Subject: Re: [multimob] WG adoption call on draft-schmidt-multimob-pmipv6-source-00

From: "Ning Kong" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:44:39 +0800

Hi folks,

I also support adopting the draft-schmidt-multimob-pmipv6-source-00 as a WG
draft.
Please see my comments inline.

1) IMHO it will be more readable if the terminologies used in this document
can be listed and clearly explained in the "2. Terminology" section.

2) With the proposed scheme, the profile of MN also should be extended with
the multicast source related information. I suppose these extensions should
be considered and included in this document.

Cheers,
Ning

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [multimob] WG adoption call
> ondraft-schmidt-multimob-pmipv6-source-00
> 
> Hello all,
>   There was consensus on the source mobility solution draft in Taipei.
>  This mail is to confirm the consensus.
> 
> 
> This document can be found at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schmidt-multimob-pmipv6-source-00.txt
> 
> This mail starts a WG adoption call on this draft.
> 
> The intended status for this document is proposed standard.
> If adopted, the draft will be named:
> 
> draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-mobility.
> 
> Please your comments by December 12, 2011.
> 
> 
> Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> multimob mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
> _______________________________________________
> multimob mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob