
Return-Path: <pmol-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pmol-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pmol-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74393A6A54; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pmol@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pmol@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F933A6B44 for <pmol@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbVQZ3d1dOQS for <pmol@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6146B3A6C00 for <pmol@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,568,1204520400";  d="txt'?scan'208,217";a="129198818"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.avaya.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2008 15:08:18 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,568,1204520400";  d="txt'?scan'208,217";a="203300115"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.10]) by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2008 15:08:17 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8C288.84214F2A"
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 21:08:15 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04C71CAE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] Soliciting comments on GMPLS performance metrics draft inCCAMP
Thread-Index: Acipzdu7M1xUVN+DQziiIiWQSDKp1wYun5VQ
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: <pmol@ietf.org>
Cc: Weiqiang Sun <sunwq@sjtu.edu.cn>
Subject: [PMOL] FW: [bmwg] Soliciting comments on GMPLS performance metrics draft inCCAMP
X-BeenThere: pmol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance Metrics at Other Layers <pmol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pmol>
List-Post: <mailto:pmol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol>, <mailto:pmol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: pmol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pmol-bounces@ietf.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8C288.84214F2A
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C8C288.84214F2A"


------_=_NextPart_002_01C8C288.84214F2A
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Although the authors did not ask the advice of the pmol working group, I
guess that they could get valuable inputs here as well.=20
=20
Dan
=20

________________________________

From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Weiqiang Sun
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:44 AM
To: ippm@ietf.org; bmwg@ietf.org
Cc: 'Rajiv Papneja'; 'gjhhit'; 'zhangguoying'; sunwq@sjtu.edu.cn; 'Bin
Gu'; 'xqwei'; 'blithe'
Subject: [bmwg] Soliciting comments on GMPLS performance metrics draft
inCCAMP



Hi IPPMers and BMWGers,

=20

Recently the LSP dynamic provisioning performance draft is adopted as a
working item of CCAMP. The draft, abstract shown below, defines a set of
metrics to characterize the performance of a signaling protocol in the
control plane, which normally runs on top of a packet switched control
network. The draft proposes the metrics be tested in an active fashion.
It also proposes that some of the metrics be implemented in an online or
be collected passively.

=20

The authors would now like to solicit comments among the performance
metric experts, as this document contains notations that are commonly
seen in IPPM and BMWG. The authors believe that your expertise can help
us further improve this document, with regard to the definition of the
metrics and the structure as well. Please send your comments directly to
the authors, or, to the CCAMP working group mail list (
ccamp@ops.ietf.org). We do appreciate your input.

=20

Title: Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance
Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks

         Author(s) : W. Sun, G. Zhang, J. Gao, G. Xie, R. Papneja, B.
Gu, X. Wei

         Filename  : draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt

         Pages                 : 39

         Date                   : 2008-4-14

        =20

Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) is one of the most

promising candidate technologies for the future data transmission

network.  The GMPLS has been developed to control and cooperate

different kinds of network elements, such as conventional routers,

switches, Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) systems, Add-

Drop Multiplexors (ADMs), photonic cross-connects (PXCs), optical

cross-connects (OXCs), etc.  Dynamic provisioning ability of these

physically diverse devices differs from each other drastically.  At

the same time, the need for dynamically provisioned connections is

increasing because optical networks are being deployed in metro area.

As different applications have varied requirements in the

provisioning performance of optical networks, it is imperative to

define standardized metrics and procedures such that the performance

of networks and application needs can be mapped to each other.

=20

This document provides a series of performance metrics to evaluate

the dynamic LSP provisioning performance in GMPLS networks,

specifically the dynamical LSP setup/release performance.  These

metrics can depict the features of the GMPLS network in LSP dynamic

provisioning.  They can also be used in operational networks for

carriers to monitor the control plane performance in realtime.

=20

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt

=20

Best regards,

Weiqiang


------_=_NextPart_002_01C8C288.84214F2A
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =3D=20
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3314" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
	font-family: SimSun;
}
@font-face {
	font-family: SimSun;
}
@font-face {
	font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
	font-family: SimSun;
}
@page Section1 {size: 612.0pt 792.0pt; margin: 72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt =
90.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
	TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; =
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
LI.MsoNormal {
	TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; =
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
	TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; =
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
A:link {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
	COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
	COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
P.MsoPlainText {
	FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-link: =
"&#32431;&#25991;&#26412;Char"
}
LI.MsoPlainText {
	FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-link: =
"&#32431;&#25991;&#26412;Char"
}
DIV.MsoPlainText {
	FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-link: =
"&#32431;&#25991;&#26412;Char"
}
SPAN.Char {
	FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-priority: 99; =
mso-style-link: &#32431;&#25991;&#26412;; mso-style-name: =
"&#32431;&#25991;&#26412;Char"
}
SPAN.EmailStyle19 {
	COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: =
personal-compose
}
.MsoChpDefault {
	FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
	page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=3DZH-CN style=3D"TEXT-JUSTIFY-TRIM: punctuation" =
vLink=3Dpurple link=3Dblue>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D254060719-30052008>Although the authors did not ask the advice =
of the pmol=20
working group, I guess that they could get valuable inputs here as well. =

</SPAN></FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D254060719-30052008></SPAN></FONT></EM></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D254060719-30052008>Dan</SPAN></FONT></EM></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D254060719-30052008></SPAN></FONT></EM></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV><BR>
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> bmwg-bounces@ietf.org=20
[mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Weiqiang =
Sun<BR><B>Sent:</B>=20
Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:44 AM<BR><B>To:</B> ippm@ietf.org;=20
bmwg@ietf.org<BR><B>Cc:</B> 'Rajiv Papneja'; 'gjhhit'; 'zhangguoying';=20
sunwq@sjtu.edu.cn; 'Bin Gu'; 'xqwei'; 'blithe'<BR><B>Subject:</B> [bmwg] =

Soliciting comments on GMPLS performance metrics draft=20
inCCAMP<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=3DSection1>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Hi IPPMers and=20
BMWGers,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Recently the LSP dynamic =
provisioning=20
performance draft is adopted as a working item of CCAMP. The draft, =
abstract=20
shown below, defines a set of metrics to characterize the performance of =
a=20
signaling protocol in the control plane, which normally runs on top of a =
packet=20
switched control network. The draft proposes the metrics be tested in an =
active=20
fashion. It also proposes that some of the metrics be implemented in an =
online=20
or be collected passively.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>The authors would now like to =
solicit=20
comments among the performance metric experts, as this document contains =

notations that are commonly seen in IPPM and BMWG. The authors believe =
that your=20
expertise can help us further improve this document, with regard to the=20
definition of the metrics and the structure as well. Please send your =
comments=20
directly to the authors, or, to the CCAMP working group mail list (<A=20
href=3D"mailto:ccamp@ops.ietf.org">ccamp@ops.ietf.org</A>). We do =
appreciate your=20
input.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Title: Label Switched Path =
(LSP)=20
Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS=20
Networks<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Author(s) =
: W. Sun,=20
G. Zhang, J. Gao, G. Xie, R. Papneja, B. Gu, X. =
Wei<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
Filename&nbsp; :=20
draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
Pages&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
: 39<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
Date&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
: 2008-4-14<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Generalized Multi-Protocol =
Label=20
Switching (GMPLS) is one of the most<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>promising candidate =
technologies for the=20
future data transmission<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>network.&nbsp; The GMPLS has =
been=20
developed to control and cooperate<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>different kinds of network =
elements, such=20
as conventional routers,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>switches, Dense Wavelength =
Division=20
Multiplexing (DWDM) systems, Add-<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Drop Multiplexors (ADMs), =
photonic=20
cross-connects (PXCs), optical<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>cross-connects (OXCs), =
etc.&nbsp; Dynamic=20
provisioning ability of these<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>physically diverse devices =
differs from=20
each other drastically.&nbsp; At<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>the same time, the need for =
dynamically=20
provisioned connections is<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>increasing because optical =
networks are=20
being deployed in metro area.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>As different applications =
have varied=20
requirements in the<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>provisioning performance of =
optical=20
networks, it is imperative to<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>define standardized metrics =
and=20
procedures such that the performance<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>of networks and application =
needs can be=20
mapped to each other.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>This document provides a =
series of=20
performance metrics to evaluate<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>the dynamic LSP provisioning =
performance=20
in GMPLS networks,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>specifically the dynamical =
LSP=20
setup/release performance.&nbsp; These<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>metrics can depict the =
features of the=20
GMPLS network in LSP dynamic<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>provisioning.&nbsp; They can =
also be used=20
in operational networks for<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>carriers to monitor the =
control plane=20
performance in realtime.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>A URL for this Internet-Draft =

is:<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoPlainText><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><A=20
href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.=
txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt=
</A><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN lang=3DEN-US>Best =
regards,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><SPAN=20
lang=3DEN-US>Weiqiang<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_002_01C8C288.84214F2A--

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8C288.84214F2A
Content-Type: text/plain;
	name="ATT3893216.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: ATT3893216.txt
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename="ATT3893216.txt"

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCmJtd2cgbWFp
bGluZyBsaXN0DQpibXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xp
c3RpbmZvL2Jtd2cNCg==

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8C288.84214F2A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
PMOL mailing list
PMOL@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pmol

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8C288.84214F2A--


