Subject: Re: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence feedback

From: Kwok Ho Chan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 14:29:41 -0500

frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength (and also frwkIpFilterDstPrefixLength) works
the same way as how IP Address Ranges are specified today using CIDR.
Please reference RFC 1519 for more details on CIDR.
-- Kwok --

At 09:52 AM 2/1/02 +0530, Krishna Prasad Akkineni wrote:
>Hi,
>     This frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength got added 
> from  draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt.
>It looks like IP range representation can be made using this. But I do not 
>know how exactly?
>Could any one please explain more about frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength
>Regards
>kp
>
>
>Muralidhar S wrote:
>>Krishna Prasad,
>>
>>The  "FrwkIpFilterEntry" in  "draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib-06.txt" defines an
>>attribute
>>"frwkIpFilterSrcPrefixLength". There is one for destination address also.
>>Can we make
>>use of this to define the range of IpAddress??.
>>
>>Regards
>>murali
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Krishna Prasad Akkineni 
>>[<mailto:[email-masked]>mailto:[email-masked]]
>>Sent: 2002. January 29. 13:31
>>To: [email-masked]
>>Cc: [email-masked]
>>Subject: [Fwd: Re: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence
>>feedback]
>>
>>Hi,
>>     I would like to construct a policy for which the condition attribute is
>>a range of IP addresses.
>>e.g., 192.168.143.100 to 192.168.143.157. How can we represent this in PIB.
>>Regards
>>Krishna Prasad.A
>>
>
>
>