From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Jan 2 09:35:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B611AE012; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:35:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JAtFPHoNQNNH; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844901AE712; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:34:58 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140102173458.20576.17958.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:34:58 -0800 Cc: netext mailing list , netext chair , RFC Editor Subject: [netext] Protocol Action: 'Prefix Delegation Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-14.txt) X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:35:06 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Prefix Delegation Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6' (draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-14.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Brian Haberman and Ted Lemon. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip/ Technical Summary: This specification defines extensions to Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol for allowing a mobile router in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain to obtain delegated IP prefixes for its attached mobile networks. The mobility entities in the network will provide network-based mobility management support for those delegated IP prefixes just as how IP mobility support is provided for the mobile node's home address. Even as the mobile router performs a handoff and changes its network point of attachment, mobility support is ensured for all the delegated IP prefixes and for all the IP nodes in the mobile network that use IP address configuration from those delegated IP prefixes. Working Group Summary: The working group has discussed this I-D at length. Comments by Alexandru Petrescu (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02815.html) claimed that the proposal was similar to work being done in other working groups. However the working group members believe that this extension is essential for Proxy Mobile IPv6 and hence needs to be published on its own. Document Quality: The document has been reviewed extensively and revised as a result of these reviews. The quality of the document at this time is good and ready for IESG review. No known implementations of this extension to the Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol exist. However a few vendors have expressed plans to implement it. All reviewers have been appropriately acknowledged in the I-D. Personnel: Document Shepherd: Basavaraj Patil Responsible AD: Brian Haberman From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jan 13 08:57:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A421AE115; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:57:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oCoP5PDqHz-Q; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:57:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C101ADF84; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:57:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140113165755.25301.75311.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:57:55 -0800 Cc: netext@ietf.org Subject: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation-01.txt X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:57:57 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working= Group of the IETF. Title : Separation of Control and User Plane for Proxy Mo= bile IPv6 Authors : Ryuji Wakikawa Rajesh S. Pazhyannur Sri Gundavelli Charles E. Perkins Filename : draft-ietf-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation-01.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2014-01-13 Abstract: This document describes splitting of Control Plane (CP) and User Plane (UP) for a Proxy Mobile IPv6 based network infrastructure. Existing specifications allow a MAG to perform splitting of its control and user plane using Alternate Care of address mobility option for IPv6, or Alternate IPv4 Care of Address option for IPv4. However, the current specification does not have semantics for allowing the LMA to perform such functional split. To realize this requirement, this specification defines a mobility option that enables a local mobility anchor to provide an alternate LMA address to be used for the bi-directional tunnel between the MAG and LMA. With this extension, a local mobility anchor will be able to use an IP address for its user plane which is different than the IP address used for the control plane. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation-= 01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From bpatil1@gmail.com Wed Jan 22 15:33:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4351A0506 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.749 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8dZQbAy5qz-n for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6301B1A00C8 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i4so1295826oah.13 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dZfZayJ2bkFhf3Kmyk9mkCBPrF8qMXIT/vGfODZYW6s=; b=CCVCtRW4ctlzynRSRKjEHZOhbN+g48cbXgSgOrm6ma9imJvMUHWXvV0fKaWw0RdvIW 5Cb/0XLSbD30s0LPR7YgTVoNPdpjHnEFL2MCeoBcpkTWEBD4D6kX/IbE93Vbez6QgMhb oQl7ALkD8BXx4HYjaIwJKFv0FlurhqXw43GpJ84504YS7xpVNDEQSWE56KN6tWq+s6d6 W+LjRrdy3YcoohptuJWyEMGPCO7LlqKfOxdZiSD6NR8JxXUwNig3XiQfgwfS/Si0VqlB IqsDz3yndMgW32sab0aB7v9N08FEw1ws6u5POxT8R7w2iPPtoeRe6ee88VL+PEm0ohaj TLtg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.157.130 with SMTP id wm2mr197706oeb.31.1390433597720; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.232.105 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:33:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:33:17 -0600 Message-ID: From: Basavaraj Patil To: "netext@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6afccad0ede04f0978cf6 Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 23:33:19 -0000 --047d7bd6afccad0ede04f0978cf6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Abstract This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be used by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be enforced on the access network using access technology specific approaches. The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, 2014. Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, authors. -Chairs --047d7bd6afccad0ede04f0978cf6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

This i= s the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for
Pro= xy Mobile IPv6 <draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-10.txt>

Abstract

=A0 =A0This specification defines a = new mobility option, the Quality of
=A0 =A0Service (QoS) option, = for Proxy Mobile IPv6. =A0This option can be used
=A0 =A0by the l= ocal mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for
=A0 =A0negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node'= ;s IP
=A0 =A0flows. =A0The negotiated QoS parameters can be used = for QoS policing
=A0 =A0and marking of packets to enforce QoS dif= ferentiation on the path
=A0 =A0between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway= .
=A0 =A0Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobi= le access
=A0 =A0gateway enables mapping of these parameters to Q= oS rules that are
=A0 =A0specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be<= /div>
=A0 =A0enforced on the access network using access technology spe= cific
=A0 =A0approaches.

The I-D is inte= nded for publication as a proposed standard.
The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th= ,
2014.

Please send your review comments= to the mailing list, chairs or,
authors.

-Chairs

--047d7bd6afccad0ede04f0978cf6-- From John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com Fri Jan 24 06:48:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719E21A0459 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:48:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.736 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5HtkrM62IhS for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:48:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03D51A00F2 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCW77699; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:48:22 +0000 Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.50) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:48:41 +0000 Received: from DFWEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.188]) by dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.21]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:48:32 -0800 From: John Kaippallimalil To: Basavaraj Patil , "netext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Thread-Index: AQHPF8pZj7X2mcoa0Ui+s4+MOYBab5qT9X9g Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:48:30 +0000 Message-ID: <6561EABF52675C45BCDACA1B4D7AA1171D9B026F@dfweml703-chm.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.190] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:48:49 -0000 Hi, This draft is in good shape and my view is that it is ready for publication= . (As noted in my earlier reviews, I have been applying the parameters and me= chanisms of this draft in a WiFi context / related draft and find that the = draft as a whole is thorough and ready). Best Regards, John From: netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Basavaraj Patil Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:33 PM To: netext@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Hello, This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Abstract =A0 =A0This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of =A0 =A0Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. =A0This option can be u= sed =A0 =A0by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for =A0 =A0negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP =A0 =A0flows. =A0The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing =A0 =A0and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path =A0 =A0between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. =A0 =A0Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access =A0 =A0gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are =A0 =A0specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be =A0 =A0enforced on the access network using access technology specific =A0 =A0approaches. The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, 2014. Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, authors. -Chairs From seiljeon@av.it.pt Fri Jan 24 07:47:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869791A04A5 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:47:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.436 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GGsqMFuLvtF for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from av.it.pt (mail.av.it.pt [193.136.92.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8B91A0459 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:47:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [193.136.93.217] (account seiljeon@av.it.pt HELO SeilATNOG) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPSA id 72629447; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:47:54 +0000 From: "Seil Jeon" To: "'Basavaraj Patil'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:47:59 -0000 Message-ID: <003c01cf191b$a8673060$f9359120$@av.it.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003D_01CF191B.A86B00F0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFj2GpRThueA/90zD8Zf3kxwU0DGJtqhXRA Content-Language: ko Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:47:59 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01CF191B.A86B00F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Current version is in fine shape. I could see my previous comment was reflected as well in the new version. I think this draft is ready for publication. Regards, Seil Jeon From: netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Basavaraj Patil Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:33 PM To: netext@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Hello, This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Abstract This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be used by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be enforced on the access network using access technology specific approaches. The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, 2014. Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, authors. -Chairs ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01CF191B.A86B00F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

 

Current version is in fine shape. I could see my previous comment was = reflected as well in the new version.

I think this draft is ready for publication.

 

Regards,

Seil Jeon

 

 

From:= = netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Basavaraj = Patil
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:33 PM
To: = netext@ietf.org
Cc: = draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [netext] = WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos

 

 

Hello,

 

This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of = Service Option for

Proxy = Mobile IPv6 = <draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-10.txt>

 

Abstract

 

   This specification defines a new mobility = option, the Quality of

   Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile = IPv6.  This option can be used

   by the local mobility anchor and the = mobile access gateway for

   negotiating Quality of Service parameters = for a mobile node's IP

   flows.  The negotiated QoS = parameters can be used for QoS policing

   and marking of packets to enforce QoS = differentiation on the path

   between the local mobility anchor and the = mobile access gateway.

   Furthermore, making QoS parameters = available on the mobile access

   gateway enables mapping of these = parameters to QoS rules that are

   specific to the access technology and = allows those rules to be

   enforced on the access network using = access technology specific

   approaches.

 

The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed = standard.

The deadline for = receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February = 7th,

2014.

 

Please send your review comments to the mailing list, = chairs or,

authors.

 

-Chairs

 

------=_NextPart_000_003D_01CF191B.A86B00F0-- From cjbc@it.uc3m.es Fri Jan 24 11:55:44 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06901A0045 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:55:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.77 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.77 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3LTcWPZY5X2l for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A181A001A for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD77CD6A84; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:55:38 +0100 (CET) X-uc3m-safe: yes X-uc3m-safe: yes Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp01.uc3m.es) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDDE2CD6A82; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:55:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1390593338.13439.1.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Bernardos Cano To: Basavaraj Patil Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:55:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.5.0.1017-20456.001 Cc: "netext@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:55:44 -0000 Hi, The comments I made to an earlier version of the draft have been addressed, so I'm supportive of this document. BTW, in the ACKs, there is no need of thanking me twice ("Carlos Jesus, Bernardos Cano," :D Carlos On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:33 -0600, Basavaraj Patil wrote: > > > Hello, > > > This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for > Proxy Mobile IPv6 > > > Abstract > > > This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of > Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be > used > by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for > negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP > flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing > and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path > between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. > Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access > gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are > specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be > enforced on the access network using access technology specific > approaches. > > > The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. > The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February > 7th, > 2014. > > > Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, > authors. > > > -Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext From maxpassion@gmail.com Sun Jan 26 22:29:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197631A01CD for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofkhHhuMaeAC for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87B41A01C3 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id le5so3165912vcb.16 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jiQR3FFp9zJoYhQSBYvbrw8qmDcAsLrm7sC6RAzCTW0=; b=CXLZbej/W2yeL8hI8KTs/PU+rTvXD00GjX5lxkTpI24l3LawfMwXM5Q4xffFrdLbAu RZrmPgeOpBeu9yrM1ZXhbPyNkjyyZO3bHxSnnL7QhqZgVb2ME2mhSh94TiwBqpQwbhqT GxpfI/BQVXi9+L3jg/6if2D3+RbKaWFt3KhOKkaYHqmTUtY4qVwADDOtPJ0mCSpFTeHf 1m3NA8iBjut5/D1VXLmIYj1j8qKQK359QICRhHRYWkRG/0ECLcM+Bpkp7azrDbRUyRZh RCHuddTMWZpdjPGvmUcBXyzZdvj1VXT+bTKqF7CtQfDdWKAr7cUP/bnDRD7xSicflCr7 0icA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.191.134 with SMTP id dm6mr14865371vcb.16.1390804155692; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.24.146 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:29:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:29:15 +0800 Message-ID: From: Liu Dapeng To: Basavaraj Patil Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158a82aa70ab104f0edd3ef Cc: "netext@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 06:29:20 -0000 --089e0158a82aa70ab104f0edd3ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I think this draft is ready for publication. Best Regards, Dapeng Liu 2014-01-23 Basavaraj Patil > > Hello, > > This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for > Proxy Mobile IPv6 > > Abstract > > This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of > Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be used > by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for > negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP > flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing > and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path > between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. > Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access > gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are > specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be > enforced on the access network using access technology specific > approaches. > > The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. > The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, > 2014. > > Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, > authors. > > -Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > > -- ------ Best Regards, Dapeng Liu --089e0158a82aa70ab104f0edd3ef Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I think this draft is ready for pub= lication.

Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
=


2014-01= -23 Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>

Hello,<= /div>

This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of S= ervice Option for
Proxy Mobile IPv6 <draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-10.txt>

Abstract

=A0 =A0This specification defines a = new mobility option, the Quality of
=A0 =A0Service (QoS) option, = for Proxy Mobile IPv6. =A0This option can be used
=A0 =A0by the l= ocal mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for
=A0 =A0negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node'= ;s IP
=A0 =A0flows. =A0The negotiated QoS parameters can be used = for QoS policing
=A0 =A0and marking of packets to enforce QoS dif= ferentiation on the path
=A0 =A0between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway= .
=A0 =A0Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobi= le access
=A0 =A0gateway enables mapping of these parameters to Q= oS rules that are
=A0 =A0specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be<= /div>
=A0 =A0enforced on the access network using access technology spe= cific
=A0 =A0approaches.

The I-D is inte= nded for publication as a proposed standard.
The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th= ,
2014.

Please send your review comments= to the mailing list, chairs or,
authors.

-Chairs


_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org
= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext




--

----= --
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu
--089e0158a82aa70ab104f0edd3ef-- From Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de Mon Jan 27 07:30:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178BD1A029C for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:30:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.785 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TxUbVNwpJcBI for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail23.telekom.de (tcmail23.telekom.de [80.149.113.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DBE1A029B for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from he113443.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.103]) by tcmail21.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 27 Jan 2014 16:30:07 +0100 Received: from HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.124]) by HE113443.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:29:45 +0100 From: To: , Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:29:44 +0100 Thread-Topic: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Thread-Index: Ac8ZPka/SF/JkDUeTEamQnDC31ynrwCNB6Kg Message-ID: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DA62C26D1@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: <1390593338.13439.1.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> In-Reply-To: <1390593338.13439.1.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: netext@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:30:52 -0000 Dear all, My comments are quite similar to those of Carlos:=20 My comments had already been addressed last year - but that seemed to have= introduced my name a 2nd time in ack section: Once is enough ;-) So: I support the WGLC for the draft also in -10. Thanks! Best regards Dirk -----Original Message----- From: netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jes=FAs B= ernardos Cano Sent: Freitag, 24. Januar 2014 20:56 To: Basavaraj Patil Cc: netext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Hi, The comments I made to an earlier version of the draft have been addressed,= so I'm supportive of this document. BTW, in the ACKs, there is no need of thanking me twice ("Carlos Jesus, Ber= nardos Cano," :D Carlos On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:33 -0600, Basavaraj Patil wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 >=20 > This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for=20 > Proxy Mobile IPv6 >=20 >=20 > Abstract >=20 >=20 > This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of > Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be=20 > used > by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for > negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP > flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing > and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path > between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. > Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access > gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are > specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be > enforced on the access network using access technology specific > approaches. >=20 >=20 > The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. > The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February=20 > 7th, 2014. >=20 >=20 > Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or,=20 > authors. >=20 >=20 > -Chairs >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext _______________________________________________ netext mailing list netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext From sgundave@cisco.com Mon Jan 27 12:49:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4531A0368 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.036 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPwZJDmp8fwW for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329DA1A00F6 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:49:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3360; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390855767; x=1392065367; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8KY7KRw6Kz73U4X/v1Bby4gmZSA3OYrgLmzkPWGaZwI=; b=P47YOkS5KNaLf2eNvSd9yN30P29FslXTOWpKuSRnyw1tgp7XPAnEkvhn RGGWgxl4Y70h+83vv91g+GrG1VyO03f/R9IgMh9UIPQCN6Bwt6IX4WAzb 1cXqMIasRx2APNElYqQBYao26SOntxuV1JtYJfwL62IC8QaY7krBqWcR2 4=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAFrF5lKtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagww4VrwMT4EcFnSCJQEBAQMBAQEBGlELBQcGAQgRBAEBAScuCxQJCAIEAQ0Fh30IDcZuEwSOYisHBoQyBJgnkh6DLYIq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,731,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="15908683" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2014 20:49:26 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0RKnQ3Y003704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:49:26 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.14]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:49:25 -0600 From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" To: "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" , "cjbc@it.uc3m.es" , "bpatil1@gmail.com" Thread-Topic: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Thread-Index: AQHPG6FDgqanzroCBkCuzhI/dn0S8A== Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:49:24 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A2DA62C26D1@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.214] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <6A25667AF16F22498621ACA2B6A87E6B@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "netext@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org" Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:49:31 -0000 > but that seemed to have introduced my name a 2nd time in ack section: >Once is enough ;-) Dirk - Usually, When we wanted to really thank some one, we repeat the name few times. More the instance count implies more we appreciate :) One of the Authors added your name, but then some other Author also wanted to thank you as well and so here we are =8A :) On a serious note, thanks for the catch, we will fix that. We did not make similar mistake with Carlos though, its just ignorance on the multiple Surname concept in Spain and so the long name =8A Regards Sri On 1/27/14 7:29 AM, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" wrote: >Dear all, >My comments are quite similar to those of Carlos: >My comments had already been addressed last year - but that seemed to >have introduced my name a 2nd time in ack section: Once is enough ;-) >So: I support the WGLC for the draft also in -10. >Thanks! >Best regards >Dirk > >-----Original Message----- >From: netext [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jes=FAs >Bernardos Cano >Sent: Freitag, 24. Januar 2014 20:56 >To: Basavaraj Patil >Cc: netext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org >Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos > >Hi, > >The comments I made to an earlier version of the draft have been >addressed, so I'm supportive of this document. > >BTW, in the ACKs, there is no need of thanking me twice ("Carlos Jesus, >Bernardos Cano," :D > >Carlos > >On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:33 -0600, Basavaraj Patil wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >>=20 >> This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for >> Proxy Mobile IPv6 >>=20 >>=20 >> Abstract >>=20 >>=20 >> This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of >> Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be >> used >> by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for >> negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP >> flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing >> and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path >> between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. >> Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access >> gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are >> specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be >> enforced on the access network using access technology specific >> approaches. >>=20 >>=20 >> The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. >> The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February >> 7th, 2014. >>=20 >>=20 >> Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, >> authors. >>=20 >>=20 >> -Chairs >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> netext mailing list >> netext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > > >_______________________________________________ >netext mailing list >netext@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >_______________________________________________ >netext mailing list >netext@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext From karagian@cs.utwente.nl Wed Jan 29 07:21:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96991A03F3 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:21:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRwvWiit5VQe for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from out47-ams.mf.surf.net (out47-ams.mf.surf.net [145.0.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6815E1A0443 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 07:21:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (exedge02.ad.utwente.nl [130.89.5.49]) by outgoing2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id s0TFLd8K018467; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:21:40 +0100 Received: from EXHUB02.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.4.229) by EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.5.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.328.9; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:21:39 +0100 Received: from EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl ([169.254.3.41]) by EXHUB02.ad.utwente.nl ([130.89.4.229]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:21:39 +0100 From: To: , Thread-Topic: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Thread-Index: AQHPF8pb79aPUJl8/0+XgNL8s++Orpqb2kgGgAAByuk= Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:21:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: nl-NL X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mimectl: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V14.2.247.1 x-originating-ip: [86.91.134.3] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F41D632EXMBX23adutwent_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: utwente-out:default, base:default, @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=130.89.5.49; country=NL; region=15; city=Enschede; latitude=52.2195; longitude=6.8912; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=52.2195,6.8912&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: utwente-out:default (inherits from utwente:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0vLjPlE7p - 3b1d8f51a14b - 20140129 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:21:49 -0000 --_000_FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F41D632EXMBX23adutwent_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Please note that I have had provided comments on the previous version of th= is draft. In this version of the draft the authors worked out well my comments! Therefore, I think that this version is ready for IETF last call! Best regards, Georgios ________________________________ Van: netext [netext-bounces@ietf.org] namens Basavaraj Patil [bpatil1@gmail= .com] Verzonden: donderdag 23 januari 2014 0:33 To: netext@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Onderwerp: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos Hello, This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Abstract This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be used by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be enforced on the access network using access technology specific approaches. The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, 2014. Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, authors. -Chairs --_000_FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F41D632EXMBX23adutwent_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <45D1C05E9CF0FB4692001877C0C931FB@exchange.utwente.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

 

Please note that I have had provided comments on the previous = version of this draft.

In this version of the draft the authors worked out well my comments!

Therefore, I think that this version is ready for IETF last call!

 

Best regards,

Georgios

 

Van: netext [netext-bounces@ietf.org] name= ns Basavaraj Patil [bpatil1@gmail.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 23 januari 2014 0:33
To: netext@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org
Onderwerp: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos


Hello,

This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for
Proxy Mobile IPv6 <draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-10.txt>

Abstract

   This specification defines a new mobility option, the Qua= lity of
   Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6.  This o= ption can be used
   by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gatewa= y for
   negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile no= de's IP
   flows.  The negotiated QoS parameters can be used fo= r QoS policing
   and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on = the path
   between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access g= ateway.
   Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobil= e access
   gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules = that are
   specific to the access technology and allows those rules = to be
   enforced on the access network using access technology sp= ecific
   approaches.

The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard.
The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th= ,
2014.

Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or,
authors.

-Chairs

--_000_FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F41D632EXMBX23adutwent_-- From michal.hoeft@gmail.com Thu Jan 30 00:56:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74A21A044E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cmNseK4jMWSS for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E0E1A03DA for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v10so2763184pde.41 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SdftLk7zwdUs3293ODdqxzi7NKcSeRxRsP0m+qKJBRY=; b=tIhYLefej2kk0jw2I4Np+7GsCDzPG10pBF0F+zXgAxn8d2zSFuF1aVHPwt7ke3A/te ennsslanHdohoi+6bCBA/E/Rsv2j4KxhFWiDrL+0WCag8NeKYsAwfQOoCrK3a7T7ThM8 URq4cjv2hfgRJrfs0qSQ+fdXyDIBv2sFomA+GlY4dJt++4WxiLtyb7L7sR7gGmDJ370z nM/JCXzZQ3wfW/JgCkLE+Q0EEwBg7Mz1HJKio4NZvC1TAGIB2/jFlfOCkuyIeFtDtKCi Qh+uLjcJa6v4H/fXvlEzUPuDnIJQ06kgd8JSnk4e5uGCSz2Xpii5TbHG2IY1l009mBJ8 YEJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.138.40 with SMTP id qn8mr13351655pab.154.1391072204062; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.129.136 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:56:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:56:43 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Hoeft?= To: karagian@cs.utwente.nl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15a41f94860004f12c3ce4 Cc: "netext@ietf.org" , bpatil1@gmail.com, draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:56:49 -0000 --047d7b15a41f94860004f12c3ce4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello I my opinion the draft is ready for publication. Best regards, Micha=B3 2014/1/29 > Hi all, > > > > Please note that I have had provided comments on the previous version of > this draft. > > In this version of the draft the authors worked out well my comments! > > Therefore, I think that this version is ready for IETF last call! > > > > Best regards, > > Georgios > > > ------------------------------ > *Van:* netext [netext-bounces@ietf.org] namens Basavaraj Patil [ > bpatil1@gmail.com] > *Verzonden:* donderdag 23 januari 2014 0:33 > *To:* netext@ietf.org > *Cc:* draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org > *Onderwerp:* [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos > > > Hello, > > This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for > Proxy Mobile IPv6 > > Abstract > > This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of > Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be used > by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for > negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP > flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing > and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path > between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. > Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access > gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are > specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be > enforced on the access network using access technology specific > approaches. > > The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. > The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th, > 2014. > > Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, > authors. > > -Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > > --047d7b15a41f94860004f12c3ce4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello

I my opinion the draft i= s ready for publication.
Best regards,
Micha=B3


2014/1/29 <= span dir=3D"ltr"><karagian@cs.utwente.nl>

Hi all,

=A0

Please note that I have had=A0provided comments=A0on the previous versio= n of this draft.

In this version of the draft the authors worked out well my comments!

Therefore, I think that this version is ready for IETF last call!

=A0

Best regards,

Georgios

=A0

Van= : netext [= netext-bounces@ietf.org] namens Basavaraj Patil [bpatil1@gmail.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 23 januari 2014 0:33
To: netext@ietf= .org
Cc: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org
Onderwerp: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos


Hello,

This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for
Proxy Mobile IPv6 <draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-10.txt>

Abstract

=A0 =A0This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality o= f
=A0 =A0Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. =A0This option can= be used
=A0 =A0by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for<= /div>
=A0 =A0negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node'= ;s IP
=A0 =A0flows. =A0The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS pol= icing
=A0 =A0and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the pa= th
=A0 =A0between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway= .
=A0 =A0Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile acce= ss
=A0 =A0gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that a= re
=A0 =A0specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be<= /div>
=A0 =A0enforced on the access network using access technology specific=
=A0 =A0approaches.

The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard.
The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February 7th= ,
2014.

Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or,
authors.

-Chairs


_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org
= https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext


--047d7b15a41f94860004f12c3ce4-- From ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com Thu Jan 30 01:24:41 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33051A0450 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGBIYhFJJ1bD for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555F41A044E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x10so2798533pdj.39 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ER1RI6pdab7l8zeN2uRl7hc+zVj+ID5hE9G8/YDv9B8=; b=ZPqAOj2yuLJFe0wzfOEoYP/Y9hWeUXkS+rgorOI0NzVMaYkjRWreH1TkDlHES7q2b+ pQXwXaD9LXSLxlgaC/xygYUisyv5LixdeMmg6/OaBINOCaOdCbPMw3N75O+NUTfZ4V0j e4JucKl6sZi2Oj7Ve43GOg2wtzNh7f/jBXe0OYGPYbhjp2B+wMhJ4Fl5ZIc73PLoP+Yg 9/ROHOpoOdqDlog0+kwdNfR7m5lUPVkWZHxduh10sRKNZNcMOM/9hPZ+XzwlVuY3pwiW ked9oqPUdyxrlac2twPtRY+Lq04dRM+mA+y3chqmjPw7cz0qTcX0tezNqvt2H0P39PoM jomQ== X-Received: by 10.67.11.12 with SMTP id ee12mr13214231pad.132.1391073877281; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.201.86.77] ([202.45.12.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gw11sm15351133pbd.17.2014.01.30.01.24.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:24:35 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) From: Ryuji Wakikawa In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:24:32 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Basavaraj Patil X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: "netext@ietf.org" , draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [netext] WGLC for I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:24:41 -0000 Raj, I don=E2=80=99t see any issue in this version.=20 The draft is ready for publication.=20 thanks ryuji 2014/01/23 =E5=8D=88=E5=89=8D8:33=E3=80=81Basavaraj Patil = =E3=81=AE=E3=83=A1=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB=EF=BC=9A >=20 > Hello, >=20 > This is the WG last call for the I-D: Quality of Service Option for > Proxy Mobile IPv6 >=20 > Abstract >=20 > This specification defines a new mobility option, the Quality of > Service (QoS) option, for Proxy Mobile IPv6. This option can be = used > by the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway for > negotiating Quality of Service parameters for a mobile node's IP > flows. The negotiated QoS parameters can be used for QoS policing > and marking of packets to enforce QoS differentiation on the path > between the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. > Furthermore, making QoS parameters available on the mobile access > gateway enables mapping of these parameters to QoS rules that are > specific to the access technology and allows those rules to be > enforced on the access network using access technology specific > approaches. >=20 > The I-D is intended for publication as a proposed standard. > The deadline for receiving reviews, comments, feedback is February = 7th, > 2014. >=20 > Please send your review comments to the mailing list, chairs or, > authors. >=20 > -Chairs >=20 > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext