
From turners@ieca.com  Wed May  1 15:29:01 2013
Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF821F9ADD for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.265
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxhDR0QUZc8A for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway04.websitewelcome.com (gateway04.websitewelcome.com [69.56.148.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0169721F9ABD for <msec@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway04.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 5744EF17CF05; Wed,  1 May 2013 17:28:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator1743.hostgator.com (gator1743.hostgator.com [184.173.253.227]) by gateway04.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B29BF17CED3 for <msec@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 May 2013 17:28:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [108.18.169.23] (port=59380 helo=thunderfish.local) by gator1743.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1UXfVc-0007N0-5r; Wed, 01 May 2013 17:28:20 -0500
Message-ID: <51819703.3050604@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:28:19 -0600
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bew@cisco.com, sheela@cisco.com, hardjono@mit.edu
References: <20130420165520.C9F4AB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130420165520.C9F4AB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator1743.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-Source-Sender: (thunderfish.local) [108.18.169.23]:59380
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 13
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IxNzQzLmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Cc: msec@ietf.org, claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Subject: Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3598)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 22:29:01 -0000

Authors,

Just to double check there's a Protocol field already there in the 
figure so this one needs to be verified right to remove the wrong field?

spt

On 4/20/13 10:55 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407,
> "The Group Domain of Interpretation".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6407&eid=3598
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Claude Briere de L'Isle <claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr>
>
> Section: 5.5.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> DST ID Prot (1 octet) -- Value describing an IP protocol ID (e.g.,
>
>        UDP/TCP) [PROT-REG].  A value of zero means that the DST ID Prot
>
>        field MUST be ignored.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> To be removed, this field does not exist
>
> Notes
> -----
> M. Brian Weiss confirmed to me that "The description of "DST ID Prot (1 octet) on Page 32 is incorrect, no such field is meant to be in Figure 8. This is definitely errata. The bullet describing "DST ID Prot (1 octet)" should be removed"
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The Group Domain of Interpretation
> Publication Date    : October 2011
> Author(s)           : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multicast Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

From bew@cisco.com  Wed May  1 15:49:21 2013
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CFB21F9B55 for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HH80x0hv14vy for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F83E21F9AE1 for <msec@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 May 2013 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2368; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1367448547; x=1368658147; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sI6cWm+HD4mQ0bWCce282KV/40HcrXTjukYuAWTkAgk=; b=eqyjz81I+Tt2MyGw3pkLhTfK4i2LXe804o+Wm8SMpB3JFgoyTbQkqY18 Pywtr1+HpUtOqp0DxymJ1lvKS2+u9EkQFdysn+O0otN0VPrnLIXYjpwJ7 gPn8iLPQWlkBRsItYQb9pPkWqpTDQIn3g24hWfG+a4/rALUidzHXGrRyn g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,591,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="77019121"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2013 22:49:05 +0000
Received: from dhcp-128-107-146-251.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-146-251.cisco.com [128.107.146.251]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r41MmWtR029323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 May 2013 22:49:04 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51819703.3050604@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:49:05 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E43D44B-59A0-4774-9FA2-F926E1CE45F2@cisco.com>
References: <20130420165520.C9F4AB1E003@rfc-editor.org> <51819703.3050604@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: msec@ietf.org, hardjono@mit.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3598)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 22:49:21 -0000

Hi Sean,

The errata author checked with me before submitting it. He is correct.

Brian

On May 1, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote:

> Authors,
>=20
> Just to double check there's a Protocol field already there in the =
figure so this one needs to be verified right to remove the wrong field?
>=20
> spt
>=20
> On 4/20/13 10:55 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407,
>> "The Group Domain of Interpretation".
>>=20
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D6407&eid=3D3598
>>=20
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Claude Briere de L'Isle =
<claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr>
>>=20
>> Section: 5.5.1
>>=20
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> DST ID Prot (1 octet) -- Value describing an IP protocol ID (e.g.,
>>=20
>>       UDP/TCP) [PROT-REG].  A value of zero means that the DST ID =
Prot
>>=20
>>       field MUST be ignored.
>>=20
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> To be removed, this field does not exist
>>=20
>> Notes
>> -----
>> M. Brian Weiss confirmed to me that "The description of "DST ID Prot =
(1 octet) on Page 32 is incorrect, no such field is meant to be in =
Figure 8. This is definitely errata. The bullet describing "DST ID Prot =
(1 octet)" should be removed"
>>=20
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>=20
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : The Group Domain of Interpretation
>> Publication Date    : October 2011
>> Author(s)           : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Multicast Security
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>=20

--=20
Brian Weis
Security Engineering, SRG, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew@cisco.com


From prvs=38388c1ca3=magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com  Mon May  6 02:53:51 2013
Return-Path: <prvs=38388c1ca3=magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A845021F8FB3 for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 May 2013 02:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j3odF45Gdg8d for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 May 2013 02:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04B821F8FB2 for <msec@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 May 2013 02:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f536d000006e05-bb-51877da8c2ae
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 2E.22.28165.8AD77815; Mon,  6 May 2013 11:53:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 6 May 2013 11:53:44 +0200
Message-ID: <51877DA7.8060303@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 11:53:43 +0200
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: msec@ietf.org
References: <20130506094039.7500.34911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130506094039.7500.34911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130506094039.7500.34911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090201060207080306040109"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA1WSfyzUcRjH9/ne9/u9r7Pj06Ge+EN+bZUUKVlL09pMQ5F+rVk5OUd+7oi2 Zo7dTa5wLTWOtoY6RMz8Hsb9Q37EJX9cGuvGkkURYljd9763pn8+ez3PPs/7/TzP58PwRGuU I5OQkiGRpYiTXGkBWXZjJ9urJjs/wlup8PXXfhtE/iPz/UQgEfx8ZoYOrq7eJMKJm9ZnYsQZ mZEJ0pRjZ6Ot49VjW2Sa4dR9ff0fvhy1eKuQFQP4BJSvVJEc74Xx6UZahQSMCA8hWFX/pLjg NYKGtm1ChRhGiD2hYzWURRK7g3E2k62lsT8YNnJpNu2AI6FVGcWmhXgPvCubNcvbm1g32Uqw zMMeMNY7RrFshy/D1C8dj2URDoRF5ZI5b4XPQeHnrzTX2n5omc/ns/KAQ2G00I6TCYeNmn6K K/UEed5DSo1Eml3Oml3XOD4KJZMKxLEztC9W8DhOBU1JJf1/XmDiAgTyqXVCY24jGgxdBrOo CHciqJu30ZgX1IQgT7tpcmDMK1U8pbh8F4LtWqUlKEEwpTcgNiDxbx6o9M0UJ+sCRZVqPssk PgDlcjniKtQICiaXae7SQSitHUechS006Nw0lkdbeLRqaU8IwyUDNFsLuBjBi803Fus2BI2b PeS/PlRVE+YpaJPdwnItn1W1x04wPGfLKdnD0uQXnsay++/D3NBC0/vsvB2xdOoO+ifdlu2J YLhi3TyNHQ4D48oE8RL51iF+sjghSZrl04xMv7a/ZcurAw29t9chJ4Z03SeMEeRGiLBUnCFJ lEjSJLLbsntJknQdIhgr9hA4ypHYIaAx+dWFgGuOTUXNjwWBPleOx7hd97Pu8Ti0TNRliS+5 RCtiY4mrxUVx2lTFdHG37EjQybXBi6f9ipq6KzqzHoTk1xhzAkLa62/5xP2wuTvwKaqwUBGo dY6WUmFzpca+poqPEK/8ENSXKGzXPxuN66DOD9jJk/y1+M5WTluvK5keL/Y5zJOli/8CcueQ 7IgDAAA=
Cc: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Subject: [MSEC] Fwd: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03.txt
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:53:51 -0000

--------------090201060207080306040109
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

In AVTCORE WG we are writing a general overview of available Security
solutions for RTP. As this WG has produced some of these solutions I
would really appreciate if you could take a look at this document and
provide feedback to the AVTCORE WG or directly to us authors.

Thanks

Magnus Westerlund

--------------090201060207080306040109
Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="[AVTCORE] I-D Action:
 draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03_txt.eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename*0="[AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-option";
	filename*1="s-03_txt.eml"

X-Mozilla-Keys: 
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.81) by
 ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (153.88.183.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 14.2.328.9; Mon, 6 May 2013 11:40:43 +0200
Received: from sesbmg11.ericsson.net (153.88.115.8) by
 esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 8.3.279.1; Mon, 6 May 2013 11:40:43 +0200
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7f676d000003b73-d0-51877a9aa895
Received: from mail.ietf.org (mail.ietf.org [12.22.58.30])	by
 sesbmg11.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
 15.94.15219.A9A77815; Mon,  6 May 2013 11:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])	by ietfa.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2034E21F8FE3;	Mon,  6 May 2013 02:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
	t=1367833241; bh=6/3dr8NG94LYEEp0DPBI2nuCMOv1NgNFtuCPvaLhtb4=;
	h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id:
	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	 Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender;
	b=c8iblOvYO8CTgfGbx8ZmfeohVXmT+FuB6uUkrh3knH90sV1E8dH/x7lATxLitcAQa
	 odrsYHzJuDjscsfAmp5AixT8X2KTD9Y8XuJoN0STecT8Srbs7Sfv5+YWjtM7XzhQWK
	 B4Z5sfCiQlmcYwvI0fY2LT9uQ66Ib1B0nWznbTU8=
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 0E0F821F8FE3;	Mon,  6 May 2013 02:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.466
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001,
	USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30])	by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id ZFvxxMoIwKrd; Mon,  6
 May 2013 02:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])	by ietfa.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B91421F8FDB;	Mon,  6 May 2013 02:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.44.p5
Message-ID: <20130506094039.7500.34911.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 02:40:39 -0700
CC: <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>,
	<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>,
	<mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: <avt-bounces@ietf.org>
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrEJsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsXCI2Ylpzurqj3QYOYLa4umu1vYLS7MPMxo
	selmgcXW90UWm5avZLJ4d/0ou0XvynmsFjdOtDNZNDYVW2ztbWC1uHDyD7PFpfX3mCxmzo23
	uLPyFqPF3J+BFr3Xm1gsDtxqZLfYf+Abm8W9n1/ZLKa32locOfWO2UHU49fXq2wBjFFcNimp
	OZllqUX6dglcGctffWQsOMxbMXvzVcYGxg9cXYwcHBICJhItk1m7GDmBTDGJC/fWs3UxcnEI
	CexglPh99jorhDONUWL3j0MsIA6LwHdmia6Lm6BaFCX6Fk1gB7FZBBQkZjc0MEJ0TGKUaJ/8
	lB2iSENixsoLjBDr+CXWHlKGWfeq+wsThM0ncfHFDyaQXgmBfkaJuT9XQ63exiix5Pc3hDuW
	r13GAtLCKyAocXLmEzCbTUBOYvWraYwgtoiApMSsM3OhNotIvLv6kBnClpR4c/omVK+DxN91
	Z6DOVpW4Or8L7B1mAQGJFf2TwU4SFvCVePTpMhNM7+19Lxlh7K7eJ2C9AkD185bsBKvhEbCT
	uLH9KyuEXSgx7ehWqLiFRNuiXjYIW0Fi0rGrLBC2qcSx3h7WCYyqs5C8MwvsDB2JBbs/sUHY
	8hLb385hXsDIvIpRtDi1OCk33dBQL7UoM7m4OD9PLy+1ZBMjMI0d3PLbcgfjoiXmhxglOZiU
	RHmtK9sDhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInz1glVBgoJpCeWpGanphakFsFkZTg4lCR4
	3UE6BYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIILrEKMEB4+SCG8tSCFvcUFibnFmOkTRKUZFKXHelRVACQGQ
	REZpHtwAWFa4xCgrJczLyMDAIMQDtDw3swRV/hWjOAejkjBvLsh4nsy8Erjpr4AWMwEtTuAD
	W1ySiJCSamDUEkw78+vCfjnnErtFF6bFv+BVydc5XDD59j6ZJ3dDuRkFbrP8271nl+OM37be
	q8M237ubZjLJ1iK5vSlT2zEjydrkNl/rnLp2jYMPZt/iyzEqPx/Dufuo8sfr6dv5AooDPgXX
	TN7WL89zTXHetkObdrBtOdvk2DVhrnngmWDWFpvdby88F41RYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAlkJMAQUE
	AAA=
Return-Path: avt-bounces@ietf.org
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Mailbox: MSFTFF;1;0;0 0 0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
MIME-Version: 1.0


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Options for Securing RTP Sessions
	Author(s)       : Magnus Westerlund
                          Colin Perkins
	Filename        : draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03.txt
	Pages           : 32
	Date            : 2013-05-06

Abstract:
   The Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) is used in a large number of
   different application domains and environments.  This heterogeneity
   implies that different security mechanisms are needed to provide
   services such as confidentiality, integrity and source authentication
   of RTP/RTCP packets suitable for the various environments.  The range
   of solutions makes it difficult for RTP-based application developers
   to pick the most suitable mechanism.  This document provides an
   overview of a number of security solutions for RTP, and gives
   guidance for developers on how to choose the appropriate security
   mechanism.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-03


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
avt@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt



--------------090201060207080306040109--
