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] LMAP WG Status Update - No Meeting Planned for IETF100 X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:32:56 -0000 --001a114db7bc7f9bcc055913dfe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" All, Seeing as there is no active discussion taking place on the list or any work planned in the near term for the final working group document ( draft-ietf-lmap-restconf-04 ), Dan and I are not planning on requesting a meeting for IETF 100 in Singapore. If there is any interest for any new or future work in Singapore please let us know quickly. And Congratulations again to the authors (big cheers to Juergen) and reviewers of RFC8193 (Information Model) and RFC8194(Yang Model). Thank You, Dan and Jason --001a114db7bc7f9bcc055913dfe1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All,

Seeing as there is no active discu= ssion taking place on the list or any work planned in the near term for the= final working group document (draft-ietf-lm= ap-restconf-04= =C2=A0),=C2=A0Dan and I are not planning on requesting a meeting for= IETF 100 in Singapore. If there is any interest for any new or future work= in Singapore please let us know quickly.=C2=A0

An= d Congratulations again to the authors (big cheers to Juergen) and reviewer= s of RFC8193 (Information Model) and RFC8194(Yang Model).

Thank You,

Dan and Jason
--001a114db7bc7f9bcc055913dfe1-- From nobody Sat Sep 30 04:53:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4FD132076; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:53:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, lmap-chairs@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com, lmap@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <150677242252.3377.1402041484150168479.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:53:42 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] lmap - Not having a session at IETF 100 X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:53:42 -0000 Dan Romascanu, a chair of the lmap working group, indicated that the lmap working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 100. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.