Subject: Re: Routing table size?

From: masataka ohta <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 19:47:15 +0900

Ray;

I'd like to confirm your points.
 
> The policy can only be for existing protocols/technology.

It is a statement for RIRs, because it is RIRs, not IETF, which
considers the policy for existing protocols/technology.

> It doesn't
> hurt to consider what an allocation policy should be when considering a
> new or revised protocol.

It is a statement for multi6, because it is multi6, not RIRs, which is
considering the new or revised protocol.

Right?

							Masataka Ohta