From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 07 07:06:08 2007 Return-path: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl12e-0005qF-Fc; Mon, 07 May 2007 07:06:08 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl12d-0005q6-NH for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 07:06:07 -0400 Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.225.91]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl12d-0004BP-Ao for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 07:06:07 -0400 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070507110606b1100kaes6e>; Mon, 7 May 2007 11:06:06 +0000 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l47B01J3067559 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l47B01hl067557 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 7 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200705071100.l47B01hl067557@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: a4a24b484706be629f915bfb1a3e4771 Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-05-10 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-05-10). Updated 2:2:27 EDT, May 7, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date SEC The Incident Object Description Exchange Format (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 8 draft-ietf-inch-iodef-12.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman SEC Feb 24 OpenPGP Message Format (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8 draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-22.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Sam Hartman RAI RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error Correction (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 8 draft-ietf-avt-ulp-21.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Colin is Shepherd. Token: Cullen Jennings A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service RAI Registration for Instant Messaging (IM) Services (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 8 draft-ietf-enum-im-service-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson APP Sieve: An Email Filtering Language (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 8 draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-12.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault Extended Kerberos Version 5 Key Distribution SEC Center (KDC) Exchanges Over TCP (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 8 draft-ietf-krb-wg-tcp-expansion-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Proto Shepherd: jhutz@cmu.edu Token: Sam Hartman SEC ESS Update: Adding CertID Algorithm Agility (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 8 draft-ietf-smime-escertid-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Tim Polk RTG ICMP Extensions for MultiProtocol Label Switching (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 8 draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Ross Callon 2.1.2 Returning Item NONE 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date GEN Feed Paging and Archiving (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP The LDAP entryDN Operational Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 draft-zeilenga-ldap-entrydn-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Chris Newman APP Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF (Standard) - 3 of 3 draft-crocker-rfc4234bis-00.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date RAI Infrastrucure ENUM Requirements (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date APP The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (Informational) - 1 of 2 draft-kunze-rfc2413bis-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault A Uniform Resource Name Namespace For The GSM APP Association (GSMA) and the International Mobile station Equipment Identity(IMEI) (Experimental) - 2 of 2 draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date Survey of Research towards Robust GEN Peer-to-Peer Networks: Search Methods (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-irtf-p2prg-survey-search-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Russ Housley 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3.3 For Action Area Date GEN ODETTE File Transfer Protocol 2.0 (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-friend-oftp2-04.txt Token: Lisa Dusseault 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date SEC May 1 S/MIME Mail Security (smime) - 1 of 1 Token: Tim 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 RFC 4636 expert (Jari Arkko) 6.2 IANA Expert for RFC 4044 (Dan Romascanu) 6.3 IESG approval of ion-tsv-alt-cc.txt (Lars Eggert) 6.4 Confirmation of replacement expert for PPP Numbers [IANA #73733] (Michelle Cotton) 6.5 IANA Expert for RFC 2932 (Jari Arkko) 7. Working Group News From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 15 10:46:57 2007 Return-path: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyIj-00011v-N5; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:46:57 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyIi-00011q-D4 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:46:56 -0400 Received: from kremlin.juniper.net ([207.17.137.120] helo=smtpa.juniper.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyIh-0007Ja-4Q for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:46:56 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO merlot.juniper.net) ([172.17.27.10]) by smtpa.juniper.net with ESMTP/TLS/DES-CBC3-SHA; 15 May 2007 07:46:53 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,538,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="3868102:sNHT1948425068" Received: from rcallon-lt1.juniper.net ([172.23.1.1]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id l4FEkoJ83091; Tue, 15 May 2007 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rcallon@juniper.net) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20070515103949.042bfa30@zircon.juniper.net> X-Sender: rcallon@zircon.juniper.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:46:44 -0400 To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) From: Ross Callon In-Reply-To: <200705071100.l47B01hl067557@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f Cc: Bill Fenner Subject: draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org I have started reviewing draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec-11.txt and would like to put it onto the IESG agenda either next week or in three weeks. For this document we don't actually have authority to say whether it is published, since it is an independent submission via the RFC editor (and is experimental). However, we still have significant influence on whether it is published and if so whether some appropriate (or otherwise) warnings are included. I would welcome comments if anyone on the routing area directorate wants to review this. If you expect to get me comments but need more than a week, then please let me know by the end of the day tomorrow so that I can determine whether to put it on the agenda in one week or in three weeks. Thanks, Ross From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 15 10:50:40 2007 Return-path: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyMK-0002Tf-Js; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:50:40 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyMJ-0002TR-HR for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:50:39 -0400 Received: from borg.juniper.net ([207.17.137.119] helo=smtpb.juniper.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnyMF-0000Q2-Kj for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 10:50:39 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO merlot.juniper.net) ([172.17.27.10]) by smtpb.juniper.net with ESMTP/TLS/DES-CBC3-SHA; 15 May 2007 07:50:35 -0700 Received: from rcallon-lt1.juniper.net ([172.23.1.1]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id l4FEoXJ83827; Tue, 15 May 2007 07:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rcallon@juniper.net) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20070515104808.041d3970@zircon.juniper.net> X-Sender: rcallon@zircon.juniper.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:50:27 -0400 To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) From: Ross Callon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89 Cc: rcallon@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-07.txt X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Does anyone from the routing directorate want to review Use of Addresses in Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-addressing-07.txt This has been submitted for publication, and we are likely to put this onto the IESG agenda relatively soon (quite likely in three weeks) unless I (or other reviewer) finds issues that need resolution. Thanks, Ross From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 21 07:06:25 2007 Return-path: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq5ia-000317-9Z; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:06:24 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq5iR-0002ck-Gx for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:06:16 -0400 Received: from alnrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.225.91]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hq5iR-0001MT-3F for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 07:06:15 -0400 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (c-67-188-114-134.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[67.188.114.134]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070521110612b1100ka7ghe>; Mon, 21 May 2007 11:06:12 +0000 Received: from frogbits.attlabs.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l4LB01gF019602 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@frogbits.attlabs.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by frogbits.attlabs.att.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l4LB01YP019601 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200705211100.l4LB01YP019601@frogbits.attlabs.att.com> From: fenner@research.att.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 850245b51c39701e2700a112f3032caa Subject: IESG agenda for 2007-05-24 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2007-05-24). Updated 2:2:26 EDT, May 21, 2007 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date TSV Stream Control Transmission Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 8 draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd: James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) Token: Lars Eggert Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) TSV Dynamic Address Reconfiguration (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8 draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-20.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd: James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) Token: Lars Eggert INT Automated Updates of DNSSEC Trust Anchors (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 8 draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04 is the associated requirements document Token: Mark Townsley RAI IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP' (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 8 draft-ietf-enum-xmpp-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson SEC May 15 Evidence Record Syntax (ERS) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 8 draft-ietf-ltans-ers-13.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: PROTO Shepherd is Carl Wallace Token: Tim Polk TSV Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms (BCP) - 6 of 8 draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt-02.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lars Eggert INT DNSSEC Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 8 draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Exiting IETF LC 5/23 Token: Mark Townsley Pseudo Wire Virtual Circuit Connectivity INT Verification (VCCV) (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 8 draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-13.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date INT IP Version 6 over PPP (Draft Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document has been split to DS (this doc) and negotiation options (will be PS). Token: Jari Arkko Deployment Considerations for APP lemonade-compliant Mobile Email (BCP) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Eric Burger is PROTO shepherd Token: Chris Newman 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item NONE 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item Area Date Security Attacks Found Against SCTP and TSV Current Countermeasures (Informational) - 1 of 5 draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-03.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd: James Polk (jmpolk@cisco.com) Token: Lars Eggert TSV TCP SYN Flooding Attacks and Common Mitigations (Informational) - 2 of 5 draft-ietf-tcpm-syn-flood-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd: Mark Allman (mallman@icir.org) Token: Lars Eggert INT Requirements related to DNSSEC Trust Anchor Rollover (Informational) - 3 of 5 draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Please see comment on security model issues Token: Mark Townsley RAI The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Spam (Informational) - 4 of 5 draft-ietf-sipping-spam-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jon Peterson Requirements for Multi-Segment Pseudowire INT Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) (Informational) - 5 of 5 draft-ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-requirements-05.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Mark Townsley 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item Area Date A Uniform Resource Name Namespace For The GSM APP Association (GSMA) and the International Mobile station Equipment Identity(IMEI) (Experimental) - 1 of 1 draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-01.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date GEN ODETTE File Transfer Protocol 2.0 (Informational) - 1 of 1 draft-friend-oftp2-04.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review Area Date OPS May 17 Operations and Management Area Working Group (opsawg) - 1 of 2 Token: Dan RAI May 16 Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services (bliss) - 2 of 2 Token: Cullen 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review NONE 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 Removal of System port application form from the IANA website [IANA #73481] (Michelle Cotton) 6.2 Expert for RFC4308 and RFC4869 [IANA #79151] (Michelle Cotton) 6.3 Confirmation of replacement expert for PPP Numbers [IANA #73733] (Michelle Cotton) 7. Working Group News