
From rpelletier@isoc.org  Sun May 26 12:46:24 2013
Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E45B21F8F38 for <recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.295
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.304, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MPY6sYa6oQRY for <recentattendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp113.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp113.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.113]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C8D21F8F11 for <recentattendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 12:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9D6021B8089 for <recentattendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:46:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rpelletier-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 52B2B1B8086 for <recentattendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:46:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:46:17 -0400
Message-Id: <5FEB74E0-1DE6-432B-891C-B72352B8A727@isoc.org>
To: recentattendees@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Subject: [Recentattendees] IETF Meeting in South America
X-BeenThere: recentattendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Discussion IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
List-Id: Recent IETF Attendees <recentattendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/recentattendees>
List-Post: <mailto:recentattendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees>, <mailto:recentattendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:46:24 -0000

All;

This email is being sent to everyone who attended an IETF meeting in =
2012 and 2013.
Every effort was made to eliminate dupes, but errors may have occurred =
or people may
have used different addresses for different lists.  Apologies in advance =
if you have=20
already received this information and request for feedback about the =
IETF considering=20
holding an IETF meeting in South America.

Ray Pelletier
IETF Administrative Director

As you may know the IAOC has been investigating the feasibility of =
having an IETF
meeting in South America.  There was a site visit to South America last =
February.=20
We have found two venues that we believe will support a successful IETF =
meeting
and we would like to get feedback from the community.

The venues are in Buenos Aires.  They meet our requirements for the =
meeting
space, networking, nearby restaurants and bars, hotel room rates in the =
mid $200
dollar range, nearby alternate hotels at a broad range of prices, nice =
area in the
city, safe, direct international flights, and accessible visas.  The =
IAOC thinks we
could have a successful IETF meeting in Buenos Aires and that attendees =
would
like the venues.

There has been a consistent level of IETF participation from South and =
Central
America, and it has been growing since IETF82.  The data on this is =
posted at=20

  http://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/IETF-Regional-Attendance-00.pdf. =20

The current meeting regional rotation (announced at IETF79) allows for =
an
occasional IETF meeting outside of our main regions (Europe, North =
America,
Asia/Pacific). =20

IETF standards are made more valuable the more relevant they are and the =
more
uptake they get.  IETF standards are also made more robust when all =
perspectives
are represented during their development.  Encouraging growing =
participation
will help strengthen the Internet, further encourage participation from =
those areas
that will see the most growth in the coming years, and will help advance =
the IETF
in political and international circles which is becoming more of an =
imperative.

We have asked the IESG for their feedback and they are supportive of a =
meeting in
South America if there is community support and active participants =
attend.

Things to consider are that it will be a long trip for the majority of =
IETFers and the
air fares are more expensive (about 10% to 20% higher than average), =
though
restaurants are less expensive.  This would be a case where most IETFers =
would
bear more travel pain and expense. =20

The IAOC would like to understand if the IETF community thinks that the =
IETF
should have a meeting in the next few years in Buenos Aires.  The IAOC =
would
also like to get feedback on how we can ensure the meeting is as =
successful as
possible and on ways to grow participation in the region.

We have set up a survey at  https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/NWYLQCD  =
where
you can indicate your likelihood of attending, and we encourage you to =
send your
general feedback to the IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>.

Thanks,
Bob Hinden
IAOC Chair


