From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 10 07:00:12 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSu7w-0001qY-9O; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:00:12 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSu7u-0001oe-MD for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:00:10 -0400 Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSu7u-0003HF-DI for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:00:10 -0400 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (frogbits.attlabs.att.com [135.197.129.116]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48C9147D3F for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:00:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3AB08bB055963 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3AB08rv055962 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200604101100.k3AB08rv055962@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: e472ca43d56132790a46d9eefd95f0a5 Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-04-13 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-04-13). Updated 2:2:19 EDT, April 10, 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date RTG OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: A revision -10 is expected shortly to update some minor issues (the most major is the use of Integer32 vs. Unsigned32 noted in the I-D Tracker's comment log) Token: Bill Fenner RTP Payload Format for the 1998 Version of RAI ITU-T Rec. H.263 Video (H.263+) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 draft-ietf-avt-rfc2429-bis-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO shepherd Colin Perkins csp@csperkins.org Token: Cullen Jennings Update to DirectoryString Processing in the SEC Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 draft-ietf-pkix-cert-utf8-02.txt Token: Sam Hartman 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT BGP-MPLS IP VPN extension for IPv6 VPN (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley INT Constrained VPN Route Distribution (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-l3vpn-rt-constrain-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Remaining discuss before the new IESG was inaugerated was held by Alex for implementation reports (which have since been submitted). Ross, as Alex's successor, has entered a "Yes" position. Token: Mark Townsley 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item Area Date Registration and Administration Guideline INT for Chinese Domain Names (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-xdlee-idn-cdnadmin-06.txt Note: RFC Editor submission for RFC 3932 processing Token: Mark Townsley 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date RTG Jan Secure Inter-Domain Routing (sidr) 30 - 1 of 1 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 7. Working Group News From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 24 07:00:07 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXynX-0007C8-0Q; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:00:07 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXynV-0007C2-Af for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:00:05 -0400 Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXynT-00046L-0M for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:00:05 -0400 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (frogbits.attlabs.att.com [135.197.129.116]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703FC87A7 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 07:00:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3OB011A027975 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3OB00VD027974 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200604241100.k3OB00VD027974@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 140baa79ca42e6b0e2b4504291346186 Subject: IESG agenda for 2006-04-27 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2006-04-27). Updated 2:2:24 EDT, April 24, 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 1.5 Review of Projects 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date IPsec Security Policy Database SEC Configuration MIB (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley RAI Number Portability Parameters for the "tel" URI (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Proto Shepherd: Jonathan Rosenberg Token: Cullen Jennings TSV Packet Reordering Metric for IPPM (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-12.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO shepherd: Henk Uijterwaal (henk.uijterwaal@ripe.net) Token: Lars Eggert 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date Dialstring parameter for the Session GEN Initiation Protocol URI (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-rosen-iptel-dialstring-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson 2.2.2 Returning Item Area Date SEC RIPv2 Cryptographic Authentication (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 draft-rja-ripv2-auth-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date Reoptimization of Multiprotocol Label RTG Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) loosely routed Label Switch Path (LSP) (Informational) - 1 of 3 draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon RTG A Framework for Inter-Domain MPLS Traffic Engineering (Informational) - 2 of 3 draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-framework-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon TSV Improving the Robustness of TCP to Non-Congestion Events (Experimental) - 3 of 3 draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO Shepherd: Ted Faber (faber@isi.edu) Token: Lars Eggert 3.1.2 Returning Item Area Date RTG A Path Computation Element (PCE) Based Architecture (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-pce-architecture-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date A URN Namespace for the Latvian National GEN Government Integration Project (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-kornijenko-ivis-urn-00.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ted Hardie 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item NONE 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date GEN iSeries Telnet Enhancements (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-murphy-iser-telnet-04.txt Token: Brian Carpenter 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date INT Apr 19 IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e) Networks (16ng) - 1 of 1 Token: Jari 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date TSV Mar 24 FEC over Transport Framework (fecframe) - 1 of 1 Token: Magnus 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 7. Working Group News