
From bew@cisco.com  Mon Jul 22 17:00:34 2013
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7034611E81B6 for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -112.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-112.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDXII2UZWWJI for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC3011E81B3 for <msec@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=954; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1374537625; x=1375747225; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=b4CAkIOqTrmXXj1WpsuCZwcpsygWNlHHvgecLkHx0Go=; b=Yp7QcLpFQBqH7RdG4CQQmknrZRjas1zQmJWwD5uw7ksGFi63pZJHVNku xA9AtGk1XhvHYpsqUxy2tewB87Czr1hjiwxQ4Xk5GJKGM8YNQNQmGPqEu Ay7R6qgZgzs5E0QMEVKkheMc5KfBz5Z+CMRcIK5D4AATLsNorrRxSBDcg A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokIAE7H7VGrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABYA4MDNYMTqWiUBYEWFnSCZT+BPhOIDw24TY5UEYExGIJ/bgOJKI41gSmQJIMyHIE1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,722,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="86828521"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2013 00:00:20 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-212.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-212.cisco.com [10.32.244.212]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6N007m2012708; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:19 GMT
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:56:11 -0700
Message-Id: <3CB35FCD-F9EA-4361-B290-3CBBE087C3B8@cisco.com>
To: "<msec@ietf.org>" <msec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: draft-weis-gdoi-iec62351-9@tools.ietf.org, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
Subject: [MSEC] GDOI support for IEC 62351
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:34 -0000

Greetings,

The IEC 62351 power utility automation standards group has chosen to use =
GDOI (RFC 6407) as their key management method to distribute group keys. =
The keys protect multicast traffic streams sent by devices monitoring =
the power grid, and other multicast streams as well. To do this they =
require some new GDOI payloads. This message is an invitation to review =
and comment on the new definitions, which are defined in =
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-weis-gdoi-iec62351-9-01>. Since the =
MSEC WG is not currently active, we hope to progress the draft as an =
individual submission soon and would appreciate any feedback. If you =
have comments, please post them to the MSEC list (msec@ietf.org) or send =
them to the authors (draft-weis-gdoi-iec62351-9@tools.ietf.org).=20

Thanks,
Brian=20

--=20
Brian Weis
Security, Enterprise Networking Group, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew@cisco.com

