From nobody Fri Dec 29 03:19:58 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D5512D855 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:19:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z42lQyg_XIV4 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:19:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888D212D853 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 03:19:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1eUshd-0008Qy-FP for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:19:53 +0100 Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1eUsZG-0006Oj-5Q; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:11:14 +0100 From: Werner Koch To: Ronald Tse Cc: "openpgp\@ietf.org" References: <87F231F7-04A6-485A-822F-B6BFFD13C6DE@ribose.com> Organisation: The GnuPG Project X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. Mail-Followup-To: Ronald Tse , "openpgp\@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:11:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87F231F7-04A6-485A-822F-B6BFFD13C6DE@ribose.com> (Ronald Tse's message of "Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:25:27 +0000") Message-ID: <87efnd23hv.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=Honduras_Albright_Belknap_Ft._Meade_virus_JUWTF_Soviet_PGP_NASA=hack"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [openpgp] Proposed patch to add OCB to AEAD section X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 11:19:56 -0000 --=Honduras_Albright_Belknap_Ft._Meade_virus_JUWTF_Soviet_PGP_NASA=hack Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I just pushed -03 with these changes o Changed v5 key fingerprint format to full 32 octets. o Added Literal Data Packet format octet 'm'. o Added Feature Flag for v5 key support. [Not yet discussed in the WG] o Added AEAD Encrypted Data Packet. [I also added a feature flag and a Preferred AEAD Algorithms signature subpacket] o Removed notes on extending the MDC packet. [Not yet discussed in the WG] =20=20=20 I also noted o The OCB mode is patented and a debate is still underway on whether it can be included in RFC4880bis or needs to be moved to a separate document. For the sole purpose of experimenting with the Preferred AEAD Algorithms signature subpacket it is has been included in this I-D. Shalom-Salam, Werner =2D-=20 Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. --=Honduras_Albright_Belknap_Ft._Meade_virus_JUWTF_Soviet_PGP_NASA=hack Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQTX/8BjtAoilLlm20f/gK6dHew1jQUCWkYizAAKCRD/gK6dHew1 jTWMAQDe9yelJ0LEFCMnptUqubJhZMFi+I9HcgTcokuOS9WzvwD9H8esxM6HTiJG gqErHPpXE/koDxJX9FqJr7BLhyCMogU= =313y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=Honduras_Albright_Belknap_Ft._Meade_virus_JUWTF_Soviet_PGP_NASA=hack-- From nobody Fri Dec 29 07:03:05 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84AE127873 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:03:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R76ywSn3wrKm for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:03:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-pu1apc01on0043.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.126.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639011200C1 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 07:03:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ribose-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=UBX6aqdU9Eul/cX6GTHPhz5FcSPAkg9hoc1bcHzGmgk=; b=H7yQ4FcUJtx3gPQE0UtQ1I2XlVXiqVeq2w012iUVRORsCo3cQQcMpCM0GtgjuJyY2cI9wZ8crnzl3OtG3cRCo4lIR5L63x9+XNjqtOmE2MWnOVgSi3ILRhbeSCC91FdmOiJI3TmVpJ+rOp+e/41SwOXTk8EHioP8oc9uKYzJgBU= Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.210.30) by PS1PR01MB1049.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.165.66.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.366.8; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:02:55 +0000 Received: from PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::b8eb:ed00:f921:128b]) by PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::b8eb:ed00:f921:128b%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0366.007; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:02:55 +0000 From: Ronald Tse To: Werner Koch CC: "openpgp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [openpgp] Proposed patch to add OCB to AEAD section Thread-Index: AQHTTflO+mdMNUs6WUGQQpYCxgrW8KNakfsogAA+RoA= Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:02:55 +0000 Message-ID: <9A760170-D008-4740-B8F4-DAAAEE0C2E4B@ribose.com> References: <87F231F7-04A6-485A-822F-B6BFFD13C6DE@ribose.com> <87efnd23hv.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> In-Reply-To: <87efnd23hv.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tse@ribose.com; x-originating-ip: [220.71.45.39] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PS1PR01MB1049; 6:8B0WTL3H72D57SP4NgzgZsx4IVpsrhiYGIFL6u+ZZk6SDqH/AHyjPHNjEqN7n5yuUnyfMrKe+jSBgJAjM/fAwQg/ZS2+w2TqX6npBO+r53jbf+qAUbF6TTkBHi60qbqxTrwRDNLJPAJFSgXYTRU8sJkXqdakJM6FMzqAmhNqzxC2nly6ySI7UPwNqyQwcug9SxQ8duoCgZ6d0GJF706kaE0NabD0ViQ2UQyvnKRvVS5tiF2QdRdOHbZeiVSwXork/NLgzKoBm2aqHGEIThRles9JsLnYkHTvG/3y9sL4Zb6LYlsp3OcCgGx1Ss23DJ8cNECJZublXvy2CstzIuwxckKpDIZKjJ9Yx2abNr5VbXZGMP3RrEjFKuCvknw5hMMJ; 5:df1vzAfbmCbHL2PQy7KVLPj54nFnlNPojUMAie3Ao6W7THN9KqSja02CvNCMRr/D8qvENyB70Ybaq7syJB2TgYnGrxc2Z3jM0c95g6cpY0IzobyqXaMkTaNndfvdMRl47rUWQtauGNsTf9UOY+FxsQTArWbBaZKcQRYBek1KDJY=; 24:t/fhVAvPVExrTnDzra9BqeSEcHY90zu5zTEiKcJmrJruahhBCRY+EpoeYLmwsn7EtSq7HYKkUuI25otHBjenIpU99hfZWQzMxt709/479sU=; 7:MtbaPn+UBVlzD8vJDOAux2ARiH2HWO1CJrwe9OrUFFWINfLydGPlFGM3F3gUKip+rukHwo457+8zZvyskBtkwRefomekm6g/UzkNSYB6zGuZ99XN9vZSDbF2l983rkIXADEbHFPFXUpogR1+ueVW6BIz7/q4lZpSGXFZ596plIyhGqXU+NBmOLlFfd82a9/LybyKxc19ddiSzOL9ZkClY8I+0c3A+dbh0HuNOlkQ/cNqBRQc8S268unNq1BVoMNP x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0dbd5264-82f6-4d6e-b523-08d54ecd3db9 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4534020)(4602075)(4603075)(4627115)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1049; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR01MB1049: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(944501075)(6041268)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(2016111802025)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6043046)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1049; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:PS1PR01MB1049; x-forefront-prvs: 0536638EAC x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(39830400003)(39380400002)(189003)(199004)(24454002)(36756003)(2906002)(6436002)(25786009)(83716003)(4326008)(2950100002)(102836004)(54896002)(8936002)(229853002)(6916009)(5250100002)(6486002)(7736002)(5660300001)(86362001)(97736004)(8676002)(2900100001)(106356001)(53936002)(316002)(105586002)(68736007)(236005)(478600001)(6512007)(53546011)(14454004)(6506007)(82746002)(33656002)(99286004)(81166006)(3846002)(6116002)(76176011)(3280700002)(81156014)(3660700001)(6246003)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR01MB1049; H:PS1PR01MB1050.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ribose.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: D6bB7u/0wNHx/JnJ55IAyZ0KlQ1MaKRlEWLNnH1RXQfLm/0gHchFKtm9TLXJvcLWtsHTpk/rN7o9jKz9vP85MQ== spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9A760170D0084740B8F4DAAAEE0C2E4Bribosecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0dbd5264-82f6-4d6e-b523-08d54ecd3db9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Dec 2017 15:02:55.2386 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR01MB1049 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [openpgp] Proposed patch to add OCB to AEAD section X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:03:04 -0000 --_000_9A760170D0084740B8F4DAAAEE0C2E4Bribosecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Werner for pushing the draft forward! Given the latest status of the openpgp wg, perhaps the wg chairs could brie= fly clarify what needs to be done for draft adoption? Personally I am highly supportive of this draft, and believe some others ar= e too. Ron _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc. On Dec 29, 2017, at 8:11 PM, Werner Koch = > wrote: Hi! I just pushed -03 with these changes o Changed v5 key fingerprint format to full 32 octets. o Added Literal Data Packet format octet 'm'. o Added Feature Flag for v5 key support. [Not yet discussed in the WG] o Added AEAD Encrypted Data Packet. [I also added a feature flag and a Preferred AEAD Algorithms signature subpacket] o Removed notes on extending the MDC packet. [Not yet discussed in the WG] I also noted o The OCB mode is patented and a debate is still underway on whether it can be included in RFC4880bis or needs to be moved to a separate document. For the sole purpose of experimenting with the Preferred AEAD Algorithms signature subpacket it is has been included in this I-D. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. --_000_9A760170D0084740B8F4DAAAEE0C2E4Bribosecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you Werner for pushing the draft forward!

Given the latest status of the openpgp wg, perhaps the wg c= hairs could briefly clarify what needs to be done for draft adoption?

Personally I am highly supportive of this draft, and believ= e some others are too.

Ron

_____________________________________

Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.

On Dec 29, 2017, at 8:11 PM, Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> wrote:

Hi!

I just pushed -03 with these changes

  o  Changed v5 key fingerprint format to full 32 octets.
  o  Added Literal Data Packet format octet 'm'.

  o  Added Feature Flag for v5 key support.
     [Not yet discussed in the WG]

  o  Added AEAD Encrypted Data Packet.
     [I also added a feature flag and a Preferred = AEAD Algorithms
     signature subpacket]

  o  Removed notes on extending the MDC packet.
     [Not yet discussed in the WG]


I also noted

  o  The OCB mode is patented and a debate is still underway= on whether
     it can be included in RFC4880bis or needs to = be moved to a
     separate document.  For the sole purpose= of experimenting with the
     Preferred AEAD Algorithms signature subpacket= it is has been
     included in this I-D.



Shalom-Salam,

  Werner

--
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

--_000_9A760170D0084740B8F4DAAAEE0C2E4Bribosecom_--