Subject: Re: [ppsp] Selection of PPSP peer protocol draft -- final outcome

From: Martin Stiemerling <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:58:49 +0000

Dear all,

Here is the final outcome of the PPSP peer protocol selection:

There is rough consensus to progress draft-grishchenko-ppsp-swift-03 to working group item. 

Arno, please do this as soon as possible:
- submit the draft with the new filename draft-ietf-ppsp-peer-protocol-00
- and with you as the only author at this point of time. 

It is understood that there are a number of details which must be changed in the peer protocol and we (the WG) will summarize this list of changes in a separate email in the next week. The list of things to be changed is, for instance:
- how the initial handshake is implemented,
- impact of SVC,
- update interval of the HAVE message,
- different options on chunk availability expressions, and 
- different options on chunk integrity expression.

Let the WG know if there are other areas to be discussed in draft-grishchenko-ppsp-swift-03, as soon as possible.

Thank you and we are looking for your technical input to the peer protocol

  Martin

[email-masked]

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 3:43 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [ppsp] Selection of PPSP peer protocol draft
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> The working group has to make a decision which peer protocol proposal to
> choose as basis for the PPSP peer protocol.
> 
> We have to independent proposals:
> - draft-gu-ppsp-peer-protocol-03
>   (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gu-ppsp-peer-protocol-03)
> - draft-grishchenko-ppsp-swift-03
>   (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-grishchenko-ppsp-swift-03)
> 
> Both proposals for a peer protocol have been presented at the IETF meeting.
> The slides are available here:
> - draft-gu-ppsp-peer-protocol-03:
>   http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/ppsp-3.pptx
> - draft-grishchenko-ppsp-swift-03
>   http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/slides/ppsp-1.pdf
> 
> The feedback given at the IETF meeting about both proposals is documented in
> the draft meeting minutes:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/minutes/ppsp.txt
> 
> Please state your **technical** opinion about which peer protocol proposal
> you would prefer on the PPSP mailing list until November 30th.
> 
> With best regards
> 
>   Yunfei and Martin
>      PPSP co-chairs
> 
> [email-masked]
> 
> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited |
> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in
> England 2832014
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ppsp mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp