From nobody Wed Feb 8 07:01:32 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3F129BB1 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:01:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Re08Gwhea3Jn for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D482129B83 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l19so87325098ywc.2 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:01:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UImdEsj+QHRUDvNYrcFXukBnwwWWLJmDkIhr0b3gdpE=; b=k2IqRKC/V5r2Vw5hbNtgMRkxE3Zw6rM7K0T5GQMdocr6x339GaErt41trnghZAins6 oju0i1AYRLiFxyhLUY/0RNxZ1IjwPM1uyMdnGt3g6yyH5PEXYFynvvkv+dWuGQmmFw6w y/g1m1wHpkg3WhO0szSNYAHiXKV6HdvK0YjUQ84QbkTNtZVChSSibHzA+rH9sVg/Tr10 S1zWsL4bWQS5psI+hsxCXyn+RYBYOdLPyRPRoG+/wAcknPv6ukF4aCl1rUyGZxm9sVkV dkoSvn1SbEG6n9yVOHFDKnYNLnELiUEJkDIfiq9NP75EIubw3qzpbV9iG14bcN/j8KZX L6Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UImdEsj+QHRUDvNYrcFXukBnwwWWLJmDkIhr0b3gdpE=; b=U1QF3b/Sj5Vqeku8vNK8GgLk9j5mKjg2itfsdZ6ApmYADYk4RWi0dCwsgy5pFNTP4D FN/fJVjBTRJwh5dSI7wmSg/CYVQaBpXaQInaiH1NLbLLomQ9UH2bJ3q1cSLKt83jvu/r X+Cx7PCJ+gmlorSn6DVILPg+jiLSrFf/O/IKc2oN1mjo+y4Z4crk6wD9Ko6iJ//0ErDb eDbXqJ41lPY4UjbSpqvUptyTqPe8HckKhWnojwDgJKbdKF1VNwEAtgIUgS60/q0Vc3T8 1sBYErKrAmmEhbqUb8LIT+K+VhwuH+859nuh9HRzkmvEElVsBsJnOEDeW657Igqp7wkP lZjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIvKOudqdjBwNGZwGb9TYqsUViaeUfzX6lQplJRrnW7QCn+E7k3QVcl0nomytHYO5OoqISjfEtienexZQ== X-Received: by 10.129.137.6 with SMTP id z6mr14419160ywf.19.1486566088548; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:01:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.234.9 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:01:28 -0800 (PST) From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:01:28 -0600 Message-ID: To: ppsp@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c06a7aea4c913054806234b Archived-At: Subject: [ppsp] Feedback on Errata for RFC 7574, "Peer-to-Peer Streaming Peer Protocol (PPSPP)" X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:01:31 -0000 --94eb2c06a7aea4c913054806234b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dear PPSPers, We've had implementers for your RFC, which is good, and some feedback from them, filed in the IETF Errata system. We'd like your thoughts on these three errata, so we'll know what to do with them. If the resolutions are approved, other implementers will have an easier time in their work. The errata are available at https://www.rfc-editor.org/ errata_search.php?rfc=7574. We thank you for your help. Spencer Dawkins, TSV Area Director --94eb2c06a7aea4c913054806234b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear PPSPers,

We've had i= mplementers for your RFC, which is good, and some feedback from them, filed= in the IETF=C2=A0Errata=C2=A0system.=C2=A0=

We'd like your though= ts on these three=C2=A0errata, so we'll= know what to do with them. If the resolutions are approved, other implemen= ters will have an easier time in their work.

The=C2=A0errata=C2=A0are= available at=C2=A0https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc= =3D7574.=C2=A0

= We thank you for your help.

Spencer Dawkins, TSV Area Director
--94eb2c06a7aea4c913054806234b-- From nobody Wed Feb 8 07:10:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CCC129BB8 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:10:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ET-ZBc0lgG-W for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0224C1295B4 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x49so167471232qtc.2 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:10:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HHg/LiBt+zvEigeUqrR3qqWbzxgnhfiKMALQkW0lciw=; b=ZBAizyZwpUayChzCppn/rnoHfxE5Y3XIXc7rMcv0QqW3m+kH6Q7P6Di/qgtN7/iy1L XBkzCqdWEjT/gwsYbynoHcLhsBdIG3LyByPyZRgzpviO3Iy6cEBNErx7HZwvVfQ2ICr2 wt/2+6Kjew+Zv7EYdpzcn9CZpe4sVC4xKUdY7PRy+ZLFIYsziZuyob0naWbBSa1wg6yv D76KEEvFh2Ak6O0cKKsv1P4XHvVdmZq+27MZeDZAG3rMPrgVIvBqA1YSNXUgGuX6obYC W2gmzzxmz/uY8lKTkYJgiQzfYIrGq1dzhvbpGYL+punPxCHk3hLnK7Uh7PnyQYKCm7W+ k1gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HHg/LiBt+zvEigeUqrR3qqWbzxgnhfiKMALQkW0lciw=; b=uPogdihrZyQiU7b7U8SjIEeoi7kLEegPsmH0wmH6ayXb4tO4fFfjniq5BT8p8LoXq9 Lo2FLyie9tOe5b83crHRN17Oqz7mpFMKNPhEakmhVu1P50upPImOBHez6Z73Rj8IekxV BE5Sflpnaur4IhjRqrD++PjvSLKnFSrytWybqPRWq3WgfEXDxd03lGmUHlaJKVtR/KrZ DTsdsPrxVjGsRT3xj+vxYKwqn8EOV9nlM2CeDCRWl0hoahvsiM4m8EkIT0e2L96pp1ic bt2n0Bsh984ExdCI8xPfbCkT9pwyUM+rt9irDXZwXGgP4TmxQO2zKl8SJqb1O5lYQWht SV+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mMYzqCKmKjHMbp8EVCe/teB2KPVCQ+Pvdupu5yyhhgVBmHZ89tccpGEHA5zjzS3NZx7fsIgP4Vm5kf+w== X-Received: by 10.200.53.50 with SMTP id y47mr19724215qtb.114.1486566641079; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:10:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.144.33 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:10:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Riccardo Petrocco Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:10:40 +0100 Message-ID: To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11397f76939bec05480644bb Archived-At: Cc: ppsp Subject: Re: [ppsp] Feedback on Errata for RFC 7574, "Peer-to-Peer Streaming Peer Protocol (PPSPP)" X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:10:43 -0000 --001a11397f76939bec05480644bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Dear Spencer, Thank you for for keeping us updated on the progress. I'll try to go over the feedback, and come back with my thoughts. Have a nice day, Riccardo Petrocco 2017-02-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Spencer Dawkins at IETF < spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>: > Dear PPSPers, > > We've had implementers for your RFC, which is good, and some feedback from > them, filed in the IETF Errata system. > > We'd like your thoughts on these three errata, so we'll know what to do > with them. If the resolutions are approved, other implementers will have an > easier time in their work. > > The errata are available at https://www.rfc-editor.org/ > errata_search.php?rfc=7574. > > We thank you for your help. > > Spencer Dawkins, TSV Area Director > > _______________________________________________ > ppsp mailing list > ppsp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp > > --001a11397f76939bec05480644bb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Spencer,

Thank you f= or for keeping us updated on the progress.
I'll try to go over= the feedback, and come back with my thoughts.

Have a nice day= ,
Riccardo Petrocco

2017-02-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>:
Dear PPSPers,

We've had implementers for your RFC, which is good, and some feedback= from them, filed in the IETF=C2=A0Errata=C2=A0system.=C2=A0

We'd like your thoughts on these three=C2=A0errata, so we'll know what to do= with them. If the resolutions are approved, other implementers will have a= n easier time in their work.

The=C2=A0errata=C2= =A0are available at=C2=A0https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.p= hp?rfc=3D7574.=C2=A0

We thank you for your help.

Spencer Dawkins, TSV Area Director

_______________________________________________
ppsp mailing list
ppsp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp


--001a11397f76939bec05480644bb-- From nobody Wed Feb 8 07:12:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F395A129BD2 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gk-QnrSsNh3S for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb0-x229.google.com (mail-yb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59ACB129BC4 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j82so46357662ybg.1 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:11:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IizCC+0qQTcDcR4iggA/woxDZyFJMD1qqgZIEbgj8Ho=; b=HMoQAAbcz7qKyB5TFCpcTsB2uofE39zvuh7hIF6nA98tHrsbM2Aea9Qu/dOzvyfVs1 D13MOnF4ss6NB/anB57Daefhg7ONU+0DlX0Kb2s4Z5PZt/gvVwq7pTRsu1NjZVxnf+7f iZZZFEmPxVH1BpE/gb+uV3UXoUTO3UJfqqGdLBBj9PkbvolqAHwHzGcF4nLnhHIz+iJx 0QOan79qkIqJJkS6mTj7V/liTl2ElkEgjGRNVyqP0vmP93hNbwOlyR8o8Uwr9CIp3NiI oAoUDkkCa4jvBZKTTg9ZM6iyu9yFpk69U0+5EUYtQ83gFFmU00QM12m+RU3I/UCdQgVe Cj+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IizCC+0qQTcDcR4iggA/woxDZyFJMD1qqgZIEbgj8Ho=; b=BuzSNanLRzAkqZMTlZbBg8VMSxkUzgbqG20AWoyFYLoozz0y0AGxSz+iCjFdCJI3Tx 0CODrtlqNFo17KucOeumIwGscBz1PHI21J0PXwAK/sQhUvRAZVfxtFoJEWirEEUSoItL NYCzJAUBf3E876OTmYWcxGUKDQiQLGZMk7p/sg64PopK10lIqaXJpa1kkrpW3n1xVZ+g kUHsDl6Qe70ZgrUGgboSadp8aTgWzXcBEC+kR+t/ficGzmztFj8GcXF7nmLUFLXe5GrA wPJ9iWmZHvjtEgtFC1QMFGJGx8HQrxvULVzl/WqmjZhqdK/VnLEgcHJ7O/7xnC675fY/ K7jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kfg+gbuwPwyy73bfSKdwpDmXhtoMGfrRhuD31g5qIV75ZoeelwSwr4WskFqMtvvFg6/0fK+wdl/tSuAw== X-Received: by 10.37.230.142 with SMTP id d136mr15062175ybh.121.1486566717551; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 07:11:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.234.9 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:11:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:11:57 -0600 Message-ID: To: Riccardo Petrocco Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0af9cc227ed20548064956 Archived-At: Cc: ppsp Subject: Re: [ppsp] Feedback on Errata for RFC 7574, "Peer-to-Peer Streaming Peer Protocol (PPSPP)" X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:12:00 -0000 --94eb2c0af9cc227ed20548064956 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Riccardo, On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Riccardo Petrocco wrote: > Dear Spencer, > > Thank you for for keeping us updated on the progress. > I'll try to go over the feedback, and come back with my thoughts. > Thanks! Spencer > Have a nice day, > Riccardo Petrocco > > 2017-02-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Spencer Dawkins at IETF < > spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>: > >> Dear PPSPers, >> >> We've had implementers for your RFC, which is good, and some feedback >> from them, filed in the IETF Errata system. >> >> We'd like your thoughts on these three errata, so we'll know what to do >> with them. If the resolutions are approved, other implementers will have an >> easier time in their work. >> >> The errata are available at https://www.rfc-editor.org/ >> errata_search.php?rfc=7574. >> >> We thank you for your help. >> >> Spencer Dawkins, TSV Area Director >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ppsp mailing list >> ppsp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp >> >> > --94eb2c0af9cc227ed20548064956 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi, Riccardo,

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Riccardo Petrocco <r.petro= cco@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Spencer,

Thank you for fo= r keeping us updated on the progress.
I'll try to go over the = feedback, and come back with my thoughts.

Thanks!

Spencer


--94eb2c0af9cc227ed20548064956--